57
57
Oct 14, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 57
favorite 0
quote 0
justice alito did not like it. andook a shot at it in knox the majority's choice to reach an issue not presented by the parties briefed or argued disregards our rules. justice alito did not like something about abood so he took a shot. then we went on to a later decision called harris b quinn. justice alito took another shot at abood in that case describing it as having an that is questionable. he undertook an extended critique of the decision describing it as having questionable foundations. justice kagan spotted that and in her dissent, she said today's majority cannot resist taking pot shots at abood and described its critique as fortuitous -- -- gratuitous. the message went out from judge alito that he wanted to do something about abood. there was something about abood that he did not like. with that, that was the prequel. then, we went to the two cases that followed. friedrichsne was which was supposed to be the one that got rid of abood and it had an interesting travel. the lawyer in the case was one of these
justice alito did not like it. andook a shot at it in knox the majority's choice to reach an issue not presented by the parties briefed or argued disregards our rules. justice alito did not like something about abood so he took a shot. then we went on to a later decision called harris b quinn. justice alito took another shot at abood in that case describing it as having an that is questionable. he undertook an extended critique of the decision describing it as having questionable foundations....
30
30
Oct 18, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 30
favorite 0
quote 0
justice alito did not like it. andook a shot at it in knox the majority's choice to reach an issue not presented by the parties briefed or argued disregards our rules. justice alito did not like something about abood so he took a shot. then we went on to a later decision called harris b quinn. justice alito took another shot at abood in that case describing it as having an that is questionable. he undertook an extended critique of the decision describing it as having questionable foundations. justice kagan spotted that and in her dissent, she said today's majority cannot resist taking pot shots at abood and described its critique as fortuitous -- -- gratuitous. the message went out from judge alito that he wanted to do something about abood. there was something about abood that he did not like. with that, that was the prequel. then, we went to the two cases that followed. friedrichsne was which was supposed to be the one that got rid of abood and it had an interesting travel. the lawyer in the case was one of these
justice alito did not like it. andook a shot at it in knox the majority's choice to reach an issue not presented by the parties briefed or argued disregards our rules. justice alito did not like something about abood so he took a shot. then we went on to a later decision called harris b quinn. justice alito took another shot at abood in that case describing it as having an that is questionable. he undertook an extended critique of the decision describing it as having questionable foundations....
31
31
Oct 18, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 31
favorite 0
quote 0
in 2012,ice alito justice thomas, joined by justice alito, signaled to rollback a supreme court precedent that they believe with their understanding of the constitution. for the right to same-sex marriage even though that right and called it a problem that only the court could fix. judge barrett, you said judges have to wait for cases and cannot have an agenda but here we have an example of sending out signals. take a look at precedent. cite one case where you are also sending out a signal. two court cases. without the right to vote and raising concerns that you view their right to vote to be more limited than the right to own a gun. , in that case, you jointed decision have upheld an abortion clinic buffer zone law. apply the law under a clear supreme court precedent. the decision went even further. it signaled a strong .isagreement with the precedent you directed the plaintiffs to seek relief in the u.s. record. the earlier today, a senator showed you a chart of more than 100 cases were justice ginsburg was in the majority and justice scalia was in defense. my republican colleagues is a
in 2012,ice alito justice thomas, joined by justice alito, signaled to rollback a supreme court precedent that they believe with their understanding of the constitution. for the right to same-sex marriage even though that right and called it a problem that only the court could fix. judge barrett, you said judges have to wait for cases and cannot have an agenda but here we have an example of sending out signals. take a look at precedent. cite one case where you are also sending out a signal. two...
96
96
Oct 14, 2020
10/20
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 96
favorite 0
quote 0
so like justice alito in 2012, justice thomas joined by justice alito signaled an eagerness to roll back a supreme court precedent that they believed conflicted with their understanding of the constitution. they criticized oberfel for reading a right to same sex marriage into the 14th amendment even though that right is found nowhere in the text and called it a problem that only the court can fix. judge barrett, you said judges have to wait for cases and can't say i have an agenda but here you have examples of justices who are sending out signals. bring these cases to us because we want to take a look at precedent. i just want to cite to one case where i think you are also sending out a signal. that is a circuit court case. well, two circuit court cases. one that you've been asked about, canter "v" barr where you wrote a dissent arguing certain people with felony convictions should have the right to have a gun and you went out of your way to raise the issue of whether their right to vote, about their right to vote and raising concerns that you view their right to vote to be more limited
so like justice alito in 2012, justice thomas joined by justice alito signaled an eagerness to roll back a supreme court precedent that they believed conflicted with their understanding of the constitution. they criticized oberfel for reading a right to same sex marriage into the 14th amendment even though that right is found nowhere in the text and called it a problem that only the court can fix. judge barrett, you said judges have to wait for cases and can't say i have an agenda but here you...
