there was broad support among the american populace. if it needs to continue, i still support it. >> any thoughts? mueller was very narrow. it was about russian interference in the 2016 election and any connections between that and the trump campaign. i think we probably should draw a line under that. aspects of the areident's behavior that worthy of continued examination by congress in its oversight ongoing criminal investigations in the southern district of new york into the president's pre-presidential behavior as a businessman. given what we know on the record of that. >> given that mr. mueller found no collusion and that the ag has ruled no obstruction of justice, was this worth it? >> absolutely. thing, it was useful in a systematic way by demonstrating america's adherence to the rule of law. i believe that everybody is subject to the law and can be investigated. lesson great procedural to the public and the rest of the world that we mean what we say. and equally importantly, on the fundamental question of there werenot problems w

support amongd the american populace for this investigation. i still support it. host: any thoughts? mr. mueller's writ was very narrow. any possible connections between russian interference and the trump campaign. is done and we should probably draw a line under that. there are other aspects of the that are's behavior worthy of continued examination. both by congress in its oversight role and ongoing criminal investigations in the southern district of the pre-presidential behavior which probably seems worth continuing given what you know on the record of that. not: given mr. mueller found collusion and that the ag has ruled no obstruction of justice, was this worth it? paul: absolutely. thing, it was useful in a systematic way by demonstrating america's adherence to the rule of law and our belief that everybody is subject to the law. and they can be investigated. a great procedural lesson to the american public and the rest of the world that we mean what we say when we say nobody is above the law. importantly,ually on the fundamental question of there werenot pro

support amongd the american populace for this investigation. i still support it. host: any thoughts? mr. mueller's writ was very narrow. any possible connections between russian interference and the trump campaign. is done and we should probably draw a line under that. there are other aspects of the that are's behavior worthy of continued examination. both by congress in its oversight role and ongoing criminal investigations in the southern district of the pre-presidential behavior which probably seems worth continuing given what you know on the record of that. not: given mr. mueller found collusion and that the ag has ruled no obstruction of justice, was this worth it? paul: absolutely. thing, it was useful in a systematic way by demonstrating america's adherence to the rule of law and our belief that everybody is subject to the law. and they can be investigated. a great procedural lesson to the american public and the rest of the world that we mean what we say when we say nobody is above the law. importantly,ually on the fundamental question of there werenot pro

tried-adjuster movement whiteuse disgruntled farmers and disenfranchise african-americans into a new populace coalition in virginia, and that meant breaking with the traditional republican leadership, or the established republican leadership in 1880's. wilson took an unusual stand. most african-americans cast their fate with the re-adjuster movement, feeling that this could be a break from politics as usual. wilson was such a deeply committed republican that he was suspicious of the re-adjuster movement and especially suspicious of it because it was headed by william a home -- confederatene, a general who had been somewhat conform minded during this period. wilson, knowing what he knew about the battle of the crater andahone was the commander, could not see fit to win it -- join a party led by the "hero" of the crater. >> you said that 400,000 for the unionught side during the war. what was a comparable number of soldiers who came the other way? elizabeth: the way to answer that question -- northerners in the confederacy, in the seceded who -- rather, northerners who chose to fight for the co

populace to run again. there is a large number of african-american former democratic voters who will no longer vote for hillarylinton or a democratic candidate they have in the ring today. she knows the writing is on the wall. i think she should stay in the background. i do not know a democrat who wants to have her with them. donald trump is going to be reelected in 2020 for a variety of reasons. primarily because a large number of the african-american electorate cannot vote for a democratic candidate who wants open borders and medicare for all. who is going to provide all of this free service? doctors are not going to get paid by government checks. they enjoy a good economy right now. they are going to go with the status quo. host: one of the other things to look out for on capitol hill ancerning comments by democrat from minnesota. this story saying that lawmakers could vote as soon wednesday on a house resolution condemning anti-semitism fronted by comments that omar made last week. the draft resolution acknowledges the consequences of perpetuating anti-semitic comments. not specifically rebuke omar. it ind