offering at the same time we're sending aid to gaza, controlled by that terrorist group, hamas andrew mccarthy is a prosecutor and author of "tateless execution". saying he wants to put a hold on all state department nominees until the white house answers his questions would 0 in on whether they had a hand in the decision and whether this is in fact a boycott of israel. is this the right move? >> it is the right move to use what leverage he has to get answers out of the white house. and a move underneath is the right move. >> what you say the white house and administration should not be sending john kerry there. should not be demanding a cease-fire. because we need israel to win. >> yes. hamas is not only israel's enemy. it's our enemy. for those that care about peace in the middle east and want to have a two-state solution, the only chance you have for that, and i'm a skeptic, is that hamas loses. and if the will of the global jihad is broken. if that doesn't happen, you cannot have condition for an enduring piece of any kind. >> this is a candidate of united states being at war with al qaeda

andrew mccarthy said this is what palestinians voted for. the highlighted section of article 7 comes straight from the islamic scripture, and muslim collections of the doings of the prophet mohammed. it foretells of an eternal struggle until the end of time when, with allah's intersession, the rocks and trees will help find and kill every remaining jew. mr. speaker, this is a dangerous time. prime minister netanyahu seeks ally, thef his former united states. not the stabbing in the back by the ally of the united states. i asked my office to try to set up an appointment with prime minister netanyahu if he'd see me this weekend. i know the sabbath is coming up. but i would find a commercial way to fly in there, because i believe in the israeli people and their ability to keep me safe despite the efforts of the united states in consoling their enemy. just as my friend dana rohrabacher came to me several years ago and said, look, if u.s. state department is saying iraq, t go into northern into the kurdish area, for more than just maybe a meal be

andrew mccarthy, he's a former prosecutor that worked to keep one of the underground members behind barse's a lot of great people on the fbi's ten most wanted list. that's a fantastic list. >> it's people you want to hang out with. >> rem stalet me start with you because bill ayers, you listen to him, he's intellectual, he's a compelling figure, he makes point, you may disagree with him, you may agree with him. then you saw the full interview that i did with him and then i think you saw a different man. >> the thing with ayers is he does what every other lying criminal does, he know what is can be proved in court and he knits his story around it. it turns out that ayers had smart bombs before the pentagon did, bombs that rattle the glass but don't hit any people, if you look at his own words, which you went through with him. >> i have never seen anybody do that, show the evidence in his face, and say you did do it, you admitted to it. but he's forgotten the stories. >> he's gotening away with it for 40 years. >> not only has he gotten away with it and the others, but they have been embra

conservative writer andrew mccarthy says the consequences would be that now, quote, we would be subjects of a judicial oligarchy. all future presidents, no matter how lawful their actions, would be subject to congressional lawsuits and court directives from the judiciary. judges in charge of all policy matters in our body politic. and he goes on to rightfully point out that both parties would use this to harass presidents of the other party, which would be a terrible thing for our country and what i think is happening here. mr. dellinger, you've explained the system established by the constitution that the courts do not settle disputes between political branches, but you noted we certainly could have an american legal system and constitutional principles that allow our highest court, which would frighten me personally to death, to settle disputes between the other branches of government. in fact, as you and others have explained, that's how they do it in europe, particularly in france. now, why do you suppose that the majority party wants to turn our legal system into the french system?

. >> andrew mccarthy.d to see you. >> up next, president obama blamed the border crisis first on politics and then on republicans. the fall out from that and there's a new twist in the case of a girl accused in the death of a google executive as questions come up about another case and her involvement. i make a lot of purchases for my business. and i get a lot in return with ink plus from chase. like 50,000 bonus points when i spent $5,000 in the first 3 months after i opened my account. and i earn 5 times the rewards on internet, phone services and at office supply stores. with ink plus i can choose how to redeem my points. travel, gift cards, even cash back. and my rewards points won't expire. so you can make owning a business even more rewarding. ink from chase. so you can. but i've managed. ♪ i got to be pretty good at managing my symptoms, except that managing my symptoms was all i was doing. ♪ when i finally told my doctor, he said my crohn's was not under control. ♪ he said humira is for adults like

