and the united states was not simply a good alliance, but a great alliance. words that lift me -- left me with a powerful impression. that is why the title of my remarks, as well as the preamble of the joint statement include the word great alliance. distinguished participants, standing here today, i would like to reaffirm with you together the friendship korea and the united states have built for more than a century. n 1885, the first modern founded by korea was an american missionary, dr. allen. american missionaries led the establishment of modern institutions for education and medicine in korea. while backing the koreans' independence movement against a japanese occupation. the united states intelligence agency worked with our provisional government and supported our military exercises. in 1950, the most tragic war in korea's history broke out. two days ago, the first place i visited after my arrival here was the reservoir battle memorial. this battle was recorded as one of the most fiercely fought battles of the korean war. in which the u.s. first marine

we must convey to him that this alliance is ironclad. now, just on another subject, related, it's about our national security, while we're flad to be passing thises remain -- glad to be passing this resolution affirming our commitment to article 5, the bipartisan bill sanctioning russia languishes in the house. while the white house caters to putin, congress must hold russia accountable for its actions by passing the iran-russia sanctions bill. t passed the senate with 98 -- 98-2. 98-2. strong bipartisan support for a bill that contained the iran and russia sanctions. we can't go home for the fourth of july without passing that legislation. it's my understanding, it was a blue slip problem that could be easily resolved. that's how it was characterized when the president of the -- of ukraine said to us that we really need the russian sanctions enforced. and strengthened. so let us have the courage to stand up with those who stand up to -- stand up to those who menace the free world and stand by our partners in support of the peaceful demo

well the military alliance be able to reinvent itself in the face of changing threats to talk about this and war we are joined by a former deputy secretary general of nato i stand on when authority itself. isolationists course appears to be damaging the unity of late as europe is criticized by the us president for failing to show financial commitment to the bloc decades old. this is now feeling the pressure with the e.u. seemingly ready to take it security into its own hands in a few radical european army replace him waits on the transatlantic alliance is the current disagreement just a passing cloud or will it be the catalyst of an unraveling of seventy years of western unity. i sound little mean so a former deputy secretary general of nato welcome to the show it's really great to have you with us now sir at the latest nato summit startled strong scalded alliance members for not pulling their weight financially effective be effectively for not contributing two percent of their g.d.p. to defense but since it's the united states that will see most influence in the alliance isn't it fair w

of the military alliance be able to reinvent itself in the face of changing threats to talk about this and war we're joined by former deputy secretary general of nato don when you thought. isolation is schools appear to be. as europe is criticized by the u.s. president for failing to show financial commitment to the block. is now feeling the pressure. to take its security. european army replacing the transatlantic alliance is the current disagreement just a passing cloud or will it be the catalyst of an unraveling of seventy years of western. sound it'll mean the former secretary general of nato welcome to the show it's really great to have you with us now sir at the latest nato summit startles truong scalded alliance members for not. pulling their weight financially effective be effectively for not contributing two percent of their g.d.p. to defense but since it's the united states that will see most influence in the alliance is it fair washington pays to lion's share of expansive well you know destroy oreo to two percent is an old flame you know and is not stated by lloyd it is a tar

more than six decades after our partnership was forged in the fires of war, the alliance between the united states and south korea is a cornerstone of peace and security in a very, very dangerous part of the world. the link between our countries, cemented in battle, is now also ied together by culture, commerce and common values. together we are facing the threat of the reckless and brutal regime in north korea, the nuclear and ballistic missile programs of that regime require a determined esponse. the north korean dictatorship has no regard for the safety and security of its people or its neighbors and has no respect for uman life. and that's been proven over and ver again. millions of north korea's own citizens have suffered and starved to death. and the entire world just witnessed what the regime did to our wonderful otto warmbier. i thank president moon for expressing his condolences on the travesty of otto's death. our thoughts and prayers remain with his wonderful family. the year of strategic patience, with the north korean regime, has failed. any years and it's failed. and fr

