that earns about $52,000 per year could afford rentals for the alice griffith units. that is about half of the available below market housing. i want to ask you to go into more detail on the transportation improvements. i know you walk us through that. how much does the yosemite bridge cost? in different documents i have the transportation improvements are up to $404 million. that includes the road improvements in the hunters point transit center. can you give us a general breakdown of the transportation improvements for the southeast sector? >> if i could have the power point screen. supervisor mar, you are correct. the roadway improvements, brt, transit preferential st systems the front door to san francisco, candlestick, and the shipyard, ennis. there is a roadway improvement as well. this slide is focusing on the existing southeast. the total cost of roadway improvements is within the bounds of candlestick and the shipyard. you can see the hunters point transit center. the roadway improvements within the bounds of each site plus connected to thivity -- on this sli

so, secondly, alice griffith, which, again, you're all familiar with the candlestick park phase one plan, which is winding down this month, and, of course, there are key components of approving that, which really will be moving full steam ahead on alice griffith, and we of the developer ready to engage the residents on a more detailed planning process on that. we have got others at, sunnyvales -- unnydale, and they have submitted for their environmental review to the planning department, which as you all know, it takes quite a bit of work. both of those programs have significant community facilities that they would like to accomplish, which take a lot of additional funding beyond the master plan but with the other city departments, and then, finally, as i mentioned earlier, hopefully getting into exclusive negotiating rights on kirkland yard with the mta. supervisor chiu: i know we had a conversation but kirkland yard, but where is the mta proof that they want to let it go? >> -- where is the mta? that they want to let it go? >> we agreed that the next steps would be to have a citizens a

that we gain or avoid anything except in the realm of unintended consequences, the residents of alice griffith get more of the status quo with no real viable plan for rebuilding their homes and the residents of the bay view get more of the status quo with no real plans to offset decades of high unemployment and poor public health and a lack of the basic part of transit and retail amenities the rest of san francisco takes for granted. decades of doing nothing for these potentially useful waterfront lands have clearly not done any good for the bay view or defining the african-american populations or the city as a whole. now at least we have the opportunity to try something different and to offer hope and a viable opportunity so something other than just more of the status quo.

asked the residents of alice griffith if they are comfortable with the changes? they are demanding new opportunities to help prepare their communities and give their children hope. this highlights the very essence of the proposal. this is to focus public and private investment towards an area that has lacked such attention in the past. in that process, we have harnessed growth at existing committee members can participate in. we can deliver a package of benefits that is unmatched by any development project that has come before this body for consideration. committees in the southeast are expecting this project happen. there is hours and hours of public testimony, you have heard their demands for attention and new opportunity. based on the results of the proposition, for the first time people looked at the bayview differently. they looked at the people who lived there differently. they voted yes, we want open change for the people in dade you and san francisco. this is large and complicated but it uses the very tools we have to generate activity elsewhere in the ci

about local hiring, you will be there making sure that people who live here, people who live and alice griffith or all over here will be employed. we are continuing to work on this. this city will truly be won from one hill to the other. thank you. . [applause] >> with that, if we could move to a vote on item 27. >> aye. >>aye. >> aye. >> aye. no. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> no. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> the resolution is adopted. can we move to items 11 and 13? >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> no. >> aye. >> aye. >> can we now do 12, 13, 14? >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >>no. >> aye. >> aye. >> those items are adopted and the ordinances are passed in the first reading. congratulations. >> let >> welcome back to the board of supervisors meeting of tuesday, july 27th, 2010. if we can go back to item 42, 43, regarding community policing and foot beat patrols. there might be a filibuster of our effort to resolve this issue. i have had a chance to look at the board rules and section 305 of the code to look at the rules. here is my

that we gain or avoid anything except in the realm of unintended consequences, the residents of alice griffith get more of the status quo with no real viable plan for rebuilding their homes and the residents of the bay view get more of the status quo with no real plans to offset decades of high unemployment and poor public health and a lack of the basic part of transit and retail amenities the rest of san francisco takes for granted. decades of doing nothing for these potentially useful waterfront lands have clearly not done any good for the bay view or defining the african-american populations or the city as a whole. now at least we have the opportunity to try something different and to offer hope and a viable opportunity so something other than just more of the status quo. so on behalf of all of the folks who worked so hard and so long on this process, we urge your approval of these items. thank you. president chiu: thank you. and let me ask our deputy city attorney, if you can, describe for us given what's in front of us what is appropriate to amend. >> deputy city attorney cheryl adams. th

the units in alice griffith were fixed. there were horrible conditions. we fought for that. we went to the residents there, and we talked to them over and over again, "what is it you want to see come out of this project ," and they gave their input. we were willing to walk away from the negotiation table when that project seemed we were not going to get what we wanted, which was what the residents told us to negotiate, and seeing that we were that determined, there was an agreement that was reached to be done the way that the residents asked for it to be done. ace is not working note to take from the community. we but is not working to take from the community. -- ace is not working to take from the community. we are working to give to the community. we do not do anything outside of that. from the top down. president maxwell: thank you. next speaker. >> good afternoon, supervisors. i am here in support of the project, and there was a community benefits agreement that was worked on, note -- worked on, particularly the group now known as ace. i just want to commend each and eve

made, but we also have had countless weekend workshops, monthly meetings with the residents of alice griffith, and dozens of other community forum s. as we get close to a vote on a project like this, suddenly, pieces of paper began to circulate, and i saw one of them, and it seems to be criticizing the idea that the community process just recently began and that that was inappropriate for a redevelopment project like this. i have to say, it is not only ludicrous, it is factually untrue. i know this because when i started as city attorney in 1996, it was 14 years ago here in the first project that i worked on was hunters point shipyard, and we spent years working on what the redevelopment plan should look like before a developer looks at it. what should be the priorities of this community? how should we go about selecting a developer? running and rfq and rfp process? in the community had incredible input on the selection of the developer in the process, so the idea that somehow this community process just began in earnest nine months ago or 18 months ago is just factually incorrect. as the sup

for example, the alice griffith project. >> belva: that's public housing. >> public house, low-incomeousing out by candlestick. the developer said the first thing they will do is build a whole new project right next to it that one for one everybody who's in that project now will have a new apartment in the other one. so that's going to be the first thing there. and what the city is saying is we're going to make sure that the benefits are frontloaded, that lennar the developer's going to have to put up the money for these before they get to dot stuff that's going to make them a lot of money. >> you mentioned people living there. is the cleanup done? is it to a level where people can actually live there and not worry about what's going on? >> the cleanup is in process. parts of it aren't done. but a couple of the parcels are ready to be turned over to the city for development next year. the argument they make is that this will be cleaned up to the same level that mission bay is and emeryville was. >> belva: well, jam-packed stories tonight with lots of information. so thanks to all of y

about local hiring, you will be there making sure that people who live here, people who live and alice griffith or all over here will be employed. we are continuing to work on this. this city will truly be won from one hill to the other. thank you. . [applause] >> with that, if we could move to a vote on item 27. >> aye. >>aye. >> aye. >> aye. no. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> no. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> the resolution is adopted. can we move to items 11 and 13? >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> no. >> aye. >> aye. >> can we now do 12, 13, 14? >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >>no. >> aye. >> aye. >> those items are adopted and the ordinances are passed in the first reading. congratulations. >> let us take a brief recess before reconvene.