amnesty says arson attacks are played down and the victims of racist crimes are offered little or nop. >> we want crimes against people with immigrant background and against black people and refugees to be acknowledged and dealt with by the police and public prosecutors as race crimes. and to be punished as such. >> amnesty does not claim that police officers willfully acting a racist manner but that racist third types and prejudices can still play a role. it is an accusation the police union rejects. >> the police is very well-equipped to identify extremist groups. we're less well-equipped to deal with them. in terms of staffing them up there are serious deficits but not when it comes to respecting human rights. >> amnesty want to see better protection for refugee hostels. standards nationwide be an important first that. -- step. brent: warning politicians do not expect monetary policy alone to sort out the eurozone economy. we have heard that efore. helena: the warning as called on politicians to do their part to foster jobs in the eurozone. he said structural reforms by government

charles: amnesty plan, nixed.n texas governor greg abbott with me on that and other things. this battle is just now heating up. ♪ charles: a los angeles jury has just decided the band led zeppelin, did not steal the opening to its classic, "stairway to heaven." the lawsuit said led zeppelin had history of ripping off works by other songwriters. a federal jury said not in this case. congratulations. >>> congratulations to the supreme court blocking president obama's plans to keep illegals here in this country on fox business first, we bring in texas governor, greg abbott. governor, congratulations. >> thank you, charles. great to be back with you again. charles: great to have you back because this was such a critical, there has been a lot of executive overreach with president obama but i think probably was the most critical issue. what has been resolv though? i know initially there was injunction that the fifth circuit upheld and apparently got a split supreme court. has the constitutionality of these executive ord

the supreme court blocking the amnesty fiat.ed a statement saying the 4-4 ruling blocked one of the most unconstitutional actions ever undertaken by a president. trump pushing back against critics who say he's lagging on fundraising. >> we are raising a lot of money. when you see that filing. that was for a very short period of time. it was when we barely started. we had a day yesterday, and we had a day the day before yesterday, and we are raising a lot of money. reporter: new reports trump has raised 11 million since tuesday. we'll be taking up the race for the white house. tony sayegh and car yankeery pit join us. benjamin hall in london. benjamin, what can you tell us at this hour? reporter: three hours ago they had them ahead by 4 to points. but now it's too close to call. at stake is the future of the uk and the future of europe. about 70% of the people registered to vote. at the heart of this closely fought race is whether the uk should cut its ties with the european union, got it alone or take part in this super state. d

she's pledged to grant mass amnesty and in her first is hubz days end virtually all

she has pledged to grant mass amnesty and in her first hundred days end virtually all

that's exactly what's happened now with the amnesty case.pointment case. the president is a chronic, he's a recidivist on this issue. and he needed to be slapped down again. >> there was a decision on affirmative action. race as one of many factors in admissions processes for higher education. >> it's a smaller victory that the white house celebrated. it makes clear that affirmative action is here to stay. however race is still, will be narrowly tailored. they want the schools, the justices want the schools to insure that if they use race, it's going to be under what they call strict scrutiny. while it is a bit of a win for the administration, we're going to continue to see this re-evaluation of affirmative action in the coming years. >> and julie, a very lengthy dissent from justice alito. in reading from the bench. he talked about how this ruling he thought would enforce stereotypes that are ugly and that we as americans don't think are positive to have about our fellow citizens. >> affirmative action is one of those issues that i think is

in fact that is the real amnesty. pretending that we can deport 11,000,000 people or build a wall without wall without spending tens of billings of dollars of taxpayer money is abetting what is really just actually incorrect. it is not going to work. it is it is not good for this country. it is a fantasy that offers nothing to help the middle class and to means our tradition of being both a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants. in the end, it is my firm belief that immigration is not something to fear, we do not have to wall ourselves off to those who may not look like us right now or pray like we do, or have a different leslie. being an american is about something more than that. americans sure commitment to an idea that all of us are created equal. all of us have a chance to make of our lives what we will. every study shows that whether it was the irish, the polish, the germans, or the italians, or the chinese, or the japanese, or the mexicans, or -- whoever showed up over time, by second-generation, third-gene

