on the fourth day , andrienko did not come to the interview because she fell ill.we have every reason to. to suspect that in this way the judge is trivially trying to get out of retirement before the interview, because if , after the qualification assessment, the commission finds her unfit for the position of a judge, she will be dismissed, but the resignation will allow her to retain all the privileges of a judge and a considerable lifetime allowance from the state. there are reasons to worry. according to the conclusion of the civic council of virtue, judge andrienko closed the case at the very least. 49 cases of drunk driving. the public council of virtue draws attention to the fact that the judge's omissions of the deadlines for bringing persons to justice under article 130 of the code of ukraine on administrative offenses are systematic, there is insufficient justification in the motivational part of the decisions to explain why the judge missed the deadline in such a large number of cases. in the supreme council of justice there is a disciplinary complaint ag

justice has a disciplinary complaint against andrienko from the dere foundation.hat the judge could submit forged documents to the vrp in order to avoid disciplinary action. the result of considering just this complaint may be the dismissal of andrienko, which she is trying so hard to do avoid therefore, the illness did not prevent the judge from submitting an application for resignation to the higher council of justice and an application to the higher qualifications commission for termination of the relationship. during her illness, she also sometimes appeared at other meetings, but she never made it to the evaluation of the judge's qualifications. we hope that soon the supreme council of justice will stop this manipulative attraction of cleverness and cunning. for today, i have everything, it was the program judicial control and i am tetyana shustrova. if you have information about unscrupulous judges and facts of corruption in judiciary, message me on facebook or at'.

and this is hanna andrienko, the judge of the oktyabr district court of the city of poltava, and sheery poor immunity. he fails her every time on the eve of the qualifying assessment. andrienko did not come for the interview for the fourth time. because she got sick in fact, we have every reason to suspect that in this way the judge is banally trying to escape his resignation before passing the interview, because if, after the qualification assessment, the commission finds her unfit for the position of a judge, she will be dismissed. in return, the resignation will allow to preserve all judicial privileges and a considerable lifelong financial support from the state. there are reasons to worry. according to the conclusion of the public council of virtue. judge andrienko closed at least 49 cases related to drunken driving after the expiration of the terms. the public integrity council draws attention to the fact that the judge's omission of the time limits for bringing persons to justice according to article 130 of the code of ukraine on administrative offenses are systematic. and in

andrienko did not come for the interview for the fourth time. or got sick.ct, we have every reason to suspect that in this way the judge is banally trying to escape his resignation before passing the interview, because if, after the qualification assessment, the commission finds her unfit for the position of a judge, she will be dismissed, instead, the resignation will allow her to retain all the privileges of a judge and a considerable lifetime allowance from the state. there are reasons to worry. according to the opinion of the public integrity council, the judge. andrienko closed at least 49 cases related to drunken driving after the deadlines expired. the public integrity council draws attention to the fact that the judge's omission of the time limits for bringing persons to justice according to article 130 of the code of ukraine on administrative offenses are systematic. and in the motivational part of the decisions, there is not enough justification to explain why the judge missed the deadline. in such a number of cases. a disciplinary complaint agains

ilya andrienko, gymnasium number 46 of the city of gomel named after bles pascal, physics teacher veronikaork at klyuchinskaya. gesgalovskaya secondary school deputy irina nikolaevna shumskaya. danilo rabbimov - educational director and history teacher , secondary school number 210 in minsk , primary school teacher elena nikolaevna tumanova. daniil vaitikhovsky, gymnasium number 39 in minsk. nikolai khalamov, mogilev state regional lyceum no. 3 and teacher-psychologist. i just have one more person to introduce, this is our scientific expert ekaterina duko. head of the department of methodological support for mathematical and natural science education of the academy of education. in case of controversial situations, it is she who will decide whose side is right. hello guys, i wish you a good mood today, interesting questions and quick, accurate answers to all participants. good luck! good afternoon, guys, we are glad to welcome you here on our playground, right now, in the teachers’ room, at this very minute, my colleague, yulia pertsova, is already communicating with your teachers. julia,