that becomes the basis of andrew jackson and his supporters' cry of a corrupt bargain. whole system again turns into controversy by 1828. host: jackson is successful in 1828 and is the president that our current incumbent president trump points to as his favorite in history. how did the election of andrew jackson change the system again? dr. brown: it certainly changed in that andrew jackson was from tennessee, he was this war hero, he had a certain celebrity in the country. he also wanted to represent the common man. interestingly enough, in 1828, he basically picked up william crawford's campaign manager, who had been martin van buren, who later becomes president. but martin van buren helps andrew jackson to expand the basis of the parties. the parties become these mass organizations. by 1832, andrew jackson and martin van buren had decided to adopt an innovation called the national convention, which was a way to bring all the state party leaders to one convention to choose the nominees instead of using this either state legislative resolution or a congressional caucus

but they question andrew jackson. all three of these are on dollar bills. people suspect that thomas jefferson or fdr should probably be appear front and center with the victory. i don't disagree with that. i finally asked the owner why andrew jackson ended up air. his response to me was very interesting. he said, he has really pretty hair and i like his epaulets. i started doing these tours and talking about legitimate presidential accomplishments. people were not entertained. then i started saying how andrew jackson's parents swear and people of that stuff. hear the silly odd stuff. president lincoln, the tallest of all the presidents at 6'4". madison, whojames pounds.and 99 president lincoln assassinated in the ford theater. he actually predicted his death from a dream he had had the night before. his guest had to bail out at the last minute. officedesk in the oval was legislation to create the secret service. counterfeiting. he was also a world-class wrestler. wrestled in over 300 matches, losing only one of them. someone told me he is enshrined in the

then i said how andrew jackson's lovedswore and people this stuff. people want to hear the silly odd stuff. president lincoln, the tallest of all the presidents at 6'4", which was pretty darn tall for back in the day, contrary to that, the shortest president was resident james madison, who was a full foot shorter than that and was 5'4", and 99 pounds. president lincoln, obviously assassinated in the ford theater , and he actually predicted his death from a dream that he had had the night before. s grant to have been his guest that night who had to bail at on presidentte and lincoln's desk in the oval office the night he was assassinated was legislation to secret service, albeit not for presidential primarily for counterfeiting purses -- purposes but i thought it was ironic. he was also a world-class wrestledand supposedly in more than 300 matches, losing only one of them. someone told me he is enshrined in the world wrestling hall of fame, which i thought was interesting. coincidentally, i want to show you something over here. of all 42 sculptures, t

then i started saying how andrew jackson's parrot sweared and people love that stuff. people love to hear the silly odd stuff. president lincoln, the tallest of all the presidents at 6'4". shortest was james madison, who was 5'4 and 99 pounds. president lincoln was obviously assassinated in the ford theater. he actually predicted his death from a dream he had had the night before. grant was supposed to have been his guest that night and had to bail out at the last minute. on his desk in the oval office was legislation to create the , albeit not for presidential protection, primarily for counterfeiting. i thought that was ironic. he was also a world-class wrestler. supposedly wrestled in over 300 matches, losing only one of them. someone told me he is enshrined in the world wrestling hall of fame. i thought that was interesting. coincidentally, i want to show you something over here. of all 42 sculptures, the only spill off of the flatbed was abe. that hole in the back of his head was unintentional. that occurred when he fell off the flatbed. the remaining 39 statues ar

i asked the owner why andrew jackson ended up here. he said, that's simple, he's got really pretty hair and i like his epilettes. he does. i started doing these tours and talked about presidential accomplishments and nobody cared. then i talked about the president's parrot swearing and they loved that. president lincoln, the tallest of the presidents at 6'4" contrary to that the shortest was james hadman who was 5'6". president lincoln obviously assassinated in the ford theater. he actually predicted his death from a dream that he had the night before. ulysses s. grant was supposed to be his guest that night an d he bailed. on the president's desk was legislation to create the secret service, primarily for counterfeiting purposes. he was also a world class wrestler and supposedly wrestled in more than 300 matches, losing only one of them. someone told me he's enshrined in the world wrestling hall of fame which i thought was interesting. coincidentally i want to show you something over here. of all 42 sculptures, the only one to take a

