that sounds ambiguous and threatening phraseology. but it certainly included the press. when the baltimore exchange editorialalized a war of the south, but the war of the north was a war of the people carried out by political schemers, military authorities shut down the paper. arrested the editor, whose name was francis scott key howard. not by accident, the irony here is that he was the grandson of the author of "the national anthem" thrown into ft. lafayette prison. was he guilty of anything more than expressing himself? his surviving files included secret resolutions pledging to support the confederacy and rebellion. marshal suppressed four of the other journals. asked to justify this by congress, lincoln said, are all the laws but one to go unexecuted and the government itself go to pieces less that one be violated? accusing rebels of what he called an insidious debotching of the public mind, a phrase that reveals how deeply he felt about harnessing what he called public sentiment. he said that he could perform this duty or surrender the entire existence of governmen

there and the extended stay and the intent as they said before to hopefully result these ambiguities about iran's program and its intent. so what they have to say is crucial and of course the continued access is crucial. >> and there is continuous monitoring by other means that the iaea has as well. >> general, iran has issued various threats with respect to the state. can you give us some analysis of the activities there and what we are doing in addition to what capability does iran have or doesn't have with respect to having the potential to close the streets or affect them in any way in terms of international trends that? >> what i have said in an open

you can hardly do it without ambiguity nor compromise. the word compromise is in bad repute now and rhetoric of american politicians, and those of us in religion have some blame to share for making that a bad word. i like the definition of compromise. the compromise is the process whereby each party of conflict gives up something dear, but not invaluable in order to get something which is truly invaluable. in the conflict between justice and liberty, often peace is what is invaluable, something. whether or not our politicians are architects of the compromises that permi u

even to a certain extent the ambiguity exists now as a deterrent and serves to help embolden them. >> i'll go to cyber security. thank you for your statement of support for the legislation that senators collins and rockefeller and feinstein and i introduced. the main intention of the legislation does a lot of things, but it's to create a system where the federal government, through the department of homeland security, advised and supported if you will by the nsa can work with the private sector to make sure that the private sector is defending itself and our country against cyber attack. to me, we spent a lot of time on this. right now because of the remarkable capacities of cyber attackers and the extent to sch they can attack privately owned and operated cyber infrastructure for either economic gains or to literally attack our country that we need to ask the private sector to make investments to defend themselves and us, then i'm afraid a lot of them are not yet making. is that your general impression? in other words, bottom line do we have a vulnerability at this moment. does the p

his own judicial legacy remained a complex and somewhat ambiguous one. he never achieved the stardom recognition on supreme court. an authentic celebrity in an era before fame became an everyday commodity, he was the most reluctant of celebrities dealing viewing with intense distaste which remained with him the rest of his life the media strut any that he encountered in his early life. the passage is telling to be sure, i think it reveals much more about popular notion of the supreme court than it does about byron white. the decade he joined the court was a period that produced celebrities and rogues, either because of what the court did, think earl warren, or because of how they fashion themselves for the public and publish themselves for the press. think william o. black and william doug lags. white developed an early allergy to stardom. when asked at retirement what his legacy would be, he replied i don't have a doctrinal legacy. i shouldn't. as one former clerk observed, being nonit logical and nondock drink -- very important to white just as being h

so there is an ambiguous that the saudi arabia has back to the syrian national council other members of the arab league such as libya have also recognized the syrian national council as the legitimate representative of the syrian people so there are outside interests that have taken aside the thing to understand is we live in a period of war. humanitarianism as has become the new ideology of imperialist intervention the united nations itself is serving as a kind of human rights the iter with a very selective attention and concern for particular countries and not for other countries and what distinguishes the selective ity in the concern shown is these are regimes that have been targeted by the united states that's where human rights really counts the united states wants to cast itself as being in a position as being the liberate or of arabs as being the force i will liberate arabs from themselves because they are fundamentally incapable of ruling themselves and so what we have here is a kind of rehash of colonialists doctrine david what do you think about that. i think it's very sad

you can hardly do it without some ambiguity or without some compromise. i like very much -- the word "compromise" is in bad repute now in the rhetoric of american politicians, and those of us in religion have some blame to share for making that a bad word.

