as the department discussed new analysis were performed in 2015 with the eir analysis. the metal sheds had been open air sheds and were heavily altered after 1946. based on the firm of planck- they determined that these were not adequate resources. the the cumulative loss of pdr in eastern neighborhoods as the planning department described you did notcome close to exceeding what the eir predict. in response to supervisor peskin's question what is required in the eir is set it beef feasible. after the eir was completed, we prepared an economic feasibility report and we obtained suffolk consulting for this eir. the planning commission rejected this on a number of bases. as ms. jones indicated the rejection of the alternatives was mainly based on the inability of the alternatives to meet the city's objectives and maximize housing projections on the sites of the eastern neighborhoods and also the traffic impacts the appellants here have failed to establish any procedural errors and have shown that the decision-makers will have moreanalysis after making a decision. rather th

is the trichoview hair-and-scalp analysis. and what it does is analyze your hair and scalp, and it helps you better understand your hair-loss exclusive to hair club, the state-of-the-art trichoview technology utilizes multiple magnifications to illustrate the specific conditions of your hair and scalp. this proprietary technology also performs a density analysis and compares your healthy growing areas to your thinning areas. digital scans are then captured so you can visually understand the state of your hair loss and become educated about the cause. our experts will then explain your options for a customized solution just right for you. it's the first step towards having a natural, fuller head of hair. male-pattern hair loss using the norwood scale, which is a progression of hair loss from minimal recession of the hairline all the way to the back of the head and pretty much anything in between. and there's tremendous amount of variation from individual to individual, and this is why it's important to come in to hair club and

as the department discussed new analysis were performed in 2015 with the eir analysis. the metal sheds had been open air sheds and were heavily altered after 1946. based on the firm of planck- they determined that these were not adequate resources. the the cumulative loss of pdr in eastern neighborhoods as the planning department described you did notcome close to exceeding what the eir predict. in response to supervisor peskin's question what is required in the eir is set it beef feasible. after the eir was completed, we prepared an economic feasibility report and we obtained suffolk consulting for this eir. the planning commission rejected this on a number of bases. as ms. jones indicated the rejection of the alternatives was mainly based on the inability of the alternatives to meet the city's objectives and maximize housing projections on the sites of the eastern neighborhoods and also the traffic impacts the appellants here have failed to establish any procedural errors and have shown that the decision-makers will have moreanalysis after making a decision. rather th

how would that change the analysis? >> i think one of the difference of the two approaches aside from the assumed prejudice is what counts and in the due process contacts they said the type of prejudice we are concerned about an actual prejudice to the defense of criminal case. >> for pretrial. >> we think what that means in the sentencing contacts is the defendant should have to show a concrete affect on his sentencing. so the probability that the result would be different. or that he has been serving longer time than he should've been. i think it also means that things like access to rehabilitation programs, anxiety, those would not be independently under the due process inquiry. >> you think if the defendant was writing to a judge every week saying i am anxious, i really, really need to know what my sentences in the judge ignores up for. of time that defendant still has to prove something more? >> that's not the fact of the case. there are no complaints. the anxiety started well before any time had elapsed in the sen

and now to the presentation from the paratransits to present their analysis for civil rights the eir you'll have up to 10 minutes. >> identifying issues related to their expertise the question you're considering today is whether is environmental impact reports for the project on 16th street was conducted accurately, adequately and in corners with the ceqa and chapter three 1 i emphasis it point as many of the light appellants issues are related to the project approvals not before this board today the project site in the showcase square potrero hill plan area one of four areas that comprise the eastern neighborhoods they have considered the potential impacts of zones for height and the eir as certified and the plans westbound adapted in 2008, when we have a program eir ceqa mandates that we focus think environmental impact on those tongs u topics that are peculiar and is impacts that are peculiar to the project and site that is we're for the to reconsider and reanalyze impacts that are attributable to this as envisioned in the plan the appellants are asking we violet those and revisit

thank you, my next question for the city attorney the economic feasibility analysis was flailed i t

