another important aspect of the debate is the planned obsolescence of our products the american bennett london came up with this time in 1932 he thought it would be a good way to boost the economy because it would force customers to buy more. the argument it's incredibly flawed because what we're seeing is the type of innovation that actually does not put a meter in the climate nor people at the center. hoover lurie is a co-founder of the restart project a u.k. based organization that supports repair initiatives the european commission has recently ratified a new set of regulations that will make repairing easier from 2021 it will force manufacturers to make spare parts available to repair shops but crucially not to customers. now that doesn't make any sense and that's why people want a rio right so it's not something that is designed to limit what people can read. the pressure is mounting for right to repair based on 3 key pillars. first boxes to spare parts for all the products for everyone. secretary access to repair manuals. and 3rd design of products so that very easy to take apart. while