david: all right, judge andrew napolitano, great to see you.much. >>> facebook is trying to enter into the dating field, but with its track record on keeping data private, would you trust facebook with getting you a date? with sofi, get your credit cards right- by consolidating your credit card debt into one monthly payment. and get your interest rate right. so you can save big. get a no-fee personal loan up to $100k. you may have gingivitis. when you brush, and the clock could be ticking towards bad breath, receding gums, and possibly... tooth loss. help turn back the clock on gingivitis with parodontax. leave bleeding gums behind. parodontax. david: so now if you want, you can be more than just friends on facebook. it is officially launching its own dating service today. the social media giant letting users 18 or older create a separate profile to be used for romantic connections, but with all the problems facebook has had with keeping news or data private, would you trust them as a dating site? >> this is an excellent way for them to make mo

david: judge andrew napolitano, great to see you.ew poll shows the former vp's title of front-runner could be up for grabs. we will tell you who is challenging that lead coming next. all money managers might seem the same, but some give their clients cookie cutter portfolios. fisher investments tailors portfolios to your goals and needs. some only call when they have something to sell. fisher calls regularly so you stay informed. and while some advisors are happy to earn commissions whether you do well or not. fisher investments fees are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients come from other money managers. fisher investments. clearly better money management. and i recently had hi, ia heart attack. it changed my life. but i'm a survivor. after my heart attack, my doctor prescribed brilinta. it's for people who have been hospitalized for a heart attack. brilinta is taken with a low-dose aspirin. no more than 100 milligrams as it affects how well brilinta works. brilinta helps keep platelets

later will follow-up with judge andrew napolitano. yesterday and this hour he indicated that the solicitation of a favor from the ukrainian president to help investigate his political rival wood under the statute constitute a crime. today a justice department official tells fox news the evidence does not support that. the reason, a response from the charge and other lawyers whom you know from this program, as are reporting continues on this tuesday afternoon. va guaranteed cash out loan.ay it lets you take out an average of over 50,000 dollars. you could refinance your mortgage, consolidate your credit card debt, put cash in the bank, and lower your payments by over 600 dollars a month. newday looks at your whole financial picture, not just your credit score, so if you're a veteran homeowner who needs cash, call newday usa. you don't see psoriasis. you see clear skin. you see me. but if you saw me before cosentyx... ♪ i was covered. it was awful. but i didn't give up. i kept fighting. i got clear skin with cosentyx. 3 years and counti

judge andrew napolitano on fox news today. >> it is a crime for the president to solicit aid for his campaign from a foreign government. an agreement or a solicitation for assistance for an american campaign regulated by the federal election commission where you are seeking the assistance from a foreign government, that's the crime. >> that's the judge on fox news, andrew napolitano. joe biden responding to the president's attacks today saying this. >> i can take the political attacks. they'll come and they'll go, and in time they'll soon be forgotten. but if we allow a president to get away with shredding the united states constitution, that will last forever. >> a momentous day. only two presidents -- andrew johnson, bill clinton -- have been impeached in our country's history. richard nixon, of course, resigned in the midst of impeachment proceedings. and speaking of richard nixon, there is this very important point that i need to point out to you here. take a look at this. this is the front page of the "new york times" from june 21st, 1974, okay? we'll leave it up for you. there

judge andrew napolitano.ouse democrats are still dancing around the i word commit the impeachment thing, because they know could backfire on them. how many of them are there? after this. it's been a long time since andrew dusted off his dancing shoes. luckily denture breath will be the least of his worries. because he uses polident 4 in 1 cleaning system to kill 99.99% of odor causing bacteria. polident. clean. fresh. and confident. and now for their servicer to the community, bacteria. we present limu emu & doug with this key to the city. [ applause ] it's an honor to tell you that liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. and now we need to get back to work. [ applause and band playing ] only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ >> what concerns me about impeachment now, let's break it down, the odds are very high that it's not going to bear any fruit. the odds are very high that this president will continue to be the president. the odds are ve

andrew napolitano is here. we had a lot of busy news day's but getting your hands around all that has happened today is very difficult. i want to break this down to something very simple. the president admits that on the phone call with the president of the ukraine he requested that the president of the ukraine investigate his 2020 political rival, joe biden. is that a crime? >> it is a crime for the present to solicit aid for his campaign from a foreign government. >> shepard: so that to which the president has admitted is in and of itself a crime. >> yes, it is the same crime for which the organization decided not to seek an indictment. >> that's on the obstruction of justice, whether or not there was a conspiracy theory. he said there's some evidence but not enough to indict. and it's the same crime, an agreement or solicitation for assistance for an american campaign regulated by the federal election commission. >> shepard: at rudy giuliani's that he too pressed her ukrainian officials to investigate biden

