this, you will recall i was here a couple years ago when a new book out about where i started alexander hamilton sullivan point for american manufacturing in 1791. the majority of the resistor passed by congress are put in place by president george washington. by 1793 we had a trade system, an economy that pretty much worked pretty solidly right up until the 1980s. pretty extraordinary staff cannot have that. and in fact,. we gave a copy to all 99 of his colleagues. we all felt at that time a couple years back this were done that we not only can pull america back. we can turn america back into that extort neri, horrible, industrial powerhouse. the bad news is -- a lot of democrats in congress when you get good legislation out of the house. a number of concepts in that look. all of them died with filibusters in the senate, which was really very unfortunate. i don't mean this to be totally partisan, but there were a number democrat who were not on board, too. but we need to acknowledge the supreme court, which is the next book i'm working on right now since the supreme court decided this is a cons

. >> in the federalists , alexander hamilton wrote approval process provided in excellent check upon the spirit of favoritism of the president. when i come back i want to talk about what this really means about presidential power, to have a case like this, and also to have the president's nominations held up in the way they have been. time for us to take a short beak. this is inside story. >> journalist glenn greenwald joins "the stream" >> the us government uses terrorism as it's excuse to do almost everything... they're collecting emails and telephone calls every single day >> glenn greenwald on "the stream" on al jazeera america al jazeera america gives you the total news experience anytime, anywhere. more on every screen. digital, mobile, social. visit aljazeera.com. follow @ajam on twitter. and like aljazeera america on facebook for more stories, more access, more conversations. so you don't just stay on top of the news, go deeper and get more perspectives on every issue. al jazeera america. >> every sunday night aljazeera america presents gripping films from the worlds top docu

. >> in the federalists, alexander hamilton wrote approval process provided in excellent check upon the spirit of favoritism of the president. when i come back i want to talk about what this really means about presidential power, to have a case like this, and also to have the president's nominations held up in the way they have been. time for us to take a short beak. this is inside story. >> every sunday night join us for exclusive... revealing... and surprising talks with the most interesting people of our time... >> parkinson's forced his wife to type his novels. >> not only was i typing badly, but i was hallucinating... >> now, a revolutionary proceedure is giving is giving this best selling author a second chance >> it was a wondrerful moment... >> after the implant, they turned the juice on, and... >> emily & martin cruz smith on talk to al jazeera only on al jazeera america >> they have threatened our lives, our families' lives, i don't think anyone should be subjected to these e-mails and threats. >> the club has alerted the fbi. samuel said this is probably just a distraction. >

alexander hamilton wrote powers to protect the american people should occur without limitation.he bush era republican, i think the ability of the american government to stop threats that are very, very dire to our nation is a good thing. the leaks, you're right. >> leaks can be problematic. i'm thinking about edward snowden. we haven't heard the last from him. it will be interesting to see what the president decides on friday. thanks for your time. >> thank you. >> thanks, gretchen. >>> a huge manhunt for a crook that roughed up a pharmacy worker before robbing this place. more of this video straight ahead. >>> folks letting folks know how they feel about a proposal to allow cell phone calls on airplanes. guess what, it ain't pretty. our man panel will discuss that. we want to here from you as always. what do you think about cell phones on planes? tweet me, we'll read your comments at the end of the show. ♪ ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] you don't have to be a golf pro to walk like one. ♪ when you walk 10,000 steps a day, its the same as walking a professional golf course. humana, proud

and alexander hamilton -- >> i think the founders wanted a more egalitarian system where the minority to tyrannized by the majority. i'm incredibly frustrated by the filibuster and the way it's been used, but i also know eventually in a long enough time line, republicans will be the majority in the senate again. and the power it gives to the muim yoert part to not be trampled, don't you like that leveling force. isn't that what makes the senate the cooling branch that it is? wouldn't you want that tempering force to be there when the other side that you don't support is in power? >> tote -- i appreciate that point. the senate is supposed to be the cooler saucer, but it's not supposed to be an ice block, a freezer. that point about hamilton and what he said was, it would be used by a minority of senators by corrupt to destroy the energy of government and embarrass the administration. in the words of senator harkin who has been in the minority and the majority, he said to that point, i'm not afraid of democracy. if folks want to try to repeal health care, if folks want to privatize soci

