united nations would bee on this role that would a bumpy process -- as winston the worstsaid that thing about fighting with allies was not fighting alongside allies, so there was an expectation that the world butdn't be a perfect place with multiple supports, it got because of the devastation across europe and war ii,er world especially considering the expanse of the soviet role at the time. so 70 years, i think, is enough. know this is hard and it's frightening but that's why i say to see history trajectories. we can say, listen, we're not ones whose interests are at stake here. in fact, i thursday to an who was friend once giving it out to me about we americans are such bruisers, and know, dion, we could thanbly afford better almost anybody -- if anybody was going to be not trading with the we could rollrld, up our carpenters from europe to and be more self sufficient than most countries. said, you wouldn't go home, though, would you? because the fact is that the pay and the lives that we spend and families that when peopleours so say what are you going to solve in pakistan next week? are you going to correct i