and that is honest ambivalence and willingness to be ambiguous about those loyalties that shaped this country from its past. another one of my favorite southerners was that nameless soldier, whom shelby foote identifies as being part of long street's army, marching along and the soldier was tagging along at the end of the column. and as he trudged there and long street came up on his horse with some compassion and say "do you think you'll make it, soldier"? and he replies "yeah, i hopes i'll make it but i hopes to god i'll never loves another country." i must tell you there are times in my own life as an american citizens that i wonder about that, i wonder about that at my basic infantry raining at fort mcclellan, alabama, known as a general that may not have known too well but he dragged his feet also when it came really to making war on richmond. at any rate, that we have some reasons for ambivalence is for me a very important part of learning from history. learning from historians like the ones on this panel. i have to say that i have to admire what general grant said right after h

which tells me that that statement, or at least the ambiguity in the statement means they're leaningore to the dove side and away from the hawk side, that we could have some inflation above their tolerant rates. but you and i know as well, once the cow's out of the barn, it's out. i question the fed's ability to mop up after that moment has arrived. >> would you prefer that rates start creeping higher now? i mean, here we are talking about the fragility of the economy, yet you're saying we shouldn't be keeping rates where they are for as long as they are. so would you prefer the fed start moving on rates? this year? >> it's dangerous for members of congress to start acting like economists. i'm not going to say what kind of rates they should set up. i think a path for normaling our federal reserve policy, i agree with some of the dissenters. especially the one that left hon ig. i agree with some of them on the federal reserve. yes, we have to have accommodative economic policy, but it's still very accommodative. i'm not going to suggest we don't need accommodative policy. this is extr

the deeper you get into it, the more uncertain you be kind ambiguity is really a friend. in many ways have been a capability or near capability is as useful as more useful to them than having a weapon. if you think that we actually had a weapon, they know what would happen the way against israel, united states, for that is unlikely. if they are just as in the weapon, deep interest in the region. and they would get that influence for almost as much of an influence by having a world out that they have the capability to build the weapon in a matter of weeks or months and keep them within the u.s. intelligence agencies to be able to say they have said as recently as this past week that there is still no evidence that they made a political decision to go ahead with the weapons. but would you make a political decision when you could get many of the same benefit and be just short of. all sides have learned the lessons of north korea and on the one hand one of the lessons of north korea was that the united states says you can keep saying we won't tolerate it, but one day the coun

>> first, it is not an ambiguous capability. i think you see a number of states in the region thinking about an ambiguous capability of their own. a few years ago, you saw the gulf communities announced they were interested in uranium enrichment as well for peaceful power production purposes. but they wanted to make it clear they could also get things going. the one to watch most clearly is saudi arabia. again from which he leaks -- wikileaks, the saudi king said to cut off the head from united states. presumably, they could go out and buy a capability from pakistan, some other place. whether or not they would want to risk buying of full capability or just try to assemble all the component parts, if the iranians, too, were a screwdriver away, i think that could be a likelihood. i do not think there would be an israeli strike six months after, much less five years after. i do not know how the region could readjust to normal, if you call anything in the region normal. when you talk to a israelis about the operation, their answer i

year and have to figure out how to keep going only seventeen thousand and in fact most of those ambiguous research projects are going to have to stretch their dollars which worries the military but you know what i think i'm kind of scared too i'm so. because i don't know where all this money's going to me it's a black pit throwing fifty one billion dollars a research project with crazy pseudonyms and the worst part of it all is that we want to even know what's going on in the pentagon's dungeon until we see the finished product they just throw billions at the d.o.d. was zero oversight and then see what they come up with i'm having nightmares already. our guys it's time for a break but coming up next we have show and tell a phantom backer our use of the best way for women to keep from getting pregnant is to keep their legs shut someone to talk to tend the field philip venture about the never ending stupidity about sex and women coming out of the republican party. going to take three. three. three. three. three. three brokers video for your media project free media. dot com. ten thirty pm i

well, the first scenario which is the ambiguity.dy see a number of states in the region thinking about ambiguous capability of their own. a few years ago as the iranian capability rose, you saw the gulf cooperation counsel announce they were interested in uranium, and, of course, just for peaceful power production purposes, but they wanted to make it clear they could also get the capability going. it's not clear they made very much progress on this. the one to watch, most clearly, is saudi arabia, which is, again, from wikileaks the king who said cut off the head of the snake. it was his advice to the united states, and the king of bahrain has had similarly subtle advice. presumably, they could go out and buy a capability from pakistan, from some other place. whether or not buying a full capability or just try to assemble the component parts and the iranians knew, too, they were a screwdriver away, i think that could be a likelihood. hard to predict what middle east looks like after an israeli strike looks like six months after much

they would figure out the ambiguities in the rules, but nothing has been done. people can follow the rules, they just change them. him the rules should be that you have to be breathing. i think they can follow that rule. they have to actually break the wills, they have broken the rules since then, and under what rules, if any, do they currently operate? that is my first question. let me look at my list here. last week, you had the "it gets better" video. i thought the video, all the of 20 years later, was excellent. bullies should have been dealt with long ago, you did a great job on the video. there is a lot of other bullying that goes on the sides anti-gay bullying. there is anti republican bullying and anti conservative bullying that goes on. it is not just going on by individuals, it is going on by members of your own force and police patrol special. they break the rules on a regular basis. [chime] >> next speaker. go ahead. >> thanks, clyde. thank you for receiving me. i would like to begin by asking a question. is in a crime to give a police oic

