that was done in an addendum. the san francisco home owners' association approved a building that stayed with the grade of our neighborhood, which is what is required there. this was slipped in. there has been one after another, beginning with my mother's forged the name on a document submitted to the homeowners' association. it has been one after another of different addendums sliding things in. a larger for raj door was slipped into an addendum. the house has been made a little bit taller. she is using this addendum process to circumvent you guys, i think. what was originally proposed is very far from what she is trying to build now. we do not want to keep doing this. we just saw with this other project. we would like her to stick with what originally was approved by the board of the homeowners' association. >> mr. sanchez? >> scott sanchez, planning department staff. i did speak with the permit holder's architect last thursday. during his testimony, he indicated he had submitted materials to me. i have not rece

and later you submit an addendum. the agenda are now permits. -- not permits. the only permit is the site permit, but first umbrella permit. so the trigger is the date of the application. >> then at what point do you submit the guidelines? would that be during the site permit? >> yes. you submit this checklist, and as i said, it will not be submitted until you submit your addendum. it will be part of no. 3 or no. 4, and there should be part of your application. >> it may not be relevant to what the building department could be interested in at all. it could not be applicable. >> right. you could look at major transit hubs. or maybe it chose the site plan or something. >> during the process, if things change, you could resubmit the check list. >> that is right. >> just like every other thing you do. >> right. >> sometimes the sale of the building is earlier and the interior comes. how is the interior -- according to the building interior, how is it scheduled? >> there is a leave project for it, so you choose which rating system makes sense and i think they would

in the previous staff reports, i would refer to to be an addendum of the commission meeting from friday august to, north coast district item f4a, local coastal program amendment crcmaj-1-09, for the alliances and purposes of the sale of all rate of 3 p per century is going to be used. you mentioned in the report tsunami hazards should account for sea levels of 3 feet 26 p per century, however, project plans only accommodate 36 inches of c rise and an additional 6 inches of freeboard. however, we believe it will not be adequate for the lifetime of the project. no definitive publication had been produced that addresses the sea level rise, which makes it impossible to determine the appropriate height. it is conceivable in the lifetime of the project, the sea level may increase more than a product design. see level is problematic for treasure island. we believe the coastal commission, because this project involves rezoning plan amendment, a discussion of its requirements should have been included. under government code 6560a, it requires a land use as authorized the under programs and gener

but my structural engineer was trying to get us an addendum. last time we had this meeting, they would not approve. so we had to stick with the original approved plan. any questions? >> good afternoon. i am engineer of the project. -- the electrical engineer of the project. i sent a letter to the city of san francisco and talked to them about the door on the ground floor. the homeowners have no right to remove that door down there when they are going to create only access through the backyard. was that? president peterson: thank you. we will hear from the other side. >> is it done? president peterson: thank you. if we can hear from the appellants now, you also have three minutes. >> i am one of the homeowners adjacent. i am somewhat disappointed that after she had directives given to her by this body to produce certain documents -- the grading, the letters -- my understanding is she did not produce those. my greatest fear is that there will be a refutation of the last case we just heard. at this juncture, we need to make sure she follows the ap

but my structural engineer was trying to get us an addendum. last time we had this meeting, they would not approve. so we had to stick with the original approved plan. any questions? >> good afternoon. i am engineer of the project. -- the electrical engineer

that if you are going to talk about interfaith relations or into religious cooperation, that is an addendum to what you should be talking about christians would say is the gospel, others would say is their faith, and that is a fallacy. it is not an addenda. it is at the heart of what we're talking about. if someone in our conversation says, you should be teaching the gospel. we are teaching the gospel. it is not exclusive. it is inclusive. it is not about hate. it is about love. the people standing here right now are not doing this in spight of oute this is what religion is all about. >> my agency has the honor to be doing the twinning program. it is incredibly important to build those human contacts. it is why they are so incredibly vital. when people get to know each other, they are apprehensive at first, today you're crazy stuff. they do not come out the same when they come in. they come out excited, inspired, having been hugged t, having been connected. is so incredibly important that we build those kind of him and contacts in this atmosphere. thank you. >> as a pastor, but you are seei

>> caller: well, this is -- i think you can say an addendum to a long series of battles.hey emphasize different religious and political issues. the school board in texas is dominated by a group of -- i think it's fair to say christian conservatives. >> they identify themselves as that. >> last year they had an epic battle over social studies standards. this resolution was a surprise to some of the observers in texas. they had just resolve that had battle. then this resolution emerged. the board has decided to discuss it. >> what proof, randy reeves, who wrote the resolution says he thinks it was done on purpose, that islam was overshadowing christianity on purpose. what proof did he provide to bring it up for a vote? wouldn't he have to justify the claim? >> yes, there are a number of appendix where he believes the christians are portrayed in the harshest of terms and muslim massacres are down played. now the documentation is -- unless you're a historical scholar it's hard to get through this. >> the vote is set for tomorrow. this will impact not just texas because of the

it is not an addendum. it is at the heart of what we are talking about. if someone in our congregations says you need to be preaching the gospel, we are preaching the gospel. it is not exclusive. it is inclusive. it is not about hate. it is about love. you have to understand, please, that the people standing here right now are not doing this in spite of our individual fates. we are doing it because of our individual fatefaiths. this is what religion is all about. >> i'm from the foundation for ethnic understanding. we have the honor of doing the twining programs with mosques and synagogues and want to talk about why the best practices here are so vital. when people get to know each other, when jews go into a mosque, when muslims come into a synagogue for the first time -- and many of them are apprehensive. of what is going to happen to me there? maybe there are terrorists. they hear crazy stuff. but they do not come out the same way they came in. they come out inspired, having been hugged and connected and having seen islam being practiced, having seen ju

