but he says the greatest threat to america's national security today is russia. >> in russia we have nuclear power. we have one that not only has the capability to violate the sovereignty of our allies and do things that are inconsistent with our national interest but they are in the process of doing so. so if you want to talk about a nation that would pose a threat to the united states i would have to point to russia. >> he says if confirmed he wants to reassess the u.s. strategy against isil. >>> boko haram has reportedly offered to release 219 schoolgirls held captive for more than a year in exchange for detained leaders by the group. the offer is similar to one made last year. that deal fell through at the last minute. >>> new numbers from the united states show the devastating impact of the civil war in syria, more than 4 million people have now fled the country to escape fighting. another 7.5 million have been displaced inside syria. as our correspondent reports, it is the world's worst refugee crisis in more than two decades. >> reporter: 4 million and counting. refugees in jo

the minimum criteria we need to remove sanctions on this regime and rather than enhancing america's national security interest, in fact this deal threatens it. >> many american jrues areews are lobbying for a no vote. >>> today joe sestak announced he cautiously supports the iran deal. the former congressman said quote, i am supportive of the nuclear agreement with iran if for no other reason than iran could have bomb grade material for a nuclear weapon within 30 days of today. this agreement sets back that clock for at least one year, if not 15 years. >>> closer to home this berks county man is accused of driving into a barricade at the u.s. capitol building in washington, d.c. he says he hit the barricade intentionally this morning. authorities say he appeared imbalanced. he is from reading. he says he was upset over a clothing patent. investigators found nothing suspicious in his car. >>> a delaware woman, a mom, is accused of whipping her child with an extension cord. this right here is nivia brown of dover. police tell nbc 10 she's accused of using that cord to hit her 6-year-old daughter becaus

the frontline of the battle for national security is america already losing the cyberwar? less than an hour from the closing bell, start the countdown. breaking news, we have 58 minutes to go before the closing bell rings and we have a story the goes beyond a simple technology story. the internet of everything. your phones, finis kerrimac cecil alarm systems are putting america's national security at risk as corporate responsibility is increasingly linked to national defense. twitter is the latest target. fbi director james comey regulated efforts to identify and report accounts linked to terror. the fbi telling fox business exclusively that twitter must do more. what is twitter doing and not doing enough of to stop terrorists from using its site to recruit and carry out violent acts? a fox business exclusive, morgan right, and with us fox news military analyst bob scales and the president of the financial research firm whispersnumber.com. twitter missed the whisper number john had put in, stock is getting hammered today. does twitter have to do anything? >> yes they do. t

the tough questions and make the decision about whether this is in the best interest of america national security. charlie: there are lots of senators who have not announced what they're going to do. understandably they say they want to see the bill and hear the testimony. principal among them is senator chuck schumer who is said to be a crucial vote in all of this because of his leadership of the senate. sen. kaine: absolutely. let me tell you the dynamic that i see right now and then i would love to maybe talk about the substance, things i see that i like and questions i have. on the dynamic, i think it's important we take the time to dig into this and get it right. the reason we wrote the review act, frankly congress was kind of blundering in writing threatening new sanctions in the middle of the negotiation which even is really leadership in military leadership said, hold on. then it could blow up because of your bad faith rather than iranian action. the letter of 47 to the leader of iran -- there's a lot of things that are not the coming the body and our institutional role. we wrote this act

national security, i do not see how you can. >> you've taken large swathes of iraq. >> my opinion is they must be removed out of syria and iraq. for americanal security. not with american soldiers. it needs to be iraqis. the problem is that bashar al-assad's government will never be able to rally enough syrians to go and success li fight the extremists. there has to be a new government that is able to rally the majority of civilians to do that. >> i think syrians have taken the lead. those that - whether the die hard supporters, who are not huge, but there are a lot of people who are de facto supporters, chose that this is the best job they have. if they deal with the syrian government. the entire world should do so. >> it's not about dealing with the president or the syrian government. it's about authority in their hands. >> this constitution, 23 authorities in the hands. hopefully they convince the opposition to come and deal with it. >> they need a dictator. >> they have the power. >> they'll have a double dictator. there is a situation stopping at nothing and everything. >> i have to wrap ambassador. thank you all for joining us. >> t

the commitments can be verified, then, yes, i think this could be in the best interest of america's national security. i'm going through the hundred-plus pages and the appendices to determine whether the details match the talking points and doing independent work, as are my colleagues, to determine whether the inspections regime is sufficient, that the commitments will be verified. those are the two questions i'm digging into. >> rose: do you believe there are members of congress who are inclined not to support this, but seeing the evidence as described by the president, because the president believes this will keep iran from getting a nuclear weapon, do you believe the people are prepared to listen to the testimony, the administration, the experts and vote for this, that's a possibility? >> yeah, very good question. my answer is i sure hope so, because i would hate to think that on a matter this important people made a snap judgment or pronouncement before they even read the deal and they're uninterested in the details. and my one bit of evidence that gives me hope that that may be true is you saw a