that is the real amnesty. pretending we can deport millions of people or build a wall without spending taxpayer money is abating what is really just factually incorrect. it is not going to work. it is a fantasy and offers nothing to help the middle class and it is not our tradition to not help immigrants. immigration isn't something to fear. those who may not look like us or pray like us are not something to fear. being an american is about more than that. what makes us an american is the commitment to ideal all of us are created equal and have a chance to make of our lives what we will. and every study shows whether it was the irish, the germans, the italians, or the chinese, or the japanese, or the mexicans or the kenyans, whoever showed up by the second and third generation they are americans. they do look like us because we don't all look the same way. we share a creed and commitment to the values that founded this nation. that is who we are. and that is what, i believe, most americans recognize. so, here

he tweeted in part "supreme court has kept us safe from executive amnesty for now but hillary clintonpand it taking jobs from hispanic and african-american workers." let's talk about it all with trump national spokesperson katrina pierson and s.e. cupp and political commentator hilary rosen. >> can you separate s.e. cupp and clinton supporter? >> we have a smart audience. they know. let's talk about something interesting that donald trump did in that statement. he tried to make the executive amnesty, if that's what he called it, the executive action, giving a path to legal status an anti latino move. >> right. >> when obviously it's supported by quite a bit. >> right. we've seen him do this in the past couple of days. when he talked about isis, when he talked about muslims and extremists, this might be the new tone that the paul manafort has issued and if he's going to read off teleprompter, you see two trumps, one who is more retrained and one out on the trail is the one that we've all known for the last year. >> katrina? >> well, i mean, i've been saying that from the beginning, jak

you cannot call that free press. >> amnesty resorts to tricks to expose this. 100 ghostly images. at least they can be heard. there are candlelight vigils for him, but he is not expected to recover from the coma police put him in. the question now is whether he will be allowed to die in peace. he is on life support, and the family cannot shut off the machines because they do not have the necessary patient consent. >> i can imagine that the government would like to keep him alive as long as possible, because they probably want people to forget what happened. if he died now, protests would certainly take place. >> the blue house, as the presidential palace is called. after a long wait, she is able to come in and be observed, as if there were nothing more dangerous in south korea than remorse and concern. >> if i could go in and see president part, i would demand an apology for what happened to my father. >> that is exactly what the daughter's promise. they are going to need plenty of assistance. >> patients is also needed by countries dependent on crude oil right now. since 1980, af

most notably on amnesty. he was opposed to amnesty for illegal immigrants which he was running for the senate in 2010. but then he supported amnesty with the gang of 8. he flip flopped on invading iraq saying he would not have invaded iraq if he knew then what he knew later. he said he does not do such attacks for the office he was seeking an later openly mocked trump. he couldn't resist an insulting aside calling a trump presidency worrisome. worrisome you would think would be anyone but trump getting into the white house. it will be fun having marco rubio rsh back. now the quotation of the evening. canter said leaders must pick pauses they won't abandon easily. remain committed despite setbacks, and communicate their big ideas over and over again in every encounter. donald trump today appealing to voters' better natures. laying out his vision of america. how he hopes to help working men and women in this country and boost prosperity for all. >> everywhere i look i see what our country could be. but we can't

america held together by laws and to immediately grant with would essentially be a minor form of amnestyor five million illegal immigrants, kind of tears that fabric apart, doesn't it? >> well you know, what it does, it would tear families apart, right? we're talking about the fact in a lot of these families the children would be considered, legal to stay here but the parents would not. what are you going to do? will you deport millions of parents of children legal to stay here? and then, make them orphans? again practicalities of this decision are really gut-wrenching and heartbreaking. david: rich, what about the idea that a lot of democrats are saying look, ronald reagan had a huge amnesty program, millions of illegal immigrants. of course it was done by law. wasn't done by executive edict the way the president did it but what is the difference here? >> there is not much of a difference, why so-called comprehensive immigration reform didn't pass in congress because the experience of 1986, we had amnesty and enforcement was supposed to come later around enforcement never arrived. the b

