mueller, why would he hire someone like andrew weissmann, liberal joe, you're just dumb. nothing to really say to you. the print media also chiming in. "the washington post" called the "conspiratorial." i guess they haven't been watching msnbc and cnn fake news for a year and a half. these so-called journalists, to leave and watch last nights monologue or that were they to dumb to follow a simple analogy? as i said last night, let's help them follow the bouncing ball. i will talk slowly so the mainstream media understands. comey was the director of the fbi. he compared the president to a mob boss. now we know it is sammy "the bull" gravano. i called comey out and i talked about what real mob bosses are like and we reminded them about al capone and lucky luciano and john got a period that i use the former director's political differences, now known as the comey standard, to call out the misdeeds and frankly the crimes of a few champions of the left wing in this country. let's start with hillary clinton. we know she committed felonies with her email server, and we know she

we have discussed many times mueller and his pit bull andrew weissmann they are no strangers to stretching the law in order to squeeze a suspect. earlier today president trump held a routine meeting with mueller's boss, deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. this comes after rosenstein finally, after being threatened with contempt of congress, again, he doesn't want to give anything up that's been subpoenaed and requested by congress. finally he allowed chairman devin nunes and chairman gowdy

andrew weissmann, described by "the new york times" as mueller's pit bull. he withheld exculpatory evidence multiple times, several high-profile convictions, overturned on appeal. but not before ruining the lives of tens of thousands of people especially at andersen accounting. now we turn to another major breaking story. judicial watch tonight has released hundreds of pages, brand-new for the first time unearthed emails from hillary clinton's illicit email server. why did it take this long? how is it possible hillary clinton was not charged with mishandling classified information because some of the new email show they were classified. we know clinton server was likely hacked by multiple foreign governments, and now multiple uncovered emails tonight contain information so sensitive unclassified, they were totally redacted. including this email exchange between prime minister tony blair, clinton, and other state department officials entitled "mideast peace." another completely redacted email. in this document, even the recipients were removed. the title of t

the supreme court overturned andrew weissmann 9-0b are and how often does not happen? it doesn't matter that four merrill executives went to jail for a year and that the fifth circuit court of appeals overturned their convictions. doesn't seem to matter the courts have excoriated mueller's pitbull for withholding exculpatory evidence. it doesn't matter that mueller's team almost exclusively donated money to obama, hillary, and the dnc. after all, why would robert mueller hire a guy like andrew weissmann without atrocious track record? why was he ever a point? the answer is it was a fishing expedition, and it was an effort to get trump from the beginning. now we are stuck with a never ending, what seems to be out of control investigation. mark live in, had it. he is calling for attorney general jeff sessions to be held accountable. take a listen. >> i want to make a point. not intended to be provocative or controversial. it will destroy a 30-year friendship but i really do think it's time for the attorney general to step aside. the buck stops on the attorney general's d

as long as andrew weissmann, with his background and all.hese democratic donors, i don't trust mueller and his team. >> i don't think you are wrong. i think the search of michael cohen's office in new york was an act of terror committed illegally by people in the justice department. mueller knew it was going to happen. rosenstein authorized it. it was an outrageous act against the attorney-client privilege. it never should've been done. it was done to intimidate the president and others.d' it was done in bad faith and because it was done in bad faith by mueller and others, i don't believe under any circumstances can you trust mueller and the people around him to do aa good faith interview. i would reject the interview out of hand. >> sean: do you think, all these criminal referrals from congress, the inspector general, now james comey. a how many people do you think are in legal jeopardy in all of this?, >> quite a few, i think john brennan, clapper, rice, rhodes all involved in the illegal unmasking and the unmasked names. ms. powers from t

"the new york times" describes him as mueller's pitbull, andrew weissmann. his aggressive prosecution tactics have caused tens of thousands of people to lose their jobs, their livelihood in the case against andersen accounting. eventually overturned. he's also responsible for the imprisonment are four merrill lynch executives. that was overturned by the fifth circuit court of appeals, and he has been accused twice that i know of of withholding exculpatory evidence by judges in cases. weissmann wrote a note to sally yates. "the wall street journal" reported weissmann attended hillary clinton's election night party. do you want him to be the pitbull to go after you and this never ending, zero mandate witch hunt? that's what's happening. would you want that guy going after you with that track record, and why would mueller ever a point that man? then on his team, jeannie rey. she previously done legal work for the clinton foundation. huge democratic donor. can we say conflict of interest? next, we have the disgraced lovebirds peter strzok and lisa page. based on

look at the person like andrew weissmann he appointed.hat the media didn't report to you, i was talking about a a really deep divide that the arrogant mueller is creating and that americans are more divided than ever and i was actually talking about family members, a civil war, and they will sit at dinner and they will have a food fights and they will throw mashed potatoes and broccoli at each other at the dinner table. i wasn't talking about a real civil war and i was very clear. now this sent the media into a frenzy. but they quickly ignored everything i said. they raced to take me out of context, like they always do. claiming that hannity wants a civil war in america. no, i'm saying we are more divided than ever. as you know from watching the show, that is what the media does all the time but i'm not going to sit back and take their crap. we will call out the corrupt media in the country. for example, the media lost it at me saying the word "civil war." okay, we went to the archives. they have said it many more times than i have. we ha