. >> reporter: it's a super bowl test for america's national security celebrations in the nation's 239thacing what some call the most serious threat since 2001. >> threat stream is very high. we don't think it's been this high since 9/11. >> law enforcement is fully deployed. authorities citing no specific plot or threat but concerned about isis. supporters possibly lurking inside the u.s. >> a lone wolf is our worst nightmare. we have nothing to indicate we have any of that going on. >> the boston marathon continues. >> it was in boston where the marathon bombers originally planned to target fourth of july. they struck early authorities say, because the bombs were ready sooner that. attack and others in tunisia and france recently on the minds of tourists hitting the national mall. >> you pray it doesn't happen. >> i see the police all around the place. >> reporter: in chicago, police are working 12-hour shifts. an extra 7,000 officers deployed this weekend in new york city. on the ground in the air and on the water around ground zero. here in washington tourists navigating a security m

the pentagon has updated america's national security strategy for the first time in years. the chairman of the joint chiefs says global security is the most unpredictable he's seen in his all days. ahead these new warnings about russia and china and isis. >>> also the woman in our wall may be the toughest grandmother in all of the great state of texas. she drove her car off a road in the middle of nowhere. even with broken bones, she didn't give up. >> i thought all right now, you've got to do something. >> got to do something. and wait till you hear what she did and how she survived by herself for days. the extraordinary stories ahead. so let's get to it. >>> to start things off, this is a big one. the justice department is investigating whether some of the biggest airlines in america are now illegally working together to screw over customers by keeping ticket prices high. the associates press first reported this. fox news has confirmed it. a justice department spokes woman tells us her department is investigating potential unlawful coordination among the airlines. cuclusi

he says the greatest threat to america's national security comes from russia. >>> and family members but former presidents bill clinton and george w. bush are appearing together tonight, and why one of them is facing new controversy. congratulations. you're down with crestor. yes! when diet and exercise aren't enough, adding crestor lowers bad cholesterol up to 55%. crestor is not for people with liver disease or women who are nursing, pregnant, or may become pregnant. tell your doctor all medicines you take. call your doctor if you have muscle pain or weakness, feel unusually tired have loss of appetite, upper belly pain, dark urine or yellowing of skin or eyes. these could be signs of serious side effects. i'm down with crestor! make your move. ask your doctor about crestor. mornings. wonderful, crazy mornings. we figure you probably don't have time to wait on hold. that's why at xfinity we're hard at work building new apps like this one that lets you choose a time for us to call you. so instead of waiting on hold, we'll call you when things are just as wonderful... [phone rings] b

. >> it's a super bowl test for america's national security, celebrations of the 239th birthday facing what some call the most serious threat since 2001. >> the threat is very high. >> reporter: law enforcement is fully deployed authorities citing no specific plot or threat, but concern about isis and supporters lurking inside the u.s. >> lone wolf is our worst nightmare, but we have nothing to indicate it is going on. >> reporter: it was in boston the marathon bombers plapped to target the -- planned to target the fourth of july, they struck early because the bombs were ready sooner. that attack in tunisia on the minds of tourists hitting the national mall. in chicago police are working 12-hour shifts. afternoon extra seven thousand officers deployed in new york city on the the ground and in the air and on the water around ground zero. in washington, tourists navigating a security maze. security says the best defense is our 6th sense. >> if you believe something is wrong, or the hair on your neck sticks up, don't feel embarrassed, let law enforcement know, saying please check this. >>

america's national security, as well as global security, will be jeopardized if the administration gets this wrong. we must ensure it doesn't. the stakes are simply too high. additionally, if iran is actually serious about re-engaging with the global community, they cannot continue to hold american citizens as political prisoners. or harass and provoke u.s. navy ships in international waters. iran should stop provoking direct military confrontation, immediately release all detained u.s. citizens and provide any information it possesses regarding any u.s. citizens that have disappeared within its borders. the fact that the iranian regime won't even do these basic actions indicates to me that counting on them to honor commitments they make around a negotiating table can't be taken seriously. with that i yield back the balance of my time. ms. ros-lehtinen: thank you very much, mr. johnson. i think you highlighted in just a minute and a half the basic problems that we have with dealing with a rogue regime like iran, that cannot be trusted, that has not been dealing with this in a straight m