president andrew jackson. also how close it was -- how congress.vote was in it passed with a margin, but it was not an overwhelming margin. it really became a master of policy in a genuine way. , it it was enacted into law really does become the policy of the united states of america. for aa template paternalistic approach. there's an interesting that thisan argument is good for american indians. they will be much better off west of the mississippi. they are going to be just fine. and they are being compensated. humanitarian argument carried over in the sense of the policies following this that basically said the united states knew what was best for american indians. thehis section of exhibition is really about words and text and their meanings. it is startling to read the act, which visitors can do. very long. it never particularly references an indian tribe. it's almost like a real estate pitch. we can come to a deal, if you want. exchange lands. suggestnot directly that if the american indians decide not to

so you get somebody who's has no clue andrew jackson, johnson, but remember any of that.ou get this answer this the default number one is 1980s andrew jackson was a great american and he cared about america. the bank of the united states was outfitted for america because america was the greatest nation in human history and didn't need to have a bank. and on and on with the sort of stars and stripes forever conclusion. >> not a bad answer. >> it would pull my heartstrings a little bit and i would give it a d-. but the default was, it's not because necessarily what they believe, it's what they thought i wanted to hear. help them get out of this jam with a minimum amount of damage to their grade. but now default number two is obama apology tour, if andrew jackson was malicious, violent man who actually shows more knowledge than the fort. antiracist and materialist. so therefore, he was opposed to the bank of the united states because america is an imperialist vicious racists, cannot know what this has to do with the bank of the united states it is gas but there is that sense

andrew jackson actually wasn't even the president during the final, horrific journey of the trail of tears. again, it became a huge national policy. it was epic in scope. it involved half of the states of the union in removal routes, involved west of the mississippi. it was extraordinarily expensive. it was budgeted for 500,000. some scholars estimate it would be something like $100 million total in today's dollars. it was something that not only affected the south but created economic wealth in new england. cotton was the most important commodity on the planet. it created wealth in the united kingdom as well. we are looking at how massive a project this was. visitors who may think it is only about a terrible thing that happened to some american indians, orchestrated by bad president, it was a national policy carried out. it was brutal, it was visionary. it was all of those things at once. by the end of the decade, the wealthiest americans in the country had zip codes in louisiana and mississippi and alabama. some of the cotton kingdom's explosion wasn't due to removal, but it remove

a dozen years later, the seventh, andrew jackson, lets a drunken mob trash the place during his inaugural ball. maybe this poor piece of wood was part of the collateral damage. who knows? over the years, presidents come and presidents go, redecorating, repainting, and renovating to suit their individual tastes. then, in 1902, theodore roosevelt begins the first wholesale restoration of the mansion that he officially names "the white house." it's time to pick up the thread of this strange inheritance story. according to mike meister, in 1902, his great-uncle, joseph williamson jr., is a law student at georgetown university in d.c. one day, he strolls down pennsylvania avenue, spots the piece of wood in a junk pile, and thinks, "it's pretty neat." >> joseph jr. picked it up. >> like a yard sale? did they buy it? >> no, it was scrap. i mean, it was things that were gonna be eventually hauled off to landfills, burned, whatever. >> he brings it home to illinois from law school and gives it to his father as a memento. his dad inscribes his name and writes the date on the back. the piece is hand

andrew jackson is not exactly the same person. reconstruction led to the jim crow laws, the ku klux klan, lynchings throughout the south and washington, d.c., did not do that much about the federal government. not until the civil rights revolution in the 1960's did washington get more interested in trying to change the things. is that right, when the civil rights revolution came along, when officials said they had to do something to change laws in the country? because of howard university, washington, d.c. was at the forefront of demanding fairness. it wasn't that they waited until the 1960's but the pressure on the federal government and the didership and visibility it put pressure on the federal government to change. in august of 1953, the famous march on washington. concern aboutt of it. afraid, stores were closed. martin luther king was the last speaker that day, because? lonnie: people saw him as the leader of the community and they wanted to give him the best spot. he was so articulate that if he spoke first, the others woul

i think everyone knows something was bad that was done to indians, and we know andrew jackson was part of that story. what we found is that it tends to be seen as a shameful moment in history but a small event. we hope to show how it was a much larger event. we operated from what people already think and people already know. so at the concluding section of the exhibit we look at trail of tears in national memory over time. what's interesting is the trail of tears, indian removal, was never forgotten by american indians. but in national memory it faded away pretty quickly. and when you look at what historians wrote in the late 19th century, into the first half of the 20th century, it's rarely in textbooks as a major event involving indians, and it's often completely omitted from discussions of the jackson administration. there are many, t many books written that barely touched upon it or ignored it altogether. now is the first thing people think of when they think of president jackson. people are really familiar with that phrase. so in our last section we show how that didn't just happe

