and contemporary analogy. i'm going to just repeat this pattern here, i'm asking you to restart. this is a question really for both of you. is it the case, can we make an absolute case that the second amendment is rooted in and i actually its constitutional principles a ruling english common law, or are there are traditions that when which they may derive which may give us a another perspective on this amendment? >> well, it's an incredibly important question. like you said, the reason why we talk about english history or the statute of the northampton north what's going on in the 17 13th century england is because heller says, the right and to keep and bear arms, as just ice scalia understands, it's a right that comes over from england. the premise is that when they're writing the second amendment in 1791, they're simply including a kind of british understanding. now, very quickly, it becomes apparent that that's not really -- it's hard to do that. why? because as james madison identified very early on when t

we get back to darryl's question about analogy. if we go forward into the 19th century, we find examples of limits on purchase of firearms to minors. then we get to this other interesting question, whether heller says, longstanding, where is the metric for constitutional time? when is a short constitutional time? when is a long constitutional time? do you go back to the 18th century to demonstrate longstanding? if a particular weapon only became popular in the early 20th century and laws passed the moment it penetrates the market, does that mean the clock starts in 1915 for demonstrating something is longstanding? there are a host of issues that have not been fully theorized by either the courts or legal scholars about what some of the key constructs in heller, which is the governing precedent, what this mean and how we would apply them. >> thank you. feel free to ask for additional cards if you want follow-up questions. wave your hand. not to be a ping-pong, but i'm going back to you, darryl. is there any indication that kavanaugh

and contemporary analogy. so i'm going to just repeat this pattern here. i'm asking to you start. this is a question for both of you. but is it the case, can we make an absolute case that the second amendment is rooted in and actually, these constitutional principles are rooted in english common law? or are there other traditions from which they derive that might give us a different perspective on the second amendment? >> well, i mean, it's an incredibly important question. like i said, the reason why we talk about english history or the statute of north hampton or what is going on in the 17th or 18th century england is because heller in some sense says the right to keep and bear arms as justice scalia understands it is a right that comes over from england. the premise is that when the writing of the second amendment in 1791, they're encoding a british understanding. now, very quickly, i becomes apparent that that is not really, it is hard to do that. why? because as james madison identified very early on, we'

it's, it's a very bad analogy. i think that we should have understood afghanistan had not had centralized government in many centuries and we weren't gonna created for them. and the taliban runs on an ideology base, big theological, ideology and extremist ideology, that's not based on the complaints about living standards is based on something way, way different from that. so that affecting the living standards in afghanistan doesn't necessarily affect the ideology in pakistan. for example, you can have some of the, some of the poorest areas of pakistan or some of the most extreme and the urban areas where there's a higher standard of living are much more quote unquote, modern and western. so i think, i think there were a lot of mistakes made, i think that contributed heavily to running up the bill that we've paid much of which has now been wasted. but i think it also goes to the question of what our objective was after the victory in 2001 after taliban and had been defeated. and al qaeda had basically been pushed

this is nasa's human exploration research analog — hera for short.crew is poked and prodded in different psychological experiments, from sleep deprivation to diminished privacy, all to fine—tune a critical component that could make or break any future mission to mars — the humans inside the spacecraft. the primary purpose of hera is to learn about the effects of isolation and confinement on people. so a lot of the studies that we do are behavioural or psychological in nature, looking at the type of isolation from people. so you're really only talking to or in contact with the other crew members that are in the vehicle with you or mission control that's supporting you. yeah, astronauts on future missions to mars have more to worry about than the toxic soil, the deadly atmosphere and high levels of radiation. they also have to worry about each other. and it's hard to say which of these would be more likely to result in someone�*s death. and it's consistent, low—level stress over time. little things start to grate on you because the stress kind of heigh

it is an analogy, analogy, geraldo. you know exactly what i mean. came into office, right? 40% of them he let stay. and we are not even talking about the ones who get through because the border patrol agents are basically pushing babies for them. >> greg: geraldo kim is he fearmongering? >> geraldo: can i briefly say this about the border and the difference between trump and biden. trump strong-armed the mexican president and said "if you don't stop these people walking 1200 miles across your territory with your army, then i will impose tariffs on mexican goods. it will shut down the border factories, and you better, you know, play ball and do your share. you know what is happening. "where is mexico and biden doesn't have the guts to confront the mexicans and say you have to do your share or we do this to you. that is the only -- once they cross the river, the 6-year-old this and that, what are you going to do? >> greg: kamala harris, i have thought about why she is so unpopular and the virtue that she is a black woman and historc figure. but she ha