stagnation i'm not sure that's i would question that what i do know is that in seventy nine he won alexander hamilton proposed using tariffs as a way of. preventing growing domestic industries was largely doubt adopted by seventy three and we averaged a trade. barriers you know we average trade tariffs of thirty to thirty five percent from seven hundred ninety three up until the one nine hundred ninety nine hundred eighty s. right. during that what i believe only in the most prosperous nation in the world i know i dropped out here absolutely i don't raise their barriers and now they're the processors i'm absolutely willing to go back to the world you describe where we have no income tax and all the money for the federal government is raised through tariffs. i say yes to that you here want to work on it tara tara was raised a lot of money i mean they i think started yeah a lot of cash but i don't i checked my math on this everybody has the internet but i pretty sure you can find that the u.s. for and trade deficit most years of its history even with terrorists who were willing to pay for you know peop

alexander hamilton explained in federalist 67 clause 3 is, quote, intended to authorize the president singly, alone we might say, to make appointments and. was 3, quote, intended to authorize the president singly to make temporary appointments. lc executive has been institutional competence to know when such an appointment is required. for his article ii section iii mandate, he is required, he takes an oath to take care of that the laws be faithfully executed in condition of officers of the united states. only the executive has the institutional confidence to know when temporary conditions are needed. as to specifics of the d.c. circuit's erroneous tendency reluctantly biased grouping, to help the reference used to the solicitor generals available through the excellent website scotusblog.com to take before the court, a double click away for you. the brief is exhausting and detailing why the temple or reappointment authority to the exercise strength in cross section break and for preexisting positions the solicitor general rises to the challenge, and defeats the d.c. circuit's ruling t

this, you will recall i was here a couple years ago when a new book out about where i started alexander hamilton sullivan point for american manufacturing in

they have alexander hamilton's book. it is like from 1780. i was there with rutgers university.nformation that tony has to live with is unreal. is that a hindrance to investing? >> it makes you more aware of lacklack boxes, like the of information in china. when you have infinite information and no information other areas, it treats asymmetries. >> the beauty of this is that is the opportunity. ultimately, if any cycle has proven that long-term fundamentals are the only thing that matters, it's this one. we have had a fiscal cliff, three bouts of the european debt crisis -- >> in your defense, you have been right. >> it is not easy, it's simple. as long as inflation stays low, the fed stays easy. the yield curve is steep and the banks are willing to lend to us. as long as that's the case, it goes higher. >> for all of you gloomies send your e-mail to tony dwyer. >> send it to tom keene. >> i said it was simple, not easy. >> in your defense, you are optimistic when it was easy to be bearish. perkins is defending his message about class warfare and says he regrets the comparison t

they had people like james madison and alexander hamilton, george washington, james wilson.these are not people who view government as a necessary evil in the words of thomas paine. government properly limited and probably frameless central as a public good. so think what has happened is that the founders of the constitution have been is appropriated by some modern-day conservatives. they are invoked more often than red. i do think you people would go back and the debate of the american founding, the rhetoric tothis positional mindset government would be different than what we're hearing. i want to make one thing clear come i very much in favor of limited government. in the essay we explain why we are. i think there's a difference between limited government on the one hand and a kind of reflective rhetorical denigration on the other. some people are going to read this are going to say establishment republican. guest: yes they will. i'm not quite sure what that phrase means. around as hurl that an epitaph are part of the establishment themselves. actually don't think establis

alexander hamilton wanted the government just like great britain. he wanted a king. that is what we have. you had a great color, the ethiopian -- great caller, the ethiopian caller, talking about our government is one of limited power. we have our president refusing to acknowledge that. power is not delegated to the federal government or reserve. when we don't have a government that recognizes that and says these are things that we cannot do because the constitution does not give it, you have a to radical government. tyrannicale a ta government. guest: there was only one branch of government, the continental congress. there was no executive. there was a president of the congress, but it was not an executive position. you can describe the constitutional convention of 1787 as a power grab. i would describe it more as an attempt to fix the failed articles of federation. hamilton liked the idea of a constitutional monarchy, but he was persuaded it would not work in the united states. anti-federalists argue by creating a president, we will have a king. hamilton explains w