fox news senior judicial analyst, judge andrew napolitano, is with us now.g here. khalid shaikh mohammed, the mastermind behind the attacks, is still awaiting trial. why? >> so under the constitution, you have a right to a speedy trial. this is the longest delay in american history between the commission of the crime and the happening of the trial while the defendant has been incarcerated. so there's a couple reasons. one, took the supreme court three cases and seven years to conclude these people have the same rights as if they were americans being tried on the mainland, because the provisions of the constitution that regulate due process pertain to persons, not just citizens. therefore, wherever the government goes to confine and try people, the constitution goes with them. second, the government tortured these people and extracted information from them as a result of the torture. what's the due process ruling came in, all the torture information can't come in. so the government had to reconstruct its cases and find ways to get this information before a ju

the judge is coming in, andrew napolitano, fox news senior judicial analyst.e is next. ♪ that's why your cash automatically goes into a money market fund when you open a new account. just another reminder of the value you'll find at fidelity. open an account today. dimitri's on it. eating right? on it! getting those steps in? on it! dimitri thinks he's doing all he can to manage his type 2 diabetes and heart disease, but is his treatment doing enough to lower his heart risk? [sfx: glasses clanking.] sorry. maybe not. jardiance is the number 1 prescribed pill in its class. jardiance can reduce the risk of cardiovascular death for adults who also have known heart disease. that means jardiance can help save your life from a heart attack or stroke. plus, jardiance lowers a1c and it could help you lose some weight. jardiance can cause serious side effects including dehydration, genital yeast or urinary tract infections, and sudden kidney problems. ketoacidosis is a serious side effect that may be fatal. a rare, but life-threatening bacterial infection in the skin o

joining us right now is judge andrew napolitano. >> good morning., when the anti-trust division of the justice department, the federal government, announces that they're commencing an investigation, sometimes they announce the investigation by filing a complaint, sometimes the investigation takes years because there's so much information they have to gather from the entities they're investigating. it's not surprising for the state attorneys general to do the same thing. the feds are looking to correct what they believe are monopoly practices, practices intended to prevent any competition from entering the marketplace. the state attorneys general only want one thing. can you guess what that is? cash. they want to shake down google to get these investigations to go away, so they can supplement their state treasuries. that's all they're looking for. the state anti-trust statutes mimic almost word for word the federal anti-trust. maria: judge, google has 90% market share in search, right? >> the question is, did they obtain that 90% by any i'l illel mea

bring in the judge andrew napolitano. senior judicial analyst. good day and good morning.f things i want to bring to your attention. did you hear ken starr last hour? what did you think? >> i agree with him that this is in the oversight area. i disagree with him there is no basis for an allegation for impeachable behavior on the part of the president. the president has admitted to holding up nearly $400 million in aid until he got a political favor, his word favor from the president of the ukraine. that's arguably impeachable. what i agree with ken starr is in is house of representatives hasn't taken a vote to move forward with impeachment. when it does, if it does, then the president loses a lot of defenses like executive privilege evaporates and whoever they subpoena must testify. they have not yet done that. >> bill: i thought what he was saying is nancy pelosi has wide latitude here suggesting that they don't have to take it before the full house for a vote in order to continue -- another question on yes or no on impeachment but whether to go forward. >> yes, if they h

regarding the brett kavanaugh situation joining us to talk about the latest allegations and judge andrew napolitanough to sue the new york times? he is known for yanking bar owners back from the brink on bar rescue. >> you don't even walk through it and look around. you know the term hostile takeover? i am getting through to you. shame on you. >> on tapper with a new season behind-the-scenes, a dozen minutes from now, right here on the channel everybody trusts for their morning news. let's do it. to you. be right back. ...and earn a free night. because when your business is rewarding yourself, our business is you. book direct at choicehotels.com is skincare from around the wobetter than olay? olay regenerist faced 131 premium products, from 12 countries, over 10 years. olay's hydration was unbeaten every time. olay, face anything. hour 36 in the stakeout. as soon as the homeowners arrive, we'll inform them that liberty mutual customizes home insurance, so they'll only pay for what they need. your turn to keep watch, limu. wake me up if you see anything. [ snoring ] [ loud squawking and siren blarin