to parallel the analogy that is being used here by my colleagues on the other side. there is just absolutely no rationale, mr. president, for doing this. that's what it calls for, $3.5 trillion. according to the budget committee analysis, it includes $4.2 trillion in spending when discretionary spending and interest on the debt are included. this bill, that bill which was entirely unpaid for -- and i'm talking about the $1.9 trillion bill that was passed in march -- was ostensibly a covid relief bill but was in reality more a payoff for democrat constituencies. billions and billions for schools while omitting any requirement for actually getting kids back in the classroom. even those schools that barely touched the billions in covid aid they had already been given. by the way, handouts to states with the distribution formula heavily weighted in favor of blue states, included bailout for union pensions, loans for labor unions, and i could go on. and we talk about the money that's going to be in the budget the democrats are going to force us to vote on later today. the

but take your analogy further we've all ballot benefited from the analogy with think of the envelopment- - environment the elephant is navigating. there are other elephants. sources of food. that is where the top-down solution matters. think of the landscape. the platforms create the playing field that we all play it. if he want top-down solutions think about how we incentivize better behavior. the most concrete and immediately actionable idea i would like any other to take up tomorrow like facebook or twitter but boost content that appeals to different types of people. . . . . we work a long time with loved wors and we experiment on these designing features because when you think about it the crazy thing about all this is that we never really considered in a concrete empirical way what would be the best designed on social media platforms to encourage stability and moderation. we allow platforms that were created for harvard undergraduates to wage others physical attractiveness or arrange alcohol centric data in a default in the primary forms. what we would love to do is say they make f

but take your analogy further we've all ballot benefited from the analogy with think of the envelopment- - environment the elephant is navigating. there are other elephants. sources of food. that is where the top-down solution matters. think of the landscape. the platforms create the playing field that we all play it. if he want top-down solutions think about how we incentivize better behavior. the most concrete and immediately actionable idea i would like any other to take up tomorrow like facebook or twitter but boost content that appeals to different types of people. . . . . we work a long time with loved wors and we experiment on these designing features because when you think about it the crazy thing about all this is that we never really considered in a concrete empirical way what would be the best designed on social media platforms to encourage stability and moderation. we allow platforms that were created for harvard undergraduates to wage others physical attractiveness or arrange alcohol centric data in a default in the primary forms. what we would love to do is say they make f

this is nasa's human exploration research analog — hera for short.e crew is poked and prodded in different psychological experiments, from sleep deprivation to diminished privacy, all to fine—tune a critical component that could make or break any future mission to mars — the humans inside the spacecraft. the primary purpose of hera is to learn about the effects of isolation and confinement on people. so a lot of the studies that we do are behavioural or psychological in nature, looking at the type of isolation from people. so you're really only talking to or in contact with the other crew members that are in the vehicle with you or mission control that's supporting you. yeah, astronauts on future missions to mars have more to worry about than the toxic soil, the deadly atmosphere and high levels of radiation. they also have to worry about each other. and it's hard to say which of these would be more likely to result in someone�*s death. and it's consistent, low—level stress over time. little things start to grate on you because the stress kind of hei

analogy b can be drawn to the early days of the internet. -- an analogy can be drawn to the early daysthe internet. if you put the full weight of it on an average joe building a website in the early days of the internet, the innovation could have been stifled a lot, and that is a similar thing being proposed here, meaning it will bring the entire tax code to a software developer or miner who might not have the resources to basically comply with that from a technology standpoint, so it definitely should be much more specific and nuanced peer there -- much more nuanced. there is no question about it. as she pointed out, what we are seeing is lawmakers attempting to understand the nuances and make sure the legislation is done well. because the u.s. is leading the way here. emily: raghu yarlagadda, ceo of falconx, thank you for joining us. i'm sure this debate will continue. meantime, in more crypto news. thieves have given back half of what was likely the largest crypto pack in the defi space, in a bizarre twist, hackers returned half of $610 million they stole earlier this week from defi

