although amelkovich's driver's car may drive sideways contrary to the laws of physics, but here this more cheerful. well, he actually jumped not even under the wheels at the door, just drunk. yes, he is also no, well, you can, well, probably, to sit at home, since he does not know how drink drunk you can live. well, if some go behind the wheel like that, it’s already scary, the driver has not violated any rules for a pedestrian. it has no advantage here. he is not on a zebra on the roadway, however, usually in such cases, the inspectors. all the same, they accuse the driver of violating clause 10.1 of the traffic rules, he could not stop when dangers arose and avoided a collision, blaming the driver for such an accident is absurdly the case of the driver omelkovich. maybe they'll stop anyway. there is hope. but the car is broken, and here the prospects for their optimism are not 54.000 inspire me with pleasure our friend's jump cost so far only the beginning. it is possible to seek material damage from a drunken pedestrian, provided, of course, that the charges against the driver are