some of the reporting that came out of hanoi suggested that we have no added amoco and biological weapon department on the table in negotiations, have we? again they gets to the whole goalpost thing that we keep harping on. >> since the day i arrived and adopted this portfolio the effort to bring a more pertinent piece to the korean peninsula has evolved the elimination of all weapons of mass destruction. it would hardly make sense to remove the threat of nuclear weapons from north korea and endorse the continued presence of chemical, biological weapons and be acceptable to us, be unacceptable to north korea's neighbors including russia, china, japan and south korea. but, also to suggest moving the goalpost is in defiance of the actual history of the issue of north korea's mass weapons about the structure. they are as pointed on the issue of law school and biological weapons, and ultimately the process is that the antecedent for those sanctions. those sanctions, which are international sanctions imposed unanimously by the security counsel would also look to the elimination of biological