. >> harris: we want to bring in judge andrew napolitano, fox news senior judicial analyst. thank you for joining us. let me ask you, can you tell us the difference, the two charges he was convicted on, criminal sexual act in the fifth degree, rape in the third degree. >> the first charge, is a rape, the forcible entry of a body of another without that person's consent. the second charges the same without the entry, the forcible thrusting of himself on another person's body for his own gratificatiogratification. that's the difference between the two of them. that's why one of them as a potential 20 years and the other is a potential four years. the surprises in this case, melissa, are the acquittals for the sexual predatory behavior, those are new statutes in new york and in california which would mean almost automatically life in prison. those charges require an actual rape within the statute of limitations and some sexual predatory behavior. at any time, the actress from "the sopranos" testified to an attack going back to 1992, obviously couldn't be prosecuted for that tod

judge andrew napolitano, thank you. we are going to bring you back to us as soon as we get the verdict, and we will squeeze in a quick break here. but don't worry, we will be right back as we continue to follow the sentencing here. pardon me, the sentencing in the roger stone trial. we'll be right back. ♪ oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! ♪ (announcer) once-weekly ozempic® is helping many people with type 2 diabetes like james lower their blood sugar. a majority of adults who took ozempic® reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. here's your a1c. oh! my a1c is under 7! (announcer) and you may lose weight. adults who took ozempic® lost on average up to 12 pounds. i lost almost 12 pounds! oh! (announcer) ozempic® does not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events like heart attack, stroke, or death. there's no increased risk. oh! and i only have to take it once a week. oh! ♪ oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! ♪ (announcer) ozempic® should not be the first medicine for treating diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoa

andrew napolitano straight-ahead. the reason why.t lets you shortcut the loan process and refinance with no income verification, no appraisal, and no out of pocket costs. one call can save you $2000 every year. call my team at newday usa right now. dhtd=ñ6z jy4hoúm# you try to stay ahead of the mess. but scrubbing still takes time. now there's new powerwash dish spray. it's the faster way to clean as you go. just spray, wipe and rinse. it cleans grease five times faster. new dawn powerwash. spray, wipe, rinse. >> sandra: new fallout in the roger stone case. judge amy berman jackson firing back at him, denying his request that she be removed from deciding whether he gets a new trial. kristin fisher has more on all of that from washington for us this morning. hey, kristen. >> hey, sandra. the immediate issue is something that judge jackson said during roger stone during roger stone sentencing. she said the jury had served with integrity. a stone's defense team immediately pounce on that filing a motion on friday saying the statement sh

we bring in judge andrew napolitano. so who was right?ok at this, one way is president is chief law enforcement officer in the united states and he is entitle to make law enforcement decisions with respect to federal prosecution. david: that is not what senator schumer made. said. >> right, his argument is opposite, it is unseemly for president publicly to intercede in a trial still go on, that statement was echoed by senator lindsey graham by the way. one of president's strongest supporters. so, what to do when lawyers make the recommendations? against it is just a recommendation. judges have an algorithm, when properly applied shows stone should be exposed to three to four years, but there are ways to raise that, which is what prosecutor did, it in the hands of the judge, one of the reasons it is in her hands, because of legislation that president trump signed that allowed federal judges to deviate and are recommendations and sentence minimum or maximum. >> judge, this is a set up question, i hope you appreciate this, why do you. they h

. >> dana: let's bring in judge andrew napolitano. day of deliberations, given what the jury asked about today in regards to that list, people being flagged for investigation comp does not give you any clue as to what they might be thinking about? >> it sounds as if they are being very methodical. they have in it a of the indictment. again as alex reported this is a tremendous about of questions, more than is normal. now the question sound as though harvey weinstein should be happy in terms of what they are zeroing in on. that's what's bad for harvey weinstein. what's good is this is a very, very rare rate trial where police have not testified. the nypd has been investigating weinstein for years and interrogated everybody that's a witness in this case and the government chose not to put them on. you can infer from not that the nypd didn't believe the witnesses and so didn't want to be involved in the case. that was an argument that was made in the closing argument by the defense counsel. >> dana: so he has this to deal with and additi