he believes a number of ambiguities in this rule are going to be worked out and that the bank is goingto be just fine. keep in mind there is concern that the volcker rule is going to impact the profitability of the market-making or constrain the market-making operations of these banks. but he believes because countries, including canada and japan, and germany have expressed concerns about the liquidity pressures that could come to bear because of volcker, he believes those ambiguities have been worked out. that being said, he also provided investors probably with the most detailed look ever at a bank's trading operations, breaking out by product what jpmorgan makes by revenue trading these products every quarter. it's heavily are on the derivatives business, that it's said it's better to be a bigd derivatives trader like jpmorgan, that puts you in a positive position, a dominant position in that area. >> so mary, now that we've got a lot more clarity in terms of the volcker rule, and how they're feeling about the volcker rule, do you think, number one, we're going to get some clarity o

i can't make the decision ambiguous. >> it's tough to have something like that happen. and it's especially hard to look at, you know, in the tapes and things like that. but it's just more fuel to the fire. >> reporter: this april, ryan lost the spark in that fire. mark cody, the coach who recruited and inspired ryan left for the university of oklahoma. >> i felt like he got me back to the place where i was during my youth. and just really believing in myself and hatching the confidence and having the mental state to really want to push through everything all the time. i wasn't angry at all. because i think i had gotten from him what i really needed, and that was -- i think we both benefited from each other greatly. i was ready for a change. i was ready for a new coach, and ready to get something -- take something new from a new leader. >> reporter: keith moore is that new leader, and is springboarding ryan's success. flores is undefeated. the top heavyweight in the nation. and pinning opponents in record time. >> i looked at it as, from a perspective of, let's take the

and i think so many americans as well, there's an am bive lens and an ambiguity about their feelings, about when it comes to life and at what point do you choose to raise a child who has difficulties and what point is it your responsibility to do to is it -- to do so? that's not an easy yes-no situation. it's something that should be thought through. chris: people that have moral concerns about it, when asked about it, they may have moral concerns and they probably do because i take people at their word with you also we have a new statistic from an institute which everyone believes is quite credible, 40% of people who have unwanted pregnancies have abortions. so even though they have qualms and concerns they go ahead in many cases and have an abortion. >> moral certainty is very difficult and perm. and we've reached the point in this country where not often enough do we have tolerance for people's personal decisions when faced with remarkable challengeless. we each have to respond to it in our own personal way and joe's column moved me. look, whatever you think of rick santorum and hi

. >> this was ambiguities at baptist church to recruit mentors.t's part of a larger program to stem the cycle of violence in the city. tonight's kickoff by church leaders, adults and youth groups were meant to coincide with events around martin luther king day. jason hill memorized the speech. >> i have a dream that my four children will live in a nation will not be judged by the color of their skin but their character. >> there were testimonials from mentors and those who benefited. >> biggest part we can have and we can share with the youth is to genuinely, genuinely give them our heart. >> they are in school and having someone to come and talk to. >> we honor the dream of dr. martin luther king. we connect young people with dreams field adults. >> plenty of dreamed filled mentors stood under a they filled out mentor cards. >> one way do get kids to focus on college and show them what the results can be. we have had experience mentoring but why is it important, why do you do it? >> i think that leadership, we're responsible for our community. if

durham is a masterpiece of structure, and that makes it, in a way, a slightly ambiguous building becauseurham is undoubtedly a romanesque church. in fact, it is a massive romanesque building, one of the largest, but it also has gothic elements in it. in the 19th century, archaeologists defined the gothic style as having three essential characteristics-- the pointed arch, the rib vault, and the flying buttress-- and durham has got all three of these. it's got pointed arches in the nave of the building. durham's also got rib vaults. in fact, it's perhaps one of the first buildings in europe consistently to use rib vaults throughout the whole structure. and, finally, durham does have flying buttresses. you can't see them from down here below, but they do exist up in the dark triforium, supporting the gallery roofs, of course, but also taking some of the lateral thrust of these great vaults outwards and downwards onto the ground. do these three features make durham a gothic building? of course they don't, because durham, like every other romanesque church, perhaps even more so, supports the

we have not elected to offer our facebook application base of ambiguities in the privacy protection act. unlike most federal privacy statutes, it could be read to offer explicit consent to authorize disclosure on information that they so desire to share. the friction places a drag on social innovation that is not present in any other median, including music, books, and articles. recognizing this, the house recently passed by partisan bill hr-2471 that clarifies the ability to leave the opt-in standard for privacy undisturbed. we believe this approach is workable and consistent with our members' expectations and desires. the bppa singles out one kind of data sharing. we could encourage and measure holistic review for the 21st century. one designed to balance the desires and privacy expectations of consumers. such a review will understandably take considerable time and effort and we are ready to assist. in the interim, it's our hope that the senate will see the value and quickly approve hr-2471. again, i thank you for the