she is the amnesty international south ages -- south asian director. what's behind this dramatic rise in internally displaced afghans? guest: the key factor leading to this dramatic rise in numbers is conflict. the 1.2 million that has been documented -- these are people uprooted solely due to crisis and conflict. it does not include those who have been returned from pakistan or the eu and does not include those who have and displaced due to natural disasters. it is based on conflict alone. sarah: being there on the ground, what are the implications for afghan society? guest: it is difficult to have a million citizens who have been uprooted and leave their families behind for top what we see is there has been a germanic explosion in numbers since 2012. now we are looking at over a million because of a rise in recent conflicts. in afghanistan, you have many displaced communities and some of them we have spoken with are people who have been displaced from earlier conflicts and some have an displaced for over a decade. sarah: after spending billions wagin

they denied the marco rubio amnesty bill.opped the amnesty back under president bush and the dream act went nowhere. so it's not so much that we're in limbo, it's just that we have an administration, not that different from the previous administration, that isn't committed to enforcing our immigration laws. >> woodruff: so you're saying that, what, that what should happen to these individuals? >> well, under federal law they are supposed to go home. it was noted a moment ago that they're not tourists, but plenty of them came as tourists. they just lied to the state department and lied to the american people and overstayed their vies as some if we have any sense of law in this country, people have to abide by the terms we set forth. >> well, we have a record number of people who have been deported under this president. he has hardly been a softy on illegal immigration. and we have a tremendous buildup at the border so that illegal immigration in the united states is basically at zero. the question is what are we going to do ab

and hillary clinton pledged she would go beyond obama's executive actions in regard to amnesty and push further. you had him pouting today and saying he was disappointed, but there would be no deportation of the 11 million in the shadows that this law affected. this is a hot button issue for the american public and they need to vote that way come november. there is a supreme court justice at stake. charles: i get the notion that president obama is viewed as an imperialistic president with no regard for the constitution. you are a gop strategist. i think a lot of people think congress made it easy for him to do this. where has the gop representatives been even before the november election, the mid-term election. where have they been with respect to standing their ground and pushing back so this president doesn't have a carte blanche or blank check. >> there is more work to be done but it's not as easy as wee think. there were points in the last couple years. it's a process. what's so interesting. obama said we need to decide if we are a nation that does x. we need to decide if we are a n

i'm going to execute an amnesty by the signing of my pen that legalizes everyone in the country here today. it's an unbelievable overreach, a matter of tremendous import. and it's an affront to the legislative process. it's an affront to the majority of the american people who want a lawful system of immigration, ones that serves their interest, serves the interest of america, the national interest, not some special interest who wants cheaper labor. not some political interest who's looking for votes. but what's in the policy -- what's the policy that best serves the american people, that's what this issue is all about. but supreme court, by a 4-4 vote concluded that the state should remain. and that is he blocked the president at least on that portion of the executive orders he's issued that was before the court. he's done some other things that were not before the court and are, i think would be at risk too if properly challenged but they haven't made it to the court yet. i think this was an important vote. if you remember, the judge heard the case. he issued a stay, blocked the pr

in fact, that's the real amnesty. pretending we can deport 11 million people, or build a wall without spending tens of billions of dollars of taxpayer money is abetting what is really just factually incorrect. it's not going to work. it's not good for this country. it's a fantasy that offers nothing to help the middle class, and demeans our tradition of being both a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants. in the end, it is my firm belief that immigration is not something to fear. we don't have to wall ourselves off from those who may not look like us right now, or pray like we do, or have a different last name. because being an american is about something more than that. what makes us americans is our shared commitment to an ideal that all of us are created equal, all of us have a chance to make of our lives what we will. and every study shows that whether it was the irish or the poles, or the germans, or the italians, or the chinese, or the japanese, or the mexicans, or the kenyans -- whoever showed up, over time,

