that is not amnesty. amnesty would be free and clear. >> congressman king, last word. >> if you're going to lower or eliminate the penalties, that is amnesty. you do not change the rules after the game. >> congressman king, you worked on the farm bill. you get a bigger republican majority in the house at a republican majority in the -- and that a republican majority in the senate, when you write the next farm bill, should iowa farmers plan for no federal support? >> not at all. i have been a strong advocate for a stable farm bill, and that means -- remember, 80% goes to the foodstamp side and nutrition side, we're talking about a 20% going to agriculture. that means a risk management program. insurance.l crop that is the stability that we have to have, and we need to have input so that iowa farmers are playing premiums -- paying premiums that reflect the risk along with the folks in texas and florida that are getting a better return on premium dollars. that is where i would look for adjustments. but we ha

we should say no to amnesty. my opponent says he is against amnesty. he will say that he did not say that -. >> thank you. regarding foreign policy, the u.s. invasion of afghanistan and iraq, was it justified? yes or no. your preferred response to the new threat? of afghanistan, yes. geteeded to do something to the muslim extremists there and make sure they did not have the safe havens to attack again. nowerms of iraq, it is being suggested that we were not as thoughtful as we should have been going in there. we have lost thousands of lives and have had tens of thousands of people critically injured. we have spent hundreds of honoring theollars commitment to our veterans to prevent muslim extremists from having a strong world and the middle east. a vacuum in iraq and a civil war in syria is allowing that. i believe that we need to follow the campaign we are doing and protect the poetic assets on the ground. we need to train the iraqis to solve that problem with our support. >> thank you. >> afghanistan, yes. i worry about afghanistan. if the president

amnesty international accuses shia militias of war crimes in iraq. >>> strategic gain, houthi rebelseize a key sea port in yemen. >>> europe takes more precautions against ebola as a u.n. worker in germany dies from the disease. ♪ >>> now just a couple of hours from now, president obama will meet with heads of the military from the 20 or so countries who have joined in a coalition. we'll have more on that in just a moment, but first let's have a look at the spillover from the crisis effecting the region. turkish jets have attacked pkk areas. turkey says it launched the air strikes in retaliation for an attack by the pkk on a border post. we can talk to stephanie decker who is close to the border with syria. tell us more about this air strike, which could possibly place that peace deal under great strain. >>> that's right. well, that peace deal is already under strain because of what is happening in kobani. these air strikes hour, we heard from the pkk, targeted two of their headquarters. it can be seen as a message by turkey. there has been language coming out of the pkk that says be

there should not be any amnesty. we have 167,000 convicted felons just admitted to by the department of homeland security that are illegal in the united states. we have isis. we have ebola. we have to secure the border. and we cannot have amnesty. >> real quick. a point of clarification, sir. he asked about the 66,000 children that have come up to the u.s. border. what are we going to do with all them? we can shut down the border but they're already there. what should the u.s. do moving forward with policy? >> obviously, they have been working through the system and obviously you're not going to deport 66,000 children. but we have to secure the border to prevent other situations like that from happening again and yes we can work with the central american countries to make sure that they understand that they're going to be like mexico and canada and that they cannot do this kind of thing again. there's also the drug cartels involved jist as well. >> thank you, sir. mr. orman rebuttal? >> i'm not sure what the senator

the amnesty international report is damming.s is something we have heard over the last year, some of the shia militia groups have gone way beyond their agreement to try to protect and hold towns against the isil threats and have gone on to fight with antigovernment groups. now i have been speaking to a b in of shia political figures trying to gauge some reaction. we got the official statement from them. they say that this is about foreign agendas, and you'll hear this quite a lot. the idea that there are other people influencing. i have also heard is there is a fundamental misunderstanding about what the shia militias are for. they have answered the call that all iraqis have come to help fight isil, and they are a legitimate fighting group. so they are saying they are actually part of the iraqi security. >> but it does highlight the need for a national security force that comprises all sections of society. >> reporter: that's absolutely right, and that's the big talking point here in iraq at the moment. they are trying to bring

