stephanie: amy klinger, thank you for joining us. ou. ♪ geoff: jury selection started ynin ving systems $1.6 billion defamation suit against fox news. the voting technology company is suing the right wing network for airing debunked conspiracy theories that its voting machines were rigged against donald trump in the 2020 election. npr's media correspondent, david folkenflik, is following the case and joins us now. thank you for being with us. as the case goes to trial, the judge has rejected several of the first amendment defenses that fox hoped to invoke. and he also took the extraordinary step of admonishing and sanctning the fox defense team. help us understand why and what it might mean for the case? david: we have heard in recent days that the judge is increasing frustration with the increase in of incidents in which he has concluded that fox has been less than forthcoming with the court. what does that mean? take an instance where, for example, there had been numerous representations per the judges account that rupert murdoch, t