this is an election year and in election years politicians use words like amnesty in hopes that it will whip up votes. keep in mind that millions of us, myself included, go back generations in this country. ancestors put in the painstaking effort to become citizens. we don't like the notion that anyone might get a free pass to american citizenship. here's the thing. millions of people who have come forward and worked to get right with the law under this policy, they've been living here for years, too. in some cases, even decades. so leaving the broken system the way it is, that's not a solution. in fact, that's the real amnesty, pretending we can deport 11 million people or build a wall without spending tens of billions of dollars of taxpayer money is abetting what is really just factually incorrect. it's not going to work. it's not good for this country. it's a fantasy that offers nothing to help the middle class and demeans our tradition of being both a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants. in the end, it is my firm belief that immigration is not something to fear. we don't have

in fact, that's the real amnesty, pretending we can deport 11 million people or build a wall without spending tens of billions of dollars of taxpayer money is abetting what is factually incorrect. it's not going to work. it's not good for this country. it's a fantasy that offers nothing to help the middle class and it demeans our tradition of being both a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants. in the end, it is my firm belief that immigration is not something to fear. we don't have to wall ourselves off from those who may not look like us right now or pray like we do or have a different last name because being andifferent name because being an american is about something more. makes us americans is of us are created equal and all of us have a chance to make of our lives what we will. and every study shows that whether it was the irish or the pols or germans or the italians or the chinese or the japanese or the mexicans or the kenyans, whoever showed up over time by second generation, third generationers those kids are americans. they do look like us because we don't look one way.

in fact, that's the real amnesty, pretending we can deport 11 million people or build a wall without spending tens of billions of dollars of taxpayer money is abetting what is factually incorrect. it's not going to work. it's not good for this country. it's a fantasy that offers nothing to help the middle class and it demeans our tradition of being both a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants. in the end, it is my firm belief that immigration is not something to fear. we don't have to wall ourselves off from those who may not look like us right now or pray like we do or have a different last name because being an american is about something more than that. what makes us american is our shared commitment to an ideal that all of us are created equal, all of us have a chance to make of our lives what we will. every study shows, whether it was the irish or the polls or the germans, italians, chinese, japanese, the mexicans, the kenyans, whoever showed up over time by second or third generation, those kids are americans, they do look like us, because we don't look one way. we don't al

will the supreme court slap down his amnesty play?al on the case and gutfeld mcguirk on a presidential candidate promoting marijuana. we hope you stay tuned to those reports. good luck with the meeting today. thank you. as our business is growing, and you're on the road all day long, it's exhausting. holiday inn has been a part of the team. you're on the fourth floor. it makes life on the road much easier. book your next journey at holidayinn.com >>> factor follow-up segment tonight. trying to pass some kind of new gun laws. four measures defeated yesterday in the senate. the issue is really extremely partisan. very hard to get 60 votes to do anything in the senate on it new cbs news poll not good news for the progun folks. when asked do you favor stricter laws on guns. a 7% of americans say yes. 11% say they want more lenient laws. 29% want the laws kept as they are. do you favor federal background checks on all gun buyers? 89% of americans favor that. just 8% oppose. and finally do you favor a ban on assault weapons? 57% favor. 38%

it would be effective inay, granting amnesty to virtually everybody i'm awfully in the country today but it did not, it would not have been able to th carry out an effective and lawful system for the future. that is what i believe intensely. i was a federal prosecutor for 15 years, we try to read the line picture it was effective and it was not effective. president j well, so the president justpen m decided that i'm going to use ma pen and i'm going to issue orders to all the executive agencies that are implied to enforce the laws of the united states and i'm going to tell them to do with the congress by the rejected. i'm going to execute amnesty by the signing of my pen that legalizes everyone in the country here today. this is an unbelievable overreach. a matter of tremendous import. it is a front to the legislative process. immigrati it's a front of the majority of the american people who want to lawful system of immigration. one that serves their interest, serves the interest of america, the national interest, not just some special interest who want cheaper labor. not just some p