judge andrew napolitano, fox news senior judicial analyst. always good to have you. thank you. all right, a rough debut. mike bloomberg, getting pummeled from all sides in his first democratic debate. the headlines are brutal. as the candidate declares last night's real winner, it wasn't anybody on the debate stage. defendant socialism. bernie sanders is not backing down is very expensive plan. but he is right to say that america is already socialist? question mark? is he read about that? think about it during the commercial. reaction to this. ♪ what? i got it. alexa, start roomba. the lexus es. eagerly prepared for the unexpected. lease the 2020 es 350 for $389 a month for 36 months. experience amazing at your lexus dealer. dropping to near record lows, my team at newday usa lease the 2020 es 350 for $389 a month for 36 months. is helping more veterans refinance than ever. the newday va streamline refi is the reason why. it lets you shortcut the loan process and refinance with no income verification, no appraisal, and no out of pocket costs. one call can save you $2000 every y

>> i saw you mentioned judge andrew napolitano.t to california and air force one they have television, turn to fox business you will be very interested, mr. president, what judge andrew napolitano has to say about the pardons. that is coming up in about ten minutes. connell: now that's a tease. there you go. see you at the top of the hour. lauren: thanks for the lessons today, gentlemen. we have out of this world experience. spacex is offering a trip around the earth for a few lucky, private, perhaps rich citizens. plus swiping left on apps in general. how the dating scene is well, going back to the basics. maybe you don't have to play it. connell: what? lauren: you don't even know what i'm talking about. connell: no. ♪. stewasted opportunity. >>exactly. that's why td ameritrade designed a first-of-its-kind, personalized education center. see, you just >>oh, this is easy. yeah, and that's >>oh, just what i need. courses on options trading, webcasts, tutorials. yeah. their award-winning content is tailored to fit your investing goal

we bring in fox news judicial analyst, judge andrew napolitano. thank you.hattan prosecutor, he got two out of five convictions. do you think he is disappointed. >> i am sure he is. but you saw from his press conference he will try to make the most out of this he was dragged kicking and screaming. i exaggerate to bring this -- these cases before a grand jury. because he had been caught up in this vent where weinstein lawyers have been making contributions to him. he knew that lawyers represented weinstein at the time. david: compromise. >> and he dropped changes, now these charges, but -- not these but others, he was red faced over it, he said okay i'm not taking campaign contributions from any lawyers, who are representing people that my office is prosecuting, in weinstein case it was too little too late, high got . he was using, a novel statute in new york. california has same statute, if you can prove a rape went state out of limitation and prove similar behavior at any other time, in this case alleged to occur in 19. >>1992, then you can find the defen d

here is senior judicial analyst judge andrew napolitano. >> you have a duty, an affirmative obligation to reveal to us when we selected you the existence of these tweets and you wish you were so harshly negative about the president. >> when asked if he would consider pardoning roger stone paul manafort or general michael flynn the president said he is not even thinking about that. >> plenty of breaking news, many thanks, the president flagged the story that broke yesterday confirming a meeting between a prominent democratic senator and the iranian foreign minister. richardson tracking down what happened and what it all means. >> senator chris murphy says he met with iran's foreign minister to wonderscore bipartisan priorities like release of american hostages and protecting us forces in the middle east, donald trump suggests murphy broke the law. >> senator murphy met with the iranians, i just saw that on the way over. is there anything i should know because it sounds to me a violation of the logan act. >> a really used 1799 federal law prohibiting unauthorized americans from conductin

information they can't grant anyone clearance on travel screening programs, with us now judge andrew napolitanos claim this is political retaliation against new york, true? >> i don't know. but i know it will be undone by the first federal judge who sees it. you are important -- punishing people for what someone else did. david: punishing is different from saving people's lives, because they may get on a plane with someone who a terrorist. >> wait, department of homeland security is assuming that because someone came to united states illegally and has a driver license, they are a terrorist. there is no basis for that assumption. david: but one final follow-up, new york state changed its application procedure for a driver license, nows that one where you don't have to share a lot of information about authorities about who you are to protect illegal immigrant. >> so why should everyone watching now be punished because some illegal got his driver license, that is what a judge will say. >> i went to do global entry, a took massive amounts of forms and bill cop t copy to prove my address, and why do