on skype from london, a campaigner at amnesty international out of mexico.has worked with survivors of torture. and out of los angeles, this man's brother has been detained in mexico for almost six years and claims he was tortured repeatedly. so maureen, the u.n. says this is a systemic problem in mexico. certainly mexico has a widely-known history of torture, but it seems to be expanding. why do you think that is it? >> well, as you said it's an historic problem in mexico. but the big shift was the former president's decision to heavily deploy the military and federal police forces to different parts of the country considered hot spots for organized crime to address the violence happening in mexico. so you had agencies that aren't really trained for interacting with the civilian population. they are looking at use of force not how to interact with the population. and you had a lot of pressure to show you are doing your job. which again is detaining people and then show them to the public, to the government as guilty people, which a lot of times means tortur

so it's not just about amnesty. and he won't be calling congress in all likelihood back to vote to authorize the use of force in syria any time either. but, of course, as the saying goes, past performance is no guarantee a future result. today, mr. obama did exactly the right thing. and he fired secret service director julia pierson for the agency's never ending and worsening screwups. a firing that i called for on this broadcast yesterday. today's firing is the october surprise. and it is a welcomed surprise for all americans. >>> a quotation, this one from our founding fathers, the second president of the united states, john adams who said, "the people have a right and indisputable, unalienable and defeasible divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge. i mean of the character and the conduct of their rulers." >> he's going but he's not gone. attorney general eric holder making a big change before he does leave. juan williams on the attorney general's profiling plans. ♪ mr. daniels. mr. daniels.

so amnesty international sent a trial observer so it's just a mockery.s hope that this happens because the three journalists are in very difficult situations and living in very unsatisfactory prison cell. fahme has an injury which has been really he has been denied proper medical care and possibly permanent disability to his shoulder. so let's hope that something comes out of this. >> reporter: how important has this case become globally? we at al jazeera have continued to highlight the incarceration for the past 300 days and media colleagues globally helped raise awareness but does it really resonate anywhere else? >> well, certainly amnesty international membership with more than 7 million members acting as supporters so i think obviously it's a very important case for us and it's almost problematic because this is part of a wider crack down we see across egypt and they have been attacking peaceful student protesters in the last weeks and people have been detained or indicted and in egypt in resent times so this is really a very important case. but whe

this issue of amnesty for illegals, maybe millions. what white house reporters want to know is anything the administration might be doing to prepare for a surge in worker i.d. card rz. the idea being sandra, you issue potentially millions of new cards you must be preparing for millions of new permanent citizen status or close to it. >> yep. that means they would be gobbling up a lot of the available jobs in the u.s. which are hard to come by right now. so the economic -- >> well, their argument is they're already here. >> they're already here and the more immigrants we let in the country, the epi, economy policy institute looked at this. the effect of immigrants on the u.s. economy, in good times, when the u.s. economy is thriving, adding immigrants into the mix actually improves the job situation. but they looked at the economy today. it is still soft. it is still weak. adding immigrants to the situation now and adding more residents to the united states now will only worsen the economic situation in this country. i point out the job

now amnesty says it has evidence that armed groups have carries out execution style killings.t also says they have been kid p thatting some families pays tens of thousands of dollars in ransome but once the money is handing over, many of the hostages are killed. amnesty warns the crimes are fueling what it called a cycle of violence with shiite fighters exempt from punishment. the senior crisis response adviser, and she says the government hasn't done enough to dismantle the militias. >> the government of prime minister has he himself has said that he wanted to have a more inclusive government. the government is new, it is not yet complete. the posts of the ministry of the interior and defense are still to be filled. and, indeed, there is an adjusting of position by one of the militia leader whose used to been the minister of transport in the previous government, and heads one of the militias. so i feel now the government has not done anything, but what it should do is initiate proceedings to disband this militias. the existence preclude any possibility of unified iraqi army,

