one, on showing of good cause as determined by the alj. the record can be augmented with any record that was inadvertently admitted or excusedded and, finally, any newly discovered evidence that could not have been known at the time of the original trial. the alj would conduct a full independent review, paper review of the entire record. the parties would fight briefs and could make appeal appear for oral arguments. finally and most important the alj would review your decision under two standards. legal error or abuse of discretion. again, as we explained earlier, the appellant, disciplined officer would where the burden of proving that the commission committed an illegal error. if they find they did abuse discretion, a very high standard, alj can reduce to lesser penalty or vacate altogether. we have been in negotiations over a year. we went through a fact finding process required under state law. the neutral panel in the fact finding process was preeminent professor of law at the university. william gold was the chairperson of the labor