107
107
Oct 14, 2020
10/20
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 107
favorite 0
quote 0
justice alito didn't like it. he took a shot at it in knox versus seiu. the concurrence in that case said, wait a minute oochs, quote, the majority's choice to reach an issue not presented by the parties briefed or argued disregards our rules. but justice alito didn't like something about abood, so he took the shot. then we went on to harris v quinn. alito took another shot at abood in that case, describing it as having analysis that is questionable. he undertook an extended critique of the decision. justice kagan spotted that. in her defense she said today's majority cannot resist taking pot shots at abood and described its critique of abood's foundations as gratuitous dicta. but the message went out from judge alito that he wanted to do something about abood. there was something about abood that he did not like. with that we went to -- that's the prequel. then we went to the two cases that followed. the first one was friedrich which was supposed to get rid of abood. it had an interesting travel. the lawyer in the case was one of the groups from janas, i
justice alito didn't like it. he took a shot at it in knox versus seiu. the concurrence in that case said, wait a minute oochs, quote, the majority's choice to reach an issue not presented by the parties briefed or argued disregards our rules. but justice alito didn't like something about abood, so he took the shot. then we went on to harris v quinn. alito took another shot at abood in that case, describing it as having analysis that is questionable. he undertook an extended critique of the...
49
49
Oct 27, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 49
favorite 0
quote 0
alito 58-42. judge alito, well known on our side of the aisle. the kind of person you would be looking at to promote to the supreme court. when president bush nominated him well within the mainstream, roberts alito well-know well kne conservative world of being very bright court of appeals judges any president would be looking at to put on the court if they ever had anet opportunity. no difference between alito and roberts, but alito went through hell but he made it into got 58 votes. so then along comes president obama. he gets to pics, sotomayor. i think she deserved more votes but 68 is pretty good. i thought she was qualified. then we had elena kagan, 63 votes. both obama nominees, 68 and 63. i thought elena kagan was highly qualified. the different judicial philosophy. the dean of law school at harvard about worked for the solicitor general's office. both of them had been with a liberal side of the court. most every case, but not all. i'm not surprised the way they decidednk cases. i think they were tremendously well-qualified women and shou
alito 58-42. judge alito, well known on our side of the aisle. the kind of person you would be looking at to promote to the supreme court. when president bush nominated him well within the mainstream, roberts alito well-know well kne conservative world of being very bright court of appeals judges any president would be looking at to put on the court if they ever had anet opportunity. no difference between alito and roberts, but alito went through hell but he made it into got 58 votes. so then...
36
36
Oct 7, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 36
favorite 0
quote 0
justice roberts: justice alito? justice alito: no further questions. justice roberts: justice sotomayor? justice sotomayor: is this your answer to the transformative use argument and what is your best argument on fair use? mr. goldstein: our answer is that it cannot be the transformative use only exist when the computer code does something different. computer code only does one thing. there is no parity of computer code. that would mean that this highly in functional expression is less susceptible to fair use in a novel cannot write. -- it cannot be right. if a jury was entitled to conclude that this was an entirely new context that java was not usable in a smartphone with respect to fair use, our best argument is about the standard of review under rule 39 of fact and law was put to the jury at oracle's insistence. the question is, could the jury have balanced these factors? the other side is concerned about providing legal guidance, that's why we have jury instructions. hascourt in other cases made quite clear this is incredibly fact found. it will de
justice roberts: justice alito? justice alito: no further questions. justice roberts: justice sotomayor? justice sotomayor: is this your answer to the transformative use argument and what is your best argument on fair use? mr. goldstein: our answer is that it cannot be the transformative use only exist when the computer code does something different. computer code only does one thing. there is no parity of computer code. that would mean that this highly in functional expression is less...
24
24
Oct 22, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 24
favorite 0
quote 0
thomas,venge bork, ,istraught of, alito -- estrada alito or cavanaugh, but to return integrity to the supreme court and the senate, and all the institutions left is judicial abuse has twisted and desecrated for two generations. we need to confirm amy coney barrett not to give political power to conservatives or republicans but to finally give it back to the american people. whomhome it was stolen -- it was stolen 70 years ago. left -- so many years ago. barrett will take the constitutional highroad for decades to come. every day earning in more ways than one new title of justice. thank you, mr. chairman. sen. graham: both said. i have a statement i will introduce into the record without objection about the process. i think senator grassley would like to speak. take your time. sen. grassley: obviously our colleagues don't think they should represent their states by -- that is what they are not doing. represent either people and they don't you appear. i'm talking about my colleagues across the aisle. those of us that are here are amy,ed to have voted judge uh, barrett's nomination to th
thomas,venge bork, ,istraught of, alito -- estrada alito or cavanaugh, but to return integrity to the supreme court and the senate, and all the institutions left is judicial abuse has twisted and desecrated for two generations. we need to confirm amy coney barrett not to give political power to conservatives or republicans but to finally give it back to the american people. whomhome it was stolen -- it was stolen 70 years ago. left -- so many years ago. barrett will take the constitutional...
