alexander shulgin alexander vasilievich we welcome you. good afternoon. good afternoon. tell me, please, this is what this indicates that the work is the actual work. uh, oh, paralyzed, or what, it turns out? the absurd conference of services to review the activities of the chemical convention, which took place the other day, ended without e-e of the final document, 12 this lies entirely with the americans and their allies. they tried to saturate these subtle documents with anti-russian and anti-series propositions. they wanted to expose us as malicious to violate hmm navalny's chemical convention , covering up the alleged crimes of the syrian regime. in quotation marks, who used chemical weapons against their own people. they also sought to legalize in the final document. er, the activities of the e group to investigate and identify this completely illegal structure created by the americans by their followers in gross violation of the chemical convention and to the detriment of the exclusive prerogative of the security councils of it. but we, with our like-minded people and allies , primarily with china, but also with iran , promoted really topical topics for activity, first of all, with a full-fledged one not burdened by any. sanctions, all the more illegal, and under the article of cooperation under article 11 of the convention , the participating states of the kazakhs undertake to facilitate the exchange of chemicals, and by equipping them with scientific and technical knowledge in the fields of e- activities, yes, permitted under the convention , they undertake to refrain from restrictions e capable of e. hinder international trade. this is exactly what the americans are doing with their allies, trying to impose sanctions against russia against a number of other states that i like. we had enough good will. we are in the course of a consultation before the conference itself did a lot of work directly at the conference agreed on about 90% of the text of this total year of the document proposed a good denouement said, let's premium consensus on what we managed to agree on first of all a political declaration, and reflect the rest of the issues on which disagreements remain. uh, purely factual statements by the chairman of the conference. in this case, the permanent representative of the netherlands but the euro-atlantic allies were not ready for this. they took to blackmail us uh, voting prospects. uh, the adoption of the document by voting, counting, apparently. use their numerical advantage. no wonder the americans. every time balances are brought here to gaga by an obedient delegation from the vast expanses of the pacific ocean, there is the caribbean, but, nevertheless. this did not happen. american plans were not realized, since most of the states of africa asia latin america made it clear that they would not like to accept, and the results of the document were not reached by consensus. yes, like this, it means that we parted without final document. this is not good. but at the same time, it is not critical. it would have been even worse if the document had been adopted by a vote, which was exacerbated by the already serious water spilled through the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons. you talked about topical issues raised by the russian delegation and, uh, supported by, uh, some of the countries that took part. in this conference , there is still a rather dangerous question about the extent to which the chemical weapons convention is being observed. now e in world format and such disagreements do not mean what is purposeful here, just being formed with plans. you know, for a long time the americans declared the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to be the place where they pass the line of struggle of the civilized, as they say , world against aggressive russia and, according to this idea, the americans. really. uh, it's always a confrontation here over and over and over and over and over and over again and every time. uh, they fail in their attempts to, uh, expose russia, uh, push us back dvorki azhu. uh, it seems that we are supported by at least 1/3 of the member states at the conference last december on the issue of important russian interests, 44 countries cast their votes for us. now in this vote last week, 45 countries. this suggests that it means that there is definitely a core of e states. e, who knows how to answer the grain from the left chaff and who refuse to follow, but the luck, and the americans. uh, trying to us to secure our country and present it as an international pariah. vasilyevich, if i'm not mistaken, the united states as a member. uh, the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons, in my opinion, is the only one left now that has these chemical weapons on a dangerous scale. here with this question. and how to be discussed or were they biden's promises? yes , get rid of him before the end of the year, but the promise there, well, the president of the united states can simply forget about them. indeed, the americans have already postponed the deadlines set for them twice. destruction of chemical arsenals. until now , they have not completely got rid of chemical weapons refers to various. well, you know , the details, then environmental aspects, some need to be worked out, then it is advisable to consult with trade unions, they mentioned covid. uh, external it looks like they are like excuses, like attempts to cling to the chemical until the last moment. uh, weapons. now september is approaching. e new, a deadline for yes destruction of the chemical arsenal of the us military, let's see if the americans keep their promises. in there have been cases in the past when they, uh, uh, quickly renounced these promises, the united states, like in many other international organizations it becomes, despite the fact that they are permanent members there about certain organizations, in particular , they remain by the tail, and even a country that does not comply with the basic principles. indeed, this is absolutely true, er, and in fact the americans are arranging what we can call an illustration of their attempts to replace international law with a set of invented rules. i remember you here this illegal attribution of vesting the technical secretary with prosecutorial functions, there are other examples, moreover, uh, they put on a show. uh, they're their allies. the so-called alarmed states come with some statements and present us with far-fetched claims. uh, well, at the same time, it is seen that they are in many ways. uh creates an obstacle to the way of normal constructive work. so he will give one example at one of the meetings, the representative of the frg did not lament the fact that the russian federation, they say. uh, hiding information regarding what happened to bulk. we have noticed that the russian federation has provided exhaustive information. there is a huge dossier on this matter. but uh, a western country, including the frg, such critically important information , why are you reproaching us for looting some information, if the federal government of the frg, in response to questions from deputies, uh, hides the points of the stag itself critical information to move towards establishing the truth of what happened in 2020. the year is not only in information a yes, but also navalny himself was given the federal republic of germany, if memory serves, and hmm, alexander vasilyevich, about the netherlands, there was also information that the netherlands could become the first european country to transfer f-16 fighter jets to ukraine this week. this information somehow circulated in the information space. it is known that this is an account. indeed, the dutch were one of the first to talk about the possibility of transferring f-16 aircraft, and in ukraine the prime minister of the netherlands made a corresponding statement mark yuta e he stated that this topic can not be considered. as taboo , there have recently been reports in the english press that holland is taxiing to create some kind of coalition together with great britain in order to supply f-16 aircraft to the kiev regime. but this is still at the level of press releases. uh, the official circles are holding a rather low profile. and we haven't seen any relevant statements to that effect. unless there was a statement by the dutch foreign minister that the netherlands was going to join to effor