the united states has declared a hunt for russian human rights activist alexander ionov, he is considered a threat to national security and recognized as a foreign agent. the state department is offering up to 10 million dollars for any information about alexander. why does washington consider ionov dangerous and what is american-style media totalitarianism? about this. uzbek spy in general anyone, the case of the russian human rights activist ionov, that he allegedly recruited politicians in america, has reached the court, seven prosecutors and 29 federal employees are dealing with it. but if the pernicious, as stated on their official website, pernicious influence of the kremlin is so obvious, then why such trouble, and because the current trial in the city of tampa, in florida, if you think about it, harshly discredits the american law of fara or information about me a reward of 10 million dollars, and as proof that i worked for the russian government, they are conducting some correspondence, and from this correspondence it is impossible to conclude that anyone is giving me any instruc

russian human rights activist alexander ionov, about the famous american freedom of speech, which isfectly demonstrated in a very interesting trial that is currently taking place in the state of florida. the case was opened. due to incitement of hatred and the dissemination of russian propaganda in the united states. among the defendants, in fact, is ionov himself, a public figure, an active participant in the human rights council under the president of russia, as well as several us citizens who are suspected of working as agents for russian government. it is interesting that not only employees of the american prosecutor's office, but also the fbi have been called in as witnesses for the prosecution. moreover, the russian is already on the blacklist of the american authorities. the state department even offers up to... as many as seven prosecutors and 29 employees of the federal bureau of investigation, but if the kremlin's pernicious, as stated on their official website, pernicious influence is so obvious, then why such fuss? because the current trial in tampa, florida, if you think

the state department is even offering up to 10 million dollars for any information about alexander ionovnizations that are associated with him. the announcement of the reward, by the way, has been translated into many languages, including ukrainian. well, i found out on what basis all this is being done. usually, the american one has it in quotation marks hello, does the investigation have any evidence? no, of course, everything is sewn up with white thread, as is justice, but all this is not an obstacle to their law on foreign agents. the fbi has no law, or rather, it is written, but such that anyone can be classified as a russian spy. the case of russian human rights activist ionov, who allegedly recruited politicians in america, has reached the court, seven prosecutors are working on it and two. but if the pernicious, as stated on their employees of the federal bureau of investigation, the official website, pernicious influence of the kremlin so obvious, then why all the fuss? because the current trial in tampa , florida, if you think about it, harshly discredits the american fara act