judge andrew napolitano was a fox senior judicial analyst. we just spoke to him about roger stone.ge, thanks so much for joining us tonight. >> i'm happy to be here. >> tucker: is it your view a problem that the foreman of the jury in roger stone's trial turned out to be a former congressional candidate who attacked trump on twitter and mocked concern, i think most critically, about the fbi raid on stone's house? why was someone like this allowed to remain on the jury? >> let me start by telling you i'm happy to be here with you. and roger stone and i. >> tucker: thank you, you too. >> roger stone and i have been friends for about 40 years. i will take the friendship out of this and wear my judicial hat. >> tucker: okay. >> this is information that she must have hidden from the lawyers and the judge who interrogated her before she was put on the jury. now, in federal court, judges pick the jurors. so, judges do the interrogation. >> tucker: right. >> the lawyers sign off ahead of time on the questions the judges are going to ask. the purpose of the interrogation is to weed out peop

connell: judge andrew napolitano, fox news senior judicial analyst.ey wrap it up, they need 67 votes. nobody expected anything else close going in. it will be the romney votes gets vote up to 48 of the 67, right. >> if you had a chance to listen what senator romney said or read the transcript what he said, what offended him the most, a vote he also voted against the party line the other day, that was to bar testimony. he felt that this should be a real trial with real witnesses, particularly john bolton, and real documents particularly the 24 emails that "the new york times" has uncovered that the senate never saw. he also felt that the president's behavior could not be justified under the constitution. and finally he felt this was a serious and some per event. connell: yeah. >> that the president didn't take it seriously. all of those things i think animated senator romney. we know it didn't change the outcome. takes a little bit of the wind out of president's victory. connell: your personal analysis. there are 48 guilty votes against the president,

judge andrew napolitano is a fox news senior judicial analyst, we just spoke to him about roger stone>> tucker: thanks so much for joining us today. in your view, is it a problem that the foreman of the jury in roger stone's trial turned out to be a former democratic congressional candidate who attacked trump on twitter and mocks concern i think most critically about the fbi raid on stone's house. why would someone like is allowed to remain on the jury? >> let me start by telling you i'm happy to be here with you. in roger stone and i have been friends for about 40 years. i'm going to take the friendship equation out of this and where my judicial hat. this is information that she must have hid -- hidden from the lawyers and the judge who interrogated her before she was put on the jury. now, in federal court, judges pick the jurors, so judges do the interrogation, the lawyers sign up ahead of time on the questions the judges are going to ask. the purpose of the interrogation is to weed out people that have a bias, prejudice, knowledge of the case or interest in the outcome. she obvious

this morning, the president sent out this message, quoting comments from fox news legal analyst andrew napolitano, as one does. quote, judge jackson now has a request for a new trial based on the unambiguous and self-outed bias of the foreperson of the jury. pretty obvious he should get a new trial. judge jackson today refused to delay stone's sentencing on felony charges. that will still take place on thursday. last week barr backed up the justice department's handling of roger stone's trial. >> i thought that was a righteous prosecution, and i was happy that he was convicted. >> and on the 2020 campaign front, former new york city mayor michael bloomberg will make his onstage debut, as one does, in vegas. bloomberg qualified for tomorrow's debate just today after a new poll showed a 15-point surge on his part, putting him nationally now at 19%. as you see, that puts him behind sanders and in front of biden, et al. so far he's put about $400 million of his own money into this presidential campaign. that is a notable record for traditional media spending, and as they say, there is more where that

