democratic administration, even as the republican managed to ship the center to the right and that would be an example, you know, the state trees are incomplete and that's really the evidence for the value of remaining engaged. >> i am curious to hear your thoughts and i guess i should preface my question. my understanding in the way i come to think about politics in the late 20 opposition and so on his earlier parts if you look in mention with animating a lot of protest movement, it's really tied into economics. it's the great depression obviously so that's covering a lot of what's going on. the consent of of the populist movement. a lot of it comes out of economics is really animating the communist party and so on in the united states and the like. and when i look at the conservative era from the 1970s on up until the present day really, one of the things that could be about that area is economics gets sorted removed from staff, you know, everybody sort of has assumption that the free market reign supreme and they sort of, these morbidly conservative ideas about opposition to government regulation, opposition to governm

in tripoli but if youngest son and three grandchildren under the age of twelve did not they were killed is this an example of the united states overreaching the u.n. resolution and if this as i aleisha of international law. it's clearly not authorized by the u.n. resolution which authorized all necessary means to protect civilians. and so protecting civilians would be stopping forces that are in the process of attacking civilians trying to assassinate a leader is not within the realm of protecting civilians so you know international lawyers can say whatever they want but i think a normal person reading that resolution would say that it did not authorize assassination so that's the first thing the second thing is when you start attacking the leaders of countries for their behavior in a civil war against rebels where they're clearly not targeting civilians on mass you set a very dangerous precedent and i said this before that how about of somebody around the world didn't like the way barack obama is prosecuting wars in iraq iraq or afghanistan or libya and they said well then we're up obama is a legitimate target let's assassin

i'd like to should offer as an exampl the state with mr. s and where i live, texas, as a good example of the direction where we would like should head to the rate in texas is a .1%, certainly below the national average. certainlmuch higher than we would like you to be in the state of texas, but nevertheless the texas economy has performed better than any other state because of, why? a job from the radar machine, no state income taxes, and the fact that texas is a right to work state. as of march annual job growth in texas was 3.6% compared with u.s. growth job rate of 2%. the dallas offense has unemployment rate in texas wld be even lower except for the fact that texas has had a rabbit population increase in the last 10 years, of which we are all aware. we also accounted for 14% of the united states employment growth over the last year or the agreeable weather in texas, better job conditions are attracting people from all over the country, and people are voting with their feet and moving to the lone star state. over 200,000 jobs were created

i'd like to should offer as an example the state with mr. y lives and where i live, texas, as a good example of the direction where we would like should head to the rate in texas is a .1%, certainly below the national average. certainly much higher than we would like you to be in the state of texas, but nevertheless the texas economy has performed better than any other state because of, why? a job from the radar machine, no state income taxes, and the fact that texas is a right to work state. as of march annual job growth in texas was 3.6% compared with u.s. growth job rate of 2%. the dallas offense has unemployment rate in texas would be even lower except for the fact that texas has had a rabbit population increase in the last 10 years, of which we are all aware. we also accounted for 14% of the united states employment growth over the last year or the agreeable weather in texas, better job conditions are attracting people from all over the country, and people are voting with their feet and moving to the lone star state. over 200,000 jobs we

i'd like to should offer as an example the state with mr. brady lives and where i live, texas, as a good example of the direction where we would like should head to the rate in texas is a .1%, certainly below the national average. certainly much higher than we would like you to be in the state of texas, but nevertheless the texas economy has performed better than any other state because of, why? a job from the radar machine, no state income taxes, and the fact that texas is a right to work state. as of march annual job growth in texas was 3.6% compared with u.s. growth job rate of 2%. the dallas offense has unemployment rate in texas would be even lower except for the fact that texas has had a rabbit population increase in the last 10 years, of which we are all aware. we also accounted for 14% of the united states employment growth over the last year or the agreeable weather in texas, better job conditions are attracting people from all over the country, and people are voting with their feet and moving to the lone star state. over 200,000 job