on the national mall all of them going through security check independents like this one as authorities here across the country on their highest state of alert. it's a super bowl test for america'sional security. celebrations in the nation's 239th birthday facing what some call the most serious threats since 2001. >> threat treatment is very high. in fact we don't think it's been this high since 9/11. >> reporter: l.a. to d.c. chicago and boston this morning law enforcement is fully deployed. authorities citing no specific plot or threat. but concerned about isis and supporters possibly lurking inside the u.s. >> obviously a lone wolf is our worst nightmare but we have nothing to indicate we have any of that going on. >> reporter: the boston marathon continues. >> reporter: it was in boston where the marathon bombers originally planned to target the fourth of july. they struck early, authorities say, because the bombs were ready sooner. that attack and others in tunisia and france recently on the minds of tourists hitting the national mall. >> you just pray it doesn't happen. >> i see the police all over the place. >> reporter: in chicago police are working 12-hour shifts an ext

he's politicizing america's national security. >> do you think he doesn't genuinely hold those positions>> i have no idea. he used it to raise money off the internet. it's wrong. his position is wrong. he wouldn't know that his position is wrong because he's never had the responsibility to do it. i've had the responsibility to do it, shannon. i've it to review applications under the patriot act under section 215. i know what it's like to interact with the fisa court. the fact is that we can do this and protect civil liberties. how do you find out who the terrorists are talking to the united states? if you're tracking those phone numbers numbers, we're not listening to anyone's conversations or looking at their e-mails without search warrants that the court is talking about. what we say is if you're a known terrorist outside this country and you're calling numbers inside in country, we would like to know who those people are and that's the right thing to do. and as we face a heightened warning on this fourth of july weekend weekend, what the american people need to know is senator paul's

the pentagon has updated america's national security strategy for the first time in years.hiefs says global security is the most unpredictable he's seen in his all days. ahead these new warnings about russia and china and isis. >>> also the woman in our wall may be the toughest grandmother in all of the great state of texas. she drove her car off a road in the middle of nowhere. even with broken

analysis of the details bears that out, you know, i think it could be very, very good for america's national securitye got to make sure the deal does what the talking point says it does. >> woodruff: senator tim kaine, senator johnny isakson, we know this is just the beginning of the examination of that deal. we thank you for talking with us. >> thank you. absolutely. >> ifill: as u.s. critics of the nuclear agreement debate its merits, there is disagreement about whether it will achieve its intended goals elsewhere as well, including in iran. jeffrey brown has that story. >> brown: while members of congress debated the merits of the nuclear deal with iran, the reaction in tehran has been mixed. in the government, hard-liners have not come out against the new agreement while out on the streets there have been pockets of celebrations. i spoke to "new york times" tehran bureau chief thomas erdbrink a short time ago. thomas erdbrink, welcome. let's start in the streets. were there reaction from ordinary iranians seems to have been somewhat muted? >> well, a bit more muted than i expected, for sure. i me

cut the speeches and put them on the internet to raise money off them and politicizing america's national security. >> does he not hold those positions? >> i have no idea. but after he made in addition decisions he used him to raise money off the internet. it is wrong. his position is evening where. he would not know the position is wrong because he has never had the responsibility to do i. i had the responsibility to do it and i have had to review politicians under section 215 and i know what it is like to interact with fisa court we can do this to protect civil liberties. of course we want to track terrorist phone numbers how do you find out who they are talking to in the united states if you track the phone numbers? we are not listening to conversations or looking at their e-mails without the type of search warrants that the court is talking about. what we are saying, if you are a known terrorist outside the country and calling numbers inside this country we would like to know who those people are. that is the right thing to do. as we face a heightened warning on this fourth of july weekend wit