the judge joins us, judge andrew napolitano, fox news senior legal judicial analyst, liberty file onare wondering about some of these things, judge. for most part the government asking rather than requiring but could they require? >> the federal government can certainly require. of the congress enacted statutes under the commerce clause. the commerce clause lets congress regulate interstate commerce and commerce after effecting interstate commerce. stated differently, the congress gave the united states public health service, part of the department of health and human services the ability to order mandatory quarantines. there are quarantines and there are quarantines. one is a quarantine in your home where they can't watch you because they don't have resources to do that. the other is a quarantine in a federal hospital where they can watch you. connell: right. >> the third, most odious is quarantine at federal military facility where they can hold you. connell: from from the perspective civil liberties some boxes have to be checked and if so what are the boxes? >> the boxes are not c

judge andrew napolitano, fox news senior judicial analyst joins us.sually, i believe amazon does pretty well in these types of cases. are you liable for selling something someone else made but interesting how the three judges initially ruled against amazon. what do you know about the case? >> the injuries are catastrophic but the issue here is not how to compensate but who should compensate her. connell: right. >> she alleges a design defect in this retractible dog leash. if it is a design defect, meaning it was designed wrong or manufactured improperly, amazon did not design it or manufacture it. connell: they claim they can't find the company who did. does that matter? >> yes. as everyone knows, if you buy something from amazon, sometimes amazon is a broker. they have third party sellers. they never touch the product. comes directly from the third party manufacturer/seller to the consumer who purchases it. that is what happened here. so in the trial court, a federal district court in pittsburgh, threw the case out, how could amazon be liable, they n

here is judge andrew napolitano. >> you have a duty, an affirmative obligation to reveal to us when we selected you the existence of these tweets in which you were so harshly negative about the president and the people that support him. >> and ask if he would considering pardoning roger stone, former campaign chair paul manafort, or general michael flynn, the president said he is not even thinking about that. mike? >> mike: trace gallagher with plenty of breaking news tonight. many thanks. the president also fighting a story that first broke yesterday and to confirm tonight about a meeting between a prominent democratic senator in the iranian foreign minister. rich ads and tracking down what happen for us what it means. good evening, rich. >> senator chris murray says he met with iran's foreign minister to underscore bipartisan priorities like releasing american hostages and protecting u.s. forces in middle east. president trump suggests murphy broke the law. >> i saw senator murphy met with the iranians, i just saw that on the way over. is there anything that i should know? because th

judge andrew napolitano. we'll be right back. maria: welcome back.ld propose paying workers at least $22 an hour if he wins the white house. mitch roschelle, your reaction to this and by the way, tell us who usually does minimum wage work? college students? what's the demographic of the people who he wants to pay $22 an hour? >> well, it's a mixed bag. generally it's people with high school educations, not college educations. and all of the studies show that whenever you force companies to increase minimum wage, you create less jobs as a result. interestingly enough, if you look at the retail industry in 2018, that pushed a lot of states for higher minimum wage, you saw the retail industry last year have slower wage growth in friday's jobs report as a result. all you do by forcing wages you is actually depressing wages in the long run. dagen: during the first 11 quarters of president trump's -- of the trump presidency, this is from the wall street journal editorial page, before the most recent month, wagings for the bottom 10% of earners over the age

brian: host of the liberty file the same guy on fox nation judge andrew napolitano. don't know what's going to happen. brian: what should happen? >> what should happen is the judge should interrogate this foreperson about her biases against the president and against donald trump. the judge should interrogate the departed prosecutors about what they knew about this foreperson and when they knew it and why they quit. and then determine whether or not the integrity of stone's trial was adversely affected by this juror. it seems inconceivable that it was not. the supreme court has said you are entitled to 12 jurors who are indifferent as to the outcome. this woman appears to have known the outcome in her own mind before the trial started. why do i say that? because the things she said about the presidentr the judge k that and sentence him anyway and push that offer is almost unforgivable. steve: because she should listen to the evidence first and then decide whether or not to sentence him. >> absolutely. i don't know what the president is going to do but this is. steve:

joining us right now, judge andrew napolitano.ial but the principal -- listen to this, the principal accuser in california is one of the witnesses in this case, whom the jury either disbelieved or discounted. to refresh your memory, the two major charges for which he was acquitted required new allegations and older allegations. one of those older allegations was one of the principal accusers in california. stated differently, both the prosecution and the defense in california have seen how she does in direct testimony and under cross-examination. so they both have a little bit of an advantage. but it's an equal advantage. so i don't think it's going to change anything. i don't think what happened in new york makes the prosecution of him in la easier or the defense of him in la easier. but la is almost moot because he is going to get the lion's share of the 29 years in new york and he's 67 years old and in bad health. so are they going to try him in la? absolutely. when will it happen? probably sometime later this year. maria: you