43
43
Oct 17, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 43
favorite 0
quote 0
tom's, alito, cavanaugh -- thomas, alito, cavanaugh.hat, and ideserve don't think it makes this hearing any better. believe,can people, i do not deserve a repeat of those episodes in the senate judiciary many history. , imy democratic colleagues respect you all. we have done some things together and had some fights in this committee. i have tried to give you the time you need to make your case, and you have every right in the world to make your case. i think i know how the vote is going to come out, but i think barrett is required to listen to your questions. let's extent possible, make it respectful, challenging, let's remember the world is watching. senator feinstein. sen. feinstein: thanks very much. i want to address your last statement. we feel the same way and i believe we want this to be a very good hearing. i certainly will strive to do my best to achieve that. , andmorning, judge barrett welcome to you and your family. at less than one month ago, the nation lost one of our leading voices for equality, ruth bader ginsburg. she l
tom's, alito, cavanaugh -- thomas, alito, cavanaugh.hat, and ideserve don't think it makes this hearing any better. believe,can people, i do not deserve a repeat of those episodes in the senate judiciary many history. , imy democratic colleagues respect you all. we have done some things together and had some fights in this committee. i have tried to give you the time you need to make your case, and you have every right in the world to make your case. i think i know how the vote is going to come...
223
223
Oct 5, 2020
10/20
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 223
favorite 0
quote 0
we saw them do it again with sam alito, the same brutal, ugly attack.t still remember justice alito's wife reduced to tears as the democrats went into the gutter and we just saw with bret kavanaugh recently. there is a ke pattern. we don't do that to democratic nominees. there's never been a democratic nominee. will engage with them on substance and issues, but the kind of slime and personal attack, for bret kavanaugh, he's got two young daughters. the agony and the pressure that was put on this family was really disgusting and now with judge barrett, i sat down with her this week in the capital and visited with her and one of the things i talked with her quite a bit about was how her kids were doing. seven kids, were already seeing democratic operatives attacking her young children which is despicable and should be totally off bounds, but the left views the court and central to their agenda for america. it really goes back to the 1960s when leftists discovered and seized upon the court as a way to implement their agenda that the american people wouldn'
we saw them do it again with sam alito, the same brutal, ugly attack.t still remember justice alito's wife reduced to tears as the democrats went into the gutter and we just saw with bret kavanaugh recently. there is a ke pattern. we don't do that to democratic nominees. there's never been a democratic nominee. will engage with them on substance and issues, but the kind of slime and personal attack, for bret kavanaugh, he's got two young daughters. the agony and the pressure that was put on...
73
73
Oct 14, 2020
10/20
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 73
favorite 0
quote 0
this precedent was called abood which protected public sector unions, and justice alito engaged in a 6 year campaign, and i just have this chart to show you he was very persistent in signaling that he wanted to revisit at butted. so in 2012, justice alito first signaled he wanted conservative an antiliber antiliberal groups to challenge at butted. abood. these groups brought cases. although they came close in 2016 his plan was thwarted by justice scalia's death was left the court stuck in a 4-4 decision tied. and justice alito had to wait until senator mitch mcconnell blocked merrick garland's election for nearly a year so that president trump could appoint neil gorsuch. pretty much the minute justice gorsuch got on the court the court finally overturned abood. and janus, now we're seeing that same kind of challenge to invite challenges to another precedent. obergefeld which recognized the right of same section couples to marry. the court denied review in over a thousand cases but justice thomas and justice alito issued a sharply worded statement about one case that was denied review
this precedent was called abood which protected public sector unions, and justice alito engaged in a 6 year campaign, and i just have this chart to show you he was very persistent in signaling that he wanted to revisit at butted. so in 2012, justice alito first signaled he wanted conservative an antiliber antiliberal groups to challenge at butted. abood. these groups brought cases. although they came close in 2016 his plan was thwarted by justice scalia's death was left the court stuck in a 4-4...
79
79
Oct 13, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 79
favorite 0
quote 0
tom's, alito, cavanaugh -- thomas, alito, cavanaugh. that, and ideserve don't think it makes this hearing any better. believe,can people, i do not deserve a repeat of those episodes in the senate judiciary many history. , imy democratic colleagues respect you all. we have done some things together and had some fights in this committee. i have tried to give you the time you need to make your case, and you have every right in the world to make your case. i think i know how the vote is going to come out, but i think barrett is required to listen to your questions. let's extent possible, make it respectful, challenging, let's remember the world is watching. senator feinstein. sen. feinstein: thanks very much. i want to address your last statement. we feel the same way and i believe we want this to be a very good hearing. i certainly will strive to do my best to achieve that. , andmorning, judge barrett welcome to you and your family. at less than one month ago, the nation lost one of our leading voices for equality, ruth bader ginsburg. she
tom's, alito, cavanaugh -- thomas, alito, cavanaugh. that, and ideserve don't think it makes this hearing any better. believe,can people, i do not deserve a repeat of those episodes in the senate judiciary many history. , imy democratic colleagues respect you all. we have done some things together and had some fights in this committee. i have tried to give you the time you need to make your case, and you have every right in the world to make your case. i think i know how the vote is going to...