judge andrew napolitano a key player on fox news says this. this just a lawyer saying we lost and we don't like him? >> that's not what you thing. she's making an admission on behalf of her client that there was significant bias that motivated her outrageous allegations that were found to be unsubstantiated. they couldn't find a shred of evidence or support for these accusations and so it is clear that there was political bias. and contrary to the prior segment you had with neil gorsuch talking about you don't have 5 people change the constitution, that's exactly what liberals want and what they got in roe versus wade and today they will do anything and stop at nothing to prevent any such changes so despite the fact that this man's reputation was dragged through the mud they don't care. 's for troubling, just that her testimony was shaped by her lawyer or this motivation and not the truth and merits further investigation. >> senator tom tillis suggested it will be the subject of an investigation. in the meantime, during the flagrant and ruthle

we will talk about that and brooke shields to appear on the same show with andrew napolitano.e worked it out, they will both be on together. a man wanted in the 1985 hijacking of the twa flight under arrest by greek police. by hijacker accused of killing his passengers after finding out he served in the u.s. navy but that was the big story yesterday. stephen's brother says the greek police have the wrong man. that exclusive coming your way. see you later, guys. this is the family who wanted to connect... and find inspiration in new places. leading them to discover: we're woven together by the moments we share. everything you need, all in one place. expedia. m...before she puts them in the dishwasher. so what does the dishwasher do? cascade platinum does the work for you, prewashing and removing stuck-on foods, the first time. wow, that's clean! cascade platinum. ♪ go where my baby lives b[ growl ]olle♪s good boy. hey. hey. you must be steven's phone. know who's on your network and control who shouldn't be with xfinity xfi. simple. easy. awesome. rob: breaking news, moments ago

andrew napolitano we'll be right back. this is the age of expression.something to say. but in a world full of talking, shouldn't somebody be listening? so. let's talk. we are edward jones. with one financial advisor per office, we're built for hearing what's important to you. one to one. edward jones. it's time for investing to feel individual. 2,000 fence posts. 900 acres. 48 bales. all before lunch, which we caught last saturday. we earn our scars. we wear our work ethic. we work until the work's done. and when it is, a few hours of shuteye to rest up for tomorrow, the day we'll finally get something done. ( ♪ ) but when i started seeing things, i didn't know what was happening... so i kept it in. he started believing things that weren't true. i knew something was wrong... but i didn't say a word. during the course of their disease around 50% of people with parkinson's may experience hallucinations or delusions. but now, doctors are prescribing nuplazid. the only fda approved medicine... proven to significantly reduce hallucinations and delusions rela

david: judge andrew napolitano.see you my friend. >>> climate change protests shutting down d.c. commutes but our next guest wants to shut down the protests. [shouting] here, it all starts with a simple... hello! -hi! how can i help? a data plan for everyone. everyone? everyone. let's send to everyone! [ camera clicking ] wifi up there? -ahhh. sure, why not? how'd he get out?! a camera might figure it out. that was easy! glad i could help. at xfinity, we're here to make life simple. easy. awesome. so come ask, shop, discover at your xfinity store today. ♪ david: i love the new logo. kristina on campus. after graduation students are pushing to get free room and board, not just them, with their parents? christina part take as closer look at -- kristina partsineveloss takes a look at 20-somethings leaving campus and coming home. >> you're a dad. david: i'm a dad. >> many reasons why you see this trend amongst millenials. a ugov survey saying millens ya'll, they interviewed 1200 people above the page 18, millenials are

he won senator tillis, our own analyst, judge andrew napolitano, says there may be some concern thatrd should have after her attorney has spilled this. watch. then i will get your reaction. >> what is the worst-case scenario, here? did she make this whole story u up? that would be perjury. and probably conspiracy, because others might have been involved. does the justice department want to investigate this? or is this just a lawyer saying, "you know, we lost this. he's on the court, we don't like him." >> harris: so, that asterisk. can you remove that, if the doj looks into it? what is your reaction? >> first off, there is no asterisk next to brett kavanaugh. the real question, i guess, would be -- many of us left the committee thinking that maybe ms. ford experienced something, but it had nothing to do with brett kavanaugh. that does seem to undermine what we all believed was a legitimate traumatic experience in her life. we will just let the process play out. clearly, a misrepresentation before a senate committee is a very serious offense. hopefully we can get past that. >> harris:

regards to whether there's been crimes committed, judge andrew napolitano see evidence of criminality tune that out? >> i can't speak for the judge. you know, i've seen -- i've certainly seen some of the things he's said. what is the crime that was committed? you know, i have a -- a lot of people have a short-term memory. >> conspiracy, extorsion, bribery. i will leave that to the lawyers, but to say there's no evidence of a crime just seems like a stretch to me. >> hey, hey, let's leave it to us to discuss. remember the initial press report said that the president was on the phone call and he demanded a quid pro quo. either you investigate joe biden or you're not going to get the military aid. some of these press reports said that eight times in the conversation the president said that. when the transcript was released, i think it was a mistake to release the transcript, but when it was released it came out that the president had never said the military aid, had never said any threat of holding back any aid to the ukrainians. so where did these -- does anyone ever call the reporters

our senior judicial analyst judge andrew napolitano is here. it will be 20 years on.ow the hell does it take 20 years to prosecute this? >> a series of unusual events. it took the supreme court three cases all of which were lost by the bush administration to decide with finality that the defendants at guantanamo bay were entitled to the same constitutional rights as they would be if they were americans in the united states. the parts of the constitution that are relevant to protect persons, not citizens. the bush administration resisted it. when that ruling came in, it meant evidence obtained by torture couldn't be used. that forced the government to reconstruct its entire case from the beginning. how are we going to present this evidence without getting out of the mouths of defendants who'd been tortured. the government anticipating that had fbi agents talk to the defendants before they were tortured before they were charged, before they had a right to a lawyer. the fbi, the prosecutors tried to get the evidence out of the mouths of the fbi agents as to what the tort

judge andrew napolitano is here. where do you see this? >> the lawsuits that i've seen so far are certainly with merit. now, this is a novel area of law. no jury verdicts and no serious medical literature. some jury will hear testimony from physicians and scientists in favor of the injured plaintiffs and those from the manufacturer. the jury will answer specific questions, its findings about juul. so hear's what we want to know. did juul supply -- not just juul. >> shepard: juul is more than 70%. >> juul is the 800-pound gorilla in the room. did juul comply with the marketing regulations that the fda imposed on it. did they say things to these kids that the fda authorized or did they go off the path. reason this is important is, juul does not have a permanent approval from the fda. they have a provisional approval. one of the ways to lose the approval is by not complying with the fda regs. >> shepard: bigger picture. kids smoke cigarettes, they don't shut down marlboro. kids get vodka, they don't shut down vodka companies. why is this diff

here is a quick update yesterday judge andrew napolitano a legal analyst at fox and a very nice guy went our daytime shows and declared that the president's phone call with the head of ukraine was a crime. here's what he said. >> it is a crime for the president to solicit aid for his campaign from a foreign government. so. >> that would be -- that to which the president has admitted is in and of itself a crime? >> yes. >> tucker: so that definitely got our attention, of course, it's a crime. and so i ask you because you prosecuted a lot of crimes and for viewers that didn't see it, here's what you said. >> well, i think judge napolitano is a fool and i think what he said today is foolish. no, it is not a crime. let me underscore emphatically that nothing that the president said on that call or what we think he said on that call constitutes a crime and even if he had said you are not going to get the money, it would not be a crime. tuck, apparently our daytime host who hosted judge napolitano was watching last night and was outraged by what you said and quite ironically called you partisa

the man himself, fox senior judicial analyst, judge andrew napolitano. >> remain seated.harles: your initial take on this after boeing through it? >> there is two-ways to look at this. one is the president said i need a favor. at the time he said i need a favor the president of the ukraine realized that president trump was holding up $390 million which had been authorized. charles: objection. leading the witness. >> yeah, right. charles: what do you mean? let's go through this. because some people haven't read this yet. when the president zelensky talked about buying more javelins from the united states for defense purposes president trump said i would like for to you do as you favor though because our country has been through a lot. ukraine knows a lot about this whole situation. but he was talking about cloud strike and server. he didn't bring up the bidens that was the initial reaction. crowdstrike investigated the dnc. >> yeah. charles: i guess they found nothing. president trump went on to mention, you saw a performance, the whole nonsense ended with a very poor perf