there are critical errors in the legal analysis that framed the analysis. with to start the start with the fact that impacting hb 589th just as they have begin to experience real political gains. in looking at this claim the district court failed to take account of the fact that even as a dependent expert defendant expert testified in north carolina the best predictor is not party registration but race so a proper intent analysis would require the district court to consider whether passage was motivated in part. it committed legal air when you speak to the intent claim are you returning furring to section two or the 14th amendment and is there a difference. >> under the 14th amendment is the same standard. in the united states is pressing its claim under the disguise of section two. was it motivated in part by a racial discriminatory purpose. >> you are presenting a constitutional argument here. and yet there is a section two result. should we reach that one first. we think understanding the results claim in this case is helpful in particular to look at the

the analysis we did over the weekend was an analysis that we agreed with, with the fda to do, which isspecified, interim analysis of a single critical endpoint that we agreed with, with the fda to do. of course we looked at all of the various end point, and our end points when the study is finished haven't changed the and what the analysis demonstrated is that we were having substantial benefit in these patients. what we looked at was the ability of these patients to use their muscles, measured by significant developmental milestones, like being able to raise their arms or legs, because at this stage they're so weak they can't do any of that, to sit, to, which has never happened with an sme baby untreated to stand and to walk. and it, what we demonstrated was highly statistically significant differences between the treated babies and the control babies which confirmed what we had seen in the phase two study that we reported a number offen typ eti. then it was all positive. this was great news. >> you have come on the show many times and told us this would happen. why does it take so lo

we agree with the united states that watershed procedural analysis is not put a go. but it does raise an interesting question. after all, we do part company quite strong from the united states when the united states says we need an outcome expanding alteration to the definition of substitution rule, we say that is not just a slight tweak, what that is is a change in the understanding of what a substantive rule is. the rules under the teague analysis have never depended on the frequency in which new outcomes might come about under the new procedures. in fact, in slumberland, this goes back to my original point, summerlin explained that a criminal defendant under procedural rule does have the opportunity to get more lenient outcome. under the new procedures. and nonetheless, summerlin said that such a procedural rules are not applied retroactively. and so as you are send the difference between the substantive rule in the teague is not very likely are very, very likely to result in your outcome, it's about about whether the new rule categorically removes the power of th

. >> just looking at the analysis, not even addressing the analysis, are we -- sorry. we've got real need. are we taking money away from delivering services on the ground to invest in analyses and research of the really might not get us much further down a sound development pathway? i've got a person who is make a decision about i did all the resources i can to provide basic needs for the people i've got. this climate analysis sounds like spending money on things that are not going to give me answers. >> cloud of dust. >> is this an existential issue or a real practical issue we're working with in terms of balancing our investment and we put our money in the future? >> i think it's a reasonable balance. i don't think you be investing large amounts of money. you've got to look at existing resource, find evidence and make your best judgment anthony kim learning as we go along. we don't have all the answers. >> so looking at existing resource. >> just looking from an investor's perspective, one of the hydropower dams basis uncertainty of availability over the next 30 year

it's not a conditions analysis but let me go back to something. think what was happening and skinner and that whole line of skinner and frerotte out the court is saying we are looking at the circumstances that the individuals, whether or not there is discretion on the part of the law enforcement officers to decide whether or not they did this search. all that goes into special needs in the courses and a special needs circumstance there is no fourth amendment. >> maybe i misunderstood that i thought that was the whole thrust of justice alito's question, why can't we save special-needs? let's assume the statistics are compelling. we are talking about innocent lives just as we were in skinner >> i think that the analysis there, do we look the basic fourth amendment to go into mcnealy. the court addressed the argument that the conditions and driving were so compelling we could just require and no member of the court accepted that. >> i'm not sure that is different in this case. in a row road case i think what we are saying is the need for safe transpo