. >> i agree quakes in your view over the long haul is it in america's national security interest to do things necessary to the grand destroy? >> i do believe. >> do you agree with me that whatever regional army we may form there are certain american capabilities that would be outcome determinative and it would be in our national security interest to provide them clicks particularly i agree with that in the case of aviation intelligence surveillance reconnaissance a special a special operations capabilities. >> if a soldier on member of the military falls trying to destroy isys would you agree that they died protecting the homeland? >> i would. >> and that is the reason some of the may have to go back clicks there is no question 3500 inside and those in the surrounds checking our nation clicks come blessed. god bless you. best of luck. >> thank you. >> on behalf of the chairman let me thank you for your testimony and your service. i now adjourned the hearing. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] >> good morning. welcome. strategic communications heritage. cosponsored u

the bad news for america's national security the iranians are far from stupid far from stupid command they will use these opportunities pres. has willingly given of this agreement to thwart any effective verification of this agreement and put them on the threshold of nuclear weapons. it is best for three reasons in my opinion. iran is still the largest state sponsor of terrorism in the world. there is no common sense reason why you would willingly give these folks the opportunity to become a nuclear power. it is bad because the middle east is already in turmoil and this we will lead to a nuclear eyes middle east. if you are the saudi's were egyptians or jordanians were immoralities and see this agreement you are going to start to pursue a nuclear weapona nuclear weapon yourself if you have not already. developing on your own through purchasing technology to other states or combination which is bad because we don't need it even less stable middle east with now folks who have thousand -year-old conflict with each other possessing nuclear weapons to use in attempting to resolve those tho

national security to get rid of a vibrant middle of america the desire of america to engage in the worlds you saw this during the recession, these are republicans sort of pulling back saying we can't afford to do this anymore we have to cut the military. that became, even within the republican party. why? because people were hurting. and people are hurting at home the last thing they want to do is a well we need to be going off and doing all these things around the world. all of these things interrelate, and to me the foundational element is to make sure we have strong families are we a strong families that are together and raising children get i think it was putnam who said it's more important for parents to read to the children the first four years of life than it is to pay for four years of college. i don't think that message is out there, that the message from either party about how important this public policy issue is, of knitting the american family. >> nicole from roll call. [inaudible] >> well, obviously i talk about the importance of targeting voters who have been left behind b

. >> in your view over the long haul, is it in america's national security interest to do things necessary to degrade and destroy isil? >> i do believe that's in our national interest to do that, senator. >> do you agree whatever regional army we may form there's certain american capabilities that would be outcome dieterm native and it would be for us to provide those capabilities? >> i agree particularly in aviation reconnaissance and special operations capabilities. >> finally, if a soldier or member of our military falls in iraq or syria trying to destroyed isil would you agree with me that they died protecting their homeland? >> i would senator. >> and that's the reason some of them may have to go back? >> senator, no question in my mind the young men and women deployed right now, the 3500 inside iraq and those working for centcom are protecting our nation. >> god bless them. god bless you. best of luck. >> thank you, senator. >> general, let me thank you for your service. on behalf of the chairman i will now adjourn the hearing. >> thank you, senator reed. >>> the armed services commi

it doesn't mean we should be letting the tail wag the dog in america's fundamental national security risk, but this is something we have to deal with. starting with how we expect the deal to shake out in iran over the next few years, you sort of hear these two schools of thoughts in theories. one is president rouhani foreign minister zarif, pragmatists inside the iranian system. not democrats. men of the revolution. i don't think they're looking for liberalism western style to break out tomorrow in tehran but they are more pragmatic when they weigh the economic benefits and benefits of international engagement versus support for terrorism and things like the nuclear program and are more interested in those first set of interests for iran. are they going to gain more influence and then be able to reflect into a more pragmatic iranian foreign policy? there's a strong case to make that that's the case. rouhani was elected based on the fact that it was allowed to come to power by the supreme leader based on the fact that he would get the sanctions relief, get the nuclear agreement. he's

stand by for more of my in-depth and exclusive interview with one of america's top national security officials. >>> and we're also following the republican presidential front-runner right now, donald trump. he's finding new ways to grab the spotlight with a visit to the u.s./mexican border and a threat to run as a third-party candidate if if the republican party doesn't treat him right. we have our correspondents analysts and newsmakers standing by as we cover all the news breaking right now. >>> first, let's go to our senior washington correspondent joe johns. he has the complete wrap-up of the director of the fbi's most powerful warnings to date. >> wolf that public appearance by the fbi director and your interview with him really covered all the waterfronts. a global assessment as well as a deep dive into the law enforcement situation here at home. the sober warning from the nation's top law enforcement official isis not al qaeda, is now the most serious domestic tear. threat facing the united states. >> the threat that isil presents poses to the united states is very different in