30
30
Oct 10, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 30
favorite 0
quote 0
alito has been vilified, thomas has been vilified, scalia has been vilified. others when they tend to be vilified tend to go squishy. on the supreme court, it brings out whatever character weaknesses you have. if you are ambitious, the character weakness that tends to affect a lot of us is vanity. so when you are up there and you become the most powerful person, the media tells you, because you have the swing vote, it really goes to your head, i suppose. you have got to put people up there for whom their ambition has not been to get on the supreme court. i can tell you, that has not been judged barrett's ambition. probably never occurred to her until a couple of years ago. >> i will just add that there are no guarantees in this sort of thing. on the left it is a lot easier because of the general left-wing tilt of the legal profession, especially at elite levels. and whatever interpretive scenarios they might be applying in the most controversial cases, they achieve the so-called right result for that side. on the right, republican appointed justices, there is
alito has been vilified, thomas has been vilified, scalia has been vilified. others when they tend to be vilified tend to go squishy. on the supreme court, it brings out whatever character weaknesses you have. if you are ambitious, the character weakness that tends to affect a lot of us is vanity. so when you are up there and you become the most powerful person, the media tells you, because you have the swing vote, it really goes to your head, i suppose. you have got to put people up there for...
128
128
Oct 24, 2020
10/20
by
KQED
tv
eye 128
favorite 0
quote 0
i know that justic like alito -- justice alito and justice thomas have already written skeptically about it that seems to openoor. i know that judge barrett -- would-be justice barrett -- supportive of these rights.s not and so, of course i don't knowat exactly going to happen, but that's exactly the point. when you're married, you should be reasonably confident that no decision g byernment official would end your marriage. the simple fact that we don't have that certainty is itselfer a major co >> well, let me sort of suggest to you -- i mean, there are leading lgbtq advocates.ke hannon minter, for example, from the national center for lesbian rights,wh tweeted after that scathing statement you referenced from justice alito and justice thomas, quote... the concern from the lgbt community that i think is a serious concern is a question about whether thosjudges and potentially an additional amy coney barrett as a justice would rule in favor of religiou free a way that undermine the rights and freedoms of lgbt americans. and i think that's a valid concern, but i wonder if by using the rhet
i know that justic like alito -- justice alito and justice thomas have already written skeptically about it that seems to openoor. i know that judge barrett -- would-be justice barrett -- supportive of these rights.s not and so, of course i don't knowat exactly going to happen, but that's exactly the point. when you're married, you should be reasonably confident that no decision g byernment official would end your marriage. the simple fact that we don't have that certainty is itselfer a major...
137
137
Oct 13, 2020
10/20
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 137
favorite 0
quote 0
>> senator booker, i don't know what justices thomas and alito were thinking. you'd have to ask them. >> we are seeing cases where americans are being denied social security benefits. a couple in arizona was together for 43 years and got married and one of them died. the surviving spouse is being denied benefits. they weren't married long enough after 43 years together in love. does this violate the rule of equal treatment that the supreme court has laid down? >> in obergefell? could you repeat the facts? >> they were together for 43 years. the law allow them to marry. they married and one died soon after and they are being denied survivor benefits because they weren't married long enough. the law are wrongfully denied them that equality. >> it's a legal question that would have to come up and be decided in the context of a real case. obergefell recognizes the full rights of same-sex couples to marry but the question of what are the implications of that for benefits would be something that would come up before a court later. >> there are some precedents. can a
>> senator booker, i don't know what justices thomas and alito were thinking. you'd have to ask them. >> we are seeing cases where americans are being denied social security benefits. a couple in arizona was together for 43 years and got married and one of them died. the surviving spouse is being denied benefits. they weren't married long enough after 43 years together in love. does this violate the rule of equal treatment that the supreme court has laid down? >> in...
43
43
Oct 26, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 43
favorite 0
quote 1
alito, 58-42. judge alito, well-known on our side of the aisle, the kind of person you'd be looking toot promote to the supreme court. when president bush nominated him, well within the mainstream. roberts, alito, well known in the conservative world of being very bright court of appeals judges that any republican president would be looking at to put on the court if they ever had an opportunity. no difference between alito and roberts, but alito went through hell, but he made it and he got 58 votes. so then along comes president obama. he gets two picks, sotomayor, 68 votes to 31. i think she deserved more, but 68 is pretty darn good. i was glad to vote for her. i saw that she was qualified. then we had elena kagan, 63 votes -- you can see the trend here. both of barack obama nominees, 68-he 63. i thought elena kagan was highly qualified. dean of law school at harvard. but worked for the solicitor general's office. both of them have been with a liberal side of the court, most every case but not all
alito, 58-42. judge alito, well-known on our side of the aisle, the kind of person you'd be looking toot promote to the supreme court. when president bush nominated him, well within the mainstream. roberts, alito, well known in the conservative world of being very bright court of appeals judges that any republican president would be looking at to put on the court if they ever had an opportunity. no difference between alito and roberts, but alito went through hell, but he made it and he got 58...
