i like the product and i like the process, the biggest problem here is how its abusive owner andrew rosenthal handles his employees. >> email me the [bleep] schedule! just do it! >> i'm gonna try to improve the owner and employee relationship before it's too late. >> i don't have to ask him time and time and time and time again! he doesn't care! >> my name is marcus lemonis, and i fix failing businesses. i make tough decisions... i will not do it if you're managing the people. and back them up with my own cash. it's not always pretty... first time you ever emptied out poop? but this is business. i do it to save jobs, and i do it to make money. this is the profit. la dogworks is an upscale dog boarding facility located in the heart of hollywood, california. >> you're stinky dogs. >> founded by andrew rosenthal in 2004, this 24-hour full service center with 36 employees has everything from grooming to training... >> sit. >> in a state-of-the-art indoor dog park. this business generates $1.3 million a year, but recently, their numbers have started to tumble. sloppy business practices... >> i don

i like the product and i like the process, the biggest problem here is how its abusive owner andrew rosenthaldles his employees. >> email me the [bleep] schedule! just do it! >> i'm gonna try to improve the owner and employee relationship before it's too late. >> i don't have to ask him time and time and time and time again! he doesn't care! >> my name is marcus lemonis, and i fix failing businesses. i make tough decisions... i will not do it if you're managing the people.

in his own couple the times editorial page editor, his name is andrew rosenthal saying this.trying to claim al qaeda was involved were doing so strictly for political reasons. how about himself? tara is a democratic strategist. happy new year to you. katie. rosenthe critics of his reporter's story after he crucial them of being political. then in almost the same breath rosenthal goes on this political tirade in defense of democrats. does sit strike you as not only hypocritical bull also a childish temper tantrum in print? >> i say be wary of those who say they don't play politics. the "new york times" just like everybody on the left has done everything to belittle been gassive. but the fact is there is still no accountability. he is going to go into this rants about republic cans rather than calling for accountability wondering why the terrorists who committed this attack still haven't been arrested. wondering why those at the state department who were fired are back at the state department working, the fact that he would go on the defense for democrats and attack republicans

andrew, rosenthal would have us believe that all of these people in the obama administration would haveeve that this was al qaeda. leon panetta saying it was a terror attack and all of those people were wrong and this one guy a reporter is right. does that seem implausible? is. >> it is ludicrous. it is a piece that is intended to stop the support for hillary clinton. hillary clinton wasn't mentioned one time on this. into some movie trailer no one had seen. >> i kept reading through his report. >> hillary clinton i looked up the date, on september 26th, she said, publicly for the first time and this is directly linked to al qaeda. he is defining his newspaper. >> it gets more strange. the chief defender of this report is not from the journalism side. he is going to be one of the chief people who decides whom that newspaper endorses when the process comes around in 2016. it is odd you have this journ journalist and you have someone from the opinion page coming forward. >> i was surprised that the tone of this struck many people as adolescent. here he is mocking the critics of the story

so we're hearing from the editorial page author, andrew rosenthal.for anyone wondering why it is so important to republicans that al qaeda orchestrated the attack or how the obama administration described the attack in its immediate aftermath, the answer is simple. the republicans hope to tarnish democratic candidates by making it seem as though mr. obama doesn't take al qaeda seriously. they also want to throw mud at former secretary of state hillary clinton who they fear will run for president in 2016." he also goes on to say that he hasn't figured out who they're going to be endorsing in 2016 and calls it hilarious that these accusations are evenng made. >> mr. rosenthal's column has to be one of the most crazy, hysterical pieces i have ever seen in print or the internet anywhere. he goes to great lengths to deny that there's any political connection to the story, but then as you just saw, goes on to attack republicans for some reason instead of defending the integrity of the story, which has come under attack by congressional leaders on both side