this is an election year and in election years politicians use words like amnesty in hopes that it will whip up votes. keep in mind that millions of us, myself included, go back generations in this country. ancestors put in the painstaking effort to become citizens. we don't like the notion that anyone might get a free pass to american citizenship. here's the thing. millions of people who have come forward and worked to get right with the law under this policy, they've been living here for years, o. so leaving the broken system the way it is, that's not a solution. in fact, that's the real amnesty, pretending we can deport 11 million people or build a wall without spending tens of billions of tens of billions of dollars in taxpayer money isn't betting that is really just factually incorrect. it's not going to work. it's not good for this country. it's a feant that offers nothing to help the middle class and demeans our tradition of being both a nation of laws nd a nation of immigrants. in the end, it is my firm belief that immigration is not something to fear. we don't have to wall ours

she's pledged to grant mass amnesty and in her first is hubz days end virtually all immigration enforcement and thus create totally open borders for the united states. by the way, 1,5 hubz border patrol agencies have endorsed donald trump. the first time in the history they have endorsed a presidential candidate. the first victims of her radical policies already poob african-american and hispanic workers who need jobs. they're also the ones she will hurt the most by far. let me share with you a letter our campaign received from mary ann mendoza. she lost her son, please sergeant brandon mendoza, after he was killed by an illegal immigrant because of open borders and policies supported by hillary clinton. sadly the mendoza family is just one of thousands who have suffered the same face. here's an excerpt from mrs. mendo mendoza's letter -- hillary clinton, who already has the blood of so many on her hands, is now announcing that she is willing to put each and every one of our lives in harm's way. an open-door policy to criminals and terrorists to enter our country. hillary is not concerned a

will the supreme court slap down his amnesty play? legal on the case and gutfeld mcguirk on a presidential candidate promoting marijuana. we hope you stay tuned to those reports. ♪ ♪ it's easy to love your laxative when that lax loves your body back. only miralax hydrates, eases and softens to unblock naturally, so you have peace of mind from start to finish. love your laxative. miralax. think fixing your windshield is a big hassle? not with safelite. this family needed their windshield replaced but they're daughters heart was set on going to the zoo. so guess what, i met them at the zoo. service that fits your schedule. that's another safelite advantage. ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ >>> factor follow-up segment tonight. trying to pass some kind of new gun laws. four measures defeated yesterday in the senate. the issue is really extremely partisan. very hard to get 60 votes to do anything in the senate on it new cbs news poll not good news for the progun folks. when asked do you favor stricter laws on guns. a 7% of americans

i'm in favor of an amnesty for illegal immigrants.tempt perhaps to ratchet down the rhetoric that has come to define the leave campaign. well, possibly so. we spoke to some of those who attended the event, and this is what they told us. >> one of the speakers said that europe, brussels, is the most corrupt entity in the -- on the planet. and i agree with him. it's totally corrupt. >> the atmosphere was absolutely electric. >> i was involved in the 2014 umbrella revolution in hong kong where we slept in the streets for many, many weeks. in the uk, looking around, people don't care about giving democracy away, even putting it on a plate and hand it over to the eu. >> reporter: becky anderson, cnn, london. >>> just across london, the remain camp rallied in hyde park. our richard quest was there. >> reporter: it was called the big in photographic event. bringing together up to a thousand people in hyde park to stand in outline and spell the word "in," which was then photographed from the air. a clear message of those wanting to remain wit

donald trump tweeting that the court kept us safe from executive amnesty for now, but hillary clinton pledged to expand it, taking jobs from hispanic and african-american workers, and hillary clinton calling the decision a stark reminder of the harm donald trump would do to our families, our communities and our country. >> build that wall, build that wall. >> reporter: trump rode to victory in the gop primaries using opposition to immigration. to rally his base. >> who is paying for the wall? >> reporter: now clinton may get a political boost, thanks to angry hispanic voters eager to elect democrats in key swing states with large hispanic populations like florida, nevada, and colorado. a national poll last month showed hillary clinton at 62 and trump 23% with registered latino voters nationwide. a political divide that the president is clearly even more eager now to make wider. >> deporting 10 million people or building a wall with no taxpayer money is factually incorrect, it is not going to work. >> dana bash joins us, secretary clinton and donald trump are weighing in on the ruling.

