perceived each other's literature very critically of dostoevsky, which reads who how is it that alexandra andreevna dostoevsky, and he reads it, and what? and the letter? yes, not that he reads and speaks, not that, not that. well, it's not actually literature. they are somehow literature, but she herself was very, as it were, worried. they say that i was ashamed to give, and such children's here. from the point of view of christian children's writing, in a thinker like this, that is, uh, they were just completely always on different levels, really to them in fact. uh, i think it was very difficult for them to speak. i think soviet in general, it was not very easy to speak, but it remains, those who will get up right tomorrow. i don't know, i didn't say. there are, of course, even more. i would say existential is not a meeting of course. pushkin seraphim of sarov, uh, which is for another program, yes, but here, but here, after all. i would have thought that, uh, lev nikolaevich was quite self-sufficient. i don't know about dostoevsky, but lev nikolaevich uh, hmm, some kind of jealousy, after all.