the same funds soros and became soros, because and this is hmm ideological again, returning to alexander gevichis is an ideological contest. on the soviet side, it was emasculated by dogmatism. well, i'm not such an old man to remember it to the end, but even i found the time when people came to me as a young pioneer in bryansk and spoke frank nonsense and did not answer my children's questions are largely naive do not follow the dogma went over the ears. and i saw that people who tell me about communism or progressive socialism or perestroika. they don't believe in it themselves. they already had this one in their eyes. uh, wolf shine from close gain. this is not to be allowed. how can we, as the president said, will test everyone for strength, and we will not lose this strength, but go through some that, paradoxically in this situation, we need. promote the vision of the future the image of the future belarus needs a positive program. what was the tragedy of the soviet union were unrealistic goals, because well, communism is an unrealistic goal, the way it was described, that, as they say, ev

the funds of soros and became soros, because but this is hmm ideological again, returning to alexander gevichtism. well, i’m not such an old person to remember it to the end, but even i caught a time when people came to me as a young pioneer in bryansk and spoke outright nonsense, they didn’t answer my questions, children’s in many ways naive, don’t follow the dogmas went by the ears. and i saw that people who they tell me about communism or progressive socialism or perestroika. they don't believe in it themselves. they already had this one in their eyes. uh, wolf shine from close gain. this is not to be allowed. how can we, as the president said, will test everyone for strength, and we will not lose this strength, but lose it, which, paradoxically in this situation , is necessary for us. a positive program is necessary to propagate the image of the future, the image of the future belarus. what was the tragedy of the soviet union were unrealistic goals, because well, communism is an unrealistic goal, the way it was described, that, as they say, everyone should work according to their needs, a

to the funds of soros and became soros, because this is hmm ideological again, returning to alexander gevichted by dogmatism. well, i’m not such an old person to remember it to the end, but even i caught a time when people came to me as a young pioneer in bryansk and spoke outright nonsense, they didn’t answer my questions, children’s in many ways naive, don’t follow the dogmas went by the ears. and i saw that people who tell me about communism are either progressive socialism or perestroika. they don't believe in it themselves. they already had this one in their eyes. uh, wolf shine from close gain. this is not to be allowed. how can we, as the president said, everyone will be tested for strength, and we will not lose this strength, but lose it, which, paradoxically in this situation , is necessary for us. a positive program is necessary to propagate the image of the future, the image of the future belarus. what was the tragedy of the soviet union were unrealistic goals, because well, communism is an unrealistic goal, the way it was described, that, as they say, everyone should work accordi

founder of the russian school, geopolitics, the author of textbooks on geopolitics professor alexander gevich where we are at one pole, eurasia and russia is the heart of the earth, and at the other pole are the atlantic community, where, in turn, the core is the anglo-saxon world, so here it is , from the point of view of geopolitics, the main goal of world history is to establish control over intermediate areas over what is between the atlantic and ours. zinnoy land is the battle for ukraine, this battle for europe, and now russia has strived and strived to this day at the energy level at the level of its gas pipelines. i think to win continental europe to my side in this geopolitical confrontation with the anglo-saxor world of the united states and england, according to the laws of geopolitics, this is also opposed by the explosions that the anglo-saxons certainly staged. i think the americans themselves. perhaps with the involvement of the british at the technical level. uh, they blew these threads in order to cut them off, in fact, the latter, the link that binds us to europe , uh, blow