please welcome, andrew mccarthy. >> thank you for having me. it is great to be down at the heritage foundation because when i go around to talk about, particularly national security, it is usually a college setting so this is more like a home game for me. it is great to be here. as you might imagine i have gotten some flag over the book and over the subtitle. the subtitle is building the political case for obama's impeachment. so naturally the word everyone focuses on is impeachment. i have a part in the book where a congressional hearing happened and you have this position of progressive law professors called as witnesses and they are throwing the word impeachment around and cross the room. one of the law professors called the obama presidency the uber presidency saying it was the most significant constitutional crisis of his life time and said obama was the president that nixon always wanted to be. that was the tenor of what you were getting from the witnesses. and you had republican and conservative representatives, members of congress runni

conservative writer andrew mccarthy says the consequences would be that now, quote, we would be subjects of a judicial oligarchy. all future presidents, no matter how lawful their actions, would be subject to congressional lawsuits and court directives from the judiciary. judges in charge of all policy matters in our body politic. and he goes on to rightfully point out that both parties would use this to harass presidents of the other party, which would be a terrible thing for our country and what i think is happening here. mr. dellinger, you've explained the system established by the constitution that the courts do not settle disputes between political branches, but you noted we certainly could have an american legal system and constitutional principles that allow our highest court, which would frighten me personally to death, to settle disputes between the other branches of government. in fact, as you and others have explained, that's how they do it in europe, particularly in france. now, why do you suppose that the majority party wants to turn our legal system into the french system?

. >> andrew mccarthy.to see you. >> good to see you. >> up next, president obama blamed the border crisis first on politics and then on republicans. the fall out from that and there's a new twist in the case of a girl accused in the death of a girl accused in the death of a google executive as you know that dream... on my count. ...the one where you step up and save the day? make it happen. with verizon xlte. (crowd) oh no... we've doubled our 4g lte bandwidth... hey guys, i got it right here! in cities coast to coast. so take on more. with xlte on the largest, most reliable network. get 50% off smartphones like the new lg g3. can you fix it, dad? yeah, i can fix that. (dad) i wanted a car that could handle anything. i fixed it! (dad) that's why i got a subaru legacy. (vo) symmetrical all-wheel drive plus 36 mpg. i gotta break more toys. (vo) introducing the all-new subaru legacy. it's not just a sedan. it's a subaru. now what if i told youok a hotel you can save up to 60%,me first. but you couldn't know t

there was a book by a guy name andrew mccarthy out, making the argument. there is an incredible amount of, not just anger, but, i think, a kind of a terror, a hyped up terror among conservatives about obama's perceived executive branch overreach. so what boehner did here is, in a funny way, smart. what he did is say, okay, we can't do impeachment, so i'll go over here and do this lawsuit and it will take a long time. and as such, it gives republicans a way to go back to their constituents and say, we are doing something completely unprecedented, it has not happened before, to rein in obama. at the end of the it, boehner can lose, or he can win, in which case he scored this victory against obama. but either way, it stops republicans from doing something he thinks would be a genuine disaster, which is impeachment, which is, of course, how speaker newt gingrich ended up losing the 1998 midterm election and ultimately his job. >> yeah, and that's a fair assessment. there is another door that this could walk through, which is that he does get dismissed on stand

conservative writer andrew mccarthy says the consequences would be that now, quote, we would be subjects of a judicial oligarchy. all future presidents, no matter how lawful their actions, would be subject to congressional lawsuits and court directives from the judiciary. judges in charge of all policy matters in our body politic. and he goes on to rightfully point out that both parties would use this to harass presidents of the other party, which would be a terrible thing for our country and what i think is happening here. mr. dellinger, you've explained the system established by the constitution that the courts do not settle disputes between political branches, but you noted we certainly could have an american legal system and constitutional principles that allow our highest court, which would frighten me personally to death, to settle disputes between the other branches of government. in fact, as you and others have explained, that's how they do it in europe, particularly in france. now, why do you suppose that the majority party wants to turn our legal system into the french system?

