. >> absolutely, right we should continue refer to it as amulta cult er and stop the public raid of the library and don't give money to the friends of the library, and i am a little bit shagrined or shocked that you fail to understand what really is at stake here. first of all, the words subnative and the words substantial are not synonyms. and what we are really talking about is something substantial. and the crucial point is whether at the time the public had its only opportunity to make public comment, that they knew the substance of what they were commenting on. if you find that there are things that come before the final action, that the public should ahave an opportunity to comment on, then that is substantial change in the public should have been given an opportunity to comment again, that is the law. and the reason that it is the law is because the body itself needs to be informed of the testimony, judgment, perspective of the citizens that this applies to. this is why we have public comment provisions. it is not for the benefit of the commenter. it is for the benefit of the del