our capacity to manage programs and conduct rigorous research include performing cost-benefit analysis which are often a key component to our projects. our cost-benefit knowledge bank was initially funded by the bureau of justice assistance and it seeks to inform practitioners and policymakers about the budgetary impacts of criminal justice policy choices and provide researchers and decision-makers with tools to of -- to help incorporate cost-benefit analysis into their policy development. we developed this knowledge bank in response to the growing need for cost-benefit analysis capacity in the criminal justice field. as a part of this work we have the capacity to conduct work and other costs related studies to provide assistance to local jurisdictions conducting their own studies and to carry out research to prevent the knowledge and application of cost-benefit analysis in the field. a little bit of history on the vera institute of justice. so vera began doing criminal justice research over 55 years ago. the way the organization works is that we identify any within -- an area within t

he literally is the man who briefs the people fighting the war of the realities with his analysis his views are listen to and to influential so when he writes a book about how to deal with this law of war that it seems is getting longer all the time people care about this issue and their security and the challenges to prosperity in the world today that we should listen to what he has we are excit so he will talk then we will take questions so if you have a question just raise your hand so setter listening can hear the question thanks for being here and joining me to welcome dr. gorka. [applause] >> that is an introduction my father would be prodded my mother would have believed. [laughter] thanks to a heritage to inviting me specifically from what was inferredwouldn't i earlier would have my position or even able to write this book without thert om support of the family that support my position and also made writing this book possible. but logistically my team here is president my editor and everybody else they can for helping me get across the finish line. >> let's talk about why i w

analysis . the reason that we do that is that there are reasonable freedom argument on the different issues. we have our own strong opinions, but there are different freedom arguments. we provided on these as well as alternative indices because based on these different regimes for the different type of policies, you will see an appendix for that. something aside from freedom of morality. there is a critical caveat about the laws of equal freedom that is at the heart of the study, and that is our approach does not employ normative neutrality. said we believe we just just because we believe that these types of policies should not impinge on people's freedom to do all kinds of different things, that does not mean that the exercise of those rights, the ability to do something, is that one ought to do those things that is either wise or virtuous or healthy to exercise those freedoms. however consistent with our moral concept that is the heart of the study, we believe that people ought to be able to d

that was the enemy threat of doctrine and analysis. it was an incredibly accurate description of what was called the personality of the soviet union that made it clear this nation and its allies are motivated by the ideology that will not stop unless we are destroyed and that is why this is a union i is mx essential threat to america and western allies. how did we go onto the analysis of who the enemy is? they were tasked by the administration and the document national security council 68 he wrote a plan on how to defeat the soviet union from the outside and helped to defeat it from the inside by delegitimizing its ideology. that document was unlike any document i've ever seen. let me read to you if i may one short segment from the beginning. in the book i actually reproduce both of those documents in their entirety in the back of the book so you can read them. them. but let me give you an opening of the section and ask yourself a question. when i read these words to you from the top-secret government strategy to ask yourself how many

main analysis. the reason we do that is because there are reasonable freedom arguments on the different sides of the issues. jason and i have our own strong opinions about these two things but there are different freedom arguments. with abortion people at different views about what role the state should play in a liberal regime depending on when they think life should begin and a liberty approach where libertarian, we don't want to impose a particular view on that. we leave that aside but we do provide data on these as well as alternative indices based on different regimes for those policies over look in the of the book you will see that. we have three different abortion policy regimes and how that might affect the index but the main rankings do not include either of those policies. now i do want to note something as an aside on freedom and morality. there's a critical caveat about the law of equal freedom that is at the heart of the study and that is our approach does not imply neutrality so just b

why cannot they remove themselves from the macro analysis?e forces of nature the most mean regressing economic profit margins have a mind of their own. at 26 times cap earnings and 19 times non-cap earnings. the differential has never been wider in history. they should relearn their cfa textbooks. i'm quite concerned. doug kass, william lee will join us next from citigroup. this is bloomberg. ♪ a bloomberg's "surveillance." let's get straight to the bloomberg business flash. there was report that valeant pharmaceuticals is the subject of a criminal investigation. it's a question whether they defrauded insurance by hiding its ties to notify message. valeant says it is cooperating. -- its ties to online suppliers. shake shack has relied on its: brandon new stores to post scored but the company and analysts say the sector may be headed the recession. brexit has hit the british health market good they have had the fastest to clients in 2008 and british home prices continued to rise in july at the slowest patient years. a little bit of a touch on

