the americans in this field don't be alone later, as stuxnet is a joint product of the american national security agency and the only 82200 zionist regime, which specializes in electronic eavesdropping and decryption , remini tv service , this virus caught it security experts with pepper for the first time. kaspersky anti-virus laboratory said in this regard that after this incident , it defined our way of thinking about threats, the way to fight cyber attacks and what may happen in the future. despite the widespread penetration of this virus, half of the infected computers were in iran . stuxnet was designed for a specific purpose. iran's enrichment facilities were disrupted. part of the code of this virus, which worked for windows , was encoded to attack siemens' industrial facilities in natanz, and was designed in such a way that it identified and collected files related to siemens software . it is a multinational company in 1847 berlin was founded and is active in the field of telecommunication equipment, supply of industrial electrical parts , medical equipment and household appliances. this was no

fsb believes that the company is working closely with intelligence, in particular the american national security agency, and also the department believes that the policy confidentiality of personal data that declare is not true. the issues of the international agenda and development prospects and the possible launch of a single currency, these topics and not only will be discussed by the foreign ministers of the brix countries sergey lavrov will hold a number of bilateral meetings in cape town . for more details on the agenda, we will learn more about the agenda from our special correspondent natalia solovyova. she went live. hello natalia. what other topics will be in the spotlight, maybe some statements have already been made. really was several statements have already been made, the meeting itself is underway. here in this beautiful place. this is a hotel called 12 apostles after the name of the mountain range. here in china it 's part of its famous dining sights and mountains, and the south african republic this year is presiding over brix and getting ready to host it themselves. this is already in

know, the ceo said, the agency i'm sorry company as well has said that they have been working with national security governments or national security agencies, to ensure that americanf going back on that in a is very concerning. maria: request republicans have told me in the past ccp uses information to potentially blackmail that person, later on, this is the reason we request whether or not joe biden is compromised we know that is an issue on this program a lot, it is because of issues that are important to the american people and his response to them the biden administration has been promising report on tiktok security, security, right? we heard two years ago, still not delivered, we heard that there were going to come up with new legislation, to bandt they came up with thune bill, tiktok not mentioned i am wonk if this is smoke and mirrorors trying to make us believe they want to do something about securing americans privacy really rolling over once again for the ccp your reaction. >> was i disappointed in that hearing, would show you have this wonderful you bipartisan support for doing something about the fact that the chinese communist party has created a litt

himself and won a pulitzer prize for his reporting of warrantless wiretapping of americans by the national security agencyed a seven year battle risking jail after the bush administration come obama administration sought to force them to testify and reveal his confidential sources in a leak investigation. he never gave in and the government finally backed down. now he has written a piece for the intercept headlined "don't compare donald trump to reality winner. he's no whistleblower. he's just a thief!" can you elaborate on this? >> i think one of the things that bothered me right after the trump indictment was that there were a lot of pundits starting to compare trump to people who have been caught up in other espionage cases, including reality winner, who was a whistleblower about russian efforts to hack into and you can election systems in the 2016 presidential race. i just thought it was a ridiculous comparison because trump was just doing this for selfish reasons. he clearly came to believe that keeping classified information was like keeping gold coins. it was a way of keeping something of value and

americans were not alone in this field. later, stuxnet is a joint product of the us national security agency and the only 82200 zionist regimet specializes in electronic eavesdropping to decipher a hand in a restaurant in the most poren campus. tv, the smallest of this virus, informed it security experts for the first time, when the director of the kaspersky anti-virus laboratory was caught, he said that after this , our way of thinking about the threats, the way to fight against cyber attacks and what might happen in the coming years has changed. despite the widespread penetration of this virus, half of the infected computers were in iran. stuxnet was designed for a specific purpose , disrupting iran's enrichment facilities from the code of this virus that worked for windows, to attack industrial facilities made by siemens in an encrypted and designed manner . it was the files associated with soft it identified and collected the software of siemens company. siemens is a multinational company founded in berlin in 1847 and is active in the field of telecommunication equipment, supply of industrial electrical parts, medical eq

services testifies to the close cooperation of the american company, apple with the us national intelligence community. in particular, the national security agency and confirms that the declared policy of ensuring the privacy of personal data of apple device users is not true. the space as it has confiscated thousands of vice phones with such malware. the device is offsets were being used with foreign sim tots registered with diplomatic emissions on the embassies in russia, originating from nato and post soviet states, as well as, as well south africa and china. apple has been quick to deny the allegations and claims that it never has. it never will work with any government to insert the vulnerabilities into its products. meanwhile, china has reported the express concerns about surveillance operations inside russia by foreign diplomats using i phones. let's not discuss this with boma new york university professor handles a. michael rex involves many thanks for joining us on the program. now following the denial from apple, russia's deputy national security chief is accused the american company of lying and hiding the truth. what's your take on t

