his lawyer in the trial was a man named alvin moore and alvin moore at the time in 1963 was a 73-year-old lawyer during that trial, during the rape case. alvin moore objected to the disability of the written confession and his objection was because he didn't have a lawyer before he gave that statement. alvin moore's statement to the trial judge was i object because there was no lawyer present at the time you gave that and no one told him he would have to get it or words to that effect so when the case went to the arizona supreme court, it went up there in 1965, that was a record. there was an objection made by a lawyer on miranda's behalf that his confession should not have been admitted and shown to the jury because he didn't have a lawyer at the time he gave it. so when the case went to the airs on the supreme court they came down with an opinion in 1965 and they rejected the arguments by mr. moore the confession should not be admitted as he did not have a lawyer. arizona supreme court said that is not required under american law. the supreme court has not said that a confession is inad

alvin moore statement to the trial judge, judge mcfate, was i object because there was no lawyer present at the time he gave that and no one told him that he didn't have to give it, or words to that effect in the trial record. so when the case with to the arizona supreme court, it went up there in 1965, that was the record. there was an objection made by a lawyer on the defendants behalf that his confession should not have been admitted and shown to the jury because he didn't have a lawyer at the time he gave it. so when the case went to the arizona supreme court they came down with an opinion in 1965, again they rejected the argument by alvin moore that the confession should not be admitted because he didn't have a lawyer. the arizona supreme court said that's not required under american law. the supreme court has not said that i confession is inadmissible if you don't have a lawyer. what the court has said two years prior in a case called acevedo versus the united states, the court has said that if the suspect asks for a lawyer at any time before or during interrogation, then you have