while they do that, bring in our expert, fox news senior judicial analyst, judge andrew napolitano. ken paxton essentially says the internet is not free, witnessed by the gargantuan profits google and youtube. he said this is a akin to fact-finding mission. are you okay with this? >> no. you can't start an investigation because you think somebody is too rich, start an investigation. you start an investigation, if there is some evidence, some evidence of criminal activity. now there are two antitrust pursuits. one is civil antitrust. we want the court to break this company up because it is too big. the other is criminal antitrust. have they harmed somebody, have they done this intentionally to harm? there are two questions that are always asked at the beginning of any antitrust investigation. has the consumer been harmed and has the defendant engaged in anti-competitive activity. both questions have to be answered yes to justify this investigation. charles: it would seem they would have inkling whether those two are satisfied. it sounded like no, we're not sure. we all do google sear

let's bring in fox news senior judicial analyst, judge andrew napolitano.sked for you on this, because free-speech is your lane. >> looked, the city of san francisco, just like the state of california or the federal government, cannot punish a person or a group because of their speech. with the city is attempting to do is punish the nra, the national rifle association, because of its robust advocacy of the second amendment rights. by labeling it a terrorist organization. first of all, only the fbi can label an entity as a terrorist organization, and one of the linchpins of that labeling is that the entity itself has committed crimes of violence, intended to affect the policy of the government. that's not the nra at all. think about it -- individuals have freedom of speech. the government doesn't have freedom of speech, because if the government exercises free-speech rights, it monopolizes the marketplace. it makes people think twice before they want to contradict the government for fear of reprisal. in this case, the reprisals are serious. if the nra uses a

this federal state showdown could and maybe should turn out, fox senior judicial analyst, judge andrew napolitanost of "the liberty file" on "fox nation." these emissions rules, judge, have been really, really closely tracked in the auto industry. they want to know how the whole thing will shake out. >> right. connell: federal government versus the state, is it states rights issue or both? >> it is both. it is interstate commerce and state as rights issues. here is how the it came down. statute was written set a floor which no state could permit or manufacturer could permit the automobile to go, the statute gave the president of the united states to make a waiver. not to make the rules easier but make them more difficult. to impose greater standards as a manufacturer. california has been doing that for years. if you buy a car in nevada, drive it to california it might not conform to the california law. that is the president's argument, you go from one state to another, that will not conform, that will interfere with interstate commerce. california is talking about health and safety here, particul

all rise, judge andrew napolitano. what do you think? >> there is no such thing as constitutional immunity. the president has immunity and conversations that he has with his most senior aides about military, diplomatic, and sensitive security matters, however, i don't blame the white house, and i don't blame the doj for trying to frustrate the investigation of the president. because we don't know what that investigation is. stated differently, if the congress decides that they want to impeach the president, there are no privileges until they do that, they are going to get this resistance. there is absolutely no obstacle that the congress gets its hands on whatever it wants from the president once it decides to impeach. but as congressman pointed out, though democrats are schizophrenic on this. mrs. pelosi does not want it to happen, because she knows there will be backlash. she gives 50 or 60 hard-core lefties who hate the president. she is trying to walk that narrow line. it does not work. >> charles: although the term may not be offici

let's bring in fox news senior judicial analyst, judge andrew napolitano. judge, tech crunch just coming out with a new data breach, 419 million records of several data bases worldwide have been released and they said the server on which this data base was located was not protected by a password and furthermore, anybody could have found access to the data base. that gives more fuel to the fire of whether or not somebody like zuckerberg could be held personally liable and go to jail as a result of these releases. >> well, this is gross negligence which is a very extreme form of negligence but unfortunately for senator wyden, it is not a crime. as he knows, it is not a crime for him to lie and it's not a crime for mark zuckerberg to lie, assuming neither is under oath and assuming neither is certifying something to be true. right now, the american public is protected by laws that require, because of a contractual relationship between facebook and its customers, require facebook when it receives confidential information to secure it. they obviously haven't. th

joining us now is judge andrew napolitano. always a pleasure. a couple basics. the supreme court ruled that if there is a federal statute and a state statute and the same behavior has arguably vi violatd both, that both can investigate. so at the same time that the ftc is looking at facebook and at the same time that the department of justice is looking a at alphabet, the state attorneys general in two groups, one headed by the attorney general of the state of new york and one headed by the attorney general of the state of texas, these are nonide non-ideoogical, they're looking to see if individual state laws were violated, particularly the laws against privacy. the federal law that prohibits for example computer hacking or flailing to safeguard information that was given to you, there are state versions of those law as well. that's one way to look at this. the other way to look at this is, what do they really want? they're running in the red. they're looking for cash. dagen: bingo. >> just like when they shook down big tobacco. they got billion