we had a rough campaign it was nasty it was one of the nastiest they say they say andrew jackson was always the nastiest campaign they actually said we topped it was a nasty it was a nasty both in the primaries and in the in the election but you see we thought after the election would stop but it didn't it just started and. tremendous corruption tremendous corruption so we had a campaign little did we know we were running against some very very bad and evil people with fake is with all of these horrible dirty cops that took these dusty is a did bad things they knew all about it the pfizer courts should be ashamed of themselves. it's a very tough thing and then we ended up winning on russia russia russia should have taken the one day as i said and it took. years then bob muller testified that didn't work out so well for the others. but they should have said that 1st week because it came out is that right jim jordan they knew in the 1st 2 days actually they haven't is that right 2 days they knew that we were totally innocent but they kept it going mark. they kept it going forever. beca

from those other administrations, the three tables down the middle of the room were made for andrew jackson in 1829, and they still exist. flank thetwo that lincoln bedroom, and one was in this room on the ground floor as part of the tour route. -- this is them earliest known photograph of the about 1867.y -- chairs around the edges of which we own four. thate the three tables have been in the white house from 1829 until now, the chairs were used in the east room and -- from 1817 until 1874. were sold at the chester arthur garage sale. in the 19th century, it was perfectly legal when you came in as the president, they would say here is money to move in, and if that's not enough, get rid of the stuff you don't like and make more to buy what you need. throughout the 19th century you had entire administrations disappeared. we have four of those chairs, all of which have come back since ms. kennedy's time, one that the office just acquired about four months ago. they were made in georgetown by william king. here is a picture of the room. in 1858 being held by president james buchanan. this is h

andrew jackson. which way do you think he went? down. he, in fact, went over the course of the surveys from 13th place down to 18th. woodrow wilson. down. 6 to 11. and you folks are going to have to explain this to me because i have a little bit of a soft spot in my heart for rutherford b. hayes. he actually dropped six points over the surveys from 26 to 32 spot. and grover cleveland, our only two-term nonconsecutive president went from number 17 in the sir rurvey to 23. so who are the ones that went up? well, dwight eisenhower. he made it from number 9 spot into the top five. bill clinton, i told you that he was in the number 15 position, but when he first came into this survey, he was in 21st. that was in 1999 right after the impeachment process. and he moved to 15th by the second time we did it. there he stays in 2017 survey. and finally, u.s. grant. and edna, you're going to have -- you're a specialist on this area. you're going to have to help me understand this one. grant is the person, the president who changed the most, going up

andrew jackson, which way do you think you want? down. he in fact went over the course of the survey from 13th place down to 18th. wilson, down six to 11 when you folks are going to explain, because every little bit of a soft spot in my heart for hayes. he actually dropped six points over the survey, from 26 to 32 and bullet leave a. and are only two term non consecutive president, went from number 17 in the survey, 23. you are the ones that went up well, dwight eisenhower made it from number nine spot into the top spot. bill clinton, i told you that he was in the number 15 position, but when he first came into the survey he was in 20, first that was in 1999, right after the impeachment process, and he moved to 15th by the second time we did, and there he stays in our 2017 survey. and finally, u.s. grant, and edna you're a specialist on, this you're going to have to help me understand this, one grant is the person, the president would change the, most going up 11 points over the course of our free surveys. i love you hear possessions of w

gregg: i have been reading a biography on andrew jackson.ught bitterly with the washington establishment and bureaucracy that tried to undermine everything he did. so this is nothing new historically. it's easy to say comey, mccabe, clapper, and strzok are all gone. but there are 10 other people just like them, right? >> there are 110 people within the department of justice. some 10,000 attorneys. there is a lot of talk about members of congress having term limits. you need to have term limits on the bureaucracy. have there be more turnover within the organization. an fbi agent is not allowed to go serve of in a city for who long so they don't get too even grand. but -- too ingrained. and they have a political agenda that is not conducive to equal justice with the blindfold. gregg: have you lost confidence in the department of justice now that they have made the decision not to go after copy, not to go after mccabe, despite the criminal referrals and they continue to pursue the case against a guy who actually told the truth, yet they continu