and to reason the analogous along the promised to. ready try to meet her requests because she wants to continue close for the career. this is quite possible and we are ready to help to assist with facilitation of negotiation with the polish officials and also polish. and i will see the late afflicted duration. so my invention to. ready come to a safe place to. ready ready re union with, with your family because her husband also had to leave from the country and because he was afraid for also repressions from this side of therapist and then to start thinking about the future plans within her career. she told us today she has plans for 2 next olympics. so she is quietly on perspective. and we would like to help her to assist her to be per bad for about event because the main thing is her played her life and her career. now let me call to what extent has the seminar sky as case expose the tactics of the bell russian regime on de luca shanker? well, i have a question. i would say a couple words about the symptoms and you know, just all th

this idea of victim analogy. is this idea that we should privilege from first hand experience of a phenomenon and proximity to a phenomenon over other forms of knowledge for example when you're having a policy debate in a class, about immigration policy, if there is somebody who says, i myself and them them and in an immigrant or a child of an immigrant the person might save a lot of things in the conversation in this idea that speaking as a working class, not a socialist and speaking as a political philosopher are living in a small town in ohio has become a very powerful rhetorical device in a lot of places. what you think about the standpoint of victim analogy and how it shapes our ability to reach sound conclusions and have rigorous conversations about evidence. >> academically you should listen to me. [laughter] and i'm a child of an immigrant so yes, well i'm, will be to be fair, i think first hand is important. you cannot capture everything with analysis or sort of - but cannot be the only kind of way that

we've also got analog devices, jim, 172 i think was the beat, revenue ahead.he weakness in the semis is one reason why some argue this dip is not viable >> the weakness in the semis, analog is really very straightforward iot. this is industrial things so to speak, and you know what we're only going to have to wait until the end of the day when cisco talks abilout it they're number one i think analog is a great company. it made some acquisitions. this group faltered the moment that sky works reported. people are telling me sky works chart is a living hell sky works very much apple and i find it counterintuitive that sky works is going to be down and apple is going up. qualcomm reported a great quarter. like this group, and i would not be surprised if you look at analog gdevices a few days from now and it's doing okay. texas instruments was supposed to be the end of the world the last they reported, hasn't done anything. >> they displaced tencent and we can guess why. >> one lives in a democracy. taiwan semi, i don't know what's going on if i were there, but i t

well, you make the jimmy carter analogy there. of course, we saw a period under the carter administration with oil shock as it was noun. and in came paul walker, who raised rates dramatically to stop inflation. and right now, inflation is earning out about the same rate where volker saw needs to raise rates to the 14 to 15 percent range rates are still around one to 2 percent. if they come in and they jack rates the 14 percent to stop inflation, that means given the leverage in the system, every bank and insurance company in america is technically installed and it was just going to go home. when they do that there's, there's, i mean, you know, as you pointed out, if they bring, i mean, is there any, it's that broad short term right up to 5 percent up to the rate of inflation. that's still similar to the rate the short term interest rate being just below the rate of inflation and that is stimulative. so that will be 5 percent short term. and long term rates will be somewhat higher than that at the fed would have to start loading it

there's that a good analogy. very good analogy. if you look at the ports, the ports on all over the world are clogged with chinese ships and chinese goods. trying to get products out of china and in the united states, they're the are factories of not been bombed by wars, but have been bombed out by money printing. and d, incentivizing the production and manufacturing industry, the united states. you know, you can remember 20 years. no academics have been telling us, we're going to sell burgers to each other and everything is gonna be fine. is not fine, but we've been de industrialized the infrastructure rotted obie oreck at the demick . we have all kinds of social issues that have grown out of this, but china is the 800 pound gorilla, the global economy. you can look at it from anything. and it's not just manufacturing anymore. 3 quarters of artificial intelligence, patents over the last decade of come from china, they're leading in quantum computing, mobile payments, e commerce markets $2.00 to $3.00 times the size, the united sta

