aminu, please tell me what is the reaction of the kyiv city council advice on this matter. do they somehow get in touch, do they comment on the case, or in general is there some kind of understanding with them in the context of how to solve this issue in the proper legal field? yes. in court cases , the kyiv city council, it acts with the kyiv vegetable factory on the side of the defendant, and representatives of the kyiv city council did not appear in the appeals court. at the same time, the executive body of the kyiv authorities, the kyiv city state administration, acts on the side of the plaintiff, that is, on the side of the public, with the aim of preserving of the chinese archaeological complex. such a dissonance is created in us. and the kyiv city council, as i said earlier, extended the lease agreement with kyiv ocha. the factory is located on three plots of land bordering the archeological, kytaev archaeological complex, and accordingly, there has not been any reaction after this scandalous vote, which took place on july 4, the kyiv city council does not appear in the courts of ap