maria: joining us right now is fox news senior judicial analyst, judge andrew napolitano.bribery, if it is bribery, it is an impeachable offense. if it's bribery it's easier to understand and to demonstrate and more grave in my view anything bob mueller alleged or unearthed. the president admits to the phone calls. there were eight of them. he admits he discussed joe biden. he admits he held up on $390 million worth of aid, 250 are a series of licenses to manufacturers to sell military hardware to ukraine, 140 is actually largesse. he said he was concerned it would get into the wrong hands. if his intent was pure, there is no crime. if his intent was to get the government of ukraine to help the campaign, his campaign for re-election, but tarnishing joe biden or his son, that's a felony. that's the same felony he was investigated for, for which he was never charged, by mueller. maria: kelly. >> i thought there wasn't -- people kept talking about collusion. there's no law on collusion. is there a specific law that says the president cannot ask a foreign leader to look into h

we're getting into that with judge andrew napolitano later this hour. ♪. oh, wow. have such a great trip. thanks to you, we will. this is why voya helps reach today's goals... ...all while helping you to and through retirement. can you help with these? we're more of the plan, invest and protect kind of help... voya. helping you to and through retirement. tv aas many safety features powas the rx, the new...... the lexus rx has met its match. if they're talking about you... you must be doing something right. experience the style, craftsmanship, and technology that have made the rx the leading luxury suv of all time. lease the 2019 rx 350 for $399 a month for 36 months. experience amazing at your lexus dealer. now you can, with shipsticks.com! no more lugging your clubs through the airport or risk having your clubs lost or damaged by the airlines. sending your own clubs ahead with shipsticks.com makes it fast & easy to get to your golf destination. with just a few clicks or a phone call, we'll pick up and deliver your clubs on-time, guaranteed, for as low as $39.99. s

joining us now is analyst judge andrew napolitano.r who is chair of the house judiciary committee, the place where any impeachment inquiry would have to begin, was asked right after the new york times piece came out, are you going to start another impeachment inquiry, he said don't you think we have enough on our hands. so he's already either counted noses or realizes that whatever they're doing with president trump, because they haven't said whether or not it's impeachment which is causing them a lot of constitutional issues, another story for another time, i don't think there is the political will even to commence an impeachment proceeding against justice kavanaugh. this could of course -- it would not be unprecedented. the last time it happened against a sitting supreme court justicer was 200 years ago. the question is not that this happened, because the evidence of this happening is so sketchy, the question is did ellie or mislead -- did he lie or mislead congress and did the fbi knowingly look the other way. that has caused a lot

to liberty file host, fox nation, so much more, best-selling author, judge andrew napolitano.is last week, and many said we agree with everything you're saying about the danger to kids, et cetera, but be careful what you wish for. what did you mean by that? >> i meant that people, very similar to what your prior guest was saying, that the people no longer have vaping available to them will go back to cigarettes, which is probably far worse for them, as bad as vaping is, cigarettes is worse, and that is really the opposite of what governor cuomo wants. but let me say this about governor cuomo. under the constitution, health, safety, welfare and morality is reserved for the states. so he really has his eye on the ball. this is not a federal issue. it may be a national issue but it's not a federal issue. but i think this bang is going -- banning is going to backfire on him. neil: this issue, this goes against the republican grain, you know, let business do its thing but in this case, the argument is, and the president has espoused, it's kids. >> i think number one, we have to do

here to reacted fox news senior judicial analyst and host of liberty file on fox nation judge andrew napolitanoon this? >> you know, this is not a decision on the merits. this is a decision on whether or not the president's authority should be interfered with by the court while the trial is going on. the trial court said yes. the famous or infamous ninth circuit said yes. the supreme court said no. interestingly, this is the second time this very issue went to the supreme court. the first time the supreme court said yeah, we are going to keep everything in place during the trial. so the case goes back to a san francisco trial judge to try the case. and the issue is this: should immigrants from countries other than mexico, who want to come here, be forced to apply for asylum in mexico first or does that violate federal law and does it violate treaties to which the united states is a party? those treaties, some of them go back to the truman era basically say when an immigrants is knocking on the door, because they are being persecuted by the government or the place that they live, you have to ans

