alexandra maroa alexandra mikhailovna good morning. hello, well, it turns out that this one was taken away in an unknown direction or taken away in an unknown direction, despite the court decision. we still have up to yura , although still, in my opinion, in the twentieth year. we discussed amendments of the ministry of justice on criminal liability, what became amendments for you with them. why have n't they been adopted yet? well, apparently, they are lying somewhere, some papers are being piled up somewhere and with someone, and no feedback on these amendments has been given, and unfortunately, it’s really not just since the twentieth year for many years there has been no progress towards this issue. it's just not null. and what happens in the end happens what parents see? and the fact that it can be done, but understands that nothing will happen for it and with joy all this embodies life. that is, if i understand that there will be nothing for me, impunity gives birth to itself. in this case, yes, and if i can pay 2.000 for uh a penalty in the form of yes, an administrative offense. yes, i would be with him, i will pay them and as a tariff, in fact, yes, keep her further than my child. for some reason, we have this appointment for you. yes, in general, some strange institution, some kind of court, which decided something there. so what, i mean, i'm quite serious about executive actions. yes on the transfer of the child where the court, but it is prescribed not only to oblige the child to be taken away instead of the child’s residence, but there the father and hand over to the mother, because he maliciously does not comply with the judicial act. guardianship shrugged it off , but you see, the child doesn’t want to, so, probably, we will not comply with the court’s decisions. i say, wait. in the sense that you will not comply with court decisions, this is what the guardianship authorities, who are also civil servants, tell me. with this mentality, for now, we are here , too, but not intermittently. we won't show our citizens that it is obligatory for all for all . this is the civil code. it is written in the code of civil procedure that a court decision is binding on everyone without exception. after all, there are some preventive measures that can greatly lift the punishment of deprivation. parental rights have very large fines, a criminal term for such actions, listen, yes, firstly, we believe that e is malicious non-enforcement of a court decision. this should be the basis for the restriction. perhaps even to deprivation of parental rights and practice already have courts. in general, it starts to go to what is limiting parental rights. yes parents who hold the child contrary to the judicial act, and the second is definitely the introduction of finally criminal liability for non-execution yes of the judicial act. i believe that a lot of hotheads, but breed when they realize that they actually shine. not just some kind of administrative fine. yes, which by and large can, well, do not pay attention. and when you have a criminal conviction, it will be in all bases it is not enough, where you will already get a job. there, your children will suffer the consequences of your own criminal record. this is a completely different story, but then again. yes, i believe that even today there are even in the legislation, and there are articles that can already be applied today and they are being applied, but so far single one-offs have not come into practice. this is article 330. the code is arbitrariness, there are actually criminal cases initiated against. yes, fathers who took their children by force, and through there is no such practice as such, perhaps because the topic, in principle, has entered the public space quite well. recently, yes . previously, everyone just shrugged, shrugged it off . come on, family squabbles, but in principle, he's still with his dad. well, okay, the legislation needs to be somehow changed additionally. well, it is necessary, of course, to include restrictions on parental rights in one of the criteria for deprivation. this is a malicious execution of a judicial act. but in principle, you can work out the story with article 315 criminal code. let me put it in there. well, this is what the ministry of justice suggested that this article should be applied, including when an individual. she executes a judicial act in part, there places, residence. the order of communication of the child first. we can bring to administrative responsibility by analogy with the elements. yes , at first it comes to bringing to administrative responsibility, if this does not work and the person continues, yes, to commit illegal acts there by and large. this can also be considered in the criminal code and this is already 315 legislative and executive power and everything, in general, all the essence. we hope that some decisions will follow in the near future. well, we spoke with an expert of the all-russian popular front, alexandra. your heart does not want peace, how are you here? you don't see a young family on vasily, he doesn't have parameters for you. on the streets of moscow, you know it. oscar is getting warmer every day and summer residents rushed to their suburban areas. they can be understood in the open air there is something to do, not forgetting the responsibility. true selection of the most popular fines for summer residents made to give away from the new. on the information stand of the chairman of the moscow region horticultural cooperative, tatyana pavlenko hangs an announcement about fines on the eve of the summer season, warn the owners of plots about violations for which punishment is threatened, you need to constantly inform tatyana summer residents also through chat in messengers a decent conversation, of course, at general meetings, many summer residents do not think about the fact that there have been changes in the law and already for some violations you can pay a a fine, so we warn ever

