this is amy coney barrettnd taking issue with the portion of hiarment. take a look at this. [veo clip] >> a try -- a way of try to do with our president or the constition itself? it's explaining why the procedural limitations are ok but some are not. >> we certainly have tried to craft an argument that is consistent with all of the courts precedents. but we think there are good reasons why there would be a limitation. even if not a procedural limitation. we can see this in james madison. 367 were james madison he singles out one state, south carolina for a program for their partisan gerrymander. it was found right in the state constitution. that's the rule that my friends on the other side are advocating r. they are saying you can have a partisan gerrymandering. host: procedural substance so not so much the matter of the test but pulling things from the history and say like the madison comments supports the procedural substance in mind. guest: we grounded in precedents, your honor, and tax and structure and history. -- text, and structure and history. guest: justice barrett