lemonis: i want you to do that analysis for me. larry: all right. including the labor, the rate? lemonis: i want you to do the same analysis that i did. larry: okay. so, let's add, uh... so, uh... uh... lemonis: if your business is in trouble and you need my help, log on to... runstaying in a differentns hotel every night. so i use the hotels.com rewards program to earn free nights. which i can use for my w friends here. thanks, captain obvious. you're welcome. roger that, sir. my name isn't roger. supported by hotels.com. like their photo claims tool. it helps settle your claim quickly, which saves time, which saves money. and when they save, you save. that's auto and home insurance for the modern world. esurance, an allstate company. click or call. esurance does insurance a smarter way, which saves money. like bundling home and auto coverage, which reduces red tape, which saves money. and when they save, you save. that's home and auto insurance for the modern world. esurance, an allstate company. click or call. when a moment spontaneously turns ro

so my question is how do you fit that into your analysis, i'm trying to complicate the analysis. copies of that element into your analyst? >> when you are talking about corruption in the period during the nixon administration there is corruption running through. the way that the programs are implemented on a local level in some ways there's corruption in the organizations that are getting funded and the ways the programs are even selected to be funded and things like that, that is a problem with the kind of bureaucracy in some ways it is created. we see this at the highest level taking off during the nixon administration so there is corruption among federal policymakers and the way they are being allocated dc it is very much reflected in the ways in which the friends and supporters get the grants and similar things happen with the war on poverty when the federal government introduces and begins funding and we see that it creates new channels as a favorable than the groups will emerge. the problem is that especially when you are dealing with these kind of more transformative progr

the government says it's special task force on the north korean situation is conducting analysis at the prime minister's office. once again, south korea's military says north of korea has fired what appears to be a ballistic missile. the japanese government also says it has received information that north korea has fired a missile. the government says it's special task force on the north korean situation is doing analysis at the prime minister's office. we'll bring you more information as it becomes available. >>> on to other stories now. the japanese prime minister will soon reshuffle his cabinets, the lineups will be announced on wednesday afternoon, but nhk has already learned most of the changes from various sources, abe is expected to appoint the woman as the defense chairman. she will be the second woman to assume the post following the n new lly elected government. according to sources some of abe's team ministers will be staying put to maintain the basis of his government. those include the foreign minister and the chief cabinet secretary. the prime minister is also changing par

the book also goes into another analysis but in fact, the media is biased coverage of immigration and in the way they talk about immigration and we find that the size of sex of policies and when that is large enough but that overall pattern for the research uncovers is that white americans of negative views of immigration are more likely to identify as republican, of the republican and support policies and with the criminal-justice in education in health care for crowfoot and with research is that makes the case is now the core of politics no longer a perjury issue is an important issue every couple of years and what we are witnessing a say backlash and despite some of the commentary in frederick that we move into opposed racial era that is far from the reality to raises more than ever before if we just looked at the conversations and the debate from the presidential race. and i want to leave one's thoughts as i conclude is there a response to the backlash? particularly those who are being attacked at the center of this backlash of the large immigrant population in the united states i

main analysis. the reason we do that is there are reasonable freedom arguments on the different sides of the issue. jason and i have our own strong opinions about these two things but there are different freedom arguments. with abortion people have different views on what role the state should they justly in a liberal regime depending on when they think like should begin and -- we do note or want to impose a particular view on that because this is more of a scientific, theological, moral question so we leave that aside. we do provide it on these as well as alternative indices based on different regimes for those types of policies so if you look in the appendix of the book you will see that. we have three different abortion policy regimes and how that might affect the index. the main rankings and index do not include either of those policies. i do want to note something as an aside on freedom of morality. there is a critical caveat about the law of equal freedom that is at the heart of the study and