inspection team will then write down in some detail what they believe the ambiguity was.the uss 14 will then in response to that right on what they observed and what they believe if they are able to give it a response to the russian team at that time, with the situation is or what the clarifying information is. for those things they are not able to work on site, they may ultimately end up in this bilateral consultations commission in which we work through whatever the issue was. sometimes it is simply of procedures we need to be able to stand in a different place to see the item of inspection more quickly, or it wasn't absolutely clear because of the lighting conditions but was there or something like that. but each one of these things is not unusual in this almost worked through a very short period of time. jumping out submarines. the difference is the flow. when they arrive at that base de contact the tco. which ones are on the base the would like to inspect and they then are briefed on the of configuration of that particular submarine and good given an opportunity to d

>> what i think is ambiguous is having a cyclical bounce and we're having it for good reason. a tremendous amount of liquidity has been put into the system by the federal reserve and other central banks. the savings rates has come down from over 6% down to 4%. that's another stimulus in the system. and let's not forget also that some how europe mentioned to press me pause button on the crisis and having a good cyclical bounce and markets are right to reflect it the question is can we transform that into a secular bounce and the jury's still out on that. >> susie: yesterday ben bernanke was saying the recovery was frustratingly slow, given today's news do you think fed policymakers need it rethink their strategies of the super low interest rates? >> i think that everybody would agree that the last thing you want to do right now is derail the cyclical bounce. so don't look for the fed to do anything that would be a headwind to growth. i don't expect it to be changing its language about interest rates. i expect them to continue to tell us they'll very accommodating and everybody'

which may have in some ways contributed to the kind of almost kind of bumptious am a ambiguous. but i think his education and i think it's a broader education than people think. people think of washington as well, yeah, he read. he read farm books, you know. and the fact is washington was remarkably innovative farmer. he understood and acted upon the realization that tobacco tended to destroy the soil rather quickly. and he was really ahead of almost everyone else in terms of turning away from that dependence on a one-crop economy. and he conducted all kinds of agricultural experiments here at mt. vernon. came up with all kinds of new -- he invented a plow, for example, specifically designed. he had that kind of -- he loved gadgets, you know. if you go into his study, you'll see his wonderful chair, which he bought i believe in philadelphia. and basically, you could rock in the chair, and there is a pedal. and it will sweep the flies away. and you read the accounts of the constitutional convention in 1787 where next to one another, the delegates found most annoying thing to be t

you know, i'm ambiguous about that. i think the law made a tremendous contribution that requiring that schools pay attention to every group. it isn't fair to have a group, a school with 80% of the school in affluent and the parents read to them at home and they're doing fine, so the administration of the school says, look, we have a great school because 80% of our kids are doing great. and then another group that are forgotten in the school. that's the impulse that said, look, you have to publicize the academic achievement of every group. let's keep track of them. setting up a grade card system for them on the other hand on which one of these groups failing to meet the bar each year and the whole school is labelled failing is basically a pass/fail system for the whole system, a lot of people are sympathetic to that. what the trend is, and basically, this will eventually be fixed when congress rewrites the law. we don't know how they'll do it. but a lot of people are pressing for a system in which as you mentioned the wa

that's not ambiguity. it's what the law says. but it's actually easier to satisfy those requirements online than off. the statute's authors, getting a customer to sign a separate document with pen and paper in person and to play a movie, could be offered a play and share button right alongside it, allowing them to both show the video and post that information in social networks. i think it would be quite radical to assert that it does not require written consent under the statute. it is contrary to the east sign act and to all of the case law that i've seen. and to get case by case consent rather than one-time authorization. finally, i want to note that hr-2471 has a lot of problems and this is some opportunities for reasonable compromise. i'll just note a few. changes to the statute apply to every disclosure, not just those in social networks. by rushing to address netflix and face boork, the bill reduces privacy in many other settings from law enforcement to behavioral advertising. by specifically mentioning internet, i'm conce

and the inspection team within right down in some detail what they believe the ambiguity was.he u.s. as will respond to that what they observe and what they believe, if they are able, to give a response to the russian team at that time, what the situation is our what the clarifying information is. for those things that they're not able to work out on site, they may ultimately end up in this bilateral consultative commission in which we work through whatever the issue was. and sometimes simply procedures, we need to be able to stand in a different place to see the item of inspection more clearly, or it wasn't absolutely clear because the lighting conditions, what was there or something like that. each one of these things is not unusual. it's almost always worked through in a very short period of time. jump now to submarines. difference is it's a float. they take first when they arrive at that pace, contact the tco which something of the sub range on the base they would like to inspect. then briefed on the configuration of that particular submarine and then they're given an oppo