. >> march 22, if that's ameanable to the motion-maker? >> yes. >> and seconder? >> yes. >> so on the motion to continue this matter to march 22 -- [roll call] >> excellent. that matter has been continued to march 22. we'll move on to item number 17. 2016-014684drp at 2622-2624 greenwich street, request for discretionary review. >> good evening, commissioners. dav david lindsay, department staff. this includes the infill of a three-story light well on the east side. addition of a deck on the west side. and reconfiguration of the two dwelling units. it's been reviewed by staff pursuant to planning code 317 and it's been determined that it's not tantamount to dwelling. it's not seeking variations to requirements of the planning code. the subject property is on the north side in the marina neighborhood. circumstance yeah 1912 house occupies a downslowing slop, 25 feet wide, 113 deep. rh-2 zoning. 2622 occupies the third floor. 2624 occupies the entire second floor and a portion of the ground floor behind the garage. both units are condominiums and currently vacant. t

we'll come back again at a future hearing and then if the commission is ameanable, we can have approval only for a certain amount of time frame and this will help to rectify the enforcement issue. that's the issue, that it's not there legally, so we have to move it forward somehow, either move it forward with enforcement proceedings, as we normally would. or allow it, basically. >> commissioner melger: so would it be possible for us to act on what -- the motion that is on -- in our packets today, disapprove or defer enforcement until the end of -- no? >> not typically. since -- and i might have planner kwiatkowska come up -- >> if you approve it for a two-year time frame, it's the same thing. >> commissioner melger: we can put it on the consent item? >> yes. the motion before you is only for disapproval. so you can direct staff to create a motion, include a time limit for the motion. and then we'll bring it back forward for the commission. and since it seems not super controversial, put it on the consent calendar. >> commissioner melger: i would be inclined to do that. i wouldn't want t