so let's bring amon jaffers in for more. the justice department wording was extremely strong -- really tough language from doj. i want to read an excerpt to give you a sense how strong this language was, writing apple attacks the allritz act, the 1789 law the government is relying on, attacked as air cake, the court order as leading to a police state, and the fbi investigation as shoddy, while extolling itself as the primary guardian of americans' privacy. the department of justice saying apple is holing itself up on a pedestal as the guardian of america's privacy when in reality the department of justice says this is about terrorism and access to a particular phone under a legal warrant. this is this back and forth blizzard of paperwork that we're going to see now between apple and the government ahead of this march, end of march hearing, where we'll see both parties in court and they could argue it out in front of the judge. >> the public opinion is so divided on this. the latest nbc news/"wall street journal" poll basical