no point innd themselves great change in polarization bellamy figure or take your analogy low but forthe jon. so many ofla us have used that analogy but listening about the environment that the elephant is navigating. there are other elephants and their sources of food. and that is where these top-down solutions really matter. if you think about the landscape, it's really been platforms that are creating the playing field but we are all playing. if we want the top-down solutions we have to think about incentivizing better behavior and there's at few ways we can o it like the most immediately actionable i did not i would love to twitter need other social media take up tomorrow is that we can boost content that appeals current types of people. so right now you're rewarded for this engagement. and you know, the easiest way to put it online is say something negative about trump and people just come out of the woodwork and the moderates, the kind of content that that woman sarah was talking about earlier, there is no incentive, she has every disincentive. it will make thanksgiving dinner w

compelling portrait of the privileged lives of the countries elite, rewind north korea. cinema of dreams. analogy 0. o. and again, i'm nora carlindo. however, the top stories on out to 0, gun forces fighting st. baffles against a ton of bond in several cities. and a port has been hit by rockets. the runway has been repaired, but there is still no flights. security situation is fragile and lashed. gall and taliban are inside the city center and army reinforcements have been deployed in harass, not to mark as says, i've gone for the facing attacks in multiple places across the country. most worrying, i think for the african government, those the fighting continues within the walls of kandahar city in a number of areas in kandahar city, we understand that they've been as strikes that by the african air force overnight. now the african military, we didn't have a response from the taliban saying that 35 taliban were killed over night. the other very worrying figure we have, which comes through doctors mere weiss hospital, is that 18 people were injured overnight, including women and children. 3 dead s

for me, i think the closest analogy i can make is that ethereum and things like it, it is more like aompany. bitcoin doesn't change. but to take this analogy further, i think being a maximalist to me is like being a commodity trader that refuses to believe there are new teams working on new software attacking the market. the sec for 10 years funded hundreds of companies. i know that couldn't be true. i am not an ethereum maximalist, that commodity traders should not exist -- i think there is a deep value for bitcoin. all i'm saying is that think protecting proof of state, validator's, and programmers that will create the next digital future is very important for us to keep that sort of innovation in the united states. emily: i recently interviewed the man recognized as the inventor of ethereum that was fairly critical, definitely skeptical of jack dorsey's plans. somebody who we think of as somebody who understands what's going on here. listen to what he had to say. >> i think a lot of the projects want to do this, right? i think a lot of them are realizing that the centralized focus

there's that a good analogy. very good analogy. 1 if you look at the ports, the ports on all over the world are clogged with chinese ships and chinese goods trying to get product out of china and in the united states. they're the r factories of not been bombed by wars, but have been bombed out by money printing and d, incentivizing the production and manufacturing industries and united states. you know, if you can remember 20 years, no academics have been telling us we're going to sell burgers to each other and everything's gonna be fine. is not fine, but we've been de industrialized the infrastructure rotted. o p o. demick. we have all kinds of social issues that have grown on this, but china is the 800 pound gorilla, the global economy. you can look at it from anything. and it's not just manufacturing anymore. 3 quarters of artificial intelligence patterns over the last decade of come from china. they're leading in quantum computing, mobile payments, e commerce markets $2.00 to $3.00 times the size of the unite

it was like, as an analogy, like taking a direct hit from an ef-4 tornado. that was 50 miles wide that moved over the same location for several hours. it was relentless. it was daunting. it was almost like driving in white knuckle traffic. that high anxiety, high pressure situation. it wears you down. our producers on the third floor of our team actually felt the room in this reinforced concrete building sway in the wind. that's how incredible it actually was. listen, the sounds we've had here. familiar to me who has chased many hurricanes. we have generators in the distance. obviously, no power. just like nadya in new orleans. that's going to continue for days, if not weeks. there are helicopters that have flown around occasionally overhead. of course, we're waiting for daylight here the next couple of hours will reveal the extent of the damage. from what we've seen, and what you can see directly over my right hand shoulder, this is just a drop in the budget of what we anticipate to see this morning once sun comes up. there are trees on top of vehicles. roo