i'd like to should offer as an example the state with mr. ady lives and where i live, texas, as a good example of the direction where we would like should head to the rate in texas is a .1%, certainly below the national average. certainly much higher than we would like you to be in the state of texas, but nevertheless the texas economy has performed better than any other state because of, why? a job from the radar machine, no state income taxes, and the fact that texas is a right to work state. as of march annual job growth in texas was 3.6% compared with u.s. growth job rate of 2%. the dallas offense has unemployment rate in texas would be even lower except for the fact that texas has had a rabbit population increase in the last 10 years, of which we are all aware. we also accounted for 14% of the united states employment growth over the last year or the agreeable weather in texas, better job conditions are attracting people from all over the country, and people are voting with their feet and moving to the lone star state. over 200,000 jobs

your committee and we're going to spend more with the states and you are residing in accra who reside in the prime example right now in new york you have an illegal market for cigarettes because your state over taxes cigarettes in a united states does not tax the product so therefore if we want to have the product controlled by the government taxation and control is the only essence seventy five. here's a prohibition doesn't actually put a time in the tiller not to die and so both of you are a lot of well you know if you don't work ta you know if marijuana is being sold as medicine right how is it any different going to a marijuana dispensary how is that any different than going to your local pharmacy and getting you know in a painkiller the only difference right now is the drug is not controlled or through a tax regulation of the f.d.a. nobody wants all that's in place and you know this if this kind of legislation passes it's just going to a different kind of drug store is that there's four hundred thousand pharmaceuticals in the united states that are sold this would just simply be another one yeah. but there would be places that would

have to also remember the united states does not have the same interest in every single country for example if you take the gulf state the united states is going to have to take an entirely different approach because of our interest because our concern about about iran hence our policy and relation with it with back rain is somewhat different so we are much easier going with bahrain and we doing says safer in libya or in syria at this point that is we have to distinguish here between american national interests in various arab countries and there's no question about it that our conduct and our reaction to each country is depending on the level of interest in each of these countries and their i wonder one other point i want to mention when it comes for example to the gulf regardless of the fact that behind has a majority of shiite the this is the majority of the population in the gulf is sunni and they are terrified for example of what iran is up to the united states doesn't have a choice but to support the current regime throughout the gulf so we have to distinguish between american interests the interests of the local government and there is and they're very to

also, there is consideration of the barriers up to shoreline and the state park despite its close proximity, as an example. one intersection is characterized by a lack of crosswalks, sidewalks. here is a close-up. one area has also been a factor in planning. here it is today. this is as it is proposed to be reconfigured as part of the candlestick and hundreds part -- hunters park area. this provides a new street network and establishes a street hierarchy for the better st. planned, just recently adopted. this is a long with an open space and open free market, recognizing its adjacency to open space in including small, intimate, urban spaces to complement them. there is the establishment of new zoning guidelines. there are limits to development. it will do several things. it will be at a higher density than what is currently provided in the underlying zoning. number two, it will korea a mechanism that will korea a more typical street pattern. number three, it will assure that the streets will be accessible and approved, and then you need at the site, the zoning looks to deal with the rights of way, namely

the flight. >> what was going through my heart is this is an example of ordinary citizens stepping up to the plate in a moment's notice and protecting the united statesorist attack. >> reporter: just before closing their case. prosecutors played one last tape. a voice mail from a flight 93 flight attendant to her husband. crying, cc lisle says her plane has been hijacked. she knows about the world trade towers. then quote, i hope to be able to see your face again baby. i love you. bye. >> and that's it for this week's second look. i'm frank somerville. we'll see you again next week.

there is a response here i mean when you've seen it in new york state for example we've had a an effective moratorium on any drilling for the last couple of years because the state has said like france we're concerned about the risk we need to understand what they are before we can move forward in other states you have seen improved regulation are we where we need to be in this country absolutely not and that. because of. two things one is the pressure to develop a mystic energy by them the feeling that natural gas provides an alternative or an oil and then economic development pressures a lot of where show up in the country isn't in economically good but there is a lot of political pressure from the other guy again and develop much got. one of influence from the energy industry because one thing that i noticed and not necessarily saying are correlated but i do know that in france for example their largest electricity company tries to take defrosts their main electricity generator is still eighty five percent state owned in this is of course includes all of their nuclear energy which is really big in france and also powers