58
58
Oct 22, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 58
favorite 0
quote 0
they slandered justice thomas, justice alito, and justice kavanaugh. they knew the filibuster -- nuked the filibuster for partisan reasons. now they are trying to scuttle this vote for partisan political reasons. when it comes to the judiciary, abuse of power is their agenda. now, the left seems to think the supreme court exists to impose their very worst ideas onto the public. onto those recalcitrant members of the public. those members recall citizens that refuse blindly to go along with their entitled extremism. they want the court to empower abortion activists, performance artist to tell everyone how to live without votes, without accountability, and without debate. putting debatable matters beyond debate seems to be there formula. they don't want democracy. amy coney barrett will not politicize the supreme court. she is going to turn back policy decisions and political debate back to the people and their elected accountable representative's where they belong. judge barrett understands under our constitution policy is supposed to be determined by t
they slandered justice thomas, justice alito, and justice kavanaugh. they knew the filibuster -- nuked the filibuster for partisan reasons. now they are trying to scuttle this vote for partisan political reasons. when it comes to the judiciary, abuse of power is their agenda. now, the left seems to think the supreme court exists to impose their very worst ideas onto the public. onto those recalcitrant members of the public. those members recall citizens that refuse blindly to go along with...
76
76
Oct 24, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 76
favorite 0
quote 0
tried it on alito. it didn't succeed. tried it on gorsuch, and it did. so the message was, in effect, nobody who president trump anonymous is -- nominates is going to get 60 votes for the supreme court. no matter how qualified. of course, speaking of qualifications, justice gorsuch 's qualifications were simply beyond question. someone who frankly has gone on to issue some rulings, by the way, that these guys over here like, which shows you predicting what a supreme court justice is going to rule on has been a hazardous guess most of the time. their apocalyptic threats about predictions about what's going to happen with nominees of republican presidents have been consistent going back to john paul stevens. every single one of them is going to be a disaster for women and minorities and all the rest, none of which, of course, ever materializes. so republicans applied and extended what senate democrats had begun in 2013. they had left out the supreme court from being dealt with as a simple majority. so we decided we're going to return to where, by the way,
tried it on alito. it didn't succeed. tried it on gorsuch, and it did. so the message was, in effect, nobody who president trump anonymous is -- nominates is going to get 60 votes for the supreme court. no matter how qualified. of course, speaking of qualifications, justice gorsuch 's qualifications were simply beyond question. someone who frankly has gone on to issue some rulings, by the way, that these guys over here like, which shows you predicting what a supreme court justice is going to...
37
37
Oct 8, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 37
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> justice alito. >> i am concerned that under your argument all computer code under one oh two b how do you square that position with the intent to provide intention for computer codes? >> that is a criticism put at the method of operation that is not fair of an argument it is strictly limited in that sense to circumstances that the function disclosed the relationship between the calls and the declaration can only be rich in one way and the principle that oracle concedes with respect to implementing code to make the shortcut programs work to produce the larger of two numbers. >> so with the merger argument how do you respond to oracle's argument that you are arguing in a circle to declare a code like oracle? >> our analysis is by reference to what the developers are trying to do it is conceded they have a right to use the command they have learned including the ones that work with the java s e-we have the right to write is command that would respond we don't have to use those declarations but the language only allows us to use those you can make that argument about the merger doctrin
. >> justice alito. >> i am concerned that under your argument all computer code under one oh two b how do you square that position with the intent to provide intention for computer codes? >> that is a criticism put at the method of operation that is not fair of an argument it is strictly limited in that sense to circumstances that the function disclosed the relationship between the calls and the declaration can only be rich in one way and the principle that oracle concedes...
47
47
Oct 1, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 47
favorite 0
quote 0
biden to this as chairman of judiciary committee he did against justice thomas as well as justice alito. he would have thought the democrats would have learned their lesson after the debacle of kavanaugh and that hearing. but about that episode continues to be a black cloud over their heads they lost senate seats as a result. amy coney barrett is an exceptional nobody into a terrific job on the court. she will be a model for many. look at the nominee. she is somebody ready to apply the law, legislate from the bench she was flooded in a bipartisan vote to a lower court. she deserves a dignified and respectable hearing. >> let me just of the president made an outstanding choice with indiana's own judge amy coney barrett as a nominee to serve as associate justice to the supreme court of the united states. we got to know amy through the seventh circuit court of appeals nomination process. a person of great integrity sharp intellect and a strong work ethic even with good humor. will need to prepare for that to make this anything but to serve on the highest court of the land. instead of the w
biden to this as chairman of judiciary committee he did against justice thomas as well as justice alito. he would have thought the democrats would have learned their lesson after the debacle of kavanaugh and that hearing. but about that episode continues to be a black cloud over their heads they lost senate seats as a result. amy coney barrett is an exceptional nobody into a terrific job on the court. she will be a model for many. look at the nominee. she is somebody ready to apply the law,...