that is the alliance from the washington summit.an think of no better way to begin this week of allied solidarity them by honoring helmut kohl. when i was elected president he had been chancellor for decades seven years later if i myself the senior leader of the gh. i once told an audience my opinion could be summed up in four words that i agree with helmut kohl. those words have never failed me. after first reading in 1993 he said the chemistry is right. the chemistry was right every time we met when we were in nato or discussed russia, talk about multilateral issues at his favorite washington restaurant. even when he made me eat -- [laughter] and in spite of that. [laughter] i hope our dinners continue far into this century. with the 21st century breaking over the horizon recollected the great leaders like churchill or roosevelt to unify germany and europe to strengthen the western alliance to extend the hand of friendship to russia and helmut kohl ranks with them his place in history is unavailable. and he has been a true friend

but since it's still united states that will to most influence in the alliance isn't it fair washington pays to lion's share of the expansive well you know distro oreo did two percent is an old flame you know and is not stated by lloyd it is a target which shouldn't political has been a science or a few years ago and it is true with most of european partners on it i don't bring up to two percent but let's say there is no magic because. there are also other failings that the european allies do like like participating in nato operations which are not counted in this family stupor slam account you see so as a complicated issue certainly what is true is that is probably the counters will be spending more in the future but how much and in which way is this still to say that nato is now joining the anti isis coalition but what's to point of doing that i mean most nato countries with serious military capability are already fighting islamic state is the us led coalition really in need of support from i don't know let's say iceland's military for example. well i can tell you you know as you are

and spending money means if you are in an alliance, everybody has to spend money. this is called burden-sharing, and i fully agree, mr. president, to that. so, of course, some people liked this better and some didn't like it so much but it's a simple fact that we have to do this, not as a purpose in itself. we have to do this to stay strong, to be strong and to defend our nations. president trump: 100% correct. and one of the things i was referring to during that speech was the fact that, yes, they haven't paid what they should be paying now. but for many years they haven't been paying. so i said, do we ever go back and say, how about paying the money from many, many years past? now, i know no president has ever asked that question but i do. we are going to make nato very strong. you need the money to make it strong. you can't just do what we've been doing in the past. so i did say, yes, we haven't paid this year but what about the past years, the many past years where you haven't paid? perhaps you should pay some or all of that money back. you have a question. rep

-japan alliance is not just about security, it is an alliance to share, values, such as democracy, human rights, freedom of press, free trade, environmental protection, and so forth. today, more and more people are alliance is just about the security, not about the common values. the secretary, what do you think? if it is an alliance based on common values, what are the common values we are trying to promote today? thank you. >> two more questions before i go back to the secretary from china. >> thank you. mentionedou strengthening the defensive links between the united states and taiwan. i think it is quite unusual for the secretary of defense of the united states to say so in this occasion. somedoes not mean there is change with regard to the one china policy of the united states. thank you. >> and the final question in this round? one of our young leaders. permittingu for permittin me this question. it relates to the statements made by your former senior director for asian affairs. on the day of the tribunal's ruling in the case against china, he says the united states has made clear

, even a loose electoral alliance.here is no functioning government. people who are imported there will now be part of the government. and it will make it more difficult to re—establish power—sharing in northern ireland, which is important or northern ireland right now. that is an interesting point you made about the economic agenda and the concerns about jobs and employment and so on because that is something that was almost completely missing from this discussion and one of the reasons why i really despise corbyn labour as an ex lefty myself is that it is now a completely bourgeois phenomenon. this is now a monopoly, monopolised by urban professionals and middle—class university students, and there has been scarcely a word said about the tragedy, the post—industrial tragedy, of working class communities in this country. it is now dead, that kind of life, a community built around a local industry, steelworks or manufacturing or coal mining. that is gone. we have lost a generation. and those are the truly forgotten peo

-japan alliance is not just about security, it is an alliance to share, promote common values, such as democracy, human rights, freedom of press, free trade, environmental protection, and so forth. today, more and more people are asking if this alliance is just about the security, not about the common values. the secretary, what do you think? if it is an alliance based on common values, what are the common values we are trying to promote today? thank you. >> two more questions before i go back to the secretary from china. >> thank you. general, i think i noticed that as you mentioned strengthening the defensive links between the united states and taiwan. i think it is quite unusual for the secretary of defense of the united states to say so in this occasion. that does not mean there is some change with regard to the one china policy of the united states. thank you. >> and the final question in this round, from singapore, one of our young leaders. >> thank you very much for permitting me this question. i had a 2 quick questions. my first one, it relates to the statements made by your fo