is of state, last one being henry kissinger and domestic policy your job is to focus on america's national security. your job is not to be involved on domestic politics. that is pretty hard and fast rule for most secretaries of state. to see this, to see how deeply involved in domestic policy and politics is really disturbing. i think it will overflow into the campaign. maria: i was with a wall street source supporting hillary. a number of wall streeters are. people in six months will not care about any of this. what hillary needs to do make all of these issues, emails, foundation, the donations to the foundation, anything else the fact that she doesn't talk to anybody, no transparency, make things unimportant. >> he may be right to the extent the details on private email and servers, all of this jazz may not influence the average voter but here's the problem for her. the most problematic scandals for anybody running for president or any political office are the ones that reinforce an already preexisting negative notion about that person. so all of these scandals are reinforces this idea she is not

veteran pentagon reporter jamie mcintyre-- who is now national security correspondent for al jazeera americaeen on special assignment for the newshour. his report was produced in partnership with the pulitzer center on crisis reporting. >> man battle station missile. spin up all missiles, sound the general alarm, general alarm, >> reporter: if america's strategy of nuclear deterrence ever fails-- the beginning of the end might look something like this. >> aye-aye sir. >> reporter: the u.s. navy's ballistic missile submarines are all part of the "ohio class," named for the first submarine of the design, the "u.s.s. ohio." they have only one mission: to lurk silently, deep beneath the ocean, ready to rain nuclear devastation on virtually any target, anywhere, anytime on orders of the president. submerged just off the coast of hawaii, the 180-man crew of the "u.s.s. pennsylvania" demonstrated for the pbs newshour an abridged version what it practices every week the sub's at sea. the submarine's video screens displayed only unclassified data, and the navy reviewed our footage to ensure nothing w

many worry islamic extremists may try to crash america's birthday party. national securityennifer griffin has the story tonight from the pentagon. >> reporter: as americans prepare to celebrate that which u.s. military commanders say threatens terrorist groups like isis the most freedom, the fbi is setting up command centers in cities across the u.s. to share intelligence and information with more than 100 joint terrorism task forces ahead of july 4th. >> unlike al qaeda of the old days there doesn't have to be and won't necessarily be a command and control relationship between somebody instigates an incident and isil as an organization. they're self-radical a'sed, self-socialized people on social media. are we concerned about that? absolutely. >> reporter: in new york city the police are deploying counterterrorism officers. mobile radar detection on planes and trains and security cameras across lower manhattan. >> we have hotel teams that will be working with the hotel security people reinforcing what we always do. which is if you see something say something. >> reporter:

many worry islamic extremists may try to crash america's birthday party. national securityorrespondent jennifer griffin has the story tonight from the pentagon. >> reporter: as americans prepare to celebrate that which u.s. military commanders say threatens terrorist groups like isis the most freedom, the fbi is setting up command centers in cities across the u.s. to share intelligence and information with more than 100 joint terrorism task forces ahead of july 4th. >> unlike al qaeda of the old days there doesn't have to be and won't necessarily be a command and control relationship between somebody instigates an incident and isil as an organization. they're self-radical a'sed, self-socialized people on social media. are we concerned about that? absolutely. >> reporter: in new york city the police are deploying counterterrorism officers. mobile radar detection on planes and trains and security cameras across lower manhattan. >> we have hotel teams that will be working with the hotel security people reinforcing what we always do. which is if you see something say something.

america, israel and the world. it's the single greatest national security threat facing america. >> you gave a powerful floor speechay. which you stated that mitch mcconnell had lied to you. this was about the import export bill basically corporate croneyism where we i guess, back up give loan guarantees to billions of dollars, the taxpayers do. did he or did he not say to you there is no deal? that this wasn't going to come up? that's the crux of it. either what he said to you is true or not true. >> right. >> what is the bottom line? >> he said it multiple times back in may when we were debating trade promotion authority tpa. i asked him at a senate lunch t. looks like a deal had been cut, i asked him, what deal did you cut? he said three times there is no deal. there is no deal. there is no deal. he said it not just to me but to all the other republican senators. al friday on the senate floor i recounted here's what he said. and his actions were directly contrary. >> but there's a poll that came out. and it's fascinating, the republicans have lost 18%. here's what i'm trying to understand. in 2013 every republic