then you have the guy, andrew weissmann, "the new york times" calls him mueller spitball. guy that as a result of his actions, twice was excoriated by judges for evidence by judges for evidence, tens of thousands of jobs were lost at andersonlp accounting for no reason, overturned 9-0 in the supreme court, you and i both know that doesn't happen a lot and a guy that spent four mural executives to jail for a year and that was overturned by the fifth circuit. wait a m minute, why would robert mueller, with his background, reappointing only obama, only hillary, only dnc donors, and corrupt people like andrew weissmann to be his team to be a spiteful? >> what are the democrats so keen on him and the media so keen on him? there's lots of leaks coming out of that operation, among them to "the washington post" the other day. he wants to put a report out by june or july, where they will probably suggest the president committed obstruction of justice. not only is that outrageous, to the extent he does a report, it is supposed to be to the deputy attorney general on the crimes he is

andrew weissmann, the robert mr spitball on the special counsel.ou expect to see and -- keep in mind, there is no conflict over there, you expect them to report honestly about art? one more thing, cnn reported in april of 2017 about the british passing intelligence to u.s. intelligence entities about donald trump. a major scandal. we haven't heard much about that since the collusion narrative fell apart, have we? they are not interested in the facts, sean. they are frauds. they are only interested in attacking conservatives and covering up for the misdeeds almost massive obama gate scandal. >> sean: i played one of our best montages ever. cnn, how many times in a day they said [bleep] hole and i called them the [bleep] whole network. wait until you see the montage i will play in the next segment. it beats that. and the thing is, with all of these conflicts, they feel that they have a right to lecture everybody on morality when in truth, they have fed the american people a story with no evidence for over a year and ignored the biggest abuse of power

i was then told that andrew weissmann has been walled off. he is not going to involve himself in any investigation involving the president. and i thought that was a naive assurance given to a member of the president's staff. because even though he may not be out front, his disciples, people he has chosen to be on his staff, after all mueller is not sitting and working on the case himself. it's the chief deputy that calls the shots. >> so you were telling the president you think the mueller investigation could be compromised and unfair? what did he say? >> i think people are starting to lose interest in mueller's investigation. i think his approval rating has gone down. america doesn't like a marauding black hooded individual with a lance going around the country with few restraints and trying to indict people. rand paul, the senator from kentucky said that few people could withstand the scrutiny that mueller has placed upon trump. and after all, erin, please understand that while he is not involved in any collusion, collusion is not a crime.

both of those divisions have litigators, and andrew weissmann, one of mueller's chief prosecutors leftud section of the criminal division to go over to the special counsel's office. and we've seen pleadings that indicate he retains internal authority to bring prosecutions. so what this tells you is if you have faith in the career people at the department, and i do, it's just part of prosecutorial dna to make sure that righteous cases move forward, then you have to believe that the good cases here will continue to progress whether mueller is in place or not. >> and joyce, just as a practical matter, am i right in thinking that just in terms of the logistics and a president's ability to hire and fire people, it's actually kind of hard for a president to fire career justice department officials, right? when it comes to a presidential appointee, sure, the president's decision holds. but with career folks, it's harder, isn't it? >> it's hard for anybody to fire career folks in government. you know, you have to go through all sorts of progressive disciplinary processes. the president can't j

and mueller handpicks andrew weissmann, who has the most atrocious track record, including withholdingxculpatory evidence, and convictions in the enron accounting scandal, overturnedlp by the supreme court, 9-0. people went to jail.al that was overturned by fifth circuit court of appeals. or mueller's own involvement when he was in boston. four people went to jail. two of them died in jail. they were all innocent. over $100 million judgment was paid out after the fact. now congressman mark meadows is also revealing tonight that newly uncovered documents suggest a "concerning level of coordination between the doj and the fbi during key moments of the clinton email investigation," which we have talked about at length on this program. how about james comey andil trump-hating fbi agent peterhi strzok and all these other people putting the fix in on the clinton email investigation? the media, they don't even mention it. it is unbelievable how corrupt a they are. if they cared about truth and journalism and about being fair and balanced and all of these things, they would be reporting these

also his pit bull andrew weissmann. 10s of thousands of jobs lost because of his tactics at andersonounting. -0 decision against him in the supreme court. four merrill executives in jail. that was overturned by the fifth circuit. and two examples of him withholding excull that pore evidence. he didn't appoint wiseman to be a potted plant. he knew his background. what does it say about mueller and his team? >> well, they are zealous. many people think they are zofer zealous. i don't think they are partisans. here you and i might disagree. i don't think they care whether they hurt the democrats or the republicans. some on the team may. i don't think that's mueller's approach. is he just determined to get his target. and, when you appoint somebody to be a special counsel, there is a target on the back of the president. the target on the back of people close to the president. >> sean: has he lost perspective? >> i think he has lost perspective. i think that happens when over zealous prosecutors are given a target. and the concern now is that there won't be cooperation. i think we will no