services testifies to the close cooperation of the american company, apple with the us national intelligence community. in particular, the national security agency and confirms that the declared policy of ensuring the privacy of personal data of apple device users is not true. as the size of the house confiscated thousands of i phones with such malware. the device is all such with being used with foreign sim cards, registered with diplomatic missions on the seas in russia, originating from nato on post soviet states as well as israel, south africa, and china level as being quick to deny the allegations and claims, but it never housings never will work with any government between such a song we're balanced cheese into his products. meanwhile, china as before, to be expressed concerns about surveillance operations inside russia by foreign diplomats using ice buttons. well menu you will could invest the professor and also michael rex. and bolton says the us have a right code of spying on other countries with the help of big tech phones. i think it's very uh, it's very predictable that this is going on. in fact, i'd be surprised if it weren't going

americans. representative jordan is incorrect and styling it in that fashion. nsa, the national security agency, is the principal agency involved in implementing the 702 program. the fbi can nominate a much smaller percentage of what is in the database as targets, based on its own investigations and so on. but the data is stored and collected by the national security agency. the fbi actually only gets access to a very small part of that data. 3.2%, according to the latest statistical or port, which was issued by the national intelligence about three weeks ago at the end of april. so it is a large surveillance program. there are 246,000-plus foreign targets. but the fbi getting exist to 3.2% of the database only seizes the data for 8000 of those. that said, let's cut to the chase. the fbi's querying of the database as been a foreign for a decade or more. it continues to be problematic. because the fbi is in a position of having both a foreign counter intelligence mission and a law enforcement mission. i might point out that it is congress who in 1978 said, you can use data derived from foreign i

national security council. how will russia proceed? american media reported the cyber attack on the country's institutions and its allies. the cnn website reported that in this attack, several american government agencies and allies of this country were targeted by cyber attack. the us department of energy and hospitals affiliated with john university hopkins in maryland, florida, as well as the british airline in england, were the target of a cyber attack. in this attack, which began two weeks ago, some of the sensitive information of users was stolen . more details of this cyber attack have not been released. australian veteran who was found guilty of killing four afghans in afghanistan said that he is proud of his actions in afghanistan and will not apologize . he was busy revealing about the crime and other australian soldiers in the war in afghanistan, including soldiers affiliated with the western countries, who targeted and killed defenseless civilians in the afghanistan war between 2009 and 2012, two days after the lockdown. the fate of more than 550 people is still unknown after the boat carrying migrants capsized near greece . according to reports, more than 750 people were on the boat . so f

national security threats facing the united states. it is important for the american people to understand mission states and non- nation state actors remain serious concern for intelligence agencies national security united states. north korea starting behavior toward the united states under south korean alleys continue at a high clip. even as the missile program ask progress. articulate malign and threatened behavior in the region towards the united states threatens us in the region, our allies in the region and i fear iran's nuclear program is advanced a point we have little warning if they decided to produce a weapons grade uranium and move on to the weaponization of that uranium. rush it remains a central threat one year into putin's brutal invasion of ukraine. last year chairman turner to have the opportunity to visit and meet president zelenskyy in his leadership to see firsthand the courage of the ukrainian people who were defending their homeland. the assistance and support we provide along with our allies and frustrated putin's ambitions we have clearly a long way to go and some thinking to do about how to make sure that conflict does not continue being the meat grinder

national security threats facing the united states. it is important for the american people to understand mission states and non- nation state actors remain serious concern for intelligence agencies national security united states. north korea starting behavior toward the united states under south korean alleys continue at a high clip. even as the missile program ask progress. articulate malign and threatened behavior in the region towards the united states threatens us in the region, our allies in the region and i fear iran's nuclear program is advanced a point we have little warning if they decided to produce a weapons grade uranium and move on to the weaponization of that uranium. rush it remains a central threat one year into putin's brutal invasion of ukraine. last year chairman turner to have the opportunity to visit and meet president zelenskyy in his leadership to see firsthand the courage of the ukrainian people who were defending their homeland. the assistance and support we provide along with our allies and frustrated putin's ambitions we have clearly a long way to go and some thinking to do about how to make sure that conflict does not continue being the meat grinder