many wanted comprehensive approach dealing with the border and amnesty, it will be hard to deal with. >> why are we bad about this? are the problems different of the other countries have sophisticated policies. some why point systems, some are investment based. we seem to be stuck in a weird thing where we had people in the country for hundreds of years. we haven't figured it out. >> we were moving towards it. midterms stopped elections. we stopped president obama saying listen, we have to defer to the democrats. we are running tough red states with a 2%, 1% hispanic population. moving on the reform will energyize the base, and democrats will be in a worse shape. the election stalled progress, but i think come november 6th, 7th, as we move into the 2016 talk, democrats will push hard on immigration reform, and republicans will have to follow suit. they don't fight the demograph. >> they won't get a presidential win. they can win the senate and keep the house not doing anything on immigration, but it's not clear they'll win a presidency if they don't figure it out. >> it's clear they w

that's where roberts is getting at the amnesty conversation.s you pointed out correctly, amnesty is never discussed in that senate bill or by the white house. he seems to be willing to take definitive stands on the issues when it is likely many voters might be skeptical of that. >> and big political stars, senator ted cruz, how does he play with latino swing voters and kansas electorate? >> a reminder, senator ted cruz didn't vote for the senate bill. he will be out there cementing support from the tea party faction of the party. it might be fluctuating. might be some people tired of him being in washington. there's a sense that washington is broken in kansas. i think what ted cruz does, he fires up the base, reminds voters if you send pat roberts back to washington, they'll have control of the senate and the senate might start working again, according to ted cruz. >> and the white house can say all they want their immigration decision would not have influenced mid terms. do you think that's true? >> oh, you know, it is hard to say, jose. they

they mislead iowans about what amnesty is. that is when you break the law and there are no consequences. you would have to admit you broke the law and go to the back of the line. we have to pass immigration reform now. >> this is an easy issue that should have been resolved a number of years ago. we have a porous border with people crossing as they wish. we should have secured it long ago. we need to enforce the laws that exist on the books right now. work long-term to address legal -- excuse me, legal immigration. we have to do that. the congressman says he has been there for eight years working on comprehensive reform. and yet there were two years when the democrats controlled the house and senate and presidency. nothing was done. we need to focus on the issue. i don't believe in amnesty. that is what this bill would do. there are 5 million people out there applying for the legal immigration process. we should not be putting others ahead of them. >> a follow-up? >> waiting for a long-term solution to immigration reform will

, they voted against reagan's amnesty. why did they have primary challenges? because our leadership has let us down. so you have the base angry and just striking out at anyone. there are republicans, by the way, who deserved a primary challenge, but not now. >> i'll give you one reason why i agree with you, the supreme court is one. but i'll give you a second. >> obama care! >> because this will stop obama's agenda in its tracks which is hurting the country. >> yes, and by the way, i'm here to warn the rest of you, since i'm one of the 1% who is already subjected to obama care. it isn't just the money. you won't be able to see a doctor any more. >> you have obama care? >> no, that mean is have no health care. everything is out of pocket like for matt drudge and the rest of us self-employed. you don't know what's coming, america. notice that it's been waived until after the election plus the amnesty. now, meanwhile, if republicans take the senate in a big way and have the house, the media has been able to get away with port

orman is pro-amnesty. he wants more government restrictions on the first and second amendment, if you believe that, and he won't repeal obama care. that's not an independent. i voted against obama care every time, and i'll continue that fight. we must stop president obama from and lamenting amnesty by another executive order. he has threatened to do that after the election. we must secure our border and respect the law. i will continue that fight. we need to create jobs and provide certainty for business with lower taxes and fewer regulations. i will do that. i have a strong record of conservative results, which is why the u.s. chamber, the same issues we talk about in washington and here in kansas. and the national independent federation of business, also the same issues, they have endorsed me. friends, my vision is our vision. most of all, i will fight every waking minute to restore our faith in government, a government that governs, not rules. a government that is a partner, not an adversary, and a gove