promising he hoped the relations would be better and the young people like you would look to the united states as an examplehave any hope back then? >> i can only speak on behalf of myself, but what i can tell you is that the sentiment i get from the street is that america is not the mother of democracy that we are striving for. we don't see that america's model of democracy is the aim for this. in fact, it started long ago, 10 years ago with the second palestinian and the u.s. invasion of iraq. it drove people to take actions in the street and against colonialism and imperialism after america and arguably can you say some people say it stands for. >> do you see a policy in the region? >> it's hypocritical. u.s. will support a dictator if it allies with interest or not. the main interest in the region are oil and israel. when president obama came into cairo and gave the speech, some people saw it's a great gesture and it's one of the first of its kind and so on, but at the same time nothing has changed since the situation has gotten worse. iraq is still happening. the war. the u.s. support to the egyptian m

there is a response here i mean when you've seen it in new york state for example we've had a an effective moratorium on any drilling for the last couple of years because the state has said like france we're concerned about the risk we need to understand that there before we can move forward in other states you have seen improved regulation are we where we need to be in this country absolutely not and that. because of. two things one is the the pressure to develop domestic energy supplies and the feeling that natural gas that provides an alternative to imported foreign oil and economic development pressures a lot of where shelter would be valid in the country is and in economically deprived places and there is a lot of political pressure from the other side to get in and develop as much got that possible that is kate then big senior attorney for the natural resources defense council and that is going to do it for our news eight for more on the stories we covered though in the meantime until tomorrow good r.t. dot com slash usa and check out our youtube page it is youtube dot com slash r t america we are always putting new v

. >> the hopes were that european states would take guantanamo bay inmates, but europe did not give obama much help. that is an example of the west needing your's help. it -- that is an example of the u.s. meeting europe's help. >> i think the europeans are schizophrenic on this. they say we should close guantanamo, but i don't see much readiness on the part of the europeans to take some of the people and put them someplace where they take them off our hands. >> the united front is always presented for the cameras, but obama as european partners failed to give him the support he needed to solve the guantanamo problem. europe and the u.s. also took a long time to agree on a unified approach to handling muammar gaddafi's murderous violence against his own people in libya. germany was against bombing tripoli, what the french and british wanted to act sooner rather than later. you're clearly was not on the same page. bridget europe was not the same page. >> there are more divisions in europe and across the like. in some ways, looking at europe as a partner is a complicated game because we have to not only know whether the

voters who were right to vote in a party other than the democrat and republican party is very difficult for an independent voter in a state like for example georgia where i am very sad to act but for an independent candidate that also needs to be changed the influence of money in an election basically it's whoever can amass a multiple has the most money is pretty darn sure guaranteed to be able to win. is wrong and so we need limits on the amount of money that is spent in campaigns as well we also have a problem with the way in which we vote some countries have what's called preference voting so that they can vote for several different candidates and not feel that they are losing.

example, the government recently introduced religious classes based on the principles of orthodox churches in public schools. late last year the russian president announced an initiative -- no religion can be a state religion. >> russian gives credit to these 2 men for elevating the church's prominence. the media shows the leaders attending church services. head of russia's pen pentecostal union, he meets with the leaders. he worries the influence is coming at the expense of religious freedom. specially for minority groups such as christians, jews, and buddhists. >> for example, if evangelicals can't buy a piece of land to build a church. >> churches destroyed during the soviet era are being rebuilt with russian tax payor money. the government has spent hundreds of millions of dollars restoring some 23,000 churches. we found mixed reactions on the streets of moscow of the growing bond between church and state. >> i am happy, but need to look at to islamic countries in the middle east to see the potential danagers between religion and state. >> the head of the orthodox church is on a mission to expand powers and influence. >> the new head of the russian orthodox church is attempting to turn the chu