in the second biggest project was that be t bombers but it served with this little analog computer, 55chanical device, a bunch of knobs and buttons and police and that was intended to solve a problem that the general bloggers since the first bombs were dropped which is having make sure that the bombs landis were supposed to land and this is a difficult problem. so your plane is going several miles an hour near 6 miles up in the air and the wind is blowing at 75 miles an hour the temperature is going to change 100 degrees from the point that you dropped the bombs to our lands on the ground read in the earth is moving it on its axis has the bombs dropping and you know, there's cloud cover may be people attacking you and shooting bullets at two. and the idea that you could drop a bomb under those conditions is ludicrous. so along comesin this eccentric, the ghost of the u.s. military. just before the outbreak of the second world war pretty give me a couple hundred billion dollars and will produce for you thousands and thousands of these contraptions that allow you to mechanically enter al

romaine: i like your analogies. it gets a little complicated and in the weeds.ll hear from a senator on the future of to and why she thinks crypto is a great store of value. this is bloomberg. ♪ ♪ joe: the regulation of crypto remaining center stage. senator elizabeth warren spoke earlier about it. >> people are going to be out there trading, there needs to be a cop on the beat. it is the small traders to get cheated. that is what always worries me. joe: earlier i spoke to a republican from wyoming to discuss the future of crypto. >> i am very confident that bitcoin and others are correctly identified as being commodities. they can be bundled into a security. that is why it is great to work with the fcc -- the sec to figure out when this happens. he will be helpful in sculpting legislation that helps make those distinctions. joe: why do you believe this is an important area to be writing for and creating space for this industry to flourish in the u.s.? >> i believe that bitcoin has a great store of value. it is an alternative to fiat currencies, including the u.

. >> your analogy to vietnam is the perfect analogy. should we have remained in vietnam?at if we left south korea and japan? what would that do to our influence in the region? in 2014 we stopped the offensive and went on a supporting role. we haven't lost a man or a woman. >> the afghan military are not able to put up a defense means we would just be the policemen in afghanistan forever? when would we leave? >> we are the defense for japan and south korea. >> are you willing to do that in afghanistan? >> our presence was providing stability in that region. denied al-qaeda and isis when president obama thought this was a great idea to leavi iraq. >> joe biden said this is not comparable at all. this administration's foreign policy is that of miscalculation and under-estimation. if they can't handle afghanistan. wait, the taliban took over faster than we thought. leaving behind women to suffer cruelly. what are we doing with china? where does that leave us? that's right. they are a competitor, not an enemy. talk to the families of 4.5 million people that dried around the gl

there is that this analogy between the social science and physics and especially of these policies faceue because that's where the partisanship comes in there is lots of research recently how it is the way we process information so yes one possible solution to that is diversity of ideological social sciences so people can go back-and-forth and test w their ideas. host: throughout the book you argue people should share their evidence regardless of the social cost this is an important idea that challenging that i want to bring us to a condition that many of us find ourselves in the idea of standpoint at this tomorrow g that have privilege first-hand experience or proximity to a farm nominal over other forms of knowledge so when you have a policy debate in a class about immigration policy someone says i myself and then immigrant i'm a child of an immigrant they may receive difference in the conversation. speaking as a working-class socialist political philosopher or living in a small town in northern ohio is a powerful rhetorical device what do you think appoint victim analogy andbo how it

and the analogy is the nba in the nineties and was the unrelenting master and uninterested in any typebroader moral discussion of the military option in wartime. my job is to kill as many of the enemy as i can in a short a time as i can.gi you can imagine when he discovers napalm. us has cooked up the greatest incendiary in the history of man and he discovers that japan is a country built of tarpaper and word. i'm done. that's all i need to know program off to the races. >> what i found fascinating is when napalm came to be and you have a band of brothers in central alabama and then a band of semi insane chemists cooking up this crazy stuff , they tested it and they simulated like computers today but that's like real life i found that fascinating. >> there is a famous architect named raymond and is one of most famous architects in japan today. the us military goes to him and said build us in the utah desert the air force testing grounds build the exact replica of a japanese village exactly as they are in japan. so he builds neighborhood to the extent of which to replicate to make it ex

very we follow their journey as they put their lives on the line. brick think it's all madagascar analogy 0. the latest news as it breaks down here in the north and doing the best job you can we've seen one water to teen at wells far further detail covering the government since the taliban is relying on human shields and losing people shot them home from around the world, the price tag to the toko games have officially felt $15000000000.00 already the most expensive summit games ever stage. ah, jo biden's downs, his ground the u. s. president. in 5th, it was the right call to pull troops for on the stone. mixture of cannot and should not be frightening a war and died in a war and afghan forces are not willing to fight for themselves. ah, hello, i'm molly inside of this is al jazeera ally from dough.