on amnesty i am not going to vote for amnesty. i am opposed to amnesty. >> mr. mitchell. >> the unaccompanied minor problem at the border i agree with pope francis is a humanitarian problem. i'm not going to -- it's unfortunate when i hear people like the senator trying to demonize the children that are coming across the border. we need sensible immigration reform to address these issues to address the humanitarian crisis with these unaccompanied minors. and at the same time, in terms of what it comes down to is we need people in washington who are willing to address the issues. >> and as far as amnesty goes, what's your position? >> amnesty is a misloading label because when you're talking about the 18-year-old down who has lived here all of his or her life except for six months we're not really talking about amnesty. we're talking about a path to citizenship. so it's a misleading label. >> i begin with senator risch. >> correct. >> there is been a lot of talk in idaho about the takeover of federal lands. is this a legitimate public policy issue or just politic

when enemies of our country are planning attacks and leaders in our country are planning amnesty, there is something wrong. we have to get serious regarding this nation's borders and enforcing this nation's laws. second, we need to reverse the direction and drawdown of our defense. we have seen a military reduction that is massive. everywhere, army, navy, air force, marines are affected. we are on track to have a small army then what was before the second world war. at a time when so much is expected of our military, we need to give it all the manpower, all the equipment, and all the support it needs to succeed in each every mission and come back safely. we oh that much at least to the people who defend us. we need to keep faith for those american veterans. has beenadministration an outrageous failure under this administration. even as the federal government tries taking over our whole health care system, it cannot deliver on the most basic promised take care of our veterans. this election is a moment of accountability, not just at the v.a., but all across the federal government. and ev

there should not be any amnesty. we have 167,000 convicted felons just committed by the department of homeland security that are illegal in the united states. we have isis, ebola. we have to secure the border. we cannot have amnesty. >> a point of clarification. he asked about the 66,000 children that have come up to the u.s. border. what are we going to do with all of them? we can't shut down the border, but they are already there. what should the u.s. do with it for a policy? >> well, obviously they have been working through the system and obviously are not going to deport 66,000 children. but we have to secure the border to prevent other situations like that from happening again and, yes, we can work with the central american countries to make sure that they understand, that there will be like mexico and canada and that they cannot do this kind of thing again. there are also drug cartels involve just as well. >> moderator: thank you, sir. rebuttal. >> first, i am not sure what the senator said there because of the

it involves securing the border and amnesty. no amnesty before anything else. my opponent would vote for that. >> let's get a rebuttal. >> i do not support amnesty. you have heard my immigration policy. it ends with people who are working to work with rules. roberts wants to talk about the senate as the place where good bills go to die. the senate is the only body that has acted on immigration reform. republican senators approved the bill and it is not happening. i would also stand up to say that obama should not act by executive action. that is what is wrong with washington today. nothing gets done. >> securing the border, if these people are in the country now, do we need to change the policy? they are going to be working in the system. what would you do with these people who are ready to deport thousands? -- you can't really report thousands. >> i never thought we should deport 11,000 people -- 11 million people. that's impossible. i think we should obey the law or in we should say no to amnesty. my opponent says he is against amnesty. he will say that he di

she supports amnesty. she supports more regulation on energy, and she supports the economic policies of this administration that have caused this crisis that we have today, where 4 million women have been thrown into poverty in the last few years. >> ms. dunn, a 30-second rebuttal. a 30-second rebuttal. >> you did not answer my question. let me ask my question again, because you did not answer it. in a single day of working at dollar general, you made one of -- what would take one of your employees earning minimum wage in entire year to make. let me ask you again, do you believe we should have a federal minimum wage, and what do you think it should be? >> if you increase the minimum wage, you will kill jobs in this country. that has been proven. bigger government, higher taxes, more regulations. this is the plan that my opponent supports. >> we are moving on. next question. i appreciate it, but i can't even hear what they are saying, and in order to be able to figure out if there is time for rebuttal, i ha