the alliance. a unified europe is the greatest test in a generation. you can bette that vladimir puteland do -- you can bet that vladimir putin will do all he can to exploit cracks in the commitment. so today the house is saying we will not waiver, we're sending a message to our allies and partners and to moscow, that a wager against nato is a losing bet. i'd like to see the house take an even tougher stance against moscow and immediately pass the senate's russia sanctions bill. the legislation with overwhelmingly bipartisan support in the other body yment i'm confident we could act on it -- body. i'm confident we could act on it swiftly in the house. article 5 is sacred, nato is strong and the resolve of the united states and our allies won't be weakened by a boy sitting in moscow. thank you, mr. speaker. i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves the balance of his time. the gentleman from california is recognized. mr. royce: i yield two minutes to the gentl

you cannot have an alliance in another alliance. we are relying on america to do more than its fair share while we reap the benefits without having to pay for the defense and sit back and americans."pid quite frankly, the ugly american has shown us where we get off, and he is right. the way hewkward presented that in brussels. it is embarrassing as an american. the words for it were spot on. i think his voters love it when he says that and people who do not like trump, they say he has got a .3 why does the united's pace a much of the defense for europe when they do not to pay for it -- he has got a point. why do the united states pays a much of the defense for europe? shet is interesting what has to say about this. she says the e.u. is not a military alliance and does not want to become one. >> but he is talking about nato. >> but angela merkel is saying that the europeans need to pull together. due respect, she does not know what she is talking about. of course, the e.u. is a military alliance. in the indianns ocean. have battle gr

while the dup are in an alliance, even at a loose electoral alliance.s. people who are imported there will now be part of the government. and it will make it more difficult to re—establish power—sharing in northern ireland, which is important or northern ireland right now. that is an interesting point you made about the economic agenda and the concerns aboutjobs economic agenda and the concerns about jobs and employment and so economic agenda and the concerns aboutjobs and employment and so on because that is something that was almost completely missing from this discussion and one of the reasons why i really despise corbyn and labour as why i really despise corbyn and labouras an why i really despise corbyn and labour as an next lefty myself is that it labour as an next lefty myself is thatitis labour as an next lefty myself is that it is now a completely bourgeois phenomenon. this is now a monopoly, monopolised by urban professionals and middle—class university students, and there has been scarcely a word said about the tragedy, the post—industrial tr

and spending money means if you are in an alliance, everybody has to spend money. this is called burden-sharing, and i fully agree, mr. president, to that. so, of course, some people liked this better and some didn't like it so much, but it's a simple fact that we have to do this, not as a purpose in itself. we have to do this to stay strong, to be strong, and to in defend our nations. president trump: 100% correct. and one of the things i was referring to during that speech was the fact that, yes, they and haven't paid what they should be paying now. but for many years they haven't been paying. so i said, do we ever go back and say, how about paying the money from many, many years past? now, i know no president has ever asked that question, but i do. we are going to make nato very strong. you need the money to make it strong. you can't just do what we've been doing in the past. so i did say, yes, we haven't -- you haven't paid this year but what about the past years, the many past years where you haven't paid? perhaps you should pay some or all of that money back.

our alliances stronger than ever. the u.s.-austria alliances more important than ever.ent trump and i demonstrated when we were together on the uss intrepid in york a little while ago, our commitment, the commitment of our two nations based on their history, based on our shared values, aced on our mutual interests is stronger than ever. haidi: is there a concern though that president trump has proven andelf to be irrational erratic at times when it comes to policy decisions, and at other times track sectional -- times track sessional -- transactional? thehe relationship between united states and australia is as strong as any relationship could be. it is based on history, shared values, common interests, the closest possible engagement at every level. course given of the events of the last few hours, anything to do with the climate and his view of climate change and united states policy? becauset is interesting before malcolm turnbull became prime minister that he had strong views when it comes to how to attack climate change, almost holding the position of a climate cha

the kennedy administration strategy to perform the alliance progress. there are other parts of the strategy. i do not want to give those short shrift, but a want to focus on these in particular today. the dimension of public diplomacy in the eyes of progress, which is in itself i will describe in a second. the public diplomacy mission is so important because it is a project with a mass brian. you have to reach mass public in order for them to join, mobilize forces of the whole society. in an environment where the same committee found the u.s. was falling way behind when it came to public diplomacy, the importance is all the more important. two of into the administration, john f. kennedy announced in wonderful bostonian spanish the alliance intended to announce a hemisphere-wide corroborative -- cooperative effort to address social ills and poor standard -- standard of living via pooling resources to support latin american social reform and economic development and in the process in ocular the region against a second castro and beyond that show the way f