. >> here to weigh in analyst and host of liberty file, on fox nation, judge andrew napolitano. >> goodg guys so a couple of principles opinion is protected so president's point of point is this is not an opinion it was presented at fact. if it is an opinion, the case goes away because your opinion can be anything you want. the doctor has called fair comment. >> even if fact quoted in it in "new york times" is wrong. >> correct. correct because it is opinion that he claims he's agreed now i said he claim. he's not the plaintiff. the plaintiff is the campaign. and under liable law here in new york where they filed the complaint, the group can't be the plaintiff only an individual who is actually been harm whatted by allege ad defamation can be the the plaintiff. was the president harmed? i don't think he was harmed the statement came out after he was had already president. so it certainly didn't harm him when he was running for president, and it is not harming him now. but he's succeeded in ginning up animosity with "times" and scrutiny of what "times" says about him. >> correct for that

knows all the stuff backwards and forwards, possibilities, judge senior judicial analyst judge andrew napolitano do you think, judge? >> well this case is really a mess and the judge is making a number of mistakes. she has before her a very serious challenge to the integrity of the conviction, namely one of jurors, the foreperson, herself a lawyer, had prejudged the case and revealed her antipathy to donald trump, to donald trump supporters and to stone specifically in private tweets to friends, not in any platform where the government without hacking could have found out what she said. she didn't reveal this until after the conviction. in fact she revealed it within the minutes of the resignation of the four prosecutors. so the supreme court has said in criminal cases in america, state and federal, the defendant is entitled to a jury of 12 people who are quote, indifferent as to thecome. this woman was not indifferent as to the outcome. so stone is clearly entitled to a new trial and clearly entitled to this kind of analysis by the judge before she sentences him. but perhaps outrage that the pr

to "liberty file" host, judge andrew napolitano. what's at stake here? both the house of representatives and the senate to tell the president, a, under the constitution, we declare war, b, under the constitution, you wage war, c, you may only wage war where we declare war, unless somebody is imminently about to attack us. neil: what was the genesis of this? >> i believe it was the assassination of general suleimani. however, senator tim kaine, who is the democratic force behind this in the senate, has been talking about repealing the authorization to use military force of 2002, which is the language that the president relied on to go into iraq and kill an iranian general. he's been talking about this for a couple of years but now he has, as we know, since the vote passed, sufficient numbers in both houses. now, the president -- neil: president won't sign this. >> correct. they could have added this to the defense authorization act in which case the president would not have been able to veto it without shutting down the government. neil: they didn't do th

the liberty file host judge andrew napolitano on where this goes. what do you think?e in the day, the justice department filed three complaints, one against the city of seattle and the county it's located in, one against the state of california, one against the state of new jersey. the essence of these complaints is the feds are in charge of immigration and when you as state governments, in the case of seattle, a city and county government, frustrate our ability to enforce immigration laws, you are violating the supremacy clause of the constitution which says the feds are superior to the states and you can't do that and we want you ordered stopped. what do the feds want the states to do. they want the states to help them enforce federal law. the states are free to help the feds enforce federal law. they rare also free not to help the feds enforce federal law because of an opinion written by justice scalia about ten years ago saying the feds can't go into new jersey and say we need you guys to stop enforcing state law, start working for us. that is the fed's reallocati