in fact, that's the real amnesty. pretending we can deport 11 million people or build a wall without spending tens of billions of dollars of taxpayers' money is a abetting what is really just factually incorrect. it's not gonna work. it's not good for this country. it's a fantasy that offers nothing to help the middle- class and demeans our tradition of being both a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants. in the end, it is my firm belief that immigration is not something to fear. we don't have to wall ourselves off from those who may not look like us right now or pray like we do or have a different last name because being an american is about something more than that. what makes us americans is our shared commit tonight an ideal, that all of us are created equal. all of us have a chance to make of our lives what we will. and every study shows that whether it was the irish or the poles or the germans or the italians or the chinese or japanese or the mexicans or the kenyans, whoever showed up over time by second gene

with words like amnesty in hopes that it will whip up votes. keep in mind that millions of us , myself included, go back generations in this country with ancestors put in the painstaking effort to become citizens. we do not like the notion that anyone might get a free pass to american citizenship, but here's the thing. millions of people who have come forward and work to get right with the law under this policy, they have been living here for years, too. in some cases even decades. so, leaving the broken system the way it is, that's not a solution. realct, that is the amnesty -- pretending we can deport 11 million people or build a wall without spending tens of billions of dollars in taxpayer money is abetting what is really just factually incorrect. it is not going to work. that is not good for this country. it's a fantasy that offers nothing to help the middle class and demeans our tradition of being both a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants. my firmnd, it sis belief that immigration is not something to fear. not wall ourselves off fro

amnesty would not be the way to dothat. i think there is a process here but to claim that what came out of the senate was bipartisan, two out of every three republicans in the senate voted against that bill. so it was never likely to pass a republican house. and on this one the president was given an offer by then-speaker boehner, leader mcconnell after the election which he lost, sit down and work with us. instead you have the provocative issuing of executive actions which frankly sent us back. it didn't help solve the problem. it got us into court and the president has consistently lost there so far and basically stymied any ability we had to deal with the issue. i think the president likes to use this as a political weapon. if he were serious about immigration reform he would have done what he promised when he ran in 2008. he said he would have an immigration bill on the floor within 100 days. never submitted one the next two years. it's always convenient around election time to use this for democrats. i think that is wh

i'm going to execute an amnesty by assigning my pen and legalizes everyone in the country today. the it is an unbelievable overreach, a matter of tremendous import. it is a front of the legislative process. it's a front of the majority of the people who want a lawful system of immigration. one answers their interests, serves the interest of america, the national interest, not just someea special interest who want cheaper labor. but not some political interest who is looking for votes, but what is the policy that best serves the that's what this issue is all about. but the supreme court by a four-four vote concluded that the state should remain and that is to block the president at least on that portion of the executive orders he has issue. that was before the court. he has done has done some otherhi things that were not before thet court and i think would be at risk to properly challenge. but they have not made it to the the i think this is an important vote. if you remember the judge heardg the case, he issued a stay, block the president from going forward with his loft own law

we spoke to liberal groups, people would ask, why don't you do executive amnesty -- illegal amnesty by executive order. he said, i don't have the authority to do it. he used terms like "i am not a dictator," not a there are restrictions and i cannot do this by executive order. everybody knew the president lacked the authority to do that and he did it anyway. that lady's and jenna munn a scary thing. the president does not have that power. we have been waiting and watching to simply assert ourselves and to stand up for the constitutional powers that we have. i have gotten very familiar with article one section seven of the constitution, which says the power to raise revenue, the power of the purse, lies specifically with the united states house of representatives. when the president of the united states gets out of control and goes around congress, taking up laws of through the rulemaking process of his department and through executive orders, congress was empowered by the founders of our country to stop him, to the power the purse. we need to do that. [applause] there has been a lot of

i know the administration favors amnesty, is this part of the amnesty efforts? >> sir, from my perspective when you took a look at the removals process, when we look at cases that we've worked and individual whose have gone into proceedings and look at the actual removals for that year, the removals process can be lengthy as you're aware. if we grab someone today they're not necessarily going to be removed anytime soon because it could take a while to go through the process. in terms of the prioritization. we utilize our prioritization scheme along with the resources we -- >> i understand that. the administration stands convicted by their own actions, why haven't they requested more money if they want to send individuals home? they have not requested money. how many investigations were conducted last year? >> within this area, sir, specific to 2015? we sent out 10,000. >> okay. and those are 10,000 individuals whose identity and location you knew and you did not consider them a priority because they had not been convicted of serious crimes? >> that's not true. t