that is a political as well as military alliance and finally the senate is on the right track i know it is a tough bill the frankly american and european countries should not have the bridges to sell into the market. >> so i will think of witnesses for your unanimous agreement with the nature of the threat so in the march public hearing to testify that then candidate trump used active major -- measures at times against his opponents so then we saw kennedy trump use the terms like the election is rigged and then with the propaganda if you come to that conclusion at least inadvertently that candidate trump wasn't reassessing the goals of the russian propaganda and efforts. >> i don't have any independent knowledge of the trump campaign. >> i am just asking if the comments about the elections being rigged that it appeared the conclusion inadvertently that the candidate trump was aligned with that same type of chaos >> it is just as important to saddam had to ration of the what he did encourage the russian government with secretary clinton's emails was irresponsible. >> i imagine i would

it's a political alliance as well as a military alliance. we ought to be working is on th with your sanctions bill. it is a tough bill. i know it has caused some controversies in countries in europe, but frankly american countries, european countries shouldn't have advantages to sell into the russian market that american companies do not have, and i think your bill makes that point. >> thank you, ambassador. vice chairman. >> let me thank all the witnesses for the testimony and thank you again for your unanimous agreement on the nature of the russian threat and the attacks that were created here in the united states. i want to go back in our march public hearing, one of our witnesses, clint watts, testified that then candidate trump, quote, used russian active measures at times against his opponents, end of quote. he cited then candidate trump's coordination or use in calling out wikileaks. we saw candidate trump continue to use terms like the election is being rigged, same type of terms that were used by the kremlin in their propaganda effo

this is a test of that alliance. the consensus of experts is the government will win the final vote on the queen's speech and that is absolutely crucial because that is the political legislative program of this government. it tests whether the government has the confidence of the house of commons. vote late afternoon paris the government that already defeated a labor amendment last night on the end of the cap public sector pay that is held at 1%. there are other labor amendment's due today before the vinyl vote. we will be watching very closely. as will the prime minister herself. thistline where all of leaves theresa may's brexit strategy. >> that's an question. we don't yet really know. since she did not get a resounding majority the labour and its leader are very much saying the prime minister does not have a mandate for a hard exit. when you look at the issue which is set to dominate the queen's speech the next two years of parliamentary life it is a monumental task to change and as we know remorse ongoing negoti

>> i want to talk about political alliances here in the united states. one would imagine if the democratic and republican parties were to join together. this is not the case, but just to talk about parties that have very different interests here for the conservatives, what does it mean to have an alliance for the dup and one of the consequences for theresa may moving forward? >> yes. the biggest consequence in a way of the alliance with the dup is that the power sharing executive in northern ireland and between the nationalists and the unionists have broken down. the british government has always needed to be neutral within the battles within northern ireland politics. now, the danger is with theresa may accepted in power by the unionist side that the british government doesn't have that neutral position. so, that is a considerable worry. some progressive conservatives are also worried that the social stance of the democratic unionists who are opposed to same-sex marriage and to any easing of rights on abortion issues like that, assurances have been sort

is the president right that we should pull back from those alliances? mr. brooks: the president has a very good point when he talks about the fact that these alliances require balance, the require people to participate in a way they hold up their end of the bargain. not just because fair is fair, the strength of an alliance requires that all parties hold up the bargain. nato is protecting the free world. it protects the concept of democratic capitalism, an unall oyed good in the world. that is what nato is all about. it is doing important work today too. the threat to nato is th ae fact that the countries of nato have made agreements. we should celebrate nato and all put our money where our mouth is. it is key to nato being able to live up to article v, common defense. let's pop champagne corks about what an important alliance this is, and let's put pressure on our ally such that we all do our part. susan: before you were best-selling author and the head of this think tank, you were a professional french horn player. mark: i played trumpet. >> i played arou

to defense but since it's still united states that will to most influence in the alliance isn't it fair washington pays the lion's share of expansive well you know distro oreo to two percent is an old flame you know and is not stated by lloyd if there's a target which shouldn't political has been aside for a few years ago and it is truly the most old european of those old made up don't pay go up to two percent but let's say there is no magic because. there are also other feelings that the european allies do like like participating in medical professionals which are not counted in this family stupor slime account you see so as a complicated issue certainly what is true is that there's probably the counters would be spending more in the future but how much and in which way is still to be saved. nato is now joining the anti.