let's bring in judge andrew napolitano. liberty file. good morning. the feds say we can't get access to new york state driving records so we don't know if we can keep people safe. does it hold up? >> i don't think so. there are two parts of the state law. one is undocumented aliens can get driver's licenses. nobody that works for the state can share people's driver's licenses with the feds no matter what they want it for. subpoena or search war aren't is the exception. the feds are saying we can't check people's driving records can't put them into global entry. it lets you get to the head of the line when you arrive from a foreign country, jfk. you don't have to have a driver's license in order to apply for global entry. so i think that this is the feds trying to poke governor cuomo in the ribs. i think he will prevail when he files a federal lawsuit. >> ed: he says banning new yorkers from the trusted travel program is a politically motivated form of extortion. hurting new yorkers to advance the trump administration's poli

judge andrew napolitano joining us.ll, fans getting a great game and great ad as well, we have the top commercial moments from last night. the half time show's top moments, what the social media world is buzzing about this morning. during my trip to miami, i visited some of miami's most legendary spots. check this one out. i am coming to you from the miami establishment, the very iconic joe's stone crabs, i'm here with the owner, steve saywith. this company started in 1913 by your great grandfather. why is it so successful? >> i think we're successful because, a, the stone crab, b, we're a family business. maria.♪ i want to want. ♪ if you want, girl, you got me. ♪ that's something, ha no, i wouldn't do. ♪you make everything... groovy...♪ done yet? yeah, yeah, sorry, sorry. you sure? hmm.mmm. ♪come on, come on, wild thing. if you ride, you get it. geico motorcycle. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. >>> rise and shine, it's groundhog day. >> oh, no. oh, no. >> phil? hey, phil. >> no, not you. >> it's

maria: judge andrew napolitano on that.president trump's fundraiser this week. michael bloomberg taking the stage tonight, billionaire makes his debut in las vegas, stay with us. this week on mornings with maria, tomorrow federal reserve chairman powell says no recession on the horizon, legendary predecessor greenspan offers intake, friday, you turn the tables on me, time for the audience to ask maria the questions that matter mostll to you all right here on mornings with maria. is there a little nutmeg in there? oh it's my mum's secret recipe. >>you can tell me. it's a secret. >>is it cinnamon? it's my mum's secret recipe. call geico and see how easy saving on homeowners and condo insurance can be. i'll come back for the plate. saving on homeowners and condo insurance can be. apps except work.rywhere... why is that? is it because people love filling out forms? maybe they like checking with their supervisor to see how much vacation time they have. or sending corporate their expense reports. i'll let you in on a little secre

we have judge andrew napolitano weighing in on whether that can become a forced issue. >> this is going in different parts of the country. in some states, the state government can force localities to enforce quarantine. but the federal government has the authority to enforce its own quarantine. they have three types of quarantine. you can't come out of your house. very difficult for them to micromanage on a mass level. you are quarantined at a federal hospital, a little bit easier. or the one that's easiest for them and most offensive to those quarantined because usually the quarantined people are not ill, they don't have symptoms, quarantined to a federal military base. so the only time this was challenged, the court said the feds had the authority to do it and they have the discretion to do it. you want to get out of the quarantine, you're not going to leave, you have to hire a lawyer and the lawyer has to go in and somehow prove you are not infected and are yyou are not exposed. that is very very difficult. if you don't have any symptoms, how can you prove a negative? how can you pro

steve: call in senior judicial analyst judge andrew napolitano.oing to have a telephone conference with both sides later today. and you got to wonder whether or not they are going to talk about what you talked about last week which was roger stone deserves a new trial. >> well, she has a lot of issues on her hands. she has already turned down the request for a new trial based on the resignation of the four prosecutors and the kerfluffle. steve: strong armed the u.s. attorney. >> the u.s. attorney interim u.s. attorney. recent appointee by president trump. he is their boss. it's almost inconceivable that the line prosecutors, the people trying the case would strong arm their boss. they signed the brief and he signed the brief. the document that went to the court recommending the 7 to 9 years. look, she could sense him from 0 to 50 with all of the convictions that he has. the guidelines say 3 to 4. these people goosed it up to 7 to 9. she has got these issues on her hands. she turned down the request for a new trial last week based on the resignatio

