reach a dangerous point and, consciously or not, begin to broadcast threats, here’s an example, andrei sainikov remember this one, once even ran for president, said that. .. must develop a program preventive strike on belarus, in response to clarification, the presenter confirmed: yes, of course, nato attacks on control points on the territory of russia and belarus. andrei petrovich, as a military man, when you hear something like this, what is the first thing that comes to mind? well, the first thing that came to mind is that i have a feeling that this character has been in a lethargic sleep since 2010, because quite a large number of different national strategies have already been adopted. both the united states of america and nato, where issues related precisely, as they say, to nuclear deterrence, pass everywhere with a red line. well, for example, the national security strategy of the united states. the waving of a nuclear club there, well , is visible throughout the entire document, and it specifically says that the united states should be able to conduct military operations simultaneousl

dangerous point comes and consciously or not, they begin to broadcast threats, here’s an example, andrei sainikovr this one, once even ran for president, said that nato should develop a program for a preventive strike on belarus, in response to clarification the presenter confirmed.