i'm here as a concerned -- andrew zacks. i'm an attorney. i practiced law in san francisco for 30 years. in my years of practice in san francisco, i have never seen the department of building inspection act as decisively and swiftly as in this case. in my 30 years of experience as a real estate lawyer i've never seen them revoke permits for the of times of minor violations that exist in this project. the building code sections that are at issue with respect to revocation of a permit are quite clear, and they are quite narrow as to when revocation is appropriate. whenever the permit is issued in error, or on the basis of incorrect information supplied, or in violation of any ordinance or violation of provisions of this code, a permit may be revoked or suspended. you don't have before you tonight evidence of any of those factors. what you have before you is evidence that work was done in excess of the scope of properly-issued permits. in no circumstances, the remedy is not revocation. the remedy is requiring a permit to solve those problems wh