mean we should be letting the tail wag the dog and not doing something that's in america's fundamental national security interest but this is something we have to deal with. so starting with how we expect the deal to shake out in iran over the next few year, you hear these two schools of thought and theories. one is president rouhani the prime minister these are pragmatists. they're not democrats, they're men of the revolution. i don't think they're looking for liberalism wen style to break out tomorrow in tehran but they are more pragmatic when think weigh the economic benefits and the benefits international engagement versus support for terrorism and the nuclear program and are more interested in those first set of interests for iran. are they going to gain more influence and then be able to reflect into a more pragmatic iranian foreign policy? there's a strong case to be made that's the case. rouhani was elected based on the fact and allowed to come to power also by the supreme leader that he would get this nuclear agreement. he's going to have tremendous credibility and leverage. we have parliamenta

legal protections and usually a -- and usually at great sacrifice to our security and to america's stature as a law-abiding nation. and whenever these issues, the people that want to go in that direction try to fan the flames of fear rather than trust. even though i think they are all -- there is all kinds of evidence that's responsible intelligence operations committees like ours actually strengthen the capital city -- the capacity of these agencies to defend us. they made it more possible that they would do their job well and efficiently. also this argument totally ignores the effect of limiting democracy upon the public process. if you just say we're going to \i you just say we're going to turn off the constitution for a while, it is not an innocent thing. you kill the whole public process. you prohibit debate this should be heard. performs at can follow. the right of the public to be heard on these great issues. i think it is a hard argument to make a but i am confident that what we did and how we tried to do it in the spirit of what we did is the best way of protecting our country. >> rick and pat. >> it is

both reactions are detrimental to our national security interest. it is time for america to come back. and come back we will. and the way you come back is to make sure the next president must be an informed and decisive commander-in-chief. ready immediately to deal with the threats i have just described. we have learned over the past six years that speeches alone won't make us safe. if that were true, we would be really safe. superior power and resolve is the only way to be safe. i am running for president of the united states because i am ready to be commander-in-chief on day one. [applause] i am ready on day one to defend our nation. with sound strategy, a strong military, stable alliances and a steady determination. i have been to the middle east more times than i can count. as a united states senator, and reserve officer in the united states air force. to all who have served our country, raise your hand. god bless each and every one of you. [applause] [chanting "usa"] i have got one simple message. i have more experience with our national security than any other candi

there are national security democrats that are america's first before we are democrats or republicans that will work with that. [applause] we've got to grow our private sector economy. this president has turned it act -- his back on energy and the keystone pipeline. there are private-sector unions that want good paying manufacturing and energy-related jobs in our country. there are democrats it will work with me for the next president to bring good paying jobs back to america by reining in the epa and cutting and lowering taxes. the last time we had central tax reform was back in the late 80's with ronald reagan. it was bipartisan. both parties have to give up their special interest and that means republicans and democrats. [applause] by the way, i say we should pay them on a perdiem basis. you should pay them every time they stay outside of d.c., not when they go to d.c. [applause] the republicans are nocturnal like that either. frank: in the very back, back left, microphone three. >> hello, i want to thank you for being the first person to investigate planned parenthood louisiana. [

national security. i am very confident in not just my knowledge but my history of making judgements and decisions on the national security issues before america at this moment where we face multiple threats. whether it's china in the asia pacific region, russia and europe which we've covered, spread of radical jihadists across multiple different groups through north africa, middle east and even into southeast asia in some places, the risk that iran now poses as a result of this deal. and those are issues i deal with on a daily basis for 4 1/2 years now. >> steve. >> i was with you last friday in council bluffs covering your appearance there in iowa. you got a very colorful question from a local resident who wanted to know -- who comparedoa progressives to termites and wanted to know if you would play the role of the orkin man. you didn't really answer his question. but you volunteered in your answer a long speech about the need for entitlement reform. >> yeah. >> isn't that crazy? to volunteer to talk about entitlement reform? >> i heard that in this very room by the way, in 2010 when i was running for the u.s. senate for the state of florida

there are democrats, national security democrats that are america's first before we are democrats or republicans that will work with that. [applause] third, we've got to grow our private sector economy. this president has turned his back on energy and the keystone pipeline. there are private-sector unions that want good paying manufacturing and energy-related jobs in our country. there are democrats it will work with me or the next president to bring good paying jobs back to america by reining in the epa and cutting and lowering taxes. the last time we had central tax reform was back in the late 80's with ronald reagan. it was bipartisan. both parties have to give up their carveouts and special interests. that means republicans and democrats. [applause] by the way, i say we should pay them on a perdiem basis. let me be clear. you pay them every day they stay outside of d.c., not when they go to d.c. [applause] the republicans are not going to like that either. frank: in the very back, back left, microphone three. >> hello, i want to thank you for being the first person to investigate