andrey bezrukov andrey olegovich hello, thank you for taking the time for you, and i propose to start with ukraine . here is such a topic, the essence of which can be formulated in this way fatigue from the ukrainian agenda. here the counteroffensive failed, pinpoint bites by drones, how the supply of leopards does not change the picture, and we see that the ukrainians themselves have become. here's to your point of view. why does the world stop being so abruptly ukraine-centric is it natural? process or is it more of an information-psychological maneuver before sudden actions, as in sports you look to the left and hit to the right, i will try to tell what i think about this. first, ukraine is a project. this project is not ukrainian. unfortunately, the ukrainians themselves have very little to do with this project. this is an anti-russian project. i'm russian for you, by the way, too. built by the west this project , like all projects, lives from time to time, as long as it is needed. and the tragedy of ukraine is that she became a project. that its elites were unable to build a country that has permanent ones? forces of attraction constant interests constant understanding of their place in the world, which would become permanent but in the absence of this they are content with the project. does the project have a beginning and an end? and now we already feel this end, what about those who built this project and who paid for it? he sees what they got from this project. well, almost everything you could get. and since it's scary to go further, i'm talking about nuclear war. and in general they never had such thoughts, they had to do a few very clearly associated things with this project to milk europe to weaken russia to pull out everything that can be pulled out of the good from ukraine and to leave as they left afghanistan vietnam and all other things when their interests ceased to coincide with this project. and because it's a project? everyone understands that this project is nearing its end. and there is fatigue from him, because there are no forces that are capable or ready to take up to him and pull him to the end through his whole life through all history and so on and so forth. it will be abandoned as soon as it is no longer needed. well, if we talk about ukraine as a project, we see the appetites of warsaw , which it does not hide, and it looks into the territory of belarus in a nato country recently hinted ukraine may join nato a new exchange for concessions to the territory, and russia but one thing is words and another thing is real deeds. here's what you think andreivich how likely is the collapse of ukraine great precisely because it is a project. you know, ukraine had several attempts in history to make a country out of themselves and all these attempts ended in one ended with someone with stronger elites, and the problem of ukraine is the lack of its own national elite. with an understanding of where they wanted to lead the country, who they are, they are east or west or something else. and just like ukraine has always been divided over the past, well, 400 years, i guess. she is divided now. and the division of ukraine according to those that make up its cultural block. he's closer, the weaker becomes central power, the weaker the understanding of the elite becomes, where to lead this country further, so the collapse of the country is possible? and in general, it is logical. after all, this is how ukraine lived for many years, there is an attraction to different west to east , i can say about hungary, about transcarpathia and so on, right? i ca

andrey bezrukov andrey olegovich hello, thank you for finding time for you, but i propose to start with ukraine . so there was such a topic, the essence of which can be formulated in this way, fatigue from the ukrainian agenda. here is the counteroffensive failed. uh, point bites by drones, like deliveries of leopards, do not change the picture, and we see what the ukrainians themselves have become. here's to your point of view. why is the world so abruptly ceasing to be ukrainian centric - is this a natural process, or is it more of an informational and psychological cook before sudden actions, like in sports you look to the left and hit to the right i'll try tell me what i think about it. first, ukraine is a project. this project is not ukrainian. unfortunately, the ukrainians themselves have very little to do with this project. this is an anti-russian project, i will tell you belarusians, by the way, too. built by the west this project , like all projects, lives from time to time, as long as it is needed. and the tragedy of ukraine is that it has become a project. that its elites were unable to build a country that is permanent? forces of attraction permanent interests constant understanding of one's place in the world, which would become permanent. but in the absence that they are satisfied with the project. does the project have a beginning and an end? and now we already feel this end, what about those who built this project and who paid for it? he sees what they got from this project. well, almost everything you could get. and since it's scary to go further, i'm talking about nuclear war. and in general, they never had such thoughts, they had to do a few things that are clearly associated with this project, milk europe, weaken russia , pull out everything that can be pulled out of good ukraine and leave as they left, afghanistan , vietnam and all other things, when their interests no longer coincide with this project. and because it's a project? everyone understands that this project is nearing its end. and there is fatigue from him, because there are no forces that are capable or ready to take up to him and pull him to the end through his whole life through the whole history, and so on and so forth. it will be abandoned as soon as it is no longer needed. well, if we talk about ukraine as a project, we see the appetites of warsaw, which it does not hide, moreover peeks and on the territory of belarus in the camp of nato recently hinted ukraine may 115 nato a new exchange for concessions to the territory, and russia but one thing is words and another thing is real deeds. here's to your point of view. andreility of the collapse of ukraine? it is great precisely because it is a project. do you know that ukraine has had several attempts in history to make a country out of itself? and all these attempts ended in one end with the fact that someone with stronger elites, and the problem of ukraine is the lack of its own national elite. with an understanding of where they wanted to lead the country, who they are, they are east or west or something else. and just like ukraine has always been divided over the past, well, 400 years, i guess. she is divided now. and the division of ukraine according to those that make up its cultural block. he is closer. the weaker the central power becomes, the weaker the understanding of the elite becomes. where to lead this country further, so the collapse of the country is possible? and in general it is logical after all, this is how ukraine lived for many years, there is an attraction to different west to east i can say about hungary about transcarpathia and so