the middle east. it's been decidedly unhelpful for years in iraq. it has been an opponent of the state of israel since 1948. it's hard to think of a positive example of syrian foreign policy. over the last 20 to 30 years, that's why some are arguing that we cannot afford to see a change of government in syria because it's a factor for stability. what kind of stability is that? >> but could the west help syrian protesters even if it wanted to? russia and china would be unlikely to accept action against assad as they did against gaddafi. >> in libya, you had a con influence of factors that came together. the arab league wanted an international u.n. intervention. the u.n. security council gave it the blessing for that. none of that is going to be present in syria. so i think what the countries have left is the ability to sanction syria to try to isolate it. in effect, to try to shame it. >> britain under the western powers once tries to cultivate assad, hoping he might be a closet reformer. even today, the u.k. has not lost hope that he might at least be pressurized into reform. but as the death toll in his country rises, the chance of that are ever

markets now and here's where it gets interesting there is this whole movement in the united states utah for example just may goal an official currency. so we're going to goal our large little fort knox here and there is the of this whole ron paul rand paul right wing hard right hard money. bunch whatever true believers who think that the dollars should be based on gold you know for a while at once and it sort of worked out but it didn't it frankly it didn't stop the debasement of the dollar look at the value the dollar from for example one hundred thirteen to nine hundred seventy one is still fell apart but what would happen if the dollar was really solidly back then gold is if these speculators came in and said you know let's buy a bunch of this gold here or china or india put a bunch of gold in drove the price which is what it's happening right now then the dollar then the price of gold goes up and the value of the dollar or the price of the dollar goes up which means that it's harder for our exports to export products if they're of selling into the market the price of gold goes down suddenly value the dollar goe

an example. the united states and panama reached an agreement in principle december 2006. however, congressional democrats expressed concern regarding certain labor issues that existed in panama at the time and the bush administration negotiated a deal with the congressional democrats who had newly taken over the congress on an announcement -- on an agreement that was announced may 10, 2007. as a result, then, president bush addressed the labor issues in the trade agreement that the united states signed with panama in late june 2007. now, you would think if there was a big news conference on may the 10th, 2007, that there's been an agreement reached, wouldn't you think that these agreements would be passed by now? but not so four years later. despite the fact that the demands made by congressional democrats were incorporated in the signed trade deal, congressional democrats would not allow a vote on the agreement. instead, they moved the goal posts by demanding more changes be made by the panamanian government. after president obama took office, the trade issue was sideline

. >> locally here in the united states, you know, were all trying to support local agriculture. i'll give you an examplein massachusetts. one of the things that has helped the local farmers is the fact that no snap in wake can be used to purchase items at the farmers market. we are doing this thing where i am from where we are empowering health care doctors and nurse practitioners to ready for the prescription that can be used in farmers markets. basically the more you buy, the more you control the price. i want more local farmers to be able to be successful in the united states, but i think to the extent we can make it more affordable for people through some of the ones you just mentioned, the more you'll be able to address the kind of economic farmers. i'll tell you, one of my challenges as we go to the supermarket to try to find local. only get the answer for the person who works the supermarket. there's a tendency to want to support local farmers. the information is not available. that's another challenge. but farmers are probably not going to be the farmers that are receiving all these big subsidie

revenge on those who criticize them during the election campaign they had their scene and now as they go pay for that as an example has once again been green stated it will but they can't buy these repressions caused uproar around europe most countries condemned the crackdown and even contemplated sanctions against minsk the world. the story. will stand firm charging against their will give them maximum prison terms with later it will use them to bargain with the european union this happened before the previous election because it was released from prison and contract with europe resume. experts say the timing of these court cases could not be worse well there is no face is a serious economic crisis with its currency on the brink of total devaluation with the opposition trials being seen in the west as a strong evidence of human rights violations the export of the russian goods to the european union has halt that along with international loans has been the country's main revenue stream for the past two decades it is the first time in seventeen years that alexander lukashenko has been a power that he finds himself under severe pressure both intern

an example of people not doing things -- this is an example of government infringing on rights, infringing on their ability to organize politically, and so on. i am by no means equating the united states and china. their system and what they're doing has no basis in consented government. but there are concerns that people have in the u.s. and in other democracies about the extent to which there is going to be sufficient due process in the mechanisms we set up. you have democratically elected politicians who are passing laws requiring technical specifications of that we can fight crime, be safe against cyber attack, protect children, protect property. these are all admirable goals, but what kind of system r resetting of? how can it be abused -- are we setting up? how can it be abused if you have a government that is seeking to abuse its power? is the system transparent and accountable enough that you can correct for that? that is a real challenge we have in democracy. >> about a year ago you wrote a column for mcclatchy news service. are china's demands for self discipline setting -- spreading to the west? do you see evidence of that? >> there is a lot of debate in the west right now a

