i do have something coming out next week with regard to andrew weisman. another story that's going to be out next week is the fisa memo. we expect that to be out some time after the state of the union in midweek. it's explosive. i know this not just from talking to congressional members and other law enforcement officials who have gone to congress as whistleblowers about fisa abuses. it should shock every american and it's a way to keep the country up check. it's one part of so many more pieces of the puzzle. a lot of the information is classified. it's classified information so we can't get our hand on it. they'll go ahead and put out the pieces, redact it, i think after the fisa memo. >> andrew weisman, the number two at mueller's operation send an e-mail supporting sally yates' order and went to hillary clinton's election-night party. >> sean: and he leaked information about paul manafort before he started investigating him to the a.p. so many conflicts all coming together. next week will be a massive news week on to the state of the union and the memo

i do have something coming out next week with regard to andrew weisman. another story that's going to be out next week is the fisa memo. we expect that to be out some time after the state of the union in midweek. it's explosive. i know this not just from talking to congressional members and other law enforcement officials who have gone to congress as whistleblowers about fisa abuses. it should shock every american and it's a way to keep the country up check. it's one part of so many more pieces of the puzzle. a lot of the information is classified. it's classified information so we can't get our hand on it. they'll go ahead and put out the pieces, redact it, i think after the fisa memo. >> andrew weisman, the number two at mueller's operation send an e-mail supporting sally yates' order and went to hillary clinton's election-night party. >> sean: and he leaked information about paul manafort before he started investigating him to the a.p. so many conflicts all coming together. next week will be a massive news week on to the state of the union and the memo

then i look at andrew weisman.ere's a guy who got it wrong, he held back exculpatory evidence and four maryland executives go to jail for a year and overturned by the fifth circuit court of appeals. does that sound like somebody who should be hired by robert mueller and should the special counsel be dismanded -- disband. >> i'm not prepared too call i'm not prepared to call for the end to the investigation. there should be transparency. >> sean: is there trump/russia collusion? >> i haven't seen it. >> sean: all right. congressman, great to see you. i know you're working hard on this. last question, paul rosenstein walked into paul ryan's office. i know it happened coming up on the deadline nor information that led to the memo from the house intel committee. that's interesting to me, begging ryan not to release it. as i look at that behavior and look at what -- you've read the memo, correct? >> i have indeed. >> sean: will we be shocked? >> based on what you're talking about here, i don't think i should comment but

look at everything that's come from andrew weisman on special counsel. sean, this is the reason why the doj doesn't want the fisa memo out. i agree chaffetz. >> sean: steve bannon talking is old news too. didn't the leaks -- don't you suspect as i do it came right from robert mueller's office because they're under fire and because of all that we're discovering here they know their time is up? >> it's not unusual for a special counsel to interview the subject of the investigation, donald trump. trump can't hide executive privilege. you have communications to congress. this say criminal investigation. the president could be held in front of a grand jury. so trump has to respond and testify. the only question is can he limit the scope of it which is attorneys should try to do because i was a defense attorney. i have yet to see they care about wins and losses and it could be a trap and he's a smart guy. when he needs to be, i've read his depositions he can be focussed and cogent -- >> sean: would you ever let the president -- i appreciate he wants to be up f

. >> andrew weisman, the number two in mueller's operation sent an e-mail on trump's order and refusedo following it, went to clinton election night party. why is he near this? >> he investigated paul manfort. so many conflicts. next week is a massive news week. more breaking news this friday. the president pushed his agenda in front of the world and the world leaders today. we have highlights. what a difference a year makes. straight ahead. dynamic performance, so you can own the road. aggressive styling, so you can break away from everyone else. the bold lexus is. experience amazing. you won't see these folks they have businesses to run. they have passions to pursue. how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters, ship packages, all the services of the post office right on your computer. get a 4 week trial, plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale. go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again. which means everyone has access to our real reviews that we actually verify. and we can also verify that what goes down, [ splash, toilet flus

i think andrew weisman is suspect. ew mccabe's wife who's received hundreds of thousands of dollars because of clinton donations or efforts, i think those are all concerns. if we are only concerned about the truth, let's make sure we have the best team investigating it. i want to make this point -- the reason why congress on a bipartisan basis let the special prosecutor law lapse is because it does become a runaway train. who would have thought that ken starr investigating real estate deals in arkansas would find his way to a 24-year-old intern with a blue dress and then it was all about perjury? i talked to henry hyde about it at the time and said, you know, this is really disappointing that after millions of dollars this is where we end up. >> did you vote for impeachment? >> i did vote for impeachment because it was about perjury. >> okay. >> it was a question of perjury. >> why did you bring up the same concerns then -- >> i did. i did do it. that's what i'm saying. >> all right. we haven't heard from phillip for a

he had key people like andrew weisman that showed up at hillary clinton's victory party and later had a memo -- >> we all agree you wouldn't be here because we wouldn't be talking. let me move on before we run out of time. senator mark warner hopes that congress will take up legislation to protect mueller next week. how realistic is that to happen and, of course, the republicans would have to go along in some way, would they not? >> the republicans would never do it. youit's -- i just left there a few months ago. if this president held up a sign that had the letter a on it and told the world it was a letter b half the republicans in the house would say, yeah, the is right. i am not someone who is going to prejudge the investigation. it's going to take us where it is going to take us. i remember years ago, jack, when democrats even had a sniff of going after law enforcement, republicans would pounce in a second. what we're seeing here today is an attempt to undermine the rule of law. to weaken independent institutions. what makes america strong is our independence and our people. but,

mueller chose, senior prosecutor andrew weisman first, and he's a money laundering guy. their path to -- trump goes right through paul manafort, don junior and jared kushner, it's as plain as a hair on your face. if you were reading that, what's your reaction? >> i would not be pleased. i would be very upset and concerned, let's say, because these are all people who beyond just being close are family. and we've always known that for president trump, family is something of a red line. the fact he is furious about this, it should not be a surprise to anybody. the fact this is a huge piece of information should not be a surprise to anybody and, again, it goes back to your point, craig, they didn't expect to win. the reality is you would hope that the nominee of a major political party in the u.s. would run a campaign come porting itself in a particular way and, unfortunately, it doesn't appear the campaign did come port itself in that way. >> if you're robert mueller reading the statement you read, what do you do? i believe you call in mr. bannon, why did you think money la

make is that because of the people that bob mueller hired to work with him, especially andrew weinstein. -- >> weisman. >> weisman, thank you, who has a very successful history of money laundering as a prosecutor for the federal government, that's where that came from. >> it is truly extraordinary. you hear it from democrats, money laundering, but to hear steve bannon raise this issue of money laundering, that is pretty extraordinary. the president, he issued a formal statement, not a tweet, a formal statement, very carefully crafted in which he opened with these words, steve bannon has nothing to do with me or my presidency. when he was fired, he not only lost his job, he lost his mind. then the president said, steve was rarely in on a one-on-one meeting with me and only pretends to have had influence to fool a few people with no access and no clue whom he helped write phony books. how surprised were you to hear that? >> well, you know, so there are a couple of things here. "the daily beast" reported that trump apparently dictated that himself. it wasn't something crafted by advisers. this was trump