the three tables down the middle of the room were made for andrew jackson in 1829.y still exist. you see one here -- there are two that flank the lincoln bedroom and the others on the ground floor as part of the tour route. room, this is the earliest known photograph of the room taken around 1867 and it shows seat furniture around the room. you can see chairs around the edges of which we owned four. unlike the tables that have been there since 1829 continuously until now, the chairs were used in the east room from 1817 until 1874. in 1882, they were sold at the chester arthur garage sale. [laughter] in the 19th century, it was perfectly legal when you came in as president -- they would say here is some money and just get rid of the stuff you don't like. make some more money to buy what you need. throughout the 19th century you had entire administrations -- the taste is exhibited -- disappear. we now have four chairs which have come back since mrs. kennedy's the time one of which we just acquired four months ago. they were made in georgetown by william king who was a

andrew jackson hamilton of texas. andrew danson of arkansas. a few others.they cast the emancipation proclamation for southern audiences as a seeming punishment that, in time, would do momentous good. in an address to texans, they promised that their sins would be pardoned if "like the prodigal son, they repent and ask to be forgiven." he said, would deliver whites from their bondage and deliver texas on a .ew route here's the key point. as hamilton's reference to the prodigal son suggests, loyal americans turned to meta-first metaphors.-- they were pupils who needed teaching. s who needed cleaning. children who needed parenting spirit heathens who needed to convert. drunkards who needed to sober up. madmen who needed to them to their senses. prodigal sons who should return home. medicinee history of -- in an era in the history of medicine when it was thought you were not healing when you were not in pain, oftentimes these deliveringnvoked the nature of suffering itself. of theas the analogy south as a wounded limb. let us bear with it and he'll is infirmiti

andrew jackson. you heard last night, the famous quote, [indiscernible]. this was routine. i'm doing work on the jackson on the nullification crisis. he's angry not only in his private letters but his public pronouncements. i seek each one of these moments, we are not at war. we were at work once. 600,000 americans died as a result. let's not get carried away. there's going to be a program immediately following this that follows this in more detail. i don't want to go into my brilliant talk now. each one of these moments seems to be different. i think social media has a big impact in this. if you look at other moments like the late 1840s and 50s, we also had technological change. we had instantaneous movement of information across nations through the telegraph. it used to take weeks to get information from new orleans to boston and now in the years following, information began to move rapidly. in the gilded age, we had similar technological impact. daily newspapers. at one point we had 19 in new york city because the cost of them dropped dramatically as people figured out h

pulled, of course, the democrats now disowned the founders of their own party thomas jefferson and andrew jacksone they are slave owners but they had a big straw pull, pulled upset, cover of time, cover of newsweek, won the iowa caucus a few months later in 1976 and ever since that's been the path to the presidency for the democrats. rob: since '76 they have done pretty well, for republicans picks nominee it hasn't been as good, if you look back at 2016 they had ted cruz winning in iowa and that was about all the more damage he did, he had rick santorum and mike huckabee in 2008, not nearly as successful for the republicans why do you think that is, iowa a pretty split state, they should have finger on the polls? >> quite anomaly, you can't win with it, you can't win without it in iowa, if you're like julie, bloomberg is testing that, you don't even go to iowa, you're out, you can't win the presidency but in 1980 ambassador bush beat ronald reagan for the caucus and in 1984 vice president george h.w. bush lost to robert, senator robert dole but went onto win the presidency, that was the stillbirt

what happened after andrew jackson was an interesting phenomenon.residents are not born based on whether they tell the truth or not. it was all likability. --we knew back in the day lincoln, he was one of the most hated presidents and also one of the most loved and then it goes on from there. we have had some really bad presidents, some terrible presidents. warren harding was not a good president. you start looking at all these different presidents we have had. in the modern era, it started after dwight eisenhower took over and then it was lbj, the worst president i think we have ever had. nixon was worse than he was. >> when you started talking about the likability factor or the truth telling factor or the effectiveness, what is the most important quality in your mind? caller: my opinion and i know it sounds strange, it is likability. i voted for george and laura twice because they were likable as opposed to the other people. i voted for reagan twice. i voted for barack obama and michelle twice. the bottom line of this story is if i don't like some

