our membership includes a 100- year-old that worked all his life down the road and allan jacob, the former director of city planning for a san francisco. we strongly request you do not accept this flawed report. why should you not accept it? i have been a teacher the last 18 years. i recognize a battle lab right up what i see one. it has faulty assumptions, a circular logic, odd data collection procedures. if a student who turned his intimate, it would get it back with tons of notes and questions written on it. while teaching what of my own, i went through the draft riding those notes and questions pointing out inconsistencies, errors, and absent research. the result was that they made a few surface changes and ignored everything else. as a result, this will cause irreparable damage. the details are easily available in public comments. in the hearing for the draft, i sent a less technical summary to all of you in 10 separate females over the last nine days. but the point of the organization is that the issue is very simple. destroying photosynthesis is bad. this project will result in a ne