brian: judge andrew napolitano. judge, what are we to believe?ad scratcher because rod rosenstein was donald trump's appointee to be the number two person. basically the chief operating officer of the department of justice under then attorney general jeff sessions. and he said that this was a joke. now, if you read mccabe's memo, and if you believe what andrew mccabe wrote. brian: and you might not. >> you might not because don't forget he was dismissed from the justice department from the fbi for not being truthful to interrogators when they were asking him about his own behavior and he is being investigated by the united states attorney for the district of columbia for committing perjury, lying under oath. nevertheless, he does give such a detailed explanation of rosen sign's comments that it just doesn't square with rosenstein's assertion that this was a joke. i said it sarcastically. steve: at the same time they can both be true. >> yes. steve: mr. rosenstein could have been joking and mr. mccabe took it serious. >> it didn't happen. if you a

her attorney said she came forward to -- let's bring in judge andrew napolitano and host of the libertyd morning, judge. she is back. >> look, this statement that is attributed to her lawyer. a tape of the question. no question the lawyer said it. appears to be a violation of the attorney/client privilege revealing what was in her client's brain at the time the client was communicating with her and these communications are not supposed to be revealed. that's one way to look at it. why would she be saying this now and do we care what the motivation was for her allegations against now justice kavanaugh? we all watched this. she was a credible witness. he was a very credible witness. neither of them changed anybody's mind apparently and he was confirmed. so did she make these allegations because they really happened and she believed he wasn't worthy of a seat in the supreme court or does she make these allegations because she believed he would get on the court and undermine his credibility in her mind against roe versus wade. >> bill: here is debra katz, her attorney. >> he will always hav

ignite impeachment proceedings once again, joining me right now fox news judicial analyst judge andrew napolitanoent pursuing, this is more of the same with jerry nadler. >> i have 30 second to explain. maria: you have all the time you need. >> i'm kidding. i think a person that's very happy about this, elizabeth warren, it makes joe biden's presidential chances dimmer by the minute as you see the behavior in which he not apparently but obviously some of it is on tape engaged in order to help the son, is the president in hot water? well, depends on whether there was a quid pro quo stated or unstated, for example, did the president press the president of -- or the prime minister of ukraine to investigate hunter biden and did he hold back $250 million worth of defensive military equipment, vital not only for the ukraine but also that part of europe because the ukraine government didn't conduct this investigation, is there a there there because they twiced investigated hunter biden and twice decided that there was no basis to pursue it. is joe biden's biden behavior even more obvious and worse than

judge andrew napolitano first thing on a monday morning. i can take you for this. this is good.onday morning. why on earth must a board of directors go on trial because of a ceo's pay package? >> utterly outrageous. it's a novel view of delaware law and the argument is because he is a 21% shareholder, that the other shareholders might have voted for his pay package in fear of him and it wasn't a freely exercised vote. in my view, i read his opinion, it's a 50-page opinion, there is no evidence for this what soe . soever. this is a colossal waste of time and money on legal fees. they have a dissident shareholder who objects profoundly to the award, not compensation, he's being paid zero, it's an award that he can reach. $55.8 billion if tesla achieves certain goals which it has yet to achieve. first of all, this is moot because he hasn't been paid, because tesla hasn't achieved these goals yet. secondly, there's obviously a vote of a compensation committee. they had an outside group come in and advise them as to what his compensation would be. they picked a number that was lower

let's bring in andrew napolitano, the judge, the judge, that is all i have to say. it's you. the subtitle of this meeting is extremism on line. how do you define extremism? how do these folks inside of the beltway define extremism? >> one person's extremism is another person's mainstream. this is almost impossible to define. the first amendment basically says the government shouldn't be in the business of defining it. when the supreme occur has examined hate speech and violence in video games and online, the supreme court has upheld the right to post all of that because hate speech is protected and visualizations of violence, whether real violence, that you're seeing a movie of or whether depicted violence by cartoon figures absolutely protected. ainsley: if i go on one of these platforms, judge, incite violence, that is my aim. am i protected? >> great question. the last time the supreme court looked at that, unanimous opinion many times said following, all innocuous speech is absolutely protected and all speech is innocuous when there is time for more speech to re

come in judge andrew napolitano. is the law going to kill the vaping industry?politics is going to kill the vaping industry, in massachusetts the governor on his own banned the sale, not the possession or use but the sale of vaping products, these are products that are authorized and licensed by the fda under the constitution, that trumps, of course, trumps what the states want to do. so the governor of a state, the mayor of a city cannot interfere with the sale of a product that the fda has authorized. you mentioned that juul will curtail advertising, that's approved by the fda, as long as they approve from the approval, consistent with the wording and placement of the wording that the fda approved, there can be no liability for the consequences of that advertising, so there's a lot going on below the surface, we know of the criminal investigation, we don't know what it's about. this is the fbi in california which is where juul is headquartered, yesterday speculated that it might be the material misrepresentation of facts to the fda in order to get their approv