we should say no to amnesty. my opponent says he is against amnesty.e will say that he did not say that. >> thank you. regarding foreign policy, the u.s. invasion of afghanistan and iraq, was it justified? yes or no. your preferred response to the new threat? >> in terms of afghanistan, yes. we needed to do something to get the muslim extremists there and make sure they did not have the safe havens to attack again. in terms of iraq, it is now being suggested that we were not as thoughtful as we should have been going in there. we have lost thousands of lives and have had tens of thousands of people critically injured. we have spent hundreds of billions of dollars honoring the commitment to our veterans to prevent muslim extremists from having a strong world and the middle east. a vacuum in iraq and a civil war in syria is allowing that. i believe that we need to follow the campaign we are doing and protect the poetic assets on the ground. we need to train the iraqis to solve that problem with our support. >> thank you. >> afghanistan, yes. i worry abou

that is not amnesty. amnesty would be free and clear. >> congressman king, last word. >> if you're going to lower or eliminate the penalties, that is amnesty. you do not get to change the rules after the game. >> congressman king, you worked on the farm bill. if you get a bigger republican majority in the house and get a republican majority in the senate, when you write the next farm bill, should iowa farmers plan for no federal support? >> not at all. not at all. i have been a strong advocate for a stable farm bill, and that means -- remember, 80% goes to the food stamp side and nutrition side, but we're talking about a 20% going to agriculture. that means a good risk management program, good federal crop insurance. that is the stability that we have to have, and we need to have equity in there so that iowa farmers are paying premiums that reflect the risk along with the folks in texas and florida that are getting a better return on their premium dollars. that is where i would look for adjustments. but w

it does not include amnesty. i did not take speaker tillis understands the definition of amnesty. it is not amnesty. i have called on the president not to execute executive orders. i support the common sense, bipartisan immigration reform bill we passed, and senator tillis should say why he will not. >> senator hagan says one wing but does another. she says she voted against an amendment trying to be offered i the senate to do just that. senator hagan has filled the people of north carolina and the nation by not securing the border. we have an ebola out rate. we have bad actors who can come across the border. we need to make it clear blanket amnesty is not on the table. we need to solve the problems we have with immigration in this country. >> i want to talk about the ebola outbreak. you have called on president obama to ban traffic. beginning with the director of the center for disease control, he told me this type of ban can backfire. >> it is very clear the president doesn't know what to do. you can see the protocols were not followed. we have potential threat of exposure. the

i don't believe in amnesty. that is what this bill would do. there are 5 million people out there applying for the legal immigration process. we should not be putting others ahead of them. >> a follow-up? >> waiting for a long-term solution to immigration reform will not make u.s. citizens safer. putting 20,000 more border patrol agents in the field by passing the senate bipartisan immigration bill and bringing it to the floor of the house for a vote will make us safer. >> let me ask you this. if you are elected to the senate, would you try to repeal the president's deferred action on childhood arrivals? >> could you state that again? >> would you try to repeal the president's deferred action on childhood arrivals? >> know, i would not. not. no, i would >> is that working? >> yes. i have talked to young iowans who are using it and becoming contributing members. that is what the american dream is about. that is why my ancestors came from ireland during the potato settled to start a better life. then theymoved -- moved to iowa to begin a better l