to the risk analysis. if you don't prevent these deaths and injuries, if you have the cost of liability payouts come together cost of settlement agreements, if you have lost commerce and tourism, if you receive drops in poverty guns and push for community pride or lost opportunities for civic progress to to fear and distrust, the cost of imported when police department are just too great. the opportunities to see cost sharing and collaborative government are great of a dependable talk about this. mutual aid, consolidation, join together for training purposes, joint use of equipment and to use of management and administer overhead costs. you have a fine series of speakers and panelists this afternoon. i commend them to you and to help that at first the discussion. but please let's lead to action because i'm quite convinced that this crisis in confidence in american policing gets worse i the month. thank you very much applause t the. >> we have time for a question or two. >> congratulations. one of the quest

we talked about analysis but i'm going to stick with economic analysis. with respect to economic there was really nothing done on this score. to an economist you have to demonstrate that not only does your policy generate benefits in excess of cost but rule out possibility that alternative like case-by-case treatment could generate even greater net benefits and there's a one-line dismissal despite economist are jumping up and down consider less restrictive, no analysis, just the word cumbersome, we think case by case would be too cumbersome. i want to pick up on one thing that baron said if that's okay on the major economic import or major economic ig nÍficance. he's quoting from a supreme court case king versus burwell and baron mentioned infrastructure and we talked about the tens of billions. ii want to tell you about what's happened since, now we have data coming through which to me is quite frightening. in 2015 where we had three quarters of the year, we had for the first time since recession we had a decrease. you look at the top three only three th

now we have all of the analysis on that from new york. what kind of jobs are these? are these quality jobs? >> yes, and that is the good news. we did see a lot of high-quality jobs that got created in the past months. that also reflects the growth of wages here in the united states. pretty much in every sector, jobs got created, but the oil industry. maybe in construction, some people would have seemed a bit more jobs get created, but overall, really well jobs that we saw in the financial industry and other service sectors. overall, really pretty promising report here for the weekend. daniel: good news elsewhere does not always translate to good news on wall street, but it seems this time investors have reacted positively. >> they certainly did. every once in a while, good economic news makes it more likely the fed might increase rates, and we sometimes see pressure, but that was not the case with this report. a few days ago, we had rather weak growth rates here in the united states. there was some concern that the u.s. economy is not doing that good, but with this j

now the analysis is really only about to begin. we've learned -- i'm not a psychologist, but to show -- i think the ultimate goal of this project is to create a screening tool for prosecutors where they could potentially look at police reports and identify police reports that might be based on bias. >> when will you have the data available or the analysis available? >> so i think we are looking at a multi-year research project. >> smuure. sure. >> and that will have to involve not only machine learning experts but also criminologists, psychologists to really understand what the patterns we are detecting, what they actually mean. then at the next step, how should those patterns inform prosecutors in the future and policy more generally. >> criminal justice system is beset by delays and bureaucracy. i mean you look at study after study has shown that. can any of this technology be used, deployed simply to make the system work faster and more efficiently? >> keep your answer really short. >> well, the hope is, yes. the mission is to b

. >> yep this system is set up to sort of compliment the job analysis we don't see job analysis there's a place in understanding the minimum qualifications and the most essential conversations that is beneficial for understanding that specific position but becomes difficult you're trying to do a gap analysis and using the same vocabulary and trying to guide people into development that is a complimentary process that hits on the job analysis that didn't hit on we still see potential for using this in structuring the personnel structures i want to point out all the things that are all the competency are developed in a similar way to job analysis we environment with the experts we have interviews with staff, we always do a validation rating so the experts rates the competency and tells you what are the best level so we have the validation report we're going behind the scenes this presentation not this exact one we presented the competency to the h.r. professionals meeting every week we're requested by dhr to present and they said this is the direction to move towards their huge advocates

you can say there was analysis behind this. by moving towards a moderate andtion, the democrats lost they decided they needed a portfolio and he gave it takes speech and asked for title ii. to give you a sense of how little they cared, they and therethe 1996 act were no lawyers involved. nobody cared about details. course.to change the they wrote the order with a hodgepodge job of this and opened the door for other concerns in the future. by virtue of changing the invoking the forbearance in the future, this is not a stable foundation and it will have unintended consequences. congress must stop this. weedshave gotten into the of net neutrality and i want to take us back to the case that is at hand and remind all of us that the appeals process is not about the substance of whether or not net neutrality is a good policy. it is about the courts reviewing agency action and there is a lot and thattuff going on will get us to the supreme court. will nobody think of the courts? i want to make it clear, from my vantage points, i'm not

