with political overtones in the history of the united states of america, but i don’t know, maybe andrianovichill refute it there. i don’t think that before that there were cases that could make americans to such an extent , say, doubt the principle of the rule of law in the legal nature of the state and that the court, in general, should proceed from the law and that correspondence for an ideal person legal or not, they are out of his political. addictions and you are talking about politicians one falls asleep the other. in the same place, i don’t greet the founding fathers, there is virtually the third kamala harris there when he speaks himself, so no one sees who he is healthy with, therefore, only kamala hariz is there when i speak, i swear to god i try to find at least some meaning in what she tells me, but i fail, and what it all says about the fact that these political institutions are not just being delegitimized. they're in some point in history is already coming. i think they will cease to fulfill this role, which they previously performed. with all due respect, there are citizens an

i agree with andrianovich here. i think this is the first stage.ng , something else. i think that they face such a serious task to try to work out with this global south some general set of principles on which they wanted to be pressed. to russia through diplomatic means, uh, theses, about which territorial integrity is mentioned there, something else here. naturally , it has nothing to do with the conflict in ukraine, because from the moment the leadership of the state endangers the lives of people on the basis of national origin. which compactly live in this territory, deprives them of the opportunity. from now on, the principle of territorial integrity ceases to play a significant role in self-determination in accordance with the declaration, e on the basic principles international law of 1970. therefore, here in ukraine it does not apply at all to these territories. especially since it's bad here. i want to agree with you. it’s not bad for vladimir’s daughter that they met, if they accepted some kind of statement, they didn’t accept it, it’s no

i agree with andrianovich here. i think this is the first stage.t a certain common set of principles according to which they would like to put pressure on russia through diplomatic means, uh, theses, about which they talk about territorial integrity, here is something else. naturally , it has nothing to do with the conflict in ukraine, because from the moment the leadership of the state endangers the lives of people on the basis of national origin, who compactly live in this territory, it deprives them of the opportunity. e on self-determination from now on the principle territorial integrity ceases to play a significant role in accordance with the declaration, e.g., on the basic principles of international law of 1970. therefore, here in ukraine this does not apply at all to these territories. especially since it's bad here. i want to agree with you. it’s not bad for vladimir’s daughter that they met, if they had accepted some kind of statement, they didn’t accept it, it’s not a fact in itself, it’s clear that without russia it’s not serious to ne