dioxin is a molecule it's a byproduct of topical processing it is a known carcinogen alvord will dispute that tao has been able to manufacture so much uncertainty about this chemical that if you look around the rust rust of the world nobody else is debating the toxicity of dioxin except your admission. in fact one of those toxicology is the linchpin subsidies said that this is perhaps one of the most toxic materials he's ever seen. why do you think be disputed now. because there's the financial implications are you know there's the pending class action lawsuit against al comical for residents on the river. and i think the implications for the dow denying the toxicity the chemical now has bigger broader implications worldwide i mean there are a lot of dioxin contaminations around the country that you know not that not just i was responsible for that could be saddled or you know could have to have ramifications from the subtle matter of being in on the toxicity of dioxin or on the somewhat of a class action lawsuit here i think the ramifications are huge for the chemical industry. but. why