national security council who has been driving this work. and the agencies who participated. it captures the biden administration efforts to drive for those critical services we rely on as american citizens. i will say that the beginning of the administration, there were minimum arm and since sectors like the nuclear sector. rob will talk a bit more about what was in place for the chemical sector. the first column you see ahead of you is the set of sectors that were largely unused authorities that could be used to require minimum resilience practices. the middle area are areas where required some level of rulemaking. looking at existing regulations for safety and applying them to cybersecurity. if we need safety for the amount of chlorine applied to a weather system, given that these are digital systems. the final column shows you the sectors where there is no ability to impose minimum requirements that we rely on. you will see clearly some of the sectors there. i wanted to show you this chart to highlight that cross picture across all of critical infrastructure. we will deep dive on the first program where major progress has been made. making those movements as well as the epa

badly compromise american national security, that we can make some of this available to jurors, but they will look being at it and just be horrified. >> and these are the records of the agencies respect not the personal records of the president. this is a critical piece of this. >> jeremy, the judge saying you can't talk to your co-defendant alleged in a conspiracy between the two, walt nauta, what is interesting -- weigh in 00 that, but also the fact that prosecutors now have to present a list of who else they think trump can't talk to. and i wonder if evan corcoran who is also a witness would be on that list. but he has to talk to evan corcoran because he is defending him in the january 6 preeb. >> i don't think it is atypical to make the determination with the co-defendant. the judge wants to ensure the integrity of this process and not run afoul of that. and we've heard from other cases in new york and in general that the former president has done these things. that list is an effort to find a compromise for the judge to make this work that understands that the former president has a right to defend himself, he has a first amendment right, but also making muring sure that

imagine a world where a federal national security agency teams up with a major research university to establish a mass surveillance program of ordinary american political thoughts and opinions. they use swarms of analysts and cutting edge technology to monitor hundreds of millions of domestic political communication in realtime and covertly sensor millions of them. these three scenarios did not come from a hypothetical dystopian future. the first to a very similar to a federal officials are doing with social media platforms now. the third scenario is not hypothetical at all. that massive violence and mass censorship program started operating in 2020. last july, the plaintiffs in the louisiana and missouri against biden presented-limited discovery of communication about censorship between federal officials and social media platforms. what we obtained astonishing, staggering, and horrifying. a veritable army of federal officials, pressures, threatens, courses, collude with, demands, and deceive social media platform to censor online speech. our evidence shows white house officials badgering white house officials to censor speech that contradict

national security agency and the fbi talked about chinese carbon and infrastructure in the united states and clearly u.s. military is the same rail and aviation systems to move material as large american companies do. there is an overly of what we call critical infrastructure and critical infrastructure in the u.s. to mobilize and move material but critical infrastructure secure and resiliency makes national security more secure and that is key to this work. >> elbow to the next. i have a friend who's was in the audience last week and said the cyber response incident, a lot of the work has to deal with state government and state regulation. t tell us how you deal with this. >> in many instances state regulation comes into play because the company in course of the cyber incident, every state has personal data, you have to tell the residents and attorney general of the state, it is relatively rare from their state authorities will get involved in response they have law enforcement investigation in the context of their state attorney general's office but it is the federal authorities to offer f the support to the entiy to help them understand what has happened to them and offer tools and

national security interests but at the same time protect u.s. citizens from a rogue agency, a biased agency or agent, i shouldn't condemn everyone. but individuals in the agency. how do we protect american citizens from what could occur? another quick example. going out and buying information from private data sellers to obtain information that you couldn't obtain with a search warrant because you don't have probable cause. those techniques are available under fisa. what should we do? >> that's clearly beyond my background and experience. thieves are very complicated questions particularly when we know adversaries are doing the same thing. what do we do under those circumstances? i think you have a tough job to figure out how to balance the liberties of the american people while at the same time protecting the country and the nation and the people of the united states? i don't feel qualified really to provide you with any helpful information along those lines. i know that it is a serious issue and a serious concern. >> thank you and i yield back. >> bill: before going to the gentleman from california, the lady from texas. >> mr. chairman, i ask unanimous consent toll reflect meetings wi

national security agencies. and so they're in a little bit of a damned if they do, damned if they don't situation because the whole point of that webinar that the americanlligence officials to sort of be speaking out about these kinds of things. and there are some people who criticize them from speaking out. and others don't. in my own view is no one i know who is formerly in the intelligence community and that includes not only sue gordon but people like john bren sxn michael haden and james clapper and others, when they arespeak speaking they are speaking not to affect politics but they're speaking because of their deeply held and strongly felt obligation to national security. and they see donald trump as a national security threat, which he is. he was when he was president. he's been one since he left. and he will be one again if he's ever the president again. and that i think to your point, to your question, and i'm sorry i took so long to get there, is yes. i do think they need to speak out about the heart of what this is about. >> i mean, look, that's everything. there's one purpose of these conversations, is to arrive at what would make the count