community process, and the staff analysis, is gretchen heckman, who is a ocii affordable housing development specialist and she's also here joined by pam sims, also ocii housing development specials. >> good afternoon mdm. chairman rosales. i'm here today to present staff recommended the moment for candlestick point block 10-8 and 11-. ocii is 100% supportable parcels and the candlestick point bayview-hunters point redevelopment project area. today's request is for commission approval to select a team led by tenderloin neighborhood development corporation and young community developers at bayview-hunters point-based organization per block 10 a at team led by san francisco housing the moment corporation and bayview-hunters point-based organization, and mercy housing california for block 11-a. i will start by

for more commentary and analysis, go on the bloomberg. scarlet: what could a donald trump presidency mean for emerging markets. you will want to hear that analysis next. this is bloomberg. ♪ mark: let's get the first word news. president obama urging republican leaders to withdraw their support of donald trump, saying he is unfit for the job. commentsdent made his at a joint white house news conference with singapore's prime minister. that he does not appear to have basic knowledge inund critical issues europe, in the middle east, in asia, means that he is woefully unprepared to do this job. sayingtrump responded, president obama and hillary clinton single-handedly destabilize the middle east, handed iraq, libya, and syria to isis. he also accused them of sending america's best jobs overseas to appease their global interest. of the dnc has resigned in the wake of that e-mail hack that in bears the party on the eve of the presidential nominating convention, according to the ap, citing three democratic strategist familiar with the decision.

again, third-party analysis as this will make housing less affordable in san francisco. to me, this is more about politics than policy and seeking to further scapegoat a group of san franciscans i believe should embrace your innocent. we're better than this. i believe we should be focusing our efforts on existing measures on about and for that reason i will be supporting this measure today and if my colleagues the authors, don't do it themselves i would love to entertain a motion to table this item because i don't think this should see the light of day anymore in our secured with that, turnover two supervisor mar. >> they determine farrell. i'm glad that supervisor peskin is here. the other co-author supervisor david campos i'm not sure these hundred join us as well. i've never been associate with donald trump or calls un-american before in my life. i will just say that when we hear from the public comments will you will hear from many communities that are not feeling the benefits of the five-year tech boom from our cities from small businesses to residence, seniors and

to the risk analysis. if you don't prevent these deaths and injuries, if you have the cost of liability payouts come together cost of settlement agreements, if you have lost commerce and tourism, if you receive drops in poverty guns and push for community pride or lost opportunities for civic progress to to fear and distrust, the cost of imported when police department are just too great. the opportunities to see cost sharing and collaborative government are great of a dependable talk about this. mutual aid, consolidation, join together for training purposes, joint use of equipment and to use of management and administer overhead costs. you have a fine series of speakers and panelists this afternoon. i commend them to you and to help that at first the discussion. but please let's lead to action because i'm quite convinced that this crisis in confidence in american policing gets worse i the month. thank you very much applause the thank you very much. [applause] >> we have time for a question or two. >> cong

how did you conduct of the analysis, mark? we did this for different policy proposals.d the same model for evaluating candidate proposals. it's a little tricky because we have to clean what those candidates are trying to -- glean what this candidates are trying to tell us. some of it is quite clear. some of it is not very clear. some of it is on their website. some of it comes from speeches. we go through that very carefully. ofhave to make a lot assumptions. think end of the day, i roughly speaking, we give you a pretty good sense of how the economy is going to perform under different policy proposals. vonnie: let's take a couple of conclusions and ask how you got there. you say her proposals will result in a somewhat stronger u.s. economy. somewhat stronger -- what is that, for example? mark: she is quite clear about her proposals. if you go on her website, it's well.ut pretty you get a pretty good grip on that. her proposal -- typical of her proposals is transparency. there's a lot of proposals. there's a lot of moving parts. the key to stronger economic growth under

