criminal law university named after kutafin, candidate of legal sciences, anastasia ragulina, anastasia vyacheslavovnagood morning, good morning, hello, here you are look, in the story, a crowd beats a person, the person receives serious injuries, the investigators for some reason open a criminal case under the article hooliganism, this is intentional infliction of harm to health, isn’t it, where is the logic, you are absolutely right, the point is that the legislator, when he changed the disposition of article 213, which provides for liability for hooliganism, he included it there. the use of violence or threats of violence, it turns out that if you look at the sanctions, then we will cover light harm of moderate severity, well only serious harm will not be covered, because we separately have the infliction of grievous harm to health from hooligan motives, but even the fact that moderate harm to health and light harm is covered is also wrong, which makes it difficult to exclude physical impact on the person directly from the article on hooliganism altogether , any physical impact already refers to an