justice alito: well, could i ask you this about 2, before you move on to that? how is a this is just a matter of information. how can a state officer who stops somebody or who arrests somebody for a nonimmigration offense tell whether that person falls within the federal removal priorities without making an inquiry to the federal government? for example, i understand one of the priorities is people who have previously been removed, then that might be somebody who you would want to arrest and and remove. but how can you determine that without making the the inquiry in the first place? general verrilli: well, in any individual case, that's correct. you you would need to make the inquiry in the first place. it won't always be correct, if you're arresting somebody based on probable cause that they have committed a serious crime, and they and they the inquiry into whether into their status will be enough to identify that person for priority justice alito: well, what if they just, they stop somebody for a traffic violation, but they want to know whether this is a pers

very angry, quite personal dissent by samuel alito. a dissent read from the bench also in the arizona case by justice antonin scalia that was again not just furious but went after the president himself on immigration changes. so it's an amazing thing to see a court that is, a, says it wants to be out of the spotlight, and b, suffering from the lowest poll ratings this court has seen in a long, long time. doing things that seem to deliberately promote the idea that the partisan rift at the court is worse than it's ever been. >> on the issue of the campaign finance stuff, i realize citizens united has been famous since it was decided. it's getting more and more famous with each passing day in american politics as we see its impact. it's interesting to see the montana attorney general put out a statement in response to this ruling. montana law, their state law is getting overthrown by virtue of this decision. he seemed to signal he does not think this fight is over yet. he said, despite this disappointing decision the last word has not be

samuel alito was so angry he read it from the bench out loud with volume. these days, anthony kennedy sides with the conservatives on just about every, but on the issue of sentencing american children to die, anthony kennedy has sided in the past and today again sided with the liberals. the liberals are not lucky however to have that same swing justice with them on issues of democracy and corruption. justice kennedy was the author of the decision in the most justly famous radical supreme court decision since bush v. gore, citizens united. that struck down decades of anticorruption election law and said corporations need to be able to spend in an unlimited fashion to dominate the political discourse in our country as much as they want to. at a time when corporate profits are at an all-time historic high and american wages are at an all-time historic low, no literally, both of those happening at once, one might think corporations are doing okay getting what thaw want. doing just fine dominating american politics and policy on their own without this big assist

the fact that chief justice roberts joined in the majority and also that justice alito joined in much of the decision cast a different light as well. it's not just two blocks. there seems to be some thinking that's going on case by case and the constitution was the big winner here. >> tonight moores, thank you. always a pleasure to have you with me. >> you too, jc. >>> howard is coming up next with a very important forecast and of course the storms are in alabama and florida. i think i said something else but it's alabama and florida. howard is up next. stay with us. >>> we're watching a cold front coming through right now. a few showers and isolated thunderstorms going o. we'll take you to break with a look at live 9000 hd. keep your fingers nothing bigger pops up. the full forecast and serious heat in the seven-day coming up when 9news now at noon returns. >>> we've been coaching through the day's daily deals, e-mails and retailer websites to find you some deep discounts and here are some of our favorites. sears.com has a cannon power shot l530 hs in white. it will cost you $269. th

justice alito is still reading from his dissent.ion over life without parole sentence for juvenile is . the court decided 5-4. the court this week traditionally talks about the cases that granting -- cases it will be hearing in the future. justices announcing their intent to retire. no word on any retirements. we are awaiting the next ruling from the court today on this monday. let me tell you about some cases. whether lawsuits under the real estate settlement procedure act which allows homeowners to sue banks when they pay kickbacks for closing on mortgages are constitutional, whether they are constitutional. also awaiting the decision on u.s. v. alvarez. this was heard on february 22, 2012. whether it it is a crime to lie about receiving military honors it violates the first amendment. there are several healthcare cases and arizona v. united states which requires police officers to check on the immigration status on anyone who makes arrests. we continue watching the scene at the court. >> how is it going ? >> all right. how about

i remind michael that then sam alito mouthed "you're wrong," insulting him at the state of the union. i don't see the president gives up his ability to criticize a supreme court decision. i think scalia really stepped beyond the boundaries of what you do in a dissent. >> speaking of that speech and the response from sam alito, let's talk about what happened today. the supreme court rules on citizens united telling 22 states, you've got to play by the federal rules. you can't limit corporations' giving. i think this is bigger than the first ruling. >> i'm with you. when i heard you earlier on your program saying let's pay attention to the montana decision, i was in montana a couple days ago and learned about some pretty interesting stuff about the whole 10th, 11th amendment argument. and a lot of lawyers were pushing the montana attorney general to assert some arguments that weren't made. and there are certainly a lot of people at home wondering whether montana, the governor and the ag, asserting that they want to keep that law, did everything that they could do, ignoring -- >> how cou