joining us now is judge andrew napolitano. to try because this is a variety of sexual assault, rape, the rule does permit the publication of the evidence or even the televising of the trial. so we have only descriptionses of what happened, a transcript of what happened. if you were down there, you could see it with your own eyes. but there was apparently a dispute over harvey weinstein's private parts and in order to resolve that dispute, they had to publish photographs of him in the nude that the district attorney took and then both sides aggressively examined his accuser. she in my opinion withstood a very rigorous cross-examination, which included many e-mails from her expressing her aaffection for weinstein after the alleged rape. but she was able to explain them and she never wavered from her version of events which is that he is her rapist. so i don't know where this is going to go. the evidence against him so far is overwhelming. it is so overwhelming that he's going to have to testify. but if he testifies, it's going t

brian: she is not going to do that here to weigh in host of liberty file judge andrew napolitano.o business even asking me to recuse myself. >> pretty much. steve: can she do that? >> the things she said about him in the sentencing, she is supposed to draw those comments from the evidence in the case. she didn't. she drew those many of those comments from the things roger stone has said and done in his life that had nothing to do with the case. brian: she said he was covering up for president trump. >> that was the reason for asking for her recused. whether you love or hate roger stone whether you like the president or don't like him, no matter what your politics are, this is very serious. the judge is ordering this hearing on juror misconduct in secret. and she is barring the lawyers as well as roger stone from talking to the press. now, you combine secrecy and silence and that is a recipe for totalitarianism. it is absolutely wrong that this hearing at which the juror will be interrogated as to whether she had formed an opinion about roger stone before the trial should be in sec

judge andrew napolitano is fired up about this. he says stone deserves a new trial.it all after this. ♪. so what are you working on? >>i'm searching for info on options trading, and look, it feels like i'm just wasting time. wasted time is wasted opportunity. >>exactly. that's why td ameritrade designed a first-of-its-kind, personalized education center. see, you just >>oh, this is easy. yeah, and that's >>oh, just what i need. courses on options trading, webcasts, tutorials. yeah. their award-winning content is tailored to fit your investing goals and interests. and it learns with you, so as you become smarter, so do its recommendations. >>so it's like my streaming service. well exactly. well except now, you're binge learning. >>oh, i like that. thank you, i just came up with that. >>you're funny. learn fast with the td ameritrade education center. call 866-285-1934 or visit tdameritrade.com/learn. get started today, and for a limited time, get up to $800 when you open and fund an account. that's 866-285-1934, or tdameritrade.com/learn. ♪ my body is truly powerful.

because we know, and i know our friend, judge andrew napolitano, i've heard him say on fox news before, you know, that basically people need to get over it. doesn't matter who you are, if you're born here, you're an american citizen. he was just ignorant of the fact that if you're a diplomat's child born here, you're not an american citizen. so those were the two areas. being a foreigner's child, a diplomat's child, you weren't to be an american citizen. but it would be very interesting if we could ever find out who made that call and how rego about curing it now. but -- we go about curing it now. but i think the president's right. if that was done by just some bureaucrat's decision, no act of congress, no executive order, just somebody just started giving out american citizenship to people that were born here to foreigners, then you should be able to retract it with a president's executive order, overruling whatever desk jockey or brewer contract decided -- bureaucrat decided it was too difficult to assess whether somebody was here legally or not . and so just start giving out america

face the court before charges were mysteriously dropped her during us now is fox news judge andrew napolitanoe of the most bizarre stories ever. >> it is bizarre. >> because he made it up. >> bizarre because of his behavior announced bizarre because of the constitutional location because there is a clause in the constitution that prohibits double jeopardy, prohibits prosecuting him again because the first prosecution failed, so the remedy-- look, he got an unbelievable sweetheart deal. it appears because the political connections, but those things happen in the world. the remedy is in to try him again it's to vote out of office the prosecutor who gave him the deal. in chicago prosecutors are elected and she is not a very popular person because of this jussie smollett. the image of smollett's guild is overwhelming and uniform, but you cannot violate the constitutional protection in order to vindicate the injustice , a justice of the sweetheart deal he got. he's already been punished for it. it was a slap on the wrist, 1000-- $10000 fine and community service and in the record was expunged. to