to weigh in is fox news senior judicial analyst and host of liberty file on fox nation judge andrew napolitanon assault on justice. >> certainly an effort to undermine brett kavanaugh as a credible legal thinker and member of the supreme court. remember the supreme court doesn't have an army to enforce its rulings are enforced because of the credibility that the legal community and the judicial community put in these nine justices puts in these nine justices and if you begin diminishing one of them for reasons with nothing to do with understanding of the law. that will undermine the court. we don't know exactly what happened here. did the fbi know about this and not investigate it? that's a serious issue. were the questions to then judge kavanaugh sufficient to have triggered an explanation of this and did he not answer truthfully? that's a serious issue. can he be impeached? look, the constitution says impeachment is for treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors. this phrase is not in the constitution but we understand it to mean committed during office. it also would pertain to

fox news analyst judge andrew napolitano is accusing congress of enabling trump to act as a tyrant. > imposes a sales tax on the items from china, when he builds a wall at the mexico/texas border using funds that the congress denied him but he takes the funds anyway, he is merely using the power that the congress has given to him and former presidents in violation of the constitution. when that happens, when congress throws up its hands and says let the president do it, that's dangerous to our liberty. because the beauty of our liberty is the division, the separation of powers. the congress writes the laws, the courts interpret them. but when congress lets presidents write their own laws, then he's not a president he's a prince. >> so there you go, susan del percio -- >> by the way, that's how real conservatives still talk. >> yeah. he's dead right. and that's on fox news. and susan, at some point you wonder if members of congress might actually hear this, let alone think for it themselves. >> you're right, mika. because when president trump started out, he had a complacent majority w

to discuss is fox news senior judicial analyst and host of liberty file on fox nation judge andrew napolitanoy said behind closed doors and in the report. >> how frustrating we don't know what congressman meadows knows what jim comey said under oath behind closed doortsz. so the allegation is he said some things under oath in secret. and then he said some things under oath in private. and they are inconsistent. they couldn't both be true and they were both under oath. they must have lied somewhere. that's congressman meadow's allegation. what he has done with it is the proper thing to do. said to the inspector general. can you resolve this? can you decide where the truth is? and if you think one of these is a lie, would you refer it to the u.s. attorney in connecticut? why connecticut? he is the person that's been assigned by the justice department to investigate and seek indictment. brian: sure. >> the inspector general, the fellow who was just on the screen, mike horowitz, dolls not seek indictments. he does not prosecute. he investigates present and former employees of the dorge, which inc

judge andrew napolitano. >> good morning. case and you looked at the complaint. what do you think. >> you gave me the case at 4:30 this morning and i devoured the complaint. brian: i got your voice mail but then you finally picked up. >> god love you. it's a very difficult case to prove. most of the allegations in here we all know are true. we know what fusion gps did. we know that bob mueller didn't even know what the report was when they asked him about it. the question is did it create a cause of action for which congressman nunes can seek relief? brian: yes. >> thank you, counselor. the essence of his complaint is as a result of all of, this as a result of everything g.p.s. did. as a result of simpson lying under oath according to congressman nunes. simpson has not been charged with that there were ethics complaints filed against congressman nunes. because of that he had to spend money to defend himself and couldn't do his job as a ranking member of the intelligence committee. ethics complaints are privileged. you can't s

i want to bring in judge andrew napolitano because when i hear the word criminal complaint, that raises ante. >> we don't have a complaint. we have an investigation. like a lot of these investigations, they begin sub rosa. we don't even know what's being investigated. the essence of crime is harm and the essence of crime is an intent to harm someone. so one could speculate that maybe the allegation is that juul misled regulators about whether or not its product was harmful, and if the misleading of regulators was done under oath, as almost everything is, that could be the crime. i'm really speculating here. the "wall street journal" reports that rumors surrounding juul are that federal investigators, criminal investigators, are looking at juul. beyond that, we can't seem to get anything solid about what they're looking for. stuart: the word criminal worries me. >> the word criminal is terrifying. it means the fbi believes there's probable cause, there's a basis to continue devoting assets, resources, to a criminal investigation. stuart: join the discussion about google, please. >> i was