amini at every step along the way. there were some changes to the plans that were made because requirements after the planning department reviewed it, they made suggestions and we adopted those. i think the key point is that no part of it extends past the rear setback, and we did everything we can to be cognizant of that and minimize the impact in that part of the yard. that's all i have to say. >> okay, thank you. mr. sanchez? >> thank you, scott sanchez, planning department, on the rh1d district it's not a lot coverage rimer, there is setback requirements, so it's not -- you can have a building that may need code requirements that exceeds maybe 100% lot ko*rj, we've had projects like this in the past, that's because over time t zoning control can change and you have non-complying buildings which is this is a non-complying building and a non-complying structure can be expand but it cannot create a new discrepancy it cannot encroach further into the rear yard and what they're proposing here is an expansion to a legally

amini you have three minutes of rebuttal. >> mr. michelle did refer to the fact that it's taken them a long time, they did have pre-op meeting on february 20, 2013, they submitted their permit in june of 2013 as well, then it was seen by planning in december of 13 and passed through the case plan per in like a couple of days, then it went to historic and environmental review, i had no block notification in that view even though i had consecutive coverage for many years and i didn't delay any of that, that was taken up by all the planning activity. i heard nothing from project holders until i found a note -- well, i found out in may of 14 because i thought i just wanted to know what was happening with the permit, i hadn't heard a thing so then i tried to get a hold of the planner, the planner didn't respond to me. i got a note in my box on may 15th of 2014 saying let's talk, there have been many change, i responded the same day put a note in the box and i got a call back about five days later saying, oh you know, it's -- sorry this i

i'm marilyn amini ask i'm here to appeal the permit that was issued, actually the primary issue is that this is a horizontal addition into a rear yard that is not compliant in terms of the required minimum area and i'll put this on overhead i'm not sure, how do i do this, have i -- victor? the addition would be put in the rear right here, right in this area, and i have on this board and i don't know if you can see it but i numbered areas of the rear yard that are not code client and are inaccessible. are you able to read the numbers down there? is that something possible because i brought individual sheets if i could hand -- >> i can't read it. >> you can't read it? can i hand these out, it's the same thing that i'm distributing. >> do you have a copy for the parties? my time is going. >> just pause it. >> i have for myself, yeah. >> well, we'll share. >> we can share. >> i don't know if the departments need one as well. >> okay, so on this piece of paper that i gave you, if you look up, this is 300 wawona area here, there are numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4, there is a line drawn straight across