alexandra maroa alexandra mikhailovna good morning. hello, well, it turns out that this one was taken away in an unknown direction or taken away in an unknown direction, despite the court decision. we still have up to yura , although still, in my opinion, in the twentieth year. we discussed the amendments of the ministry of justice on criminal liability, what became your amendments with them. why have n't they been adopted yet? well, apparently, they lie somewhere under a pile of some papers somewhere and with someone, and no feedback has been given to find amendments, and unfortunately, it’s really not easy since the twentieth years for many years no movement. yes , this question is simply not there, it is zero. and what happens in the end is that parents see that it can be done, and understand that there will be nothing for it and with joy all this embodies life. that is, if i understand that i will not take anything, impunity gives birth to itself in this case, yes, and if i can pay 2,000 for uh, a punishment in the form of yes, an administrative offense should be with him. i will pay them and as a tariff, in fact, yes, keep her further than my child. this is not for us someone for some reason you are assigned. yes, in general, some strange institution, some kind of court, which decided something there. so what, i mean, i'm quite serious about executive actions. yes, on the transfer of the child where the court, but it is prescribed not only to oblige the place of residence of the child to select the child. yes, there with the father and hand it over to the mother, because he maliciously does not fulfill the judicial hell. guardianship shrugged it off, but you see, the child doesn’t want to, so, probably, we will not comply with the court’s decisions. i say wait in a sense you won't to execute court decisions, this is what the guardianship authorities, who are also civil servants, tell me. with this mentality, for the time being, we will also, yes, not intermittently, we will not show in our citizens that this is mandatory for everyone for everyone . this is the civil code. it is written in the code of civil procedure that a court decision is binding on everyone without exception. after all, there are some preventive measures that can greatly lift the punishment of deprivation. parental rights very large criminal fines listen to the term for such actions, yes, firstly, we believe that e is malicious non-execution of a court decision. this should be the basis for the restriction. perhaps even to the deprivation of parental rights and the practice already has courts. in general, it starts to go to what is limiting parental rights. yes parents who are holding a child in defiance of a judicial act, and the second is, for sure, the introduction of finally criminal liability for failure to comply yes with a judicial act, and this one i believe that many hotheads will cool down when understand that they actually shine. not just some kind of administrative fine. yes, which by and large can, well, do not pay attention. and when you have a criminal conviction, it will be in all the bases, this is not enough, where you will already get a job. there, your children will suffer the consequences of your own criminal record. this is a completely different story, but then again. yes, i believe that today even the legislation exists, and the articles that can already be applied today are not applied, but so far they are single and one-time. this has not come into practice. this 330 article. hugo. two codes - this is arbitrariness, there are really initiated criminal cases against. yes, fathers who took their children by force through production. there is no such practice as this, perhaps because the topic, in principle, has entered the public space quite well. recently, yes. previously, everyone just shrugged their shoulders and waved off the goridol at family squabbles. well, in principle, he is still with his dad. well, okay, the legislation needs to be somehow changed additionally. well, you need to, of course, make one of the criteria for deprivation of restriction of parental rights from malicious non-execution of a judicial act. but in principle, you can work out the story with article 315 of the criminal code. let me put it in there. this is what the ministry of justice proposed for this article to be applied, including when an individual does not execute a judicial act in part, where the place of residence is the order of communication of the child, and first we can bring to administrative responsibility by analogy with the elements. yes , first it comes to bringing to the administrative responsibility. if that doesn't work, that person continues, yes, er, to commit illegal acts there. there, by and large, it can also be considered in the criminal code, and this is already 315 legislative and executive branches and everything, in general, everything. we hope that some decisions will follow in the near future. well, we spoke with an expert of the all-russian popular front, alexandrah you all the best cinema on weekends, i would like you to always be with me. these are the cards, they show that your meeting is a gift of fate. these are what, that it will cause your substances from a heart attack provoked by taking an experimental painkiller benefit. you understand what amounts we are talking about, the suspect narrows down to two people keys from the past on saturday and sunday at 13:10 on the channel, russia well , our working day has come to an end for today, you can finally sleep. i really want you, too, wish you to get enough sleep all this working week, especially since there are few days left. have a nice day. see you again tomorrow. tomorrow we will sleep out bed at the same time. if you want twice as much harvest, simply and quickly protect your crop from bad weather, rodents and insects, the best solution for you will be a greenhouse. yielding, it will protect plants from frost and retain heat, retain moisture, significantly accelerate growth and fruit ri