president, radical and unpopular in part of society, sometimes the wording sounds like this: alexander grigoryichdent, we propose to support this decision, that is, the responsibility is shifted to the president, and the minister of education himself proposed, he himself indicated that he himself began to resolve the issue and has already taken all the risks myself. alexander lukashenko publicly supported this decision and even strengthened it, but theoretically ivanets could have run into public criticism from the head of state if the head of state had made this decision incorrectly, but the minister was not idle, he could certainly be wrong. how obvious it is that, for example, the ministry’s mistake was different methodologies for converting primary scores into final scores at the rehearsal test this year, at the final test, which led to a scandal, and the scores were then recalculated, but for the transition from centralized testing to centralized exam, he took up and decides how he took on the issue of compulsory work for paid students after university, this deserves respect. at the same tim