. >> shannon: ron, talk about the tea party, within the g.o.p., as an addendum to the g.o.p. where do you see the tea party holding in or not holding in and does the g.o.p. ignore or distance themselves at their own peril? >> i see tea party candidates in my state of california involved in the get out the vote effort. the big question is how we define victory. in every stage, the tea party group and others did a good job defining victory. the first definition was to build an organization and get known and have their voice heard in the political process. they've done that. the next step is support the political candidates in the primary. they've done that effectively. now the next step is for us together to define victory as winning the general election in november. working together to turn the republican vote out. that means recognizing that the world is run by those who show up. and i'm excited about the number of activists we see participating in that. we will work together to ensure we put nancy pelosi back in the minority and harry reid back in nevada. >> shannon: talk ab

an excavation permit. i would defer to the building department. addendumt, appealable to the board of appeals. ]tçcommissioner fung: :jqe[tódoe sed elevations for the different floors? >> what was included in my pack it does not show -- included in my pocket -- packet. i do not see it in the paper work. regarding the possible excavation, juin one of these pages that was associated with the package, i am seeing iand i emcea point, which was no. 1 in the package, and it shows a site plan. the front right corner of the curb, and that is 00, so everything is related to it 00 -- to 00 elevations. this would be about 19 or 20 inches above the reference point curb,e2mñ and thero references for the rear yard. it seems to be an up sloping lot. the only thing i can assume -- it seems to be an up-sloping lot. the steps to the left-hand side of the property, it shows8dsá-juj5ei0 which would typically be#q about 7.5 inches, so it seems weg climbing above 5 feet to get the rear yard, so that would suggest that is that much excavation. commissioner fung: at a minimum. th

that if you are going to talk about interfaith relations or into religious cooperation, that is an addendum to what you should be talking about christians would say is the gospel, others would say is their faith, and that is a fallacy. it is not an addenda. it is at the heart of what we're talking about. if someone in our conversation says, you should be teaching the gospel. we are teaching the gospel. it is not exclusive. it is inclusive. it is not about hate. it is about love. the people standing here right now are not doing this in spight of oute this is what religion is all about. >> my agency has the honor to be doing the twinning program. it is incredibly important to build those human contacts. it is why they are so incredibly vital. when people get to know each other, they are apprehensive at first, today you're crazy stuff. they do not come out the same when they come in. they come out excited, inspired, having been hugged t, having been connected. is so incredibly important that we build those kind of him and contacts in this atmosphere. thank you. >> as a pastor, but you are seei

think of it as an addendum to an ongoing purchase agreement that danny has with the fha.nder the terms of this, there would be several fhfa's. it involves recourse back to the fha. it has a great deal of the underwriting and review by the fha. i have had great communication with fannie mae and freddie mac during the conservatorship. any significant actions have been reviewed and approved by the conservatives. this one got away from us. it was a miscommunication. this agreement was signed without a knowledge. when i learned about it after the fact, i reviewed what had been done. i saw that there was a legal contract with the fha's. i made it clear that we would honor and respect the contract. it ends next march. and we would not be doing this again in the future. there were several requests that came in for similar no down payment or little downpayment mortgages. i said absolutely not. we've had nothing further on this. when this particular program expires, it will not be renewed. >> how much is the value of that? >> the amount of loans made under this program i believe is

addendum. as a resident of district 2, i want businesses to be welcome to our community. i no longer want to walk in front of an empty store front covered with garbage and graffiti. we have multiple dress stores, restaurants, and markets competing with each other, et cetera. size doesn't matter. merchandise, service, fair price and convenience does. as a resident of san francisco, i want more businesses here who pay taxes, hire people who in turn shop and spend in san francisco, who rent space and become part of the community. i want san francisco to not only encourage business to be creative here, but also grow here, as well. finally, as someone who is intricately involved in the world of animal welfare and non-profits in general, i want businesses to be like pet food express who spend time, money, expertise, space and product in giving back to the community. they embody best practices as a community partner, they have earned the right to be rewarded for their successes. now, i have listened to the other side. you did not hear from a resident of district 2. they, the other side, mentioned they were doing an ex

an 18- foot garage. we settled on 18 feet. my concern is that there will be a series of addendums. commissioner fung: what does it show? i do not know. commissioner fung: that is what the permit says. >> and i have two sets of drawings. vice president goh: so i of a question for mr. sanchez. speaking of "the" permit set, which i do not know, are their windows in that game room? -- are there? >> no. vice president goh: ok. thank you. commissioner fung: i am not prepared to act on this, but one last time, to get planning and building to discuss this with the permit holder, and what i want to see is something that establishes the grade of the natural site, and i want to see how this building and its permanent -- permit, how it's it's -- how it sits. is that clear? and be approved plans are set. sir, you do not have the opportunity to speak any time you want to -- the approved plans are set. thank you. we will give the permit holder one last opportunity to provide that information, and i want to see not only the survey and the finished elevation documentation, but i want to see the permit set, the reduced set given to this