anthony g - kennedy...samuel alito.... thomas. the impact f the supreme court's decision...ill be felt by doctors as well. well.doctor john chessare... baltimore meeical cenner... spoke out thursday... about the landmark ruling. one thing he says he likes... is the ban oo insurance commanies denying coverage to people witt pre-existing medical proviiion that bars insurers from setting a doolar limit on requires companies to cover preventative care at no additional cost to consumers. but not everyone agrees. (1:37) we can save money make the americcn people happier have better healthier stme andd citizens....-butt to-"its gonna destroo the quality of &phealthcare its gonna destroo budgets and most of all its gonna destroy a patients ability to go soooa doctor and get the quality care they desperately need." need." the americcn medicaa aasociation supports the affordable care act... while the largest medical society in &pmaryland.... "medchi"... does not support the measure. in howard countyy.. the health care ruling is drawing praise from someone who will directly benefit fro

. >> justices scalia, toms as and alito wrote separate dissents. justice scalia read a summary of his dissent from the bench. basically he said that states have always been considered sovereign entities. it is inherent in sovereignty that you have the power to exclude from your territory people who don't belong. if arizona can't do what it wants to do here, then he said we should stop talking about states as sovereign entities. the other thing he pointed out was he disagreed with many of the government's arguments for preempting the arizona law. for example, the government had said... >> woodruff: the federal government. >> the federal government, i'm sorry. the federal government had said it was important to be able to allocate scarce resources in immigration enforcement. that's when justice scalia mentioned president obama's recent program for allowing the children, young people of illegal aliens to remain in the country temporarily. justice scalia said he was sure that the administrative costs of that program would be great and would take away f

>> well for one thing, when you read the joint opinion by justice scalia, alito, thomas and kennedy, you see that they were going to destroy the entire affordable care act, that is, they understandably said that it was not an easy judicial task to separate this one strand from the rest of the law. the obama administration had conceded if you get rid of this mandate, which is the center piece of the law it is very hard to make the requirement that people with preexisting conditions and sick people be covered without discrimination. and when that goes, the dominos begin to fall, so the real choice was not between eliminating one little part of the law and coming out the way the court did. it was between the radical step of eliminating this entire complicated achievement which the united states had struggled for a century to accomplish, and coming out where the court ultimately did. i think seeing the choices in that stark way the chief justice recognized that both his legacy and the role of the court would be greatly jeopardized if the court were to take on this entire statute, and the

three justices, alito, scalia and thomas dissented and right now u, reading the opinion and as that goes on, crowds outside anticipating the supreme court's major landmark ruling of the day op the health care law. we have a twitter feed going for your comments as we know more about the decision. you can tweet us and we will use many of your tweets on air throughout the day today. >>> the sec of three cases, financial corp. was dismissed. that means the the court is moving on to the health care opinion. court reporters have the opinion from the public information office at the court and everyone immediately going to it to try to understand the substance of what they got. as soon as we have more reporting, we'll be back to you with it. >>> the core of this case, amy howe tells us the individual mandate has survived as a tax in the supreme court's review. >>> we must this entire law and turn it back to -- want to hear what doctors think about this? and doctors say that it's almost irrelevant what the supreme court rules today and you know why? -- >> let me underscore the analysis from the f

or should we put him in the same camp of alito thomas and scalia? >> yes essentially. justice roberts--chief justice roberts has a more winning way with the media, i suppose. he's a very smooth operator, and he's managed to create an impression that in some ways more moderate than alito and scalia and thomas. but in terms of votes he never casts a vote against conservative especially business interests in any situation where it might actually make a difference. in other words, when he might be the deciding vote. what we have with this court right now is the most right wing and most pro corporateist supreme court in the history of the united states. even if you go back to the gilded age at the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century the supreme court was not consistent in support of the moneyed interests in the united states as this court is. that's a truly frightening thing to consider with regard to money and politics in this country. >> cenk: i think you're right. great having both of you on. we really appreciate it. >> thank you. >> cenk: now when we c