i don't think there is any reason why you can't analogize to the first amendment and borrow some of the tools. the court is already doing so lower courts are -- you know, one thing the heller court didn't do was provide precise instructions about what level of scrutiny as we call it to apply to gun laws and the lower court sort of thrashed around for a bit and ended up saying intermediate scrutiny. we're going to require the government to show some evidence that whatever goal its pursuing is important and some evidence that the regulation they propose is going to advance this goal, which is different from the lowest level of scrutiny which puts the burden on the challenger to prove either the government is pursuing some illegitimate goal or it's being irrational in the pursuit of whatever legitimate goal. i think doctrinal borrowing happens all the time and i think the first amendment is as good as any for furnishing some of those tools to provide answers to concrete cases. >> if i may, i would tend to agree with winkler, but i would put a caveat. so i agree with brannon that there's go

second was the adam project the second-biggest was the b-29 bomber but the third was this little analog computer a 55-pound mechanical device with a bunch of knobs and buttons and gyroscopes and pulleys intended to solve a problem that the deviled bombers how do you make sure that a bomb lands where it is supposed to land that is insanely difficult. the plane goes 200 miles an hour 6 miles in the air the wind blows at 75 miles an hour and the temperature will change 100 degrees from the point you dropped the bomb to where it lands on the ground the earth moves on its axis as the bond is dropping cloud cover the people attacking you are shooting bullet so the ada you could drop a bomb under those conditions is ludicrous so then to solve the problem give me a couple hundred million dollars and i will produce for you thousands of the contraptions that allow you to mechanically enter all of the variables and then you can land it where you want to land at. and then to help with the potential and then you realize wait a minute but then the other technology is napalm associated with the vietna

so, just to add one point about the first-second amendment analogy. one thing i think you will see, i think patrick is right, at some point, the history won't matter because heller's a matter of fact, so now you'll see sort of starting from heller, you'll see this, i mean, to the extent that a court returns to the issue, they're not going to go back to first principles, most likely. they're not going to rehash the historical debate. they'll start with heller and then, you know, have -- it will develop sort of according to a common law method, you know, taking the principle, deciding whether to extend it or not or whether it applies to the next case and the next case and soon you'll get a body of law that's grown up, separate and apart from the historical debate that informed the first two decisions and that's what you've seen sort of with the first amendment. i mean, nobody has a debate very much anymore about what, you know, what was the intent of the framers with regard to the free speech clause or the establishment clause. you know, it just becomes

but to take that analogy further, inge bitcoin maximal list to me is that being a commodity trader who to believe that there can be two companies, teams working on new software and attacking new markets. i have been a vc for 10 years and seen hundreds of companies reach market. i know that can be true. i am not an ethereum maximalist, i am not going around saying that commodity traders should not exist. i think there is real value for bitcoin. all i am saying is that i actually think that protecting proof of stake, protecting validator's and protecting the programmers who are going to create the next digital future is very important for us as americans to actually keep that sort of innovation right here in the u.s. emily: i recently interviewed the man widely recognized as the inventor of ethereum, v telik of uterine -- vitalik buterin, who was very skeptical of jack dorsey's de-fi plans, someone who we think of as someone who really understands what is going on. listen to what he had to say. >> i think a lot of the projects what to do this. i think a lot of them are realizing that bei

this is nasa's human exploration research analog — hera for short.uture mission to mars — the humans inside the spacecraft. the primary purpose of hera is to learn about the effects of isolation and confinement on people. so a lot of the studies that we do are behavioural or psychological in nature, looking at the type of isolation from people. so you're really only talking to or in contact with the other crew members that are in the vehicle with you or mission control that's supporting you. yeah, astronauts on future missions to mars have more to worry about than the toxic soil, the deadly atmosphere and high levels of radiation. they also have to worry about each other. and it's hard to say which of these would be more likely to result in someone's death. and it's consistent, low—level stress over time. little things start to grate on you because the stress kind of heightens how you react to the things around you. so the sound of somebody chewing the cereal next to you might be fine at first. and then, 65 days later, you really, really don't like t