disagree with it under the national law and the constitution states the states have more prerogative and more choices, but if we looked at education, as an exampleconstitution gives no authority for the federal government to run our educational systems, and they shouldn't be doing that. [cheers and applause] but at the state and federal level, what we should be guaranteeing is the protection of freedom of choice. we should always be aware of the fact that it's very important that individuals who want to opt out, whether it's opting out of obama care or opting out of the educational system, we have to protect the right of individuals to homeschool and go to private schools as well. [cheers and applause] now, this freedom of choice should lead to other choices about what we put into our bodies. for instance, your right to take things into your body, such as nutritional substances, should never be regulated by the federal government and absolutely never regulated by the united nations. [cheers and applause] and i don't know what's so bad about getting the federal government out of the business of regulating unpast rised milk. now, that's a real rad

the technology is one which is very energy-intensive, and i would rather us invest in more forward-leaning technologies and improved centrifuges as an example, and die think the united states would like to have it inhouse. >> but that isn't the issue at paducah, isn't it? that's going to happen -- so in paducah, the issue is, will we reenrich the tails and actually make money for the government or, if we aren't going to do that, will the government pay for clean-up? because we've been getting the clean-up funding on an annual basis, but there's apparently no plan in your budget for clean-ups after the operation ceased. so under this scenario, it strikes me the government loses an opportunity for revenue. we lose 1,200 jobs, and you're not funding the clean-up, which would cost you company, whereas reenriching the tails would gain the fwovet money. am i correctly understanding that? >> yes and no. i mean, certainly it's going to be -- it will be our obligation to clean up, if and when paducah closes down. but that completedee rain upwill be there. and again, to go forward in the most cost effective way, if there is a technology that they can more effectively enrich those ta

certain conflicts even the names of certain cities and towns what we do is we monitor our various media outlets and when we see for example that a certain media calls israel an apartheid state then we send our people to engage in discussion and to give the facts but the palestinians have less people to send in which is why the battlefield is not equal according to our. who heads the association of palestinian journalists he says he wishes he had the kind of cash the israelis have trained. it's a genius to brush up on the knowledge of we could later i think people should stick to the truth and not try to learn how to put their point of view in the wikipedia article i mean if you have sources to show them. but these were computer experts say it has nothing to do with training and everything to do with the truth i think people should stick to the truth and not try to learn how to put their point of view in the article i mean if you have sources just bring them on but in this war every bush of ammunition counts it's no secret that the revolutions sweeping the arab world found their support online hundreds of thousands of people signed up on a facebook page calling for a third p

certain conflicts even the names of certain cities and towns what we do is we monitor our various media outlets and what we see for example that a certain media calls israel an apartheid state then we send our people to engage in discussion and to give the facts but the palestinians have less people to send in which is why the battlefield is not equal according to abbott are not so who heads the association of palestinian journalists he says he wishes he had the kind of cash the israelis had trained. just in years to brush up on their knowledge of wikipedia and later did external in the israeli palestinian conflict will be forced on the pages of wikipedia the israelis control the online media they control words like terrorist islamic jihad we need trainers and finance so we can immediately interpret wiki pedia as well but these were completely experts say it has nothing to do with training and everything to do with the truth i think people should stick to the truth and not try to learn how to put their point of view you know a computer an article i mean if you have sources just bring them on but in this wall every bush of ammunition counts it's no secret that the revolution