grants the executive both a responsibility, availabilitycement and the discretion to assign -- alexander hamilton described in 1767, the president -- alone, may make temporary appointments,". te.close quo only the executive has the institutional competence to know when such an appointment action is required. articles -- article 2, section 3 mandate. he is required and takes an oath. to take an oath to god care that the law be faithfully executed and commissioned with all officers of the united states. only the executive has that confidence to know when temporary commissions are needed. as to the specifics of the regretfully, iluctantly biased ruling, have to reference you to the solicitors -- solicitor generals -- available through the excellent website -- they have every article away from the court. the brief is exhausting, detailing why the intrasession break -- for the pre-existing positions. the solicitor general rises to the challenge, and defeats the circuit's ruling on original grounds. the contemporary practices of the founding era, to support his the sentencesrams as if we were in ninth

they had people like james madison and alexander hamilton, george washington, james wilson. these were not people who view government as a necessary evil in the words of thomas paine. they actually believed government properly limited and properly framed central as a public good. so i think what has happened is that the founders of the constitution have been is appropriated by some modern-day conservatives. they are invoked more often than are read. i do think you people would go back and the debate of the american founding, the rhetoric of this positional mindset to government would be different than what we're hearing. i want to make one thing clear . i very much in favor of limited government. in the essay we explain why we are. i think there's a difference between limited government on the one hand and a kind of reflective rhetorical denigration on the other. host: some people are going to read this are going to say establishment republican. guest: yes, they will. i'm not quite sure what that phrase means. people who hurl that around as an epitaph are part of the establi

they had people like james madison and alexander hamilton, george washington, james wilson. these are not people who view government as a necessary evil in the words of thomas paine. government properly limited and probably frameless central as a public good. so think what has happened is that the founders of the constitution have been is appropriated by some modern-day conservatives. they are invoked more often than red. i do think you people would go back and the debate of the american founding, the rhetoric tothis positional mindset government would be different than what we're hearing. i want to make one thing clear come i very much in favor of limited government. in the essay we explain why we are. i think there's a difference between limited government on the one hand and a kind of reflective rhetorical denigration on the other. some people are going to read this are going to say establishment republican. guest: yes they will. i'm not quite sure what that phrase means. around as hurl that an epitaph are part of the establishment themselves. actually don't think establi

alexander hamilton wanted the government just like great britain. he wanted a king.t is what we have. you had a great color, the ethiopian -- great caller, the ethiopian caller, talking about our government is one of limited power. we have our president refusing to acknowledge that. power is not delegated to the federal government or reserve. when we don't have a government that recognizes that and says these are things that we cannot do because the constitution does not give it, you have a to radical government. tyrannicale a ta government. guest: there was only one branch of government, the continental congress. there was no executive. there was a president of the congress, but it was not an executive position. you can describe the constitutional convention of 1787 as a power grab. i would describe it more as an attempt to fix the failed articles of federation. hamilton liked the idea of a constitutional monarchy, but he was persuaded it would not work in the united states. anti-federalists argue by creating a president, we will have a king. hamilton explains why t

he cites, this is mark, cites federal 78 by alexander hamilton. quote, whoever attentive ty considers the different departments of power must perceive that in a government in which there are separated from each other the judiciary from the nature of its functions will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the constitution because it will be leased in a capacity to annoy or injure them. this is a founder saying that the supreme court that we must now all bow and scrape to as they rewrite the constitution in their own image, like some mount olympus, the founders said they are the least dangerous because they are going to have the least power to quote, annoy or injure, unquote. la vin goes on, yet having -- levin goes on, the final word on all matters before it, the supreme court with just five of internine members can impose the most far-reaching and breathtaking rulings on the whole of society for which there is no recourse. and my copy of mark's book's falling apart. still good stuff. he also says in the liberty amendments, what

here a couple years ago when a new book came out where i started off the first chapter with alexander hamilton and "the crash of 2016" point plan how to turn america into a great industrial nation 7091 receive their passed by congress as the secretary of the treasury and we had a trade system and economy that worked solidly through the '80s. extraordinary stuff came out of that. senator bernie sanders read part of that and he signed a letter is sent as chancellor his copy because we all felt at that time that not olivier could pull america back from the of this but turned it back into that industrial powerhouse and strong middle-class we once had. a lot of democrats pay attention because a number of the contest were pushed from that book but there was a filibuster that was very unfortunate. i don't mean this to be totally partisan but there were a number of democrats who were not on board either. we need to mcnall which the next book i am working on right now the supreme court to from the of water carry. but they are people and to so take that out it is said structural fights. when i was a kid