and president trump's firm resolve for the alliance is noted with great appreciation. the republic of korea for its part, will strive to strengthen our defined defense capabilities at the same time by pursuing defense reform, build up its own capacity to defend itself. as we undertake these endeavors, bilateral cooperations i hope will gather further traction. second, economic partnership between our countries forms an essential pillar for future oriented developments of the alliance. we both agreed on this view. economic growth and job creation will be promoted to insure our peoples enjoy greater mutual benefits through the collective efforts we've committed to make. third, as we fight against terrorism and other global challenges together, the alliance as agreed by ourselves will be broadened and developed into global partnership. as we move forward, our two nations will work towards establishing high level strategic consultation mechanisms in diverse areas of interest. to make it happen, concrete actions will be formulated in close concertation. i wish to extend my

do not question the alliance. do not question the alliance that is greatly inure strategic interest with europe. but that is also in our interest. it is important for us. and an american government, white house, that questions the validity of that alliance, that questions the validity of the article 5 neutral defense commitment does more to undermine our security and our safety than many things that the kremlin does. we're all vibrant western democracies. that's not to say we don't have flaws and vulnerabilities. we should not only address those but as western democracies can address them together. we can look at them together. and i would add only one thing. sanctions do work. perhaps even more as a political statement of cohesion and will. and as such they have had a tremendous impact on russia. they have left a deep impression on the kremlin. they have also done some economic damage. but they have above all been an expression of europe's and america's will to stand together against the threat towards ukraine an

the conservatives in this position, whether forming an alliance with democratic unionists. they are very hard right party in northern ireland. rumored to have links to loyalist paramilitary groups. this is some thing that is widely reported preeminent the controversial aspects of this is clearly this kind of alliance, which some might say is a labor grubby deal. >> many licking their real -- licking their wounds. clearly many satisfied with this outcome. >> many in the labour party actually thought that jeremy corbyn, when he was elected leader was a big mistake, it would be a huge liability. it looked this way. discourse totally fixed upon the public expect -- public aspect. those kindsation, of matters, promising to help students. bymising to have families giving them more benefits and opportunities. the conservative said it wasn't and this was a moot point. that's one of the factors that seems to have swayed things toward labor. the conservatives, the largest party in this election. labor outperforming what people ., exceeding all expectation. jeremy corbyn sitting on a

is the president right that we should pull back from those alliances? dr. brooks: the president has a very good point when he talks about the fact that these alliances require balance, the -- they require people to participate in a way they hold up their end of the bargain. not just because fair is fair, but because strength requires all parties participate in alliances. look at nato. it is not just giving germany in check your nato is protecting the free world. it protects the concept of democratic capitalism, an unalloyed good in the world. that is what nato is all about. in check soviet aggression but is doing important today -- important work today too. the big threat to nato is the fact that the countries of nato have made agreements. they are not complying with them. we should not trash nato, we should celebrate nato and say we should also a great it and put our money where our mouth is. the european countries are supposed be paying 2% towards defense. they are not living up to it so let's pop champagne corks about what an important alliance this is a

the argentine foreign minister green that the alliance had failed to capture the popular not for want of trying. millions of pamphlets, posters, cartoons, films, newsreels, tv program, radio programming, niche, mass, you name it -- it was tried, and it just did not move the needle. the diplomacy mission petered out in step with , which wasalliance effectively what kennedy did when kennedy was assassinated -- what is interesting to us are two things. in this story, you have confirmation that underdevelopment, poverty, and thus modernization became the central defining issue of inter-american and u.s. third world relations. the notion that the real revolt in essentially the same one asia and africa as in latin america represented this kind of unspoken and remarkable understanding, sort of agreement between kennedy and castro and latin america that the world was divided along economic lines, racial,logical, ethical, religious, cultural ones, but first and foremost, economic ones. so that is one. this sort of unspoken understanding that this is actually where the ballgame is, and this is