74
74
Oct 23, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 74
favorite 0
quote 0
justice alito and thomas, they are good at signaling what they would like him the chance to overturn. if she aligned herself with justice scalia who wrote all the major decisions against lgbtq rights. you combine the fact that she aligns herself with a right-wing conservative wing of the supreme court. very much in line with her mentor, justice scalia. aligned that with her view of the president where she says it is up to every justice to decide for herself what the constitution requires and if a president doesn't align with that that is tha at roe v wade t risk and that is why so many of the rights and protections ruth bader ginsburg spent her time on the supreme court fighting for our * and that's why i stand here with my colleagues in protest of the nominee. there are 40 million people that have already voted. they are listening. now i will turn to my good friend, cory booker. >> i stand with my colleagues in a firm commitment to some of the best of the american values and tactics. i stand with my colleagues in the commitment to boycott what is unacceptable. we stand resolute and i
justice alito and thomas, they are good at signaling what they would like him the chance to overturn. if she aligned herself with justice scalia who wrote all the major decisions against lgbtq rights. you combine the fact that she aligns herself with a right-wing conservative wing of the supreme court. very much in line with her mentor, justice scalia. aligned that with her view of the president where she says it is up to every justice to decide for herself what the constitution requires and if...
152
152
Oct 13, 2020
10/20
by
KPIX
tv
eye 152
favorite 0
quote 0
here's what happened: on monday, the court declined to hear a case about gay marriage, but alito ands as an opportunity to attack the 2015 decision legalizing gay marriage, writing that it lets the government "brand religious adherents who believe that marriage is between one man and one woman as bigots, making their religious liberty concerns that much easier to dismiss." nope, uh-uh. wrong. those people can still believe anything they want. they just can't force those beliefs on others. i'm a catholic. i believe in giving up meat on fridays during lent. that's my right. but it does not give me the right to go into a texas roadhouse and start knocking steaks off the tables like an angry cat. and i want to! they already let you throw peanut shells on the damn floor! we've got a great show for you tonight. jerry seinfeld is here. won't you stick around? ♪ ♪ celebrating halloween? well, if you're celebrating by eating reese's. then no, you're actually late. not sorry, reese's. ♪dy-na-na-na, na-na, na-na, eh♪ ♪dy-na-na-na, na-na, na-na, eh♪ ♪dy-na-na-na, na-na, na-na, eh♪ ♪light it up,
here's what happened: on monday, the court declined to hear a case about gay marriage, but alito ands as an opportunity to attack the 2015 decision legalizing gay marriage, writing that it lets the government "brand religious adherents who believe that marriage is between one man and one woman as bigots, making their religious liberty concerns that much easier to dismiss." nope, uh-uh. wrong. those people can still believe anything they want. they just can't force those beliefs on...
35
35
Oct 5, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 35
favorite 0
quote 0
there was an attempt to filibuster alito.oined by about half the democrats, including joe biden, barack obama, hillary clinton, chuck schumer. more those looking for their own political future. it had never gotten to the point of an actual filibuster blocking a final vote until gorsuch. he got through on the party line except for three votes. and a year later, it came time for kavanaugh. susan: let's play a clip from the judiciary committee hearing. it shows the theme between the two parties as they approach the brett kavanaugh nomination. [video clip] >> i am telling the truth. >> i want to new what you want to do. >> i am innocent of the charge. >> i want to know what you want to do. >> i am innocent of the charge. >> you are prepared for an fbi investigation? >> they don't reach conclusions, you reach conclusions. >> if there is no truth to the charges, the fbi will show that. are you afraid they might not? >> this is not a job interview. this is hell. this is going to destroy the ability of good people to come forward bec
there was an attempt to filibuster alito.oined by about half the democrats, including joe biden, barack obama, hillary clinton, chuck schumer. more those looking for their own political future. it had never gotten to the point of an actual filibuster blocking a final vote until gorsuch. he got through on the party line except for three votes. and a year later, it came time for kavanaugh. susan: let's play a clip from the judiciary committee hearing. it shows the theme between the two parties as...
137
137
Oct 6, 2020
10/20
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 137
favorite 0
quote 0
justice alito and thomas criticized the court's 2015 decision. why is that catching a lot of people's attention today? >> i think the issue clearly is going to come back. whatever issue you take, they're certainly right that this is an unresolved issue. you're talking about kim davis, the clerk in kentucky who refused to issue marriage licenses in 2015 after the supreme court said states cannot ban same sex marriage. she said it would violate here religious principles and she was sued and the question is whether she was immune from lawsuits and what the people who have sued her said government officials sometimes get immunity if they're following the law but she knew she was violating the law when she refused to issue those marriage licenses. so she shouldn't get any immunity and the court didn't take her case. but alito and thomas said this whole issue about the difference -- the tension if you will between a person's religious beliefs and laws against discrimination is unresolved. what they said is that the supreme court's ruling on same sex ma
justice alito and thomas criticized the court's 2015 decision. why is that catching a lot of people's attention today? >> i think the issue clearly is going to come back. whatever issue you take, they're certainly right that this is an unresolved issue. you're talking about kim davis, the clerk in kentucky who refused to issue marriage licenses in 2015 after the supreme court said states cannot ban same sex marriage. she said it would violate here religious principles and she was sued and...