bill: morning, everybody, sounding the alarm for what could be mass amnesty in america. a union boss warning the white house is getting ready to give amnesty to millions of illegals. martha: these reports say the obama administration ordered supplies to print work permits and green cards. they say that means they are getting ready for executive action that would take place right after the mid-term. >> reporter: they are worried about keeping people safe if the number of potential criminals mixed in with illegal immigrants surges, but the number of federal stay the same. that's why we have this official from a union with 12,000 immigration and service officers telling people to call their congressman if they want to prevent threats in their own neighborhood. the abuse of our asylum procedure, islamist radicals, the taxpayers are being fleeced and public safety is being breached on a daily basis. they claim the white house is not behind this plan but that they just watched the news, thought amnesty might, possibility and they wanted to have their bases covered. bill: what

amnesty became the issue around which this revolves. the prisoners had taken over the facility and they submitted a list of demands. a various list of demands. fly included the right to to a non-imperialist country. and, amnesty. the latter was quickly dismissed. many of the demands were met. the observers spent a day and they went through the list. most of the prisoner demands were perfectly legitimate. one of the problems with looking people,a was that most that was the first time they were exposed to how horrible conditions were in the facilities. and then people conflated before -- the horror of the facility with rockefeller's refusal to go and then the botched retaking. what they overlooked was, to rockefeller, the matter of principle, which was amnesty. if you are granted amnesty, he believed, or if he went to the first thing is they would demand that he would come into the cellblocks with them. then they would be asking for the president. what were the long-term consequences if government gave in? >> we still have not talked abou

a post election executive action granting amnesty to millions of illegals.this situation is about to get expo nen shally worse. twice deported drug dealer suspected in friday's murder of two california sheriff's deputies. white house press secretary josh ernest rejected any -- >> i would be surprised if to the white house were in a position where we were having intimate discussions with agency officials about the office supplies they're purchasing. >> he was asked if -- >> i think it is somewhat of an overstatement because we just don't know what's going on, we're not going to get any action on immigration in the week before the election and we'll see what kind of political capital the president has after the election. >> immigration services also downplayed the green card printing which is an agency practice that allows the agency to be prepare -- kansas republican senator pat roberts calls it a, quote, outrage and i will do everything in my power to stop it. immigration advocates believe that amnesty would result in increased scrutiny of immigrants, not le

barack obama and mary landrieu supports amnesty. >> now offering amnesty by executive order no matterwhat americans think. >> i oppose amnesty. we must secure that border now. >> the landreu campaign responded with a campaign ad of its own. >> listen to. >> he opposed a border fence. mary landrieu thinks that is the threat. >> joining us now michael shure. you know, louisiana is one of those southern states that traditionalcally ha traditionally been democrat. immigration is a social issue and in this senate race will it come down to social issues in terms of who comes out on top? >> it's hard to say if it's going to be social issues to do that. right now mary landrieu is trying to put the focus on jobs and her incumbency that she's on the national resources senate. that's so important for louisiana and oil-rich states. that's where the money is made. that's where the jobs come from. that's what mary landrieu wants to talk about. and cassidy wants to deflect that and say they're going to open borders and it's part of barack obama's plan for that. >> she is part of the washington estab

next i want to ask about the new amnesty international report. the organization is calling for an investigation of potential human rights abuses in the police crackdown on protests in ferguson, missouri. amnesty says police committed violations in the weeks that followed the killing of unarmed teenager michael brown by officer darren wilson. amnesty researcher justin mazzola said the militarized crackdown raises major concerns. in a presence that only served to intimidate. they used tactics such as the use of rubber bullets, tear gas, oftentimes when it was not justified concerning what was happening on the ground at that point in time. then you had local officials imposing policies restricting people's rights to actually go out and protest, whether it was the imposition of a curfew, the position of a five second rule -- people had to continue to keep walking, designated a simile areas, but anywhere else yet if you walking. these all go to show that basically, there needs to be a national review both of the use of force policy as well as police a