>> yeah, late last night he did sen send us an e-mail response to this, as you can imagine attacking the united states and saying this case is an exampleilence, while the u.s. goes on killing millions of muslims and defaming the sacred tenets and people of the true religion. that was from 4:00 a.m. this morning. >> so have the creators of "south park" responded to this? >> i have not seen a response from them yet. they have kind of laid low. this was a comedy sketch that they did last year but we'll keep monitoring and see if they have anything to say. >> fascinating. drew griffin, many thanks. >>> checking stories across the country, years before he was convicted as the so-called unabomber the fbi now wonders if ted kaczynski had anything to do with the 1982 tylenol murders that left seven people dead in chicago. authorities want kaczynski's dna as part of their probe. >>> actress rosie perez is suing the producers of "law & order" claiming she was severely injured while taping an episode in 2009. >>> police in summerville, south carolina, say a 38-year-old suspect is accused of assaulting a cop and stealing his squad car. he admits t

and as we had so recently seen -- the united states and as bill mentioned has more severe weather and more weather-related disasters than any other country. an example, 90% of the strong and life-threatening tornadoes in the world occur in the united states. the science of meet olli has made remarkable advances in the last 50 years thanks in large part due to the federal investment in knowing that better forecasts and advanced warning, before weather emergencies, are of tremendous public and economic benefit to all of us. and indeed, i would argue that if we all agree that one of the fundamental purposes of government is protection of the life and property of its citizens, few organizations do that each and every day more than our nation's weather services, both public noaa and the local practiceserses. many ask many of the investments that we have made we have made in advancements assistants, doppler radars, super computers, how could so many lives be lost in the terrible tornado outbreak of last week? more than 90% of last week's tornadoes were warned on with an average lead time of 25 minutes. something impossible years ago. but more than -- we h

relatinto the rift developing across the country, the president's apparent nod in this region when he -- it is an example. numerous officials have already stated that the united states saw no iranian hand in supporting or sparking the peaceful protests involved there. in my view, the president needs to go much farther than he did. the very notion that the president can lead a meaningful transition is risible. and i think an insult to those people struggling for peaceful change there. if they had tobacco, why not? in syria and >> how is it possible in the 21st entry for the united states to not more fully and forcefully made clear its opposition to minority rule? the president could have made this point by saying it is inevitable that such arrangements would be relegated the dustbin of history and that full transition to demoacy that recognis the rights of minorities -- most news stories that recount the ongoing repressioin bahrain and with a short paragraph noting that the united states fifth fleet is based there, but as of bahrain continues to follow a set of policies that move from soft apartheid to the real thing, i anticipate that linkage

would have given the president of the united states the power to throw the switch and shut off the internet and in i would say call in case of an emergency. another example that might seem somewhat hypocritical in the relationship to the money being allocated to break censorship in china and iran for example is the treatment of wiki leaks founder julian assange right as executives going to say that's that's one of the biggest irony is a lot said i didn't if you ask me and so for the sake of freedom of speech at the same time washington is targeting julian assange hundred wiki leaks exactly and look at the treatment that they've done to gravel manning you know are there to sensually torturing the german man who has not been convicted of anything but i can still being held in solitary confinement they moved from one person to another. for providing information that is very necessary for people to have the order to have what they would consider to be a democratic so i think this is a go and then there's you can go very well i think if you look at where. happening in the negotiations inside. the internet corporation for assigned names and numbers which gover

like the united states in the 1950s from an economic standpoint because people are happy, they're optimistic, they have jobs. and as a result, they're spending money. the telecom sector for example rising, and then the catalyst of the olympics in the next couple of years that is going to drive a major infrastructure build here. >> you're exactly right. you now have a gdp per capita something like 10, 11, 12,000. it's growing. you talked before about 30 million people being lifted out of poverty. that really puts brazil right after china and india as one of the great poverty alleviation experiments in modern times. it's booming. it's not just natural resource. though those are considerable. it is also the basics of a manufacturing economy. you've got impressive aircraft industry and so forth. so brazil is, again, it's emerging. it used to be a joke that brazil had a great future and always would. that joke is over. the future is now with brazil. the fact that president obama went there the other week in the midst of all the middle east problems i thought sent an important message, that he wasn't going to allow the urgent problems of the day crowd out the long-term important job o

whether this will work or not it's better to go back to the original debate to guess how all this will play out is as an example of a nanny state at its worst banning smoking for your own good or is this a public health issue that most americans support which gives a voice to those who don't want to suffer the negative effects of smoke do anything discussed this is jacob sullum senior editor at reason reason magazine and the author of the book for your own good the anti-smoking crusade and the tyranny of public health jacob thank you so much for joining us tonight what do you say is this protecting the rights of nonsmokers or is this infringing upon the rights of smokers you could say that we're all taxpayers here all of our money contributes to keeping some of these public parks intact but is it always the moralistic argument that ends up winning out i think that we've lost a cup there for a moment hold on we're trying to get him right back we're going to try to get him back but jacob has done a lot of reporting on this issue and there are a lot of people out there that would say it is indeed the nanny state taking into effect