national security risk. why it threatens every american and why it's so extremely serious. it's not only the example of the russia invasion, but i'm sure everybody here has been in the lobby of the central intelligence agencyen and women who have died in the line of duty gathering that information which donald trump then so cavaliere tossed in front of people with secrecy and power. i think the government has to explain that. and i sometimes think the case to a jury, even a jury of public opinion is the obstruction charge, rather than the charges under the espionage act. to go back to where we began in bedminster, one thing that i am curious about, and jackie touched on it is, i don't understand why there isn't cause for a search in bed minute sterp bedminster when you have a tape of him ruffling documents and the document of iran. probably the most secret document there is. and speaking of bedminster, why jack smith didn't include the statute about the delivery and communication of national defense material to unauthorized people, which is obviously an example of what he was doing in that tape. >> jackie, do you want to take a stab at answering that? >> yeah, but those are really good questions, and one w

american leadership on the world stage and threaten u.s. national security by arbitrarily slashing international budget by up to 22%. out my colleague had sent a letter to the agency requesting details on the projected impact of these cuts. let me ask a few questions on that because the department is saying and making scott's cuts as deep as 22% when among other things, and i quote, significantly scale back our efforts to counter aggressive coercive tactics of the prc. is that correct yes or no. >> that is correct for quickly reduce efforts to deter the aggression and coercion including through the countering prc influence fund and slow our ability to enter new post in the pacific island? >> yes it would pick. >> what reduce assistance that's critical to enhancing military to military interoperability, training, cooperation, swells fighting corruption and let money laundering? >> a yes. >> with the treaties basic commitments at his payment of u.s. assessment to international organizations would also be jeopardized? >> they would be. >> you would be required to impose he brought freeze and potentially reductions in force while also building back training and profes

national security interest but at the same time protect u.s. citizens from a rogue agency, a biased agency or agent i should say, but individuals in the agency, how do we protect americanfrom what could occur and let me give you another quick example. going out and buying information from private data to obtain information that you couldn't obtain with a search warrant because you don't have probable cause, those techniques are all available under fisa. what should we do? >> that is beyond my background. these are complicated questions particularly when we know the adversaries are doing the same thing and what do we do under those circumstances. i think that you have a very tough job to figure out how do you balance the liberties of the american people and protect the liberties t of the american peoe while at the same time protecting the country and the nation and people of the united states. i don't feel peo qualified realo provide you with any helpful information along those lines. >> the gentleman yields back. i ask unanimous consent to place this in the record of the hearing. >> without objection. >> to stay to the transcribed interviews using the statements taken

national security interest, but at the same time, protect u.s. citizens from a rogue agency, a bias agency, or agent i should say. but in individuals in the agency. how do we protect american citizens from what could occur? let me give you another quick example. going out and buying information from private data sellers, to obtain information that you couldn't obtain with a search warrant, because you don't have probable cause. those techniques are all available under fisa. what should we do? >> that is clearly beyond my background. and experience. these are very complicated questions. particularly when we have known adversaries doing the same thing. what do we do on those circumstances? i think you have a very tough job in figuring out how do you balance the liberties of the american people, -- while protecting the country. i don't feel quote will fight to provide you with any helpful information along those lines. i know it is a serious issue, a serious concern. >> i think you and i yield back. >> the gentleman yields back. before the gentleman of california, the gentleman of texas, has unanimous -- i believe? >> mister chairman. i ask unanimous consent to wreckage of th

national security interest, but at the same time, protect u.s. citizens from a rogue agency, a bias agency, or agent i should say. but in individuals in the agency. how do we protect american citizens from what could occur? let me give you another quick example. going out and buying information from private data sellers, to obtain information that you couldn't obtain with a search warrant, because you don't have probable cause. those techniques are all available under fisa. what should we do? >> that is clearly beyond my background. and experience. these are very complicated questions. particularly when we have known adversaries doing the same thing. what do we do on those circumstances? i think you have a very tough job in figuring out how do you balance the liberties of the american people, -- while protecting the country. i don't feel quote will fight to provide you with any helpful information along those lines. i know it is a serious issue, a serious concern. >> i think you and i yield back. >> the gentleman yields back. before the gentleman of california, the gentleman of texas, has unanimous -- i believe? >> mister chairman. i ask unanimous consent to wreckage of th