when you look at where ai is, i use the analogy of we are very much in the 1984 of the pc revolution.i is in a very similar position. very early days of adoption. it is not necessarily the need, it is what is possible for the technology. >> this is a really fascinating conversation. thank you for your time. we are talking about banks embracing machine learning. more on bank of america's patent push next. this is bloomberg. ♪ >> today, we are focused on artificial intelligence. the impact of it, we learned that 1 wall st bank is actually spending a lot of money and effort into turning. >> this tells it all. 227 patents were granted in the first half of the year. they are all related to artificial intelligence and big-box data. this was all related to ai. >> i feel if you get a penny for every time a company or blockchain -- catherine dockerty has been writing some great articles about it. what are you making of the race to get digital for these companies? what does it say about the banks more broadly? >> what is interesting is i connected with one of the innovators on bank of america's

that is a really vivid analogy, you talk - a really vivid analogy, you talk about what the governmentce the beginning of the pandemic, committing money through non—ring fenced grants to tackle the impact of covid—19 and services including adult social care, the government is saying it will continue to work closely with local and national partners to ensure reforms are informed by diverse perspectives including those with lived experience of the care sector. the words are all fine, i am sure you would agree, but are we badly overdue a look at how the social care sector is funded? edit social care sector is funded? of course, the money during covert was very much— course, the money during covert was very much welcome and not —— during covid _ very much welcome and not —— during covid was _ very much welcome and not —— during covid was very— very much welcome and not —— during covid was very much welcome and needed _ covid was very much welcome and needed but it has been spent on the extra _ needed but it has been spent on the extra costs — needed but it has been spent on the extra costs

i don't appear i will update my analogy, let's go to the olympics. it looks like the rocket balance stuck the landing. let's bring in financial managing partner greg france and cio, stick to landing and investors move on to focusing on fundamentals and stocks. >> i try to keep up with your analogies but you did a great job here, gave them enough -- charles: your too long -- young to know about marcus welby. >> if only that were the case but he's done a great job to give the markets enough to have confidence, the inflation day to keep going. private tapering is coming. inclinations that rates won't move, watching delta and focused on employment so he managed with the timing, difficult to do but today as another part of the crisis he's done a great job. charles: he pulled it off. how surprised are you the way things are reacting? bond yields down to the dollar down, stocks erupting. that is a pretty good trifecta. >> reporter: everything is reacting the way it should be from what he said. we are not going to be significant strengthening of the dollar u

these are not going to in themselves going to create changes in polarization bulimic take your analogy little bit further likes manyea of us wholo have benefited from the elephant in the writer but let's think about the environment that the elephant is navigating the sewer sociology in particular interesting. there are other elephants and sources of food. and that is where the top-down solutions really matter. so if we think about the landscape. and if it's about the platforms rating the playing field but we are all playing. so if w they wanted top-down solutions we have to think about how we incentivize better behavior. and there's a few ways we can do this. it must comprehend immediately actionable ideas that i would love facebook twitter neither social media platform take up tomorrow so we can boost content that appeals to different types of people. so right now you're reported for just engagement. and easiest way to get engagement on minds negative about trump or people come out of the woodwork left and right. it is this moderates, the kind of content that that woman sarah like pro

word because i've been a main street entrepreneur my entire life, and it's hard to use that as an analogous term to what we do here. anyway, senator durbin was talking about i think more than just the content of the bill. i generally, whenever i'm coming down to vote for something, look at the principles that i know have worked in the real world in building a business, in running a school board, local or state government, he referred to something that really caught my attention and that inevitably in times like these we will then on our side revert to wanting to do a balanced budget amendment. of course i've been a proponent of that and term limits as well. not at the local and state level, but here. i don't think that the founders ever intended us to grow a government like this that for all the good intentions of policy that we want to put in place to where we do it on the back of borrowing money and not doing it in a way that is painful takes political will. i'll never forget back in indiana back in 2017, 70% of hoosiers wanted better infrastructure. we polled, 70% didn't want their taxes