the state. without that guarantee, this thing is a catastrophe waiting to happen if we let it go crazy. i will close with this, just to give you an examplethe pressure this change is putting on staff and how it is changing the way they and the developers present things at hearings. at the sfpuc, commissioner torres asked the lead environmental engineer, "is this area vulnerable to a potential tsunami?" the engineer responded with the same fiction that mr. ohen just put out, that we all know is not true. he responded know. he just said no. he said it is protected by the golden gate. any of you that know about tsunami is no that is absolutely false. a recently discovered that the cascaida subduction zone could create a tsunami that is tens of meters in height. chairperson mar: the last part i have is --card i have is chris meany. >> i am with treasure island community development. we are obviously coming to the end of a long process here. there have been 18 years of work, as others have said here, at the federal, state, and local level. truth be told, the work before you today has only been going on in this intensity for about seven years.

the state legislators? >> how was this power shift, this information getting out if washington is an example for all the land, how is that gets out to the rest of the land? >> yeah, two examples of that. one, on the democratic city, the u.s. world was a major democratic newspaper. by 1869, in washington, that's the apex

the south, newspaper editorials, was it commentary by state legislatures? >> how was this -- how or if is this information -- if washington is, indeed, an example for all the land, how is that getting out to the rest of the landsome. >> yeah. well, let me give two examples of that. one, from the democratic press in new york city, the new york world was a major democratic newspaper. and by 1869 in washington it's sort of the apex of radical reconstruction. you have for the first time african-american men are sitting on juries, there are seven wards many washington, each ward has at least one african-american councilman stating on the city council. and the new york world is ap to protect tick about it, and they sort of do this series of articles about the rise of negro domination in washington. and so from -- and they talk about it as washington as an exemplar for all that is bad about reconstruction. and, actually not coincidentally or whatever, relatedly, this is the summer that the 15th amendment is passed in the winter of 1869, so during the summer is when it's up for ratification to the states. and so the 15th amendment was the amendment that said that

the issue whether this is a licensing law? licensing is not an unknown term. states and municipalities issue all sorts of licenses. for example, i think you are the district of columbia every business has to have a general business license. isn't that right? if the district of columbia werewhere, after having at it this requirement some years ago, were to pass an ordinance saying, and if you knowingly hire an illegal alien your general business license can be forfeited, would that ceased to be a licensing law? >> well, i think the answer to that specific hypothetical is that is still not a licensing law because it doesn't tie the grant of a license to the replication powers. i think congress, think congress means for the state to adopt something more specific than that although i do think. >> the same question, why is it suddenly not a license, because the state imposes an additional condition where it was a license before? >> i think the question is whether it is a licensing law whether the meaning of congress intended. the reality is justice alito, there is no common definition of license and various state's. >> actually th

the european union as an example they were faced with similar challenges, and what they did was to invest in the poorer nations. when they opened the borders, no one came. less than 2% of member states in the

of the diffusion technology is one that is energy intensive and i would rather us invest in more forward leaning technology and improved centrifuges as an example and i do think the heat united states would like to have an in-house institute. islamic but that isn't the issue is it? so the issue is as bleak wheat wheat and rich details and actually make money for the government or if we are not going to do that, will the government pay for it for the cleanup because we've been getting the cleanup funding of an annual basis but there is apparently no plan in your budget for cleanup after the operations ceased so under this scenario the government loses an opportunity for revenue, we lose 1200 jobs and you're not funding the plan at which would cost money as we enriching what actually gain the government money to manteca. am i correctly understanding? >> it certainly will be our obligation to clean up if and when it closes down but that uranium who will be there and again to go forward, in the most perspective we come if there is the technology that they can cut more effectively in rich we would be more by used to doing that. but we have an obligation to you know, if this is finalized