parties may be unwilling to form an alliance. theresa may will likely seek out the help of two parties in ireland. if that does not work and may resigns, what happens next? be up torbyn would bat. he might be able to form a coalition with smaller parties. an alliance that would put the brexit issue front and center at the debate. donald tusk has urged britain not to delay talks, warning that time is running out to reach a divorce deal. weighting hasid made the negotiations more uncertain. >> it could change a certain number of things. we will have to wait for the results. theresa may has lost her confidence, so she is in a cop located situation. what will the dynamic be like within the conservative party? what will it be like for the labour party? we have a political situation that is more open. the european commission and its negotiator are ready to open talks. story, our on this european affairs editor joins us. lots of uncertainty surrounding brexit. how might election results impact negotiations that start in 10 days? init pr

malcolm: our alliance is strong or than ever. the u.s.nce is more important than ever as president trump and i demonstrated when we were together on the uss intrepid in new york a little while ago. the commitment of our nations based on our history, based on our shareds, based on neutral interests, is stronger than ever. president trump has proven himself to be irrational, erratic when it comes to policy decisions and at other times transactional. is that something australia can rely on? malcolm: the relationship between the united states and australia is as strong as any relationship could be, based on history, shared values, common interests, the closest possible engagement at every level. defense, political, economic, business, it is the closest possible relationship, and it gets stronger all the time. haidi: scotland yard wanted to temporarily suspend intelligence sharing after the manchester event. the leak also follows from the president sharing confidential information with russian officials. has australia gotten reassurances any i

but through it all, the alliance held firm. and i invite those who protested then -- i invite those who protest today -- mark this fact because we , remained strong, the soviets came back to the table. [applause] pres. reagan: and because we remained strong, today we have within reach the possibility, not merely of limiting the growth of arms, but of eliminating, for the first time, an entire class of nuclear weapons from the face of the earth. as i speak, nato ministers are meeting in iceland to review the progress of our proposals for eliminating these weapons. at the talks in geneva, we have also proposed deep cuts in strategic offensive weapons. and the western allies have likewise made far-reaching proposals to reduce the danger of conventional war and to place a total ban on chemical weapons. while we pursue these arms reductions, i pledge to you that we will maintain the capacity to deter soviet aggression at any level at which it might occur. [applause] and in cooperation with many of our allies, the united states is pu

this is the question of future alliances. these countries will have a kind of responsibility to take the benefits of the energy solution. it is a question of opportunity. china 06/01/17 06/01/17 [captioning made possible by democracy now!] amy: from pacifica, thisis is democracy now! pres. trump: we are goioing to cancel the paris climate --eement and stop unbelievable. and stop all payments of the unitited states tax dollars to u and global warming programs -- un global warming programs. amy: president donald trump says he will make his announcement today on whether to pull the united states out of the landmark paris climate a accorda decision environmentalists warn

because nato is based on values, but it is ultimately a military alliance. and, you know, military spending is. can kateed, and you need a lot of money because nato is the strongest alliance the earth ever saw, and we want to keep it that way. so we have to spend money for defense purposes and spending money means if you're in an alliance, everybody has to spend money. this is called burden sharing, and i fully agree with the president with that. so, of course, some people like this better, and some didn't like it so much, but it's a simple fact that we have to do this, not as a purpose in itself. we have to do this to stay strong, be strong, and to defend our nation. >> 100% correct. and, you know, one of the things i was referring to during that speech was the fact, that yes, they haven't paid what they should be paying now, but for many years they haven't been paying, so i said, do we ever go back and say, how about paying the money from many, many years past? now, i know no president has ever asked that question, but i do. we're going to make nato very s

but it could get in the way of your weekend plans (jr stone) officials with the clean lakes allianceorus in runoff can produce 500 pounds of algae. (live) taking a live look outside at san francisco's embarcadero.... (anchor) time now to check on our weather... with meterologist lawrence karnow. lawrence karnow: the last weekend of spring is turning out to be the hottest weekend of the year. high temperatures soared into the upper 90s and low 100s in valleys while it was cool at the coast and it on the coast. skies are mostly clear and should stay that way for most of the night. winds are still breezy but should begin to calm down overnight except for the mountains. you can see the high pressure sysytem building from the southwest. it's bringing that dry desert air back into the bay area. father's day will be even hotter with temperatures as high as 105 inland. it will be scorching hot in the central valley with some temperatures near 110 degrees. a heat advisory is now in affect until wednesday for most of the bay area away from the coast. drink plenty of fluids and limit your expos