bill: do you think there is amnesty move coming for the election? >> no doubt about it. uk has contradictory reports saying there is just a coincidence, and another saying of course we anticipate the president doing precisely what he said he would do, extend further amnesty by unilateral action by the president and suggested action in which he would give effective de facto amnesty to as many as 4 million illegal immigrants. there is no doubt he intends to do that after the election in my opinion. bill: what is the difference between 4 million? >> in the first year 4 million. the contract would be as many as 34 million over what time period. bill: can you explain if this does go through two weeks from today circle back to that in a moment. if this does happen, what does the effect of america have on the economy, how do you see that? >> the effect has been pretty well documented by the heritage foundation. there is no guarantee here by this action that these will be people who have been here for 5-15 years. we're is no standard gets documented. this is a great fear of many

on amnesty, i am not going to vote for amnesty. i'm opposed to amnesty. >> moderator: mr. mitchell. mitchell: the unaccompanied minor problem at the border, i agree with pope francis, it is a humanitarian problem and i am not going to -- unfortunate when i hear people like the senator trying to demonize the children that are coming across the border. we need sensible immigration reform to address these issues, to address the humanitarian crisis with these unaccompanied minors. at the same time, in terms of what it comes down to, we need people in washington who are willing to address the issues. >> moderator: as far as amnesty goes, what is your position? mitchell: amnesty is a misleading label because when you're talking about a 18-year-old in pocatello who has lived here all of his or her life except for six months. we're not talking about amnesty, we're talking about a path to citizenship. so it is a misleading label. >> moderator: dr. weatherby. >> i begin with senator risch? >> moderator: correct. >> a lot of talk in idaho about takeover of federal lands. is this a public issue

they will do amnesty in this wife will be- left behind. it is wrong and i am against it.here you have it. the democrats lied about the two percent, reagan gave amnesty, and we are still paying for it today. host: last call, kingston, new hampshire democrats line. caller: yes, i'm calling about the issue. think that there should not be -- that they should not be granted immigration because of the fact that don't pay any taxes. host: would your vote -- would you vote for someone who disagrees with your position? caller: yes. host: for this november, do you plan on making immigration one of those things that determines how you vote? caller: yes. host: who is your -- i want to represent the democratic party because that's what i am. i think they need to redo their policy because these immigrants come over here and they don't want to become united states citizens because they can work and they pay no taxes. -- they get everything subsidized like food stamps and housing and everything but they are not paying federal or state taxes. host: that is joyce from new hampshire, the la

, a theme consistently hammered by cotton and a singular focus of his campaign. >> the obama amnestywant to get social security for work they did with forged identities. >> he voted against border defense three times. >> illegal immigrants, forged identities, a grab bag of republican tricks. as if all those wornt enough. two weeks ago cotillard alleged isis is working with mex an drug cartel along the southern border. >> ask to verify those claims, cotton's campaign pointed to articles on town hall, and world net daily. really. and yet this fact-free messaging doesn't seem to be hurting mr. cotton in the polls, majority showing him leading by just single digits. more evidence not negatives in the home of razor backs. if cotillardton is getting prest is from the right, for his unwillingness to sign formal pledge of hostility as if it were somehow in doubt. tonight $1 million ad is still to keep hostility on the front burner. >> should the jobs go to millions of americans and legal immigrants here looking for work. >> joining me now washington bureau for buzz feed. john, the national r

so will amnesty present this report to higher legal bodies like the icc?well, i mean the fact is that iraq is not party to the statute, so the icc has no jurisdiction over iraq at the moment. the iraqi government successive governments have really given free reign to these militias, and one shouldn't forget in the past the main target were actually coalition forces prior to when -- when the u.s. forces were present in the country. they were then reigned in a little bit in previous years, but really over this past year, especially since june, they are really doing what they want in full view of everybody. they are using military facility. they are using military vehicles. they are using army bases. and their government until now has done nothing -- >> okay. so -- >> -- to reign them in. >> -- what about the new iraqi government then? what arraignments should they put in place to investigate these abuses that your report highlighted and hold them accountable? >> well, the governor has he himself said he wants to have a more inclusive government. the governme