est alwaysnve wesked richard gill comment new technologies seem to be is this typical new techlogies?est alwaysnve anmporta factor in economic grow, not justin satellite tecology, is this typical new techlogies?est alwaysnve buquite generally. one american economist who has studiethis question and then weighteem gwi tir relative importance. r e riod1929 tough 1969, he came the following conclusions. fie und that u. gnp had grown overhat 40ears at aaverage of 3.3%rate per year. about 1.3% of ts grow denison attributed t simple% expansionw of population and bor.ed n increase he aritenw that tuaity expanding lar force had to work with-- capiltuaity accumution. lar force these two items represen the growth of inputs-- and doot necessarily represent any new way noticehe bigs. remaining item nearly half e growth rate, which represents increased output per unit ofnput. this is really where technocical ogress comes into play. re, we areealing wi new technologies, adnces in knowledge, e increased education and skills of the r foe. it's responsible for nearly out, and on a per capita sis, perha