so leaving the broken system the way it is, that's not a amnesty.we can deport 11 million people or build a wall without spending tens of billions of dollars of tax-payer money is abetting what is really just factually incorrect. it's not going to work. it's not good for this country. it's a fantasy that offers nothing to help the middle class and demeans our tradition of being both a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants. sooner or later, immigration reform will get done. congress is not going to be able to ignore america forever. it's not a matter of if. it's a matter of when. and i can say that with confidence because we've seen our history. we get these spasms of politics around immigration and fear-mongering. and then our better impulses kick in. that's how we all ended up here. because i guarantee you at some point every one of us has somebody in our background who people didn't want coming here. >> realistically, what do you see as the risk of deportation of these more than 4 million people. you say we can't deport 11 million. 4 million a

is this part of their amnesty efforts? thehen you take a look at removal process, when you look at the cases that we have worked and individuals have gone into proceedings and you look at the removals for that year, the removals process can be quite lengthy. they grab someone today, will not necessarily be removed anytime soon because it will take a while to go through the process. our prioritization scheme along with the resources that we have. >> i understand that. but the administration stands convicted by their own acts. have not requested the money sufficiently to do so. how many investigations were conducted last year? we sent out 10,000. 10,000 individuals whose identity and location you knew but you did not consider to be a priority as they had not been convicted of serious crimes. >> that is not true. the investigations were sent out to the field investigators to try to locate and remove these individuals. to add another point, if we send a lead to the field or we don't have the location of an individual or if we

. >> the supreme court ruling that halts the president's executive amnesty. this is a win for the constitution. it is a win for congress. and congress not the president writes our laws and the supreme court validated that it very core essential fundmental principle. >> chris wallace is anchor of fox news sunday on the fox news channel. the president acted like it was no big deal and didn't so many to suggest that it is a defeat for his administration, but he did get smacked down essentially by the supreme court? >> yeah, i don't know that i agree with with you that it was a not a big deal. i think he was seething with frustration. and the supreme court letting the lower court ruling stand because they couldn't come to a decision was a 4- 4 tie. the president's executive action that would have deferred deport pation for 5 million people illegally is dead. it will be dead through the rest of his presidency. he will not get it through. and that is something he believed in and a big legacy item and that will not go anywhere. it is a double defeat. one of the reas

supreme court has kept us safe from amnesty.linton takes jobs from hispanic and african-american workers." in tyhe flint water crisis, the epa has given the all clear for after want to drink filtered tap water. the agency is lifting a recommendation that pregnant women, nursing mothers, and children under 6 only drink bottled water to avoid lead exposure. puerto rico has about $2 billion in bond payments due in 8 days. its governor says the island will default on its general obligations, even if services are halted. governer padilla padilla made his remarks and washington, where he is lobbying to set up a framework to restructure puerto rico's $70 billion debt. the u.s. senate should take up the measure next week. at least 78 were killed when a powerful tornado and hailstorm struck the outskirts of an eastern chinese city. the twister destroyed buildings, smashed trees, and flipped over vehicles. the tornado hit a densely populated area and farms and factories, 500 miles south of beijing. 500word article injured -- injured, 200

the program initially awarded amnesty to some of the militants that were involved in previous up restand through the program they were able to ease the tension. but they are never -- they actually never solved the problem that caused those tensions. and this pretty much calls for -- yes. after left power and came into power the program came to an end and once again with the decline oil prices and once again we see unrest and spreading because the locals are not really happy. >> you are painting a tough picture of a situation that seems to struggle to improve at least in the short-term. how much of the premium that we've seen priced into the oil markets over recent weeks do you think is actually down to nigeria? and the cuts that we've got there. and given what you just said i guess you are suggesting it is going to remain. >> well i think much of the -- i think there is a small chunk of it is due to the nigerian situation. much also is due to added optimism in the u.s. it is summertime. and i think all has bottomed out in the part of the year and the weaker players all have been liqui