and justice alito to stay home, especially thursday, alito. and who doesn't want 50% more cash?d then the baby bear said >> david: the effects of the supreme court decision on people who really matter, the candidates. but first bill maher wants americans to grow up. charlie sheen wants a drink and that age old question. what is drugs. when it doesn't fit anywhere else, we put it in in the viewfinder. >> my point is to republican adults, and it is this when 14-year-old boys sound exactly like you and can produce radio shows and quote speeches that sound exactly like yours maybe you should rethink what is coming out of your mouth. >> what is common sense? i can't hear. >> you you probably heard the rumors and they are true. i'm a democrat. [ sobbing ] >> i just want to help those who are less fortunate than i am. and i believe good affordable healthcare for everyone. >> why aren't you a democrat? it might not be as bad as you think. >> if i was your ♪ boyfriend ♪ never let you go ♪ keep you in my arm ♪ girl ♪ you'll never be alone ♪ >> hello a jury has convicted sandusky of molest

samuel alito. . antonin scalia... and... ccarence pere's... our question of the dayy 3 do youuagree with the supreme court's ruling on the health care laa? go to fox- baltimore dot com .../ tell us what you think./. soond off thrr facebook../. send us a tweet./ or text your answer to 45-- 203../ enter fox45a for yes../ fox45b for in today's ruling... the majority of 3 &p conservatives... are clearly... -pd with... he nntion's highest court.../. but... many... vow... to conttnue... their fight.../. melinda roeder ... here... those groups --/ americans for prosperity is a group born out of fruutration pnd hope.stemmmng back to 2009 - hen taxpayers whh opposed the so-called "obamacare" - began protesting at congressional town hall meetings in maryland - and across the nation. they said they didn't want the government o come between them and their doctors. they increases. ironicalll, they say - the supreme court oday p cemented those fears.... essennially marrying thee issues of socialized medicine and taxes.the court ruled that congress ad the ri

would scalia, thomas, alito, and kennedy approved such a decision or joined in the decent?ld have. the fact is we have the most conservative court since the early 1930s and maybe more than that. these justices led by scalia believe in original intent. they want to judge cases the way the foundin fathers would. well, the founding fathers, wrote slavely into the constitution. it took a civil war and the 13th amendment to get it out. that's "hardball" for now. thanks for being with us. "politicsnation" with al sharpton starts now. . . >>> welcome to "politicsnation." i'm al sharpton. tonight's lead, the election fairness. at a campaign event in new hampshire this afternoon, president obama laid out his vision of this country. a vision of america where everyone has shot at success. a vision where the middle class thrives. a vision that stands in direct opposition to that of willard mitt romney. a man who made millions in junk bonds who always made sure the cards were stacked in h favor. and who profited by sending jobs overseas. >> it was reported that governor romney's old fir

the united states supreme court surprised many analysts today when justice alito announced he will be stepping down from the bench to become the base player for iron maiden. >> today the long-awaited decision on obamacare came down-- excuse me, excuse me, i said nobody in the break room, okay. get out, out. >> stephen: we'll stay on top of this breaking story. fingers crossed. (cheers and applause) >> stephen: now nation-- in the past few months our economy has been a sluggish as a slug in a slug convention. it's gotten so bad i had to fire my metaphor writer. well, folks,-- (laughter) i've got some good news and some bad news. the good news is there's plenty of bad news which is great news for mitt romney. (laughter) you see the cornerstone of mift's campaign is that he can fix obama's broke own economy. so the worst things are for john q public, the better they are for willard m private. >> the federal chairman ben bernanke said today unemployment will remain above 8% through the end of the year. >> this is bad news. >> pore bad job news and a weak economy it is. >> the economy is n

saauel alito. &p . antonin scalia... and.... clarence thomas. response ... prom... capitol hill... was quick.../, kathleen cairns... spent the day... in d.c..../ where ... she... poke ith members... of... maryllnn's del. delegation. at the us cap in wash dc a busyyday of debaae over otter issues seemed overshadowed by the sup cts decision involving health care. -standup--harris- opinions.-harris--dutch-so f - whats next???-dutch--harris- the debate now moves back to the olitical arena. in wash edition. 45 news late - &p conservative groups ... react... to... the ruling..../ and... vow... to fight... to epeal...//. group... stemming... back to 2009. // many... members... attended ccngressional... town hall meetings... to protest .../ they... also fight... against tax increaaes... in... several states..../ ironically,... the supreme court... ruled... congress ...could impose ...mandatory health coverage power... tt átaxá the publicc < "the court of public opinion and large, hate ttis thing. don't like when the federal ey - government comes in and tells them what to do nd what not to