17
17
Oct 30, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 17
favorite 0
quote 0
they failed once and they failed again last night, but justice alito left the door open to potentially re-examine this case when the time comes. the times said before the election, most likely the latter, now just in preparation, the pennsylvania secretary of state said they are going to invite counties to segregate all in the three days counting. it is kind of precautionary, but at the same time it is probably smart. i talked to legal experts yesterday who said that those ballots should be segregated because there could be some legal challenges after this as well. the supreme court decision last night was remarkable in the way that justice alito wrote that he does believe there is a high likelihood that this deadline extension was unconstitutional, but they did not have time to rule before the election. just as amy coney barrett did not participate in this decision. what were republicans trying to do i bringing this before this court -- ringing this before the supreme court? guest: they were bringing the trump campaign wishlist to several courts around pennsylvania. this effort had fa
they failed once and they failed again last night, but justice alito left the door open to potentially re-examine this case when the time comes. the times said before the election, most likely the latter, now just in preparation, the pennsylvania secretary of state said they are going to invite counties to segregate all in the three days counting. it is kind of precautionary, but at the same time it is probably smart. i talked to legal experts yesterday who said that those ballots should be...
21
21
Oct 22, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 21
favorite 0
quote 0
there is no constitutional basis for same-sex marriage, this would be justices alito and thomas. they are good at signaling what they would like to have a chance to overturn. herselfrrett aligned with justice scalia who wrote that all the major decisions against gay rights, including the last one, -- fact that judge barrett aligned herself with the right wing conservative wing of the supreme court. she is very much in line with her mentor, justice scalia, combined that with her view of precedent where she says it is up to every justice to decide for herself what the constitution requires and if precedent does not align with that, down goes the president. that is why roe v. wade is at risk. that is why other cases are at risk. that is why so many of the rights and protections ruth bader ginsburg fought for on her time for the supreme court are at risk. that is why i stand here with my colleagues and protest this nominee. guess what? there are already 40 million people who have voted. they know what is at stake and they are listening. republicans hope that people are not paying att
there is no constitutional basis for same-sex marriage, this would be justices alito and thomas. they are good at signaling what they would like to have a chance to overturn. herselfrrett aligned with justice scalia who wrote that all the major decisions against gay rights, including the last one, -- fact that judge barrett aligned herself with the right wing conservative wing of the supreme court. she is very much in line with her mentor, justice scalia, combined that with her view of...
29
29
Oct 23, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 29
favorite 0
quote 0
this would be justices alito and thomas. they are really good at signaling what they would like to have a chance to overturn. judge barrett aligned herself with justice scalia who wrote all the major decisions against gay rights including the last one. you combine the fact that judge barrett aligns herself with the right-wing, conservative wing, the supreme court, she very much in line with her mentor, justice scalia, with her outlier view of precedent where she says it is up to every justice to decide for herself what the constitution requires that if president does not align with that, down goes the president. that is why roe v wade is at risk. that is why overfilled is at risk, why so many things ruth bader ginsburg spent her whole time on the supreme court fighting for are at risk. that is why i stand here with my colleagues in protest of this nominee and guess what? there are 40 million people who have voted. they know what is at stake. republicans hope people are not paying attention but they are. i will turn to my goo
this would be justices alito and thomas. they are really good at signaling what they would like to have a chance to overturn. judge barrett aligned herself with justice scalia who wrote all the major decisions against gay rights including the last one. you combine the fact that judge barrett aligns herself with the right-wing, conservative wing, the supreme court, she very much in line with her mentor, justice scalia, with her outlier view of precedent where she says it is up to every justice...
114
114
Oct 15, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 114
favorite 0
quote 0
justice alito did not like it.ook a shot at it in knox the majority's choice to reach an issue not presented by the parties briefed or argued disregards our rules. justice alito did not like something about abood so he took a shot. then we went on to a later decision called harris b quinn. justice alito took another shot at abood in that case describing it as having an that is questionable. he undertook an extended critique of the decision describing it as having questionable foundations. justice kagan spotted that and in her dissent, she said today's majority cannot resist taking pot shots at abood and described its critique as fortuitous -- -- gratuitous. the message went out from judge alito that he wanted to do something about abood. there was something about abood that he did not like. with that, that was the prequel. then, we went to the two cases that followed. friedrichsne was which was supposed to be the one that got rid of abood and it had an interesting travel. the lawyer in the case was one of these gro
justice alito did not like it.ook a shot at it in knox the majority's choice to reach an issue not presented by the parties briefed or argued disregards our rules. justice alito did not like something about abood so he took a shot. then we went on to a later decision called harris b quinn. justice alito took another shot at abood in that case describing it as having an that is questionable. he undertook an extended critique of the decision describing it as having questionable foundations....