he was unable to provide any kind of legal analysis. the fact of the matter is the a.p.eporting, regardless of what the data show, and the data and the a.p. story is very very incomplete. the amount of contributors that she met with, the clinton foundation contributors she met with were probably lets than 5% of the overall meetings. but regardless of the stats as you say, the 85 or so clinton foundation contributors that she did meet with, there's no suggestion whatsoever that any of those meetings were in any way inappropriate, that any special favors were given. she was meeting with people like the melinda gates and her foundation, people that were doing, trying to find economic capital for underprivileged areas around the world. just no suggestion whatsoever there was any wrongdoing. and mr. schweizer comes on to make a lot of reckless allegations because he wants to sell books. his legal analysis is really very kind of amateurish. like the e-mail controversy. critics like mr. schweizer made months and years saying hillary clinton violated criminal laws and you have t

the reason we know that is because if you look at the bill analysis in her dissent less lesson where here that analysis specifically says because of the persistence in the state the minority students will be admitted under the top. >> i don't doubt that that is one of the things that it does and i would've thought that that would be something that you would regard as beneficial. the reason for adopting affirmative action in the first place. there had been people who were severely disadvantaged on the lack of wealth. and they should be given the benefit. >> one of the things that it does it applauds the students. they are admitted through holistic review as well. they can look at an incoming class and determine that not all of the perspectives among a particular class of students is being represented. this is just a statistic that jumped out at me. contrary to the stereotype in which they proceed and on which you proceed. of the african-american and hispanic students who were admitted under the top 10% plan 21% have parents who had either a bachelor's degree or for your degree. in for

we did a more detailed analysis on the baseline conditions. in the beginning of this presentation i mentioned the sro on average are a lot older than the building stock in san francisco. so, the mean age of an sro was built in 1909 compared to the rest of the housing stock in san francisco which was eating age was 1927. again, the majority of sros, 80% of them are located within six zip codes. these codes often, the tenderloin, bob hill, south of market, patient, chinatown, north beach and russian hill. a large portion of analysis we did focus on code enforcement in sros. as you stop our policy proposals but dumbly focused on code enforcement so we look at a lot of stuff around the buildings and how better use of enforcement data can hope the city make better decisions. the most most of the violations in all zip codes had about between 0-5 violations issued between 2008 and 2012. it's very common for sros the violation issues. the higher zip codes which were in the titling and south of market at the highest proportion of violations receiving o

again, third-party analysis as this will make housing less affordable in san francisco. to me, this is more about politics than policy and seeking to further scapegoat a group of san franciscans i believe should embrace your innocent. we're better than this. i believe we should be focusing our efforts on existing measures on about and for that reason i will be supporting this measure today and if my colleagues the authors, don't do it themselves i would love to entertain a motion to table this item because i don't think this should see the light of day anymore in our secured with that, turnover two supervisor mar. >> they determine farrell. i'm glad that supervisor peskin is here. the other co-author supervisor david campos i'm not sure these hundred join us as well. i've never been associate with donald trump or calls un-american before in my life. i will just say that when we hear from the public comments will you will hear from many communities that are not feeling the benefits of the five-year tech boom from our cities from small businesses to residence, seniors and

. >> the real isn't is fantasy football, asked by the governor on tuesday really, the legal analysis isn't as important as watching what's happening throughout the rest of the country? >> yes. >> now the big question is, will the legislature go for this? it's not going to happen this football season, 2017, that's the legislative session when they'll have to vote on if this passes or not. meanwhile, fan dual and draft nevada this season. >> if you have a fear of heights, a six meter wide bridge stretches 430 meters over a 300 meter deep valley between two cliffs. instead of doing the conversion, we'll tell you this is really high up folks. there is a maximum of 800 people moment. can you imagine being 800 if to make that step? maybe i'll wait for tomorrow. >> well well, that kind of takes that thing out of the grand canyon to a whole new level right? >> definitely for daredevils, that's for sure. kevin janison you have been checking the weather all night. is. we've had a couple of areas of intensification affecting extreme northern parts of town. this one has our eye browse raised. ey