would scalia, thomas, alito, and kennedy approved such a decision or joined in the decent?ld have. the fact is we have the most conservative court since the early 1930s and maybe more than that. these justices led by scalia believe in original intent. they want to judge cases the way the founding fathers would. well, the founding fathers, wrote slavely into the constitution. it took a civil war and the 13th amendment to get it out. that's "hardball" for now. thanks for being with us. "politicsnation" with al sharpton starts now. . . >>> welcome to "politicsnation." i'm al sharpton. tonight's lead, the election fairness. at a campaign event in new hampshire this afternoon, president obama laid out his vision of this country. a visio

and, of course, i'm talking about justice thomas scalia, alito and kennedy here. you cannot rewrite obama care to make the tax argument work. they call the tax argument feeble. strong words really directed at the chief justice the tax argument makes no sense. mountain of evidence against the tax argument here. i guess my question is now that a precedent has been set what does that mean constitutionally to you. i have been making the case that i think the president has been acting in a lawless manner a variety of ways and i want to get your thoughts on it. >> a lawless manner and a very naive and short-sighted and selfish manner. a very political manner. that is the way that our president has been operating, yes. what this gets to constitutionally is it goes to the core of who we are as americans and what the relationship is between the federal government and the individual. and this dissent there are harsh words, very -- articulated very fiercely the defense of america's economic commercial personal freedoms versus this overreach of obama care. i think people need

anthony kennedy...ssmuel alito.... thomas.coverage for people with pre- existing conditions.that's a welcome relief for some families we ssoke with. the mckkever ffmily as but they'rr happy to ind out 12-yearroll kyle, who suffers from a genetic nerve disorrer, insurancc plans... now there pre no pre-existing condition limitations. jjnine murphy ii in a similar sstuation. her-4--ear old son suffers from cerebral palsyyand is covered by medicaid. murphy says: afforddble pealth care is really important to me right now and therapy and hhs ndition - coveerd" mckeever says: "when your child has a medical condition when you have the fiiances with it thaa you are not going to ave the abiiity toopay for mri's, or x-rayssor medicinn. ii's just aaother burden" burdenn the most controversial part of the new law requiies all americans to a fine. there will be ce - &psubsidies for those who canno afford to pay. ii's another cde red day this morning. heelth officials recommend everyone stay out of the sun as much as pe happening for a largg

physical invasion of private property justice scalia's main theme, was not the motive sounded in justice alito's concurrent opinion writing for four of the justices he said that the long term monitoring of jones' car tread on his reasonable expectation of privacy, at the circuit stage, the 9th circuit was on the losing side of the split, dissenting from the denial of rehearing of bank by that court, chief judge alex kosinski got to the heart of the matter. there's something creepy and un-american about such behavior. he wrote -- to those of us who have lived under a total tear queen regame. there's a meaning of deja vu. again at issue in florence, burlington county. florence concerned the practice in new jersey county jails of subjecting all arrestees to strip searches before admitting them to a jail's general inmate quarters. florence was arrested for failure to pay a fine, wrongly as it turned out, he had, in fact, paid what was due. transferred from one jail to another. he was strip searched twice. and after all charges against him were dropped, florence sued the jails in which the searches y

kennedy, scalia, alito and thomas, they were in the minority. the health care reform law stays in full -- fully remains the law of the land in the united states. kate baldwin has been watching all of this unfold. kate, you're outside the supreme court. give us some more on what was going on inside the supreme court. >> reporter: what was going on inside the supreme court is the chief justice, he announced the ruling and began reading part, a summary, really, of the opinion, the majority of opinion of the court. and that has been happening. and of course, we then quickly got word from my colleague, bill mears, who is inside on the press office, receiving this ruling as soon as it came down, to read it back to me. >> hold on a second, kate, hold on. tom harkin, the democratic senator is standing in front of the u.s. supreme court. the senator from iowa, i want to hear what he's saying. never mind, we got that audio coming from the rally. you see some senators there with tom harkin. kate, sorry i interrupted. but go ahead and pick up your authority