110
110
Oct 14, 2020
10/20
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 110
favorite 0
quote 0
justice alito and kavanaugh agreed. justice kagan who you have been citing on the no grading said i do, that she's willing to speak to it, and as every nominee has, i do support the results in griswold. i understand that you're saying to us you're going to be your own justice and that you're very hesitant to talk about this case because it is an anchor to substantive due process. but let me just one more time say are you unwilling to say as so many currently serving justices have that at least griswold is not wrong? >> i think griswold isn't going anywhere unless you plan to pass a law prohibiting couples or all people from using birth control. and i think the question because it's entirely academic, because it seems unthinkable that any legislature would pass such a law, i think the only reason that it's even worth asking that question is to lay a predicate for whether roe is rightly decided because griswold does lie at the foundation of that line of precedent. so because griswold involves substantive due process, an a
justice alito and kavanaugh agreed. justice kagan who you have been citing on the no grading said i do, that she's willing to speak to it, and as every nominee has, i do support the results in griswold. i understand that you're saying to us you're going to be your own justice and that you're very hesitant to talk about this case because it is an anchor to substantive due process. but let me just one more time say are you unwilling to say as so many currently serving justices have that at least...
40
40
Oct 2, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 40
favorite 0
quote 0
this book chef's supreme was conceived by martha and alito. and she thought the perfect tribute to marty would be a cookbook. so this has some 30 art of his well over 150 recipes that he had on a disk. the choices were initially made by mom but then my daughter looked at the table of contents and she said. mother those are not the recipe that he would have picked. so i said, all right jane, you pick the recipes. and in the table of contents there is one recipe it is, james cesar salad. so she contributed one of her own. (laughter) >> ruth, she's the skaters her father, i understand. the food was fantastic. >> the tributes to martin ginsburg in the cookbook by the spouses is wonderful. i'd like to briefly read a bit from douglas stone who was caused the widow of william over douglas. catherine lah -- he arrived drift dressed -- elegantly and a sports jacket with a handkerchief in his sports jacket. his smile gave the impression of perpetual amusement. it's as though he had just heard some witty remark. he was softspoken. aware that one aspect o
this book chef's supreme was conceived by martha and alito. and she thought the perfect tribute to marty would be a cookbook. so this has some 30 art of his well over 150 recipes that he had on a disk. the choices were initially made by mom but then my daughter looked at the table of contents and she said. mother those are not the recipe that he would have picked. so i said, all right jane, you pick the recipes. and in the table of contents there is one recipe it is, james cesar salad. so she...
42
42
Oct 16, 2020
10/20
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 42
favorite 0
quote 0
roberts total majority opinions number the same as justices scalia and alito so if you combine their majority opinions they are no greater in number than that of the chief justice and while justice kennedy has often been seen as the point man when it comes to first amendment cases, during his tenure john roberts has authored more than twice as many majority free-speech opinions justice kennedy. so how does this compare with the request record? well, william rehnquist affirmed free-speech cases in 20 percent of the cases. 20 percent of the cases nthat he participated in the upper free-speech claim. whereas roberts has done so in over 55 percent of the cases that have come before. notwithstanding his importance in this area, significantly and my colleague david hudson might want to touch on this, the two most important opinions as far from the roberts court are citizens united, decided in 2010 by justice kennedy, the campaign finance case and read versus count gilbert decided in 2015 the content based analysis case so the two most important opinions thus far are citizens united and rea
roberts total majority opinions number the same as justices scalia and alito so if you combine their majority opinions they are no greater in number than that of the chief justice and while justice kennedy has often been seen as the point man when it comes to first amendment cases, during his tenure john roberts has authored more than twice as many majority free-speech opinions justice kennedy. so how does this compare with the request record? well, william rehnquist affirmed free-speech cases...
245
245
Oct 14, 2020
10/20
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 245
favorite 0
quote 0
thomas and alito said it needs to fix problems from its holding in observe wearing if he would. i think you've made it clear it's largely your philosophy. i'm trying to help viewers understand what it means to replace justice ginsburg with someone who may more closely follow justice scalia's approach. if justice scalia had his way we would be in a different place with regard to gender discrimination. just stills griswold struck down the male only. justice scalia was the sole discenter in that case and accused the court of destroying vm i which stands strong to this day. i'm getting at how closely you would ally yourself with justice scalia's jurisprudence. would you agree that the decision was wrong? >>> cents or coons, to be clear as i said in response to this question yesterday i do share justice scalia's opinion on text but in the litany of cases that you just identified, the particular votes that he cast are a different question of whether i would agree with the way that he applied those principles in particular cases. and i've already said, and i hope that you aren't sugges
thomas and alito said it needs to fix problems from its holding in observe wearing if he would. i think you've made it clear it's largely your philosophy. i'm trying to help viewers understand what it means to replace justice ginsburg with someone who may more closely follow justice scalia's approach. if justice scalia had his way we would be in a different place with regard to gender discrimination. just stills griswold struck down the male only. justice scalia was the sole discenter in that...