emily miller, and the three speakers in the afternoon i think will be tremendously exciting, andrew mccarthy talking about a book that he's written about building the case for obama's impeach impeachment, ann coulter -- who i assume needs no introduction concern. [laughter] and then what i'm most excited about, a little story about calvin coolidge, one of my most favorite presidents who if you don't know anything about him, he took a red line to the swire budget and -- entire budget and truly cut spending just in a tremendous way. so if you don't know your history, it's worth brushing up on that. so that that's what's coming up today on this fabulous program. now, senator jim demint. come on up. [applause] you missed it. >> be well, i'm glad i showed up. >> i am too. [laughter] >> well, great. got everybody spread out. thanks for coming. i guess i need to use the microphones here? >> please. because you're being taped. >> oh, okay. well, great. thanks for being here. this is an opportunity every year for us at heritage to hear there you, but also to share a little news of the things that we'

andrew mccarthy thank you for showing up. 19 minutes after the hour.s fought to remove the 9/11 cross at grond -- ground zero. now the case is over. what a judge said next? >>> lightning strikes once again at the breach. dr. samadi is here to talk about why we should never go to the beach ever again. vo: this is the summer. the summer that summers from here on will be compared to. so get out there, and get the best price guaranteed. find it for less and we'll match it and give you $50 toward your next trip. expedia. find yours. no question about that. but your erectile dysfunction - that could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, a

andrew c. mccarthy wrote recently that this lawsuit is a, quote, classic case of assuming the polls of meaningful action while in reality doing nothing, end quote. heaven's to betsy, how much more do we have to hear that this will not work? a recent poll by cnn found that 57% of americans oppose the lawsuit. yes, the american -- majority of the american people recognize it for what it is, political theater. they recognize this lawsuit as not only distraction from the real problems that plague our nation but it is designed to appease radical republicans clamoring for impeachment. the rules committee, which i am ranking member, was the only committee to consider this lawsuit. under regular order of the house, -- under regular order, the house administration committee would have also held hearings and a markup because they are the money committee that handles the house's internal accounts. but they were not given a chance to do so. over the past three weeks, the rules committee heard testimony from constit

including the conservative driver and former justice department official, andrew c. mccarthy. he wrote about this lawsuit and said it is, quote, a classic ase of assuming the polls of meaningful action while in reality doing nothing. democrats in the house and the american people could not agree more. the house minority has three main concerns about this lawsuit. first is the cost, second, the partisan nature. and third, the lack of legal standing and the implications for our constitutional separation of powers. first the cost. since the passage of the affordable care act, which not a single republican voted for, a majority has mounted a herculean effort trying to repeal, to dismantle, discredit it. it seems they can spare no expense attempting to take health care away for millions of americans. not only do they shut down the government to deny americans' health care, it took from this economy, $24 million to pay that shutdown. and in addition, with the over 50 votes on the house floor, to undermine repeal, to away with the affordable care act, the majority spent more than $79

that would mean that's a failure to adequately provide for our common defense and might be mccarthy's andrew "faithless - title, execution." i feel like the appropriate thing to do is to pass the resolution that i filed a year goesere in this house that through explaining how the president has failed to secure our country, has failed to secure our borders. we don't want our borders closed. i certainly don't. immigration is a wonderful thing. there's no country in the world where they have five times our population or less, no country allows a million people or more to come in to their country legally. we do. we love ip gracious. it's a great -- we love immigration. it's a great thing. the latin phrase, out of many, one, has been a part of the great seal since the 17 70's. it's on the ribbon that runs through the beek in the eagle's mouth on one side of the great seal. i was taught growing up that the melting pot is one of the many things that has made us so debate. people come here, assimilate, speak the same language, love the same country and become americans. we have seen americans become