to say a word about the supreme court ruling that we just got that halts the president's executive amnesty. this is a win for the constitution, it is a win for for congress, and it is a win in our fight to restore the separation of powers. presidents don't write laws, congress rights laws. this is a case the house weighed in on because of fundamental fundamental system to our checks and balances. congress not the president writes the law. today the supreme court validated that fundamental possible. >> there's a two-part question. what were your personal feelings when you're being screamed out and yelled shame, not even a year in, technically you have a lot of experience are you worried this sets a precedent for the should be in on the other foot, could this happen to the minority party? >> i do worry about the precedent here. i have an obligation as a speaker of the house to protect this institution. we are the are the oldest democracy in the world. we are of the world the free people. so when we see our democracy descendent in this way, it is not a good sign. it is it is not a good presen

want to say word about the supreme court really that we just got that halts the presidency executive amnesty. this is a win for the constitution, it is when for congress, and it's a win in our fight to restore the separation of powers. presidents don't rate laws, congress rights laws. this is a case of the house waiting on because it is fundamental to our system of checks and balances. congress, not. congress, not the present rights are lost. today the supreme court validated that fundamental possible. >> there's a two-part question, what were your personal feelings when you're being screamed at an yelled shane, not even any year in, tech also you have a lot of experience, are you are you worried this type of precedent for this you been on the other foot of this could happen now with any minority party. >> i do worry about president. i have an obligation as a speaker of the house to protect this institution. where the oldest democracy in the world. we are the ballast of the world of free people. so when we see a democracy to send in this way, it is not a good sign. it is not a good presence.

is this part of their amnesty efforts?> from my perspective when you took a look at the removals process, when we look at cases that we for and individuals that have gone into proceedings and you look at removals for adhere -- for that year, the removals .rocess can be lengthy if we grab someone today they might not necessarily be removed anytime soon. in terms of our prioritization, utilize our prioritization scheme along with resources we have. >> i understand that but the administration's stance, why have they not requested more money in their budget if they want to send more individuals home? they have not requested the money sufficiently to do so. how many investigations were conducted last year? >> specific to 2015 we sent out 10,000. >> 10,000 individuals whose identity you knew, whose location you knew, but you did not consider it to be a priority because they yet been convicted of serious crimes? >> that is not true. those investigations were sent out for field investigators to locate and try to remove these indiv

he was trying to usurp that power and give a class of people amnesty. you see two wonderful women to my right with differing views on donald trump and immigration. the republican party has different views. some want all illegal immigrants deported, some want amnesty, path to citizenship. we all agree before that can happen, before congress can act, a wall or form of border security has to happen. this unites the republicans. so much is made by the left over how in disarray the republicans are. >> you don't think this hurts donald trump among latino voters in nevada, colorado? >> people that are latino, pew research did a study that said 45% of latinos thought illegal immigration was a positive thing for the country. it is not unanimous opinion amongst everyone. >> not just donald trump talking illegal immigration, also deporting 11 million that are -- >> it is the way he is doing it. ridiculous to think the border is secure, van. the border is not more secure under barack obama and most of that net negative may be from mexico, doesn't count guatemala, h

the executive amnesty from president obama wiped away immigration rules written where i dong, givingle illegally in the country. added that clinton's immigration policy would, he says, give away american jobs and make the u.s. less safe. and without saying trump's name the president seemed to be addressing the presumptive g.o.p. nominee in his remarks today as well. >> it is my firm belief that immigration is not something to fear. we don't have to wall ourselves off from those who may not look like us right now or pray like we do or have a different last name. >> we will get opinions again, 10:00 a.m. monday morning. likely include a rid cal decision -- critical decision on abortion regular layings in texas. a tied there could make a difference. we'll see. >>> lisa says this prove that the president's executive actions have gone too far. 244 executives and lately the courts have been knocking back. you say it's okay. >> a couple things going on. this is not a rebuke of president obama at the supreme court level. it's a reminder that we have a tie court right now and we normally have