we know andrew jackson, his censure was expunged. i don't want to get all wonky in 1837. maybe we'll see that next. >> that is something we've heard grumblings about. what happens next is the elections. if the house flips, which under president bill clinton when the republicans impeached him the house in the next election ended up flipping from republican to democrat. if the house flips you may see a stronger push on that front to try to nullify the impeachment. there are grumblings related to that. at the moment house minority leader as you said really going after the house speaker for this impeachment. liz: we'll stay on development there. edward lawrence, thanks so much for joining with us your reporting. bringing you up to speed, history unfolding after three years of trying to get rid of the president, impeachment comes to an end. this is the way polls indicated the american people want it. another victory for the president after the president took an 80-minute victory lap last night in the state of the union address. saying quote the america's enemies are on the run

they are andrew jackson's successors. there is complete fragmentation, theglass, very clever, gets bill through the house of representatives. he is just a congressman, he plays a big role in getting the bill through the senate. it's almost regarded as a ,iracle, but on christmas day 1912, woodrow wilson signs into law the federal reserve act. and glass, while most americans don't know him, is a huge figure now in american finance and american politics. a year before, nobody knew his name. happens in treasury, so wilson names glass to become secretary of treasury. a virginia senator dies and the governor of virginia names glass to a term in the senate. glass is elected four more times. is in 1920, a united states senator. i ought to go back and say the most interesting thing about glass is he believed in fragmentation and the federal reserve reflects that. fragmented economic power. senator, well respected, on the cover of time magazine a couple of times, a big figure. and like anybody else watching the country in late 192

they say andrew jackson was always the nastiest campaign. they actually said we talked it was a nasty. it was nay both in the primaries and then the. in the election, but you see we thought after the election would stop, but it didn't stop it just started. tremendous rruption. tremendous corruption. so we had a mpaign little did we know we're running against. some very very bad nd evil people with fake doeshe is. all of these horrible dirty cops th took these dossiers and did. bad things they knew all about it e fisa courts should be ashamed of themselv. it's very tough thing and then we ended up. winning on russ, russia, russishould have taken thone day as i said it's a. years. bob mueller tetified. if so well for what they should have said that first week because it came out is that right jim jordan. ty kn in the first. today's actually. devon is that right today, stay news that we were totally innocent but they kept it going mark. they kept it going. forever.because they wanted to inflict political. on somebody that. i just won an electio

look at joe mccarthy, andrew jackson, it has happened, could happen again.ed a simple majority, not two-thirds. is it going to happen? >> i have been pushing for censure on this network and in my pieces for months, since the impeachment happened. again, all you have to do is know the math. you knew they didn't have votes in the senate to remove. never removed a president in three trials. i think a censure, given statements of republicans, very hard for them now to back down, say well, i don't support censure. yes you do, you told us you think he did it, that it is inappropriate, it is wrong, not okay. the president has got to be rebuked or slapped hard and have him understand you can't obstruct congress, can't abuse your power. we may not remove you, but we're not going to tolerate this conduct. >> why did you leave the party, sophia? >> because i am a person of moral conviction, a woman of faith, i follow my faith principles. doesn't mean other people aren't, i can only speak for me. we need a revolution in this country, a third party, an independent moveme

and giving him a medal, praising joe arpaio, praising people he shouldn't be praising including andrew jacksonor god sake. >> thank you both. sorry, i'm out of time. thank you both. we'll see you next time. have a good night. thanks for watching, everyone. our coverage continues. these folks, they don't have time to go to the post office they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the amazing services of the post office only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again! >>> i cannot do my job here at the department with a constant background commentary that undercuts me. >> the president's most loyal backer wants him to back off. what's behind bill barr's decision to speak up. >>> where i come from we measure your height from your neck up. >> mike bloomberg pulling no punches as the president fires away on twitter. the former mayor quietly building a coalition befor

and giving him a medal, praising joe arpaio, praising people he shouldn't be praising including andrew jacksonake. >> thank you both. sorry, i'm out of time. thank you both. we'll see you next time. thanks for watching, everyone. our coverage continues. but it's still important to be prepared for what's next. at fidelity, we can help you build a clear plan for retirement without the unnecessary fees you might expect from so many financial firms. we'll make sure you can cover the essentials, as well as all the things you want to do. because when you have a retirement partner who gives you clarity at every step, there's nothing to stop you from moving forward. ♪ here's wishing you the bluest sky ♪ there's nothing to stop you from moving forward. it's either the assucertification process. or it isn't. it's either testing an array of advanced safety systems. or it isn't. it's either the peace of mind of a standard unlimited mileage warranty. or it isn't. for those who never settle, it's either mercedes-benz certified pre-owned. or it isn't. the mercedes-benz certified pre-owned sales event. now th

andrew jackson was the nastiest campaign but we topped it.t was nasty in both the primaries and the election. we thought after the election, it would stop, but it didn't stop. it just started. tremendous corruption. tremendous corruption. so we had a campaign. little did we know we were running against some very, very bad and evil people with fake dossiers, with all of these horrible, dirty cops that took these dossiers and did bad things. they knew all about it. the fisa courts should be ashamed of themselves. it's a very tough thing. and then we ended up winning on russia, russia, russia. i should have tak it should have taken the one day, as they said, and it took years. bob mueller testified. that didn't work out so well for the other side. but they should have said that first week, because it came out -- is that right, jim jordan? they knew in the first two days, actually -- devin, is that right? two days they knew we were totally innocent. but they kept it going. mark? they kept it going forever because they wanted to inflict political

andrew jackson hamilton of texas, edward gantt of arkansas, and a few others cast the emancipation proclamation for southern audiences as a seeming punishment that, in time, would do momentous good. for example, hamilton, in a january 1864 address to texans, promised that their sins would be pardoned if "like the prodigal son, they repent and ask to be forgiven." emancipation, he said, would deliver whites from their present bondage and put texas on a new career of prosperity predicated upon industry and intelligence, emancipation's broad benefits. here's the key point. as hamilton's reference to the prodigal son suggests, loyal americans turned to metaphors to conjure how the union would save the south. confederates were, in these metaphors, pupils who needed teaching. patients who needed curing. children who needed parenting. heathens who needed converting. drunkards who should sober up. madmen who needed to come to their senses. errant brethren who should return to the path of righteousness. prodigal sons who should return home. and in an era in the history of medicine when it was thought yo

a dozen years later, the seventh, andrew jackson, lets a drunken mob trash the place during his inauguralce of wood was part of the collateral damage. who knows? over the years, presidents come and presidents go, redecorating, repainting, and renovating to suit their individual tastes. then, in 1902, theodore roosevelt begins the first wholesale restoration of the mansion that he officially names "the white house." it's time to pick up the thread of this strange inheritance story. according to mike meister, in 1902, his great-uncle, joseph williamson jr., is a law student at georgetown university in d.c. one day, he strolls down pennsylvania avenue, spots the piece of wood in a junk pile, and thinks, "it's pretty neat." >> joseph jr. picked it up. >> like a yard sale? did they buy it? >> no, it was scrap. i mean, it was things that were gonna be eventually hauled off to landfills, burned, whatever. >> he brings it home to illinois from law school and gives it to his father as a memento. his dad inscribes his name and writes the date on the back. the piece is handed down in the family to m

andrew jackson was censured in the senate. joe mccarthy was censured but it requires a simple majority, not a 2/3. the question will be in addition to whether mitch mcconnell will raise that. the argument that they have made to date, it was inappropriate, would be a suggestion that there will be -- >> i don't think for one second mitch mcconnell would. they should be asked why. would you vote for censure. >> i do want to make clear that one of the reasons that people have been arguing the house managers and others for more witnesses or more evidence is because we are getting more information every day and, laura, omb came out at 11:58 -- >> just before midnight. >> and omg. >> right, omb did an omg. explain exactly what happened here. because they came forward with evidence that may have really been interesting in this. >> they've been stonewalling. they didn't produce a single thing. obviously the house democrats had been trying to get these documents. this was the whole point was the vote on getting witnesses, getting more d

they say andrew jackson was the nastiest campaign. they said we topped it.rimariesty in the and the election. we thought after the election it would stop. it did not stop. it had just started. tremendous corruption. tremendous corruption. we had to campaign. little did we know we were running against very bad and dossiers.e with fake with all of these horrible dirty cops that took dossiers and did back things. the fisa courts should be ashamed of themselves. -- iteight a tough thing is a tough thing. we ended up winning on russia. it should have taken one day and it took years. then robert mueller testified. that did not work out so well for the other side. they should have said that first week, because it came out. days,new in the first two is that right? they knew we were totally innocent, but they kept it going forever. they wanted to inflict political pain on somebody that had just won an election that to a lot of people was surprising. we had had polls that we said ws going to win. los angeles times, a few papers said we were going to win, but it was go

this would be the first formal disapproval and censuring of a president by the senate since andrew jackson. it is a large and serious thing, and it could be done. so there's that piece of it. i happen to also think the election is in almost nine months. america does not really deserve to be torn apart, made more bitter, go through the tumult and the chaos of get rid of this president, get a new president, let him staff up, let the world get used to, let him get his party's nomination. that would be a dreadful thing for america. a censure would be a clean, good thing for the america. let me add by the way about lamar alexander, who i did something -- i so disagreed with him on witnesses yesterday, but i really liked one thing. he surprised everybody, brian, by saying -- nobody expected this from him. he said essentially, oh, the president is guilty. >> yeah. >> this case has been made. i don't think any other republican senator had said that. and now it has led the way for some weasely people to say, oh, well, lamar speaks for me. but i was actually personally relieved to see a republican s

we have only in fact censured one president, andrew jackson, and that censure just a few years lateras expunged by the congress, a controversial thing. back during the clinton impeachment trial, when the outcome again was certain, senator feinstein collected signatures and tried to organize a censure. that may sound strange that a democrat was doing it, but strategically, it probably was to propose that as an alternative, as if to say we did something here but that ultimately failed. >> you heard lisa murkowski say they didn't propose doing this. >> that's right. but it's still possible to propose a censure, you have to get a vote to proceed with it to consider it. that's what happened in the clinton trial, after the clinton trial, and that was eventually struck down. the vote passed to look into it further but beyond that it disappeared in the committee. >> danny cevallos, thanks, danny. >> thanks, danny, appreciate it. >>> still ahead, president trump has said americans should stand proudly during the national anthem but new video appears to show him contradicting his own words. th

kanisha, we remember andrew jackson. we remember richard nixon in terms of their impeachments.l clinton was pretty much able to shake that stigma. granted, we've been talking about it as of late but only to put it in context what's happening now. with president trump, will he necessarily have an asterisk? >> i think a lot depends on what happens after this election. i think that because he came to us from such a different place, because he wasn't elected to office before. he was a bit of a celebrity. he was a bit divisive. we would always be thinking about his presidency and in some ways, he won't be able to get past the impeachment because it was such a big part of his presidency, even from the beginning. but if it is the case, for some reason, that he is able to get re-elected and maybe work across the aisle. i don't think this will happen but if it's possible for him to do that, i think it might be possible for the impeachment to diminish. but on the whole, my guess is that this impeachment will be with him forever. and will be with those senators forever, too. >> as it has

they say andrew jackson was always the nastiest campaign. they actually said we topped it.h in the primaries and in the election, but you see we thought after the election it would stop. but i didn't stop. it just started. and tremendous corruption. tremendous corruption. so we had a campaign, little did we know we were running against some very, very bad and evil people with fake dossiers with all of these horrible, dirty cops that took these dossiers and did bad things. they knew all about it. the fisa courts should be ashamed of themselves. it's a very tough thing. and then we ended up winning on russia, russia, russia, should have taken one day as they said, and it took years. and then bob mueller testified. that didn't work out so well for the other side. but they should have said that first week because it came out, is that right, jim jordan. they knew in the first two days, actually, devin, is that right? two days, they knew we were innocent, but they kept it going, mark, they kept it going forever. because they wanted to inflict political pain on somebody that had j

they said andrew jackson was always the nastiest campaign. they actually said we topped it.a nasty both in the primaries and then in the election but d.c. we thought after the election it would stop but it didn't stop. it had just started. tremendous corruption. tremendous corruption. so we headed campaign and little did we know we were running against some very bad and evil people with fake dossiers, with all of these horrible dirty cops that took these dossiers and did bad things. they knew all about it. the fisa courts should be ashamed of themselves. it's a very tough thing and then we ended up winning on russia, russia, russia. it took years and then bob mueller testified. that didn't work out so well for the other side. but they should have said that the first week because it came out. they knew in the first two days actually. devin is that right? two days they knew that we were totally innocent but they kept it going. they kept it going forever because they wanted inflict political pain on somebody that had just won an election that to a lot of people was a surprise.

andrew jackson party was a coalition of southern whites and roman catholic immigrants in big cities ofthe north. a good combination if you keep them separate the democrats took a hundred and three ballots in nominated candidates for president in 1924 and that convention, but just like something of 2000 votes declin declined, just four of them, the ku klux klan. in effect there. today's democratic party is the coalition's most loyal members unusually black americans and unusually secular liberals. they are often going to work together to impeach donald trump. so it appears when it comes to argument of toxic junctions for church that don't perform same marriage. i predict they will be disagreed with their between these two groups. i think these two enduring characters, help to explain their longevity. that is been important in the nation that has always been diverse. and you will hear a lot of commentary that says when the last three years for the last 12 years, we become a diverse country. we have always been a diverse country. the british colonies in the atlantic seaboard were diverse

andrew jackson was always the nastiest campaign, they said we talked it . it was nasty both in the primaries and in the election but we thought after the election it would stop but it didn't stop. just started area and tremendous corruption. tremendous corruption. so we had campaign, little did we know we were running against some very, very bad and evil people with fake dossiers. with all of these horrible, dirty cops that took these dossiers did bad things, they knew all about it. the fisa courts should be ashamed of themselves. it's a tough thing and we ended up winning on russia, russia. it should have taken one day as they said and it took years . and then bob mueller testified. that didn't work out so well for the other side. but they should have said that first week because it came out , they said right jim jordan west and mark they knew in the first two days, is that right? they knew that you were totallyinnocent but they kept it going . they kept it going forever. because they wanted to inflict political pain on somebody that had just won an electi

they said andrew jackson was always the nastiest campaign, they said we topped it.e thought after the election. he thought after the election that it would not -- it —— it would stop, but he did not commit to started. yet tremendous corruption. we knew we were running against some very very bad and evil people with fake dossiers, with all of these horrible, dirty cops that took these dossiers and did bad things. the courts should be ashamed of themselves and it is a very tough thing and we ended up winning on russia, russia, russia. they should've taken the one day and it took years and bought moeller testified and he did not work out so well for the other side. but they should've said that first week, as it came out, they knew in the first two days, actually, they knew in two days that we are truly innocent. they kept it going, they kept it going forever. because they wanted to inflict political pain on somebody that had just won an election that many people were surprised. they had polls that say we're going to win, los angeles times and few papers actually said t

they say andrew jackson was always the nastiest campaign. they actually said we topped it.t was nasty both in the primaries and in the election. but you see, we thought after the election it would stop. but it didn't stop, it just started. tremendous corruption. tremendous corruption. so, we had a campaign -- little did we know we were running against some very, very bad and evil people with fake dossiers, with all of these horrible, dirty cops that took these dossiers and did bad things. they knew all about it. the fisa courts, should be ashamed of themselves. it's a very tough thing. and we ended up winning on the "russia, russia, russia." it should have taken the one day, it took years. then bob mueller testified. that didn't work out so well for the oversight. [laughter] but they should have said that first week, because it came out. is that right, jim jordan? they knew the first two days, actually. is that right? they knew we were totally innocent. but they kept it going, mark. the kept it going forever. because they wanted to inflict political pain on somebody that --

caddick-adams: going back to 1815, duke of wellington's brother-in-law was bested by andrew jackson, the future seventh president and in fact died here. so the red pants became the obvious choice to wear. it is a great privilege having been here at the conference over the last few days and to bring up the rear. now one of the jobs i have also had the privilege of doing at the world war ii museum is acting as one of the historians on some of the excellent travel programs that they offer. and around you are many of the guides who live locally on the battlefields. and no doubt you have all been talking and reconnecting with them. so my thanks to the world war ii museum. coupled with that, the guides who don't really have a voice here, but i know they enjoy coming over and they absolutely love what they do, and of course they bring to that a huge passion. well, in terms of d-day 1944, it is impossible to understand operation overlord. this is one of the takeaways i hope that has occurred to you over the last few days. it is impossible to understand 1944 without understanding the mediterr

to be formally censured back in 1834 and noting andrew jackson's portrait hangs in the oval office nowhere president trump sits. host: to that end, the white house secretary spoke to reporters and asked about this idea of censure he was presented but also questions by reporters about those republicans' arrivals of president dump's action during the call. here's to that responsibility before >> lamar said he did something wrong, may not rise to the level of impeachment but what's your response? >> that's their opinion and they have constituencies they have to answer to and that's their right to do it. the fact is the president did nothing wrong and the evidence proves this. 17 witnesses, the democrats did an entirely political process. it was biased, they leaked out things to the press that tried to color the process against this president. and the only two witnesses they could even talk to or reference when they talked directly to the president proveded opposite. the vote was unanimous on